SECT. XIX.

_Visits to sick people._

LXXXVI. On the head of visits to sick people, there is much to be

said, as in making them, we should attend not only to the rules of

good-breeding, but to those of charity also; and it is impossible,

if we are wanting in the last of these obligations, for us to comply

with those of the first. Sick people, both with respect to their souls

and bodies, should be treated and dealt by with as much delicacy and

caution, as you would handle an exquisitely thin vessel of glass. A

sick body is affected by, and sensible of the slightest touch; and

an afflicted soul, may be inquieted by such a sensation as cannot be

defined.

LXXXVII. Visiting sick people, is not only an act of urbanity, but

an act of tenderness and humanity also; but in order to constitute

it such an act, it is essentially and absolutely necessary, that the

visit should be so managed, and attended with such circumstances, as

will afford relief and comfort to the sick person. But how many of

these kind of visits are experienced by the poor sick? one may venture

to assert, scarce one in fifty. The prudent part of mankind are but

few in number, but the visitors consists of many. What effect must

his visits have on a sick man, who tires and disgusts one in health

with them? Nor is it sufficient, that he who visits a sick person is

discreet, if his discretion does not lead to instruct him, when, how

much, and in what manner a sick person should be talked to. To know

when he should be talked to, the physician, and those who attend him

should be consulted; how much, in what manner, and on what subject,

must be determined and regulated, by the prudence of the person who

visits him.

LXXXVIII. The how much, is the point which visitors most commonly

mistake. Sick people should be but little talked to, even although

the subject of the conversation is such as they are fond of; for

their attention to what is talked of, is apt to fatigue them, and to

wade those spirits, which would be better employed in resisting the

disease. Thus it in general is better to leave them in that sort of

half slumber, and languid quiet of mind, which by not being disturbed

or interrupted, permits all the ideas that occur to them to pass easily

through the brain.

LXXXIX. With regard to the manner they should be talked to in, it

ought to be such, as by no means should inquiet or disturb them; and

to prevent their being surprized or alarmed, it will be necessary to

talk to them in a low voice. If loud talking is capable of cracking a

head of brass, what effect must it have on a glass one? They should not

be asked many questions, nor should they as little as possible, be put

under a necessity of replying to what is said of them, for from thence

there would result two fatigues, that of reasoning, and that of talking.

XC. The subject of the conversation with a sick Person, should in

general turn upon such things, as he was observed to be most fond of

when in health; for with respect both to the aliments of the soul,

as well as those of the body, I am of opinion, that physicians and

those who attend on, or visit sick people, should have regard to their

appetites and desires, and I am inclined to think, that with respect

to these particulars, there are frequent mistakes made, and especially

with relation to the aliments of the soul, for by making them grateful

to people, there will seldom any inconvenience result, but having

regard to doing this, may be attended with much use and benefit.

Whenever an epidemical distemper prevails in a town or country, it may

not be improper now and then, to talk to sick people on the subject

of that disorder; but in doing this, care should always be taken

to mention to them only those who have been visited with, and have

recovered from the disease; and regard should likewise be had, never to

say a word of such as have died of it; but I have known visitors who

were such blunderers, as scarce to tell a sick person any other news,

than that such a one, or such a one is dead. This tends to make a sick

man very unhappy, for according to the logic of his melancholy, he is

apt to conclude, that his death must be an infallible consequence of

that of the other persons.

XCI. To these general rules, I shall add a remark on two mistakes that

are very commonly fallen into by those who visit sick people. The first

of these is, their beginning upon their entrance into the chamber of

a sick person, if there are three or four of them, to ask him one by

one, how he goes on, and how he finds himself. A man had need have the

patience of Job, to answer such a number of identical questions. Even

in slight illnesses, the pain and uneasiness it gives a man to answer

the same string of questions over and over again, is very evident and

palpable. Therefore the method people should pursue in their visits

to a man who is seriously ill, should be, to ask in a low voice, how

he is of those who attend him. Or the expedient may be had recourse

to, that was practised by a friend of mine, who was of the same

religious order as myself; who when he was once very ill, to avoid this

inconvenience, ordered that every morning, there should be written on a

piece of paper, all the questions that are generally asked by visitors,

together with the answers to them; such as what sort of a night he

had had, whether the pain in his head was abated, whether his thirst

continued, or whether he had taken any nourishment, &c. This paper he

ordered to be stuck with wafers on the side of his chamber door, that

those who came to visit him might read it, in order to prevent their

fatiguing him with a number of those questions.

XCII. The second mistake, is that of all the visitors taking upon them

to be physicians, and to prescribe for the sick person. This is an

affectation practised by many; but when we consider, how abstruse and

how arduous a study physic is, and how long practice and experience it

requires to obtain a competent knowledge of it, and that the greatest

ingenuity is found to be unequal to the acquisition; I say when we

consider all this, must it not appear very absurd and presumptuous,

for every one to pretend to take upon him the office. Thus, whatever a

visitor fancies would be serviceable to the diseased person, either as

food, or medicine, he is continually teasing the sick man, and vexing

the physician with his recommendation of. How often have I seen very

prudent and able physicians, much perplexed to determine what they

should prescribe; and at the same time, have observed a thousand vain

pretenders flourish away, and very self-sufficiently, and much to their

own satisfaction, determine off hand, the medicine the patient should

take! How many times also have I seen these conceited wrong-headed

people, with their importunities, drive an able learned physician out

of his course, who had determined, after well considering all the

circumstances of his patient, to stand still for a little while, and

leave the disease to nature, in order to see which way she would point;

but persecuted and overcome by the pressing instances of the people

we have been mentioning, he is brought to break this resolution, and

to set pen to paper, and prescribe something that he had better have

desisted from ordering! These ignorant folks, are ever exclaiming that

nature should always be assisted. This is a grand aphorism; and one

that all the world pretend to understand; but what such men as we have

just mentioned fancy to be assisting nature, is in reality, and most

commonly, cutting off her legs and arms.

Essays, or discourses, vol. 2 (of 4) · 第 60 / 105 题