ESSENCE OF PARLIAMENT.

(EXTRACTED FROM THE DIARY OF TOBY, M.P.)

_House of Commons, Monday, March 16._--The WINSOME WINSTON, sauntering

in from behind SPEAKER'S Chair when Questions had advanced some way,

startled by strident cheer from Ministerialists and Irish Nationalists.

Opposition angrily replied. FIRST LORD, faintly blushing, found

anchorage on Treasury Bench. Unpremeditated outburst of enthusiasm meant

as welcome back from Bradford, where he reviewed political situation

with force and frankness that recalled his father's platform speeches

delivered in his prime. Demonstration repeated when later he rose to

answer question concerning his department. Fresh storm of cheering from

Ministerialists responded to by defiant shouts from Opposition.

WINSTON evidently the man of the moment.

PRIME MINISTER, happily refreshed by week-end holiday, finds himself

faced by crowd wanting to know all sorts of things that might happen

concurrently with, or subsequent to, proposed temporary exclusion of

parts of Ulster from operation of Home Rule Bill. There were twenty-six

Questions. Assuming minimum number of Supplementaries, there would have

been at least one hundred.

To amazement and vexation of earnest seekers after truth, the twenty-six

querists discovered that they were being bowled over faster than

commonplace nine-pins. As NORMAN CRAIG breathlessly complained, the

PREMIER, having answered a question, did not, as is his custom of an

afternoon, resume his seat, and thus provide opportunity for

supplementary questioner.

This was his method: Taking in hand a sheet of manuscript he recited,

"Number 45. This is a hypothetical question. Indeed, it involves no

fewer than three hypotheses. Numbers 57, 64 and 72 are in the same

category."

Before you knew where you were, bang went four questions. Member after

Member rose to protest. The PREMIER babbled on like the brook.

"The answer to number 46 and to the first part of 70 is in the negative.

The answer to number 48 is in the affirmative. Number 49 in the

negative. I proceed to number 52."

Members held their breath. What could he say about 52? Evidently he

meant to treat it in different fashion.

"Number 52," he continued in the same level voice, as if he were reading

catalogue at picture sale, "refers to a small matter which can easily be

provided for."

Here was batch of another five questions disposed of in barely more than

as many seconds. And to think of all the industry and ingenuity bestowed

upon the preparation of this succession of pitfalls designed for the

engulfing of a ruthless Minister and the dislocation of an iniquitous

Bill!

Situation capped by PREMIER'S refusal to be drawn into minute

description of adjustments, financial and administrative, consequent on

adoption of his proposed amendment of Home Rule Bill. If general

principle were accepted, the rest would follow. If not, why waste time

and divert discussion from main issue to subsidiary and incidental

details? After beating in vain against the indomitable rock standing at

the Table, BONNER LAW, on behalf of enraged Opposition, gave notice of

vote of censure. What day will be given for discussion? he asked.

"The earliest possible date," replied the imperturbable PREMIER.

Here episode ended. Its eruption made it clear that hope of settlement

on grounds prepared a week ago to-day has vanished.

_Business done._--Notice from Front Opposition Bench of vote of censure

on Ministers.

_Tuesday._--POLE-CAREW had rather a bad time of it. Attacked in sharp

succession by land and sea. Began at Question time. He merely asked

whether two divisions and the cavalry brigade in Ireland, which took

part in manoeuvres last year, weren't rather a scrubby lot of immature

boys unfit for public service. To quote exact phrase--"whether the

physical appearance of the men was unsatisfactory; and whether the

effect of the trooping season was to increase the number of immature

boys unfit for active service?"

SEELY wrathfully replied in the negative.

"I must," he added, "profess my astonishment that the hon. and gallant

gentleman should seek by means of suggestions such as are contained in

this question to discourage and belittle the British soldier, to whom he

owes so much."

A loud cheer sent home this rebuke.

Worse still when POLLY put out to sea and came athwart the FIRST LORD.

All he sought was information as to whether the FIRST SEA LORD, having

publicly alluded to the danger of relying exclusively on the fleet to

protect the country from invasion, "subsequently went back on his word."

"A most insulting and unfair remark," said WINSTON. "It will," he

continued, "do nothing but harm if the Navy think the Chiefs whom they

honour and respect are to be subjected to offensive personal attacks of

this character directed against them by ex-military men who have gone

into politics."

"Only let me have five minutes with him, Mr. DEPUTY SPEAKER," said the

ex-military man nervously turning up his coat cuffs.

[Illustration: A TRIFLE THIN.

_WINSTON takes refuge behind REGINALD._]

[On several points connected with the Navy Estimates Mr. CHURCHILL

claimed that the responsibility rested with his predecessor at the

Admiralty.]]

Getting dangerously close to eleven o'clock, at which hour debate, if

continued, must automatically close. WINSTON punctilious in leaving the

five minutes demanded. POLE-CAREW'S retort perhaps scarcely up to

occasion.

[Illustration: ON THE WARPATH AGAINST THE CHARTERED COMPANY.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 146, March 25, 1914 · 第 24 / 42 题