CHAPTER IV.

CONDITION, CUSTOMS, AND SUPERSTITIONS OF THE PEOPLE.

There is little to be remarked, because little is known, respecting

the social and moral aspects of the untutored race which, in the

earliest historic age, sought a domicile or refuge amidst the forests

of the Fylde, or invaded its glades in search of prey. The habits of

the Setantii were simply those of other savage tribes who depended for

their daily sustenance upon their skill and prowess in the chase, and

whose intercommunion with the world beyond their own limited domains,

was confined to hostile or friendly meetings with equally barbarous

races whose frontiers adjoined their own. Certain disinterred roots were

necessary adjuncts to their repasts, and indeed, on many occasions, when

outwitted by the wild tenants of the woods, formed the sole item. Their

Druidical faith and the supreme power of the priesthood over their almost

every action, both secular and religious, have already been referred to

in an earlier page. The remorseless sacrifice of fellow beings on their

unhallowed altars, and the general spirit of cruelty and inhumanity

which pervaded all their rites, are not to be regarded as disclosing a

naturally callous and brutal disposition on the part of the Setantii, but

as indications of the deplorable ignorance in which they existed, and

the blind obedience which they yielded to the principles indoctrinated

by the Druids. That the Setantii, however submissive to the dictates

and requirements of their priests, were far from passively allowing the

encroachments of others on their liberties is shown by the promptitude

and fierceness with which they combatted the progress of the Roman

legions through their territory. No portion of the British conquest

cost the conquerors more trouble, time, and bloodshed, than did the land

peopled by the hardy and valorous Brigantes with their comparatively

small, but equally intrepid, neighbours and allies the Setantii. The two

most striking characteristics of the aboriginal Fylde inhabitants were

their ignorance and bravery, and whilst the former rivetted the chains

which held them in subjection to the priesthood, the latter incited them

to oppose to the death the usurpations of the stranger. There is nothing

of local interest to recount during the period the Romans held the

soil, but after their abdication, when the Anglo-Saxons violated their

faith and traitorously seized a land which they had come professedly

to protect, the Fylde began to evince symptoms of greater animation;

villages sprang up in different spots on the open grounds or clearings

in the woods; the solitary Roman settlement at Kirkham was appropriated

and renamed by the new arrivals, and, perhaps, for the first time a

population of numerical importance was established in the district.

During the earlier part of this era the inhabitants were graziers rather

than agriculturists or ploughmen. Three quarters, even, of the entire

kingdom were devoted to rearing and feeding cattle, so that the grain

produce of the country must have been extremely small when compared

with the superabundance of live stock, and as a consequence of such a

condition of things, those animals which could forage for themselves

and exist upon the wild herbage of the waste lands or the fallen

fruits of the trees, as acorns and beech-mast, were to be purchased

at prices almost nominal, whilst others which required the cultivated

products of the fields, as corn and hay, for their sustenance, were

disproportionately dear; thus about the end of the tenth century the

values of the former were:—

One Ox 7s. 0½d.

” Cow 5s. 6d.

” Pig 1s. 10½d.

” Sheep 1s. 2d.

” Goat 0s. 5½d.

The latter commanded these comparatively high prices—

One Horse £1 5s. 2d.

” Mare, or Colt £1 3s. 5d.

” Ass, or Mule £0 14s. 1d.

Trees were valued not by the circumference or magnitude of their trunks,

but by the amount of shelter their branches would afford to the cattle,

which seem to have lived almost entirely in the open pastures; and

bearing that in mind we are not surprised to read in the Saxon Chronicle

of periodical plagues or murrains breaking out amongst them. “In 1054,”

says that journal, “there was so great loss of cattle as was not

remembered for many winters before.” This, however, is only one extract

from frequent entries referring to similar misfortunes in different

years, both before and after the date quoted. Swine were kept in immense

herds throughout the kingdom, and there is every probability that in a

locality like the Fylde, where trees would still abound and provender

be plentifully scattered from the oaks and beeches, hogs would be

extensively bred. Indeed immediately after the close of the Saxon empire,

Roger de Poictou conveyed his newly acquired right to pawnage (swine’s

food) in the woods of Poulton, amongst other things, to the monastery

of St. Mary, in Lancaster, a circumstance strongly favourable to the

existence of swine there in considerable numbers. Kine, also, are usually

reported to have been a favourite stock with the breeders of Lancashire,

whilst sheep were rare in proportion, although in other places they were

exceedingly popular and profitable, chiefly from the sale of their wool.

The Saxon inhabitants of the small villages in the Fylde who were

engaged in agriculture had no knowledge of any manure beyond marl, which

they mixed with lighter and finer soils; nor were their farm-lands

cultivated all at one time, but a portion only of the estate was

subjected to the action of the plough, and when its fertility had been

thoroughly exhausted, the remainder was tilled and brought into service,

the first plot being allowed to lie fallow for a few years until its

productive powers had been renewed. Grain was not, as now, purchased

from the growers by dealers and stored up in warehouses, but each of

the neighbouring people, as soon as the crops had been gathered into

the barns, bought whatever quantity he thought would suffice for his

household wants until the ensuing harvest, and removed it to his own

residence. The universal waste and improvident consumption of grain

during this season of abundance, led frequently to famines in other

parts of the year, and many instances of that punishment following such

prodigality are related in the chronicle before named. One notice,

bearing the date 1044, says:—“This year there was very great hunger all

over England, and corn so dear as no man ever remembered before; so that

a sester of wheat rose to sixty pence and even further.”

The ploughs of our forefathers were, as would naturally be supposed,

somewhat rude and clumsy in construction, differing considerably in

appearance, although not in their _modus operandi_, from those which

may be seen furrowing the same land in the present day. Each plough

was furnished with an iron share, in front of which, attached to the

extremity of a beam projecting anteriorly, was a wheel of moderate

diameter, its purpose being to relieve the labour of the oxen and to

facilitate the guiding of the instrument, especially in turning. The

oxen employed were ordinarily four, and yoked to the plough by means of

twisted willow bands. Horses were prohibited by law from being used on

the land, but there must have been little need, one would imagine, for a

legal prohibition in the matter when it is remembered that horses were

nearly four times as valuable as oxen, and that the latter were fully

efficient at the task. The month of January commenced their season for

preparing the ground, and during the period thus occupied the labours

of the ploughman began each morning at sunrise, when the oxen were

tethered and conducted to the fields, where the duty of the husbandman

was lightened by the assistance of a boy, who superintended the cattle,

driving or leading them whilst at work. In the inclement months of

winter these oxen were fed and tended in sheds under the special care

of the ploughman, but during summer they shared a common lot with

the other cattle and were turned out to pasture in the fields, being

transferred to the charge of the cowherd. Other implements of husbandry

in use, in addition to the plough, were scythes, sickles, axes, spades,

pruning-hooks, forks, and flails, besides which the farmers possessed

carts and waggons of rather a cumbersome pattern. It is doubtful whether

the harrow was known here so early, but opinion usually refers its

introduction to a later date.

Of the moral tone of our Saxon settlers it is difficult to judge,

but that their business transactions were not always governed by a

very strict sense of honour is intimated by the following enactment,

apparently framed to check repudiations of bargains and, perhaps, to

insure fair dealing:—“No one shall buy either what is living or what

is dead to the value of four pennies without four witnesses either of

the borough or of the village.” William of Malmesbury, who wrote about

a century after the Norman Conquest, informs us that “excessive eating

and drinking were the common vices of the Saxons, in which they spent

whole nights and days without intermission.” It may, however, with much

probability be conjectured that not only is the statement in some degree

exaggerated, but that its application was designed more particularly for

the inhabitants of the larger towns than those of comparatively sparsely

populated districts like our own. Nevertheless it cannot be claimed, with

any show of reason, that the small section of the nation established

in the Fylde was entirely uninfected by the vices which enervated and

degraded the wealthier and more populous regions of the kingdom. The

evil of intemperance in both food and drink, especially the latter,

pervaded the whole community, but as its indulgence required both means

and opportunity, its loathsome features were less prominently visible in

localities where these were scarce than in others where they abounded.

The Church used every effort to awaken a better feeling in the minds

of her degenerate sons, and liberate them from the chains of a passion

which had so thoroughly enslaved them. Canons were directed against the

“sin of drunkenness,” and in order that no plea of ignorance could be

urged by any who had overstepped the bounds of sobriety, a curious and

minute description of the condition of body and brain which constituted

inebriation was appended to one of them, as here quoted:—“This is

drunkenness—when the state of the mind is changed, the tongue stammers,

the eyes are disturbed, the head is giddy, the belly is swelled, and pain

follows.” Ale and mead were the beverages on which these excesses were

committed, and cow-horns the drinking cups. It would seem that there was

yet another national blemish, that of gambling, which even invaded the

cloister and threw its veil of fascination over the clergy themselves,

for a canon of the reign of Edgar ordered—“That no priest be a hunter, or

fowler, or player at tables, but let him play upon his books, as becometh

his calling.”

Water-mills, planted on the banks of streams and consisting of square

weather-boarded structures, usually open at the top, were the means

possessed during the Saxon era for grinding the cereal products of the

Fylde. The wheel which received the pressure of the current, and conveyed

its motive power to the simple machinery within the fabric, differed

little from those still in use in various parts of the country, one of

which until recently was connected with a small mill on the brink of

the brook which drains the mere at Marton into the river Wyre, and less

than a century ago another mill, situated in the township of Marton and

worked on a similar principle, was turned by a stream from the same

mere. A water-mill is at present in use near Great Eccleston. After the

grinding process had been completed the bran and flour were separated

by hand-sieves. About seventy or eighty years after the Normans had

settled in the district these primitive sheds were superseded by a fresh

species of mill, in which sails supplied the place of the wheel, and

another element was called into service. The new erections were of wood,

and separated from the ground by a pivot of slight altitude, on which

they turned bodily in order to be fixed in the most favourable position

for their sails to reap a full harvest of wind. Solitary specimens of

this early piece of mechanical ingenuity are still visible hereabouts,

but most of the old mills were pulled down about a hundred years ago,

or less, and rebuilt with more stable material, whilst the modern

improvement of a revolving top only, did away with the necessity for the

venerable pivot, and allowed the foundations of the edifices to be more

intimately associated with mother earth than formerly.

Throughout the whole of the Saxon dynasty the mass of the inhabitants

would be what were termed the “villani,” that is, a class forming a

link between abject slavery and perfect independence. They were not

bound to any master but to the soil on which they happened to be

born, and on no plea were they permitted to leave such localities. To

the lord of the manor each of the “villani” gave annually a certain

portion of the produce of the ground he tilled, but beyond that they

acknowledged no claim to the proceeds of their thrift by the large

territorial proprietors. When a manor changed ownership the “villani”

were transferred with it in exactly the same condition as before, so that

really they seem to have occupied the position of small tenants paying

rent in kind, with the important addition that they were forced to pass

their lives in the district where they had first seen the light of day.

It should be noted that any “villani” not having domiciles of their own

were compelled to enter the service of others who were more fortunately

situated in that respect.

During the twelfth century the house-wife’s plan of preparing bread

for the table, in the absence of public bakehouses, common in some

neighbourhoods, was to knead the dough into large flat cakes and lay them

on the hearth in full glare of the fire, where they were permitted to

remain until thoroughly baked. Bread from pure wheat of the best quality

was a luxury unattainable except by those of high station or wealth,

the bulk of the people having to content themselves with an inferior

quality, brownish in colour and made from rye, oats, and barley. The

amount of this indispensable commodity to be sold at a specified price

was regulated by law, and the punishments for not supplying the proper

measure, or for “lack of size” as it was termed, were—for the first

offence, loss of the bread; for the second, imprisonment; and for the

third, the pillory or tumbrel.[46] In 1185 the maximum charges to be made

for certain provisions were settled by an act which decreed that the

highest price for a hen should be ½d., a sheep 5½d., a ram 8d., a hog

1s., an ox 5s. 8d., and a cow 4s. 6d.

In the ensuing century no restrictions were placed upon the tenants

of the Fylde as to the course of husbandry to be pursued, but each on

renting his farm or parcel of ground cultivated it according to the

dictates of his own inclination or experience, the only stipulation

being that the soil should suffer no deterioration from any ignorant or

imprudent action on the part of the holder. Oats and barley mixed, and

a light description of wheat, very inferior to the best grain, were the

favourite crops, the former being known as “draget,” and the latter as

“siligo.” Arable land was let at 4d. per acre, and the annual yield of

each acre sown with wheat, usually amounted to 12 bushels, the value of

the grain itself averaging about 4s. 6d. per quarter. Demand notices were

sent in two days after the rent had become due, and if not complied with

in two weeks the landlord distrained without further ceremony; after an

interval of another fortnight, if the money still remained unpaid, the

tenant was summarily ejected, and the owner seized both farm and stock.

The meals consumed by the peasantry comprised only two during the

twenty-four hours, one, called dinner, being eaten at nine in the

morning, and the other, supper, at five in the afternoon. It is very

possible, however, that during the summer those farm servants whose

arduous duties were entered on at daybreak, partook of some slight repast

at an early hour of the morning, but the only meals for which regular

times were appointed were the two mentioned. During harvest the diet

of the labourers consisted for the most part of herrings, bread, and

an allowance of beer, whilst messes of pottage were far from uncommon

objects on the rustic boards. Between the year 1314 and 1326 the prices

of live stock were again arranged, as under:—

The best grass fed ox 16s. 0d.

The best cow (fat) 12s. 0d.

The best short-horn sheep 1s. 2d.

The best goose 0s. 3d.

The best hen 0s. 1½d.

The best chickens, per couple 0s. 1½d.

Eggs, twenty for 0s. 1d.

In 1338 no domestic or husbandry servant residing in the Hundred of

Amounderness was allowed to pass beyond the boundaries of the Wapentake

on profession of going to dwell or serve elsewhere, or of setting out

on a pilgrimage, without bearing with him a letter patent stating the

reason of his departure and the date of his return. This law, which

applied to all Hundreds alike, was intended to prevent the threatened

decay of agriculture from a dearth of labourers, who heretofore had been

in the habit of deserting their employment and wandering away into other

divisions of the country, where they supported an idle and frequently

vicious existence by soliciting alms and by petty thefts.

It will scarcely surprise the reader to learn that superstition was rife

amongst the populace during the periods so far noticed, and that nothing

was too absurd to be accepted as an omen, either of good or evil, by our

credulous forefathers. A timid hare encountered in their walks abroad

announced the approach of some unforeseen calamity, as also did a blind

or lame man, a woman with dishevelled hair, or even a monk; whilst the

visions of a wolf crossing the path, St. Martin’s birds flying from

left to right, a humpbacked man, or the sound of distant thunder, were

welcomed as heralds of prosperity. All amusements were of an athletic

kind, and consisted of archery, casting heavy stones, spear darting,

wrestling, running, leaping, and sword and buckler playing. On festivals,

and occasionally at other seasons, the barbarous and cruel sports of bull

and bear-baiting were indulged in,[47] but cock-fighting was considered,

until a later epoch, an entertainment only suitable for children, and on

Shrove Tuesday each boy took his pet bird to the school-house, which was

for that day converted into a cock-pit, superintended by the master.

In 1444, the wages received by different classes of agricultural servants

were:—

A bailiff £1 3s. 4d. per year, and 5s. for clothing, with

board.

A chief hind ⎫

” carter ⎬ £1 0s. 0d. ” and 4s. for clothing, ”

” shepherd ⎭

A woman servant £0 10s. 0d. ” and 4s. for clothing, ”

A boy under 14 £0 6s. 0d. ” and 3s. for clothing, ”

A common husbandman £0 15s. 0d. ” and 40d. for clothing, ”

At harvest time, when special labour was required, the scale of

remuneration was:—

A mower 4d. per day, with board.

” 6d. ” without ”

A reaper or carter 3d. ” with ”

” 5d. ” without ”

A woman labourer, or other labourer 2½d. ” with ”

” 4½d. ” without ”

The statute which arranged the above rates of payment concluded by saying

that “such as deserve less shall take less, and also in places where less

is used to be given less shall be given from henceforth;” so that the

table just completed would seem to represent the maximum rather than the

ordinary scale of wages. This statute also enacted that farm servants who

purposed leaving their employers, must engage themselves to other masters

and give reasonable warning before leaving their present ones, by which

idleness and mendicancy were effectually guarded against.

The common pastimes of the inhabitants during the fifteenth and sixteenth

centuries, in addition to some of those already enumerated which still

held their sway, were club, and trap-ball, bowling, prisoners’-bars,

hood-man blind, (a game similar to the modern blindman’s-buff, but

entered into by adults alone,) battledore and shuttlecock, and during

hard frosts skating, at first by means of the shank bone of a sheep

fastened on to the sole of the boot and afterwards with iron-shod

skates. Hawking and hunting were confined to the families of position

who resided at the ancient Halls of the Fylde and to others of similar

social standing, forming but a small proportion of the entire population.

At Christmas the largest log obtainable was lighted on the hearth and

denominated the yule log. If the mass burned throughout the night and

the whole of the next day, it was regarded as an omen of good fortune by

the members of the household, but if it were consumed or extinguished

before that time had expired, it was looked upon as auguring adversely

for their prosperity. The first Monday after Twelfth Day was called

Plough Monday, a name still familiar to many an old Fylde man, and was

observed as a general holiday by the men whose labours were associated

with that instrument, who on this day went about the villages from house

to house asking for plough-money to spend in ale. Their processions,

if such they could be called, consisted of a plough, which was dragged

along by a number of sword-dancers; a labourer, dressed to resemble an

old woman; and another, who was clothed in skins, and wore the tail of

some animal hanging down his back. These two oddly garbed individuals

solicited small contributions from the people whilst the remainder were

engaged in dancing, and if anyone refused to disburse some trifling sum

when requested, they turned up the ground fronting his doorway with

the plough. During Christmas week the country people blackened their

faces, and thus disguised committed all sorts of frolics and absurdities

amongst their neighbours. The chief rustic festival, however, was

appointed for the first of May, on which day the May-pole was drawn

to the village green by several oxen, whose horns were decorated with

bunches of flowers, and accompanied by a joyous band of revellers, who

after its erection on the accustomed site held their jubilee of feasting

and dancing around it. The pole itself was covered with floral garlands,

and streamed with flags and handkerchiefs from its summit. A Lord and

Lady, or Queen, of May were elected by a general vote, and to them

belonged the honour of presiding over the festivities. The costumes of

these pseudo-regal personages were liberally adorned with scarfs and

ribbons, so that their appearances should be in unison with the rest of

the gay preparations. The morris-dance formed an important feature of

the festival, and the performers in that somewhat vigorous exercise wore

richly decorated habits on to which small bells, varying in tone, had

been fastened. The new year was ushered in with feasting and joviality,

whilst friendly interchanges of presents took place amongst all classes.

In the evening, a huge wassail-bowl filled with spiced ale was carried

to the different houses of the villages, and all who quaffed its

exhilarating contents drank prosperity to the coming year, and rewarded

the cup-bearers, usually female farm-servants, with some small donation;

the following carol in a more antique form, or some similar one, was sung

on the occasion:—

“Good Dame, here at your door,

Our Wassel we begin,

We are all maidens poor,

We pray now let us in,

With our Wassel.

“Our Wassel we do fill,

With apples and with spice,

Then grant us your good will

To taste here once or twice

Of our Wassel.

...

“Some bounty from your hands

Our Wassel to maintain.

We’ll buy no house nor lands

With that which we do gain,

With our Wassel.”

On Shrove Tuesday a barbarous custom prevailed of tying cocks to a stake

driven into the ground, and throwing at them with sticks, until death

ensued from repeated blows. St. Valentine’s day received a merry welcome

from the country swains and maidens, who at that auspicious time made

choice of, or more properly speaking were mated to, their true loves for

the year. The all important selection was made by writing the names of an

equal number of each sex on separate slips of paper, and then dividing

them into two lots, one of which represented the males and the other the

females. The women drew from the male heap, and the men from that of the

females, so that each person became possessed of two sweethearts, and the

final pairing was really the only element of real choice in the matter;

in this the men usually claimed the girl whom each of them had drawn,

and thus an amicable settlement was soon arrived at. After the mirthful

ceremony had been completed and each happy couple duly united, the men

gave treats and dances to their sweethearts, and wore their billets for

several days pinned on to their breasts or coat sleeves. Another, and

much simpler, plan of choosing a valentine was to look out of the door or

window on the eventful morning, and the first person seen was regarded as

the special selection of the patron Saint, provided always the individual

was of the opposite sex, and unfettered by the silken bonds of Hymen.

Whitsun-ales and Easter-ales were assemblies held within, or in the

immediate neighbourhood of, the church-yards, at which the beverage,

giving the title to these festivities, was sold by the clergy or their

assistants, and consumed by the country people, the proceeds being

devoted to ecclesiastical purposes and the relief of the poor. Wakes

originated in an ancient custom of gathering together on the evening

before the birthday of a Saint or the day appointed for the dedication of

a church, and passing the night in devotion and prayer. These watches,

however, were soon altered in character, and instead of religious

exercises employing the period of vigil, feasting and debauchery became

the recognized occupations.

The festival of Rush-bearing is of such antiquity that its origin has

become in a great measure obscured, but there is a strong probability

that the practice arose from a recommendation given by Pope Gregory IV.

to Mellitus, who was associated with St. Augustine in christianising

the inhabitants of England, to celebrate the anniversaries of the

dedications of those places of worship, which they had rescued from Pagan

influences, “by building themselves huts of the boughs of trees about

such churches, and celebrating the solemnities with religious feastings.”

The rush-cart, decorated with flowers and ribbons, was paraded through

the village streets, accompanied by morris-dancers and others bearing

flags or banners. One of the mummers, dressed in a motley suit, somewhat

resembling that of a circus jester, jingled a horse-collar hung with

bells, and kept up a constant succession of small jokes at the expense

of the bystanders as the procession advanced. In early days before

churches were flagged it was the annual custom to strew their floors with

rushes on the day of the dedication of the sacred edifice, and in the

parish register of Kirkham we find, as follows:—“1604. Rushes to strew

the church cost this year 9s. 6d.” From the register at Poulton church

we have also extracted an entry, at random, from similar ones occurring

each year:—“Aug. 6th, 1784. To Edward Whiteside for rushes, 6s. 8d.” The

practice appears to have arisen simply from a desire to promote warmth

and comfort within the churches by providing a covering for the bare

earth, and its connection with rush-bearing, when it existed, must be

regarded as having been purely accidental. Brand has discovered another

motive for rush-strewing, more especially in private houses, and one

not very flattering to our forefathers:—“As our ancestors,” writes he,

“rarely washed their floors, disguises of uncleanliness became very

necessary.” Erasmus, also, a Greek Professor at Oxford in the time of

Henry VIII., in describing the hovels in which the agricultural labourers

and others of the lower classes lived, says:—“The floors are commonly

of clay strewed with rushes; under which lies unmolested an ancient

collection of beer, grease, fragments, bones, spittle, and everything

that is nasty.”

From 1589 to 1590 inclusive, the daily wages, without board, of a

ditcher were 4d., a thresher 6d., a hedger 4d., a gardener 10d., and a

master-mason 14d. In 1533 it was enacted that no tenant should hold more

than two farms at once; and fifty-five years later sundry penalties were

imposed upon any one erecting cottages for the agricultural population

without attaching four acres of land to each, also for allowing more than

one family to occupy a cottage at the same time.[48] A law was passed

in 1597, directing that all houses of husbandry which had fallen into

decay within a period of seven years should be rebuilt, and from twenty

to forty acres of ground apportioned to each.[49] The average yields of

grain per acre on well-cultivated soils during the latter half of the

sixteenth century were—wheat 20 bushels, barley 32 bushels, and oats 40

bushels. The subjoined tables contain the average prices of some of the

common articles of consumption:—

In 1500. In 1541. In 1590. In 1597.

12 Pigeons 4d. 0s. 10d. 1s. 0d. 4s. 3d.

100 Eggs 7d. 1s. 6d. 3s. 6d.

1 Goose 4d. 0s. 8d.

1 Chicken 1d. 0s. 8d.

1 Lb. of Butter 0s. 3d. 0s. 4d.

In 1581, the charge for shoeing a horse was 10d., and sometimes 12d. Here

it may be noticed, although perhaps rather digressive, that the herb

tobacco was introduced into this country sometime during the summer of

1586, by a party of Englishmen, who for a short time colonised the island

of Roanoak, near the coast of Virginia, but, having quarrelled with the

aborigines, were removed home in the ships of Sir Francis Drake. Camden,

writing of these men, says:—“They were the first that I know of that

brought into England that Indian plant which they called _tabacca_ and

_nicotia_, or _tobacco_, which they used against crudities, being taught

it by the Indians. Certainly, from that time forward, it began to grow

into great request, and to be sold at a high rate; whilst in a short time

many men, everywhere, some for wantonness, some for health sake, with

insatiable desires and greediness, sucked in the stinking smoke thereof

through an earthen pipe, which presently they blew out again at their

nostrils; insomuch that tobacco-shops are now as ordinary in most towns

as tap-houses and taverns.”

The following rhymes, descriptive of the games and recreations common

in Lancashire amongst the youth of both sexes, were written in 1600, by

Samuel Rowland:—

“Any they dare challenge for to throw the sledge,

To jump or leap over ditch or hedge;

To wrestle, play at stool-ball, or to run,

To pitch the bar or to shoot off a gun;

To play at loggats, nine-holes, or ten-pins,

To try it out at foot-ball by the shins;

At tick-tacke, seize-noddy, maw, and ruff;

At hot-cockles, leap-frog, or blindman’s buff;

To drink the halper-pots, or deal at the whole can;

To play at chess, or pue, and inkhorn;

To dance the morris, play at barley-brake;

At all exploits a man can think or speak:

At shove-groat, venter-point, or cross and pile;

At ‘beshrew him that’s last at any style’;

At leaping over a Christmas bonfire,

Or at ‘drawing the dame out of the mire’;

At shoot-cock, Gregory, stool-ball, and what-not;

Pick-point, top and scourge, to make him hot.”

Many of these games have long since become obsolete. Tick-tacke resembled

backgammon, but was rather more complicated; seize-noddy, maw, and ruff

were games of cards, the first being somewhat similar to cribbage, while

the two latter have no modern representatives, although the expression

_to ruff_ is frequently used at the whist-table; ‘cross and pile’ is

merely an earlier name of ‘pitch and toss’; and shoot-cock has been

modernised into shuttlecock.

During the seventeenth century occasional village fairs were held in the

Fylde, at which such uncouth games as “grinning through a horse-collar,”

as well as trials in whistling, etc., were common amusements, while

pedlars’ stalls, puppet shows, raffling tables, and drinking booths were

well attended by the holidaymakers. At that period any damsel, wishing to

learn something, be it ever so little, of her future mate, was directed

to run until out of breath on hearing the first notes of the cuckoo,

and on removing her shoe she would find a hair of the same colour as

that of the husband whom fate had selected for her. On May-day a snail

placed upon the ashes of the hearth would trace the initial letter, or

letters, of the lover’s name; or the rind, peeled from an apple and

thrown backwards over the head, would by its arrangement on falling to

the ground effect a similar purpose:—

“Last May-day fair I search’d to find a snail

That might my secret lover’s name reveal:

Upon a gooseberry bush a snail I found,

For always snails near sweetest fruit abound.

I seiz’d the vermin; home I quickly sped,

And on the hearth the milk white embers spread,

Slow crawled the snail, and if I right can spell

In the soft ashes marked a curious L.”[50]

This couplet was recited by young maidens after capturing an insect

called a Lady-bird, and on releasing it:—

“Fly, Lady-bird, fly south, east, or west;

Fly where the man is that I love best.”

The following extracts from an “inventarye of all the goods and chattels

of Peter Birket, late of Borrands,” taken after his decease in 1661,

will furnish a pretty accurate idea of the monetary worth of certain

articles of farming stock at that time:—“One outshoote of hay, £1 6s.

8d.; one stack of hay without dores, 10s.; one scaffold of hay, 10s.;

one mare and one colt, £3; five geese, 4s.; 13 sheepe, £3; one cock and

five hens, 2s.; one calfe, 10s.; two heiffers, £3; one heiffer, £2; one

cow, £2 10s.; another cow, £3 10s.” Whether this gentleman was a fair

representative of his class or not we are unable to say, but if so, the

small farmers of Lancashire, to whom he appears to have belonged, were

not over indulgent in articles of dress or comfort, for the whole of

his wearing apparel was valued at no more than £1, whilst his bedding

realised only 5s.

In 1725 the Lancashire justices arranged and ordered that the rate of

wages in all parts of this county should be:—

A bailiff in husbandry,

or chief hind £6 0s. 0d. per year, with board.

A chief servant in husbandry,

able to mow or sow 5 0 0 ” ”

A common servant in husbandry

of 24 years of age and upwards 4 0 0 ” ”

A man servant from 20

to 24 years of age 3 10 0 ” ”

A man servant from 16

to 20 years of age 2 10 0 ” ”

The best woman servant,

able to cook 2 10 0 ” ”

Dairy man, or lower servant 2 0 0 ” ”

Woman servant under

16 years of age 1 10 0 ” ”

The best of millers 5 0 0 ” ”

They also appointed the hours of labour for those hired by the day to be,

between the middle of March and the middle of September, from five in the

morning until half-past seven in the evening, and during the remainder of

the year from sunrise to sunset, resting half-an-hour at breakfast, an

hour at dinner, and half-an-hour at “drinking,” as the meal corresponding

to our “tea” was termed. “In the summer half,” added the magisterial

mandate, “the labourers may sleep each day half-an-hour; else for every

hour’s absence to defaulk a penny; and every Saturday afternoon or eve of

a holiday, that they cease to work, is to be accounted but half a day.”

The day wages, as fixed by the same authorities, were:—

The best kind of husbandry labourer 12d. without, and 6d. with board.

An ordinary labourer 10d. ” and 5d. ”

A male haymaker 10d. ” and 6d. ”

A woman haymaker 7d. ” and 3d. ”

A mower 15d. ” and 9d. ”

A man shearer 12d. ” and 6d. ”

A woman shearer 10d. ” and 6d. ”

Hedgers, Ditchers, Threshers, and

persons employed in task work 10d. ” and 6d. ”

Masons, Joiners, Plumbers, Tilers,

Slaters, Coopers, and Turners 12d. ” and 6d. ”

Master workman, acting as foreman 14d. without board.

From 1660 to 1690, the average price of mutton was 2d. per pound; from

1706 to 1730, 2½d.; and from 1730 to 1760, 3d. per pound. The prices of

beef, veal, and lamb in 1710, were respectively 1⅒d., 2⅗d., and 2⁹⁄₁₀d.,

per pound.

During the eighteenth and earlier part of the nineteenth centuries

there was perhaps no pastime more popular amongst the adult members of

all classes than the callous sport of cock-fighting; every village and

hamlet in the Fylde had its pit, where mains were held at all times and

seasons. The following were the rules pretty generally adopted in this

neighbourhood for the regulation of the contests:—

“1.—To begin the main by fighting the lighter pair of cocks which

fall in match first, proceeding upwards towards the end, that

every lighter pair may fight earlier than those that are heavier.

“2.—In matching, with relation to the battles, after the cocks of

the main are weighed, the match bills are to be compared.

“3.—That every pair of equal weight are separated, and fight

against others; provided it appears that the main can be enlarged

by adding thereto.”

Skippool was one of the favourite resorts for the gentry of our district

when wishful to indulge in their favourite amusement, and frequent

allusions to the cockpit there are to be found in the journal of Thomas

Tyldesley, of Fox Hall, as—“June 9, 1714, ... thence to Skipall, where

at a cockin I meet with a deal of gentlemen. Gave Ned M⸺y 1s. for his

expenses; spent 1s., and won 2s. 6d. of Dr. Hesketh’s cockes.” In 1790 a

notice appeared in Liverpool that “The great main of cocks between John

Clifton, Esq., of Lytham, and Thomas Townley Parker, Esq., of Cuerden,

would be fought on Easter Monday, the 5th of April, and the three

following days, at the new cockpit in Cockspur Street—to show forty-one

cocks each. Ten guineas each battle, and two hundred guineas the main.”

The great-grandfather of the present Lord Derby compelled each of his

tenants to maintain a game-cock for his benefit, and many were the birds

supplied from the Fylde to uphold his great reputation as a successful

cock-fighter.

One of the most ancient punishments amongst our forefathers was that

of the Brank or Scolds’ Bridle, a specimen of which was possessed by

Kirkham, and doubtless many others existed in the Fylde. This instrument

was but little removed in severity from those implements of torture in

vogue at the time of the Inquisition, but differed from them in one

important particular—it was intended to control or silence, and not to

stimulate, the tongue of its victim. The Brank consisted of an iron

framework, which was fitted on to the head of the offender, usually some

woman whose intemperate language had incensed her husband; and a metal

spike, attached to the front of it, was so inserted into the mouth that

the slightest movement of the tongue brought that sensitive organ in

contact with its sharp edge or point. Doctor Plott, who appears to have

held the Brank in high estimation, and to have considered it greatly

superior to another mode of correction, much in fashion during his day,

says:—“This artifice is much to be preferred to the ducking-stool, which

not only endangers the health of the party, but gives liberty of tongue

betwixt every dip.”

The Ducking-stool or Cuck-stool consisted of a substantial chair,

fastened to the extremity of a long pole, and suspended over a pool of

water. The middle of the pole rested on an upright post near the edge of

the pond, and was attached to it by means of a pivot-hinge, so that the

chair could be swung round to the side to receive its victim, and, after

being freighted and restored to its original position, plunged into the

water by raising the other end of the shaft as often as those on the

bank deemed it necessary to cool the anger of the unfortunate scold.

Several pools in different parts of the Fylde still retain their names

of Cucking-ponds, and the last person condemned to suffer the barbarous

punishment was a young woman at Poulton, but she was happily rescued by

the kindly intervention of Madam Hornby, who became surety for her good

conduct in future.

In the belfry of Bispham church there formerly stood a plain-looking

wooden frame, which in earlier times had done duty as a pennance-stool,

but some years since the chair was removed, and probably destroyed, as no

trace of its existence has since been discovered. The last to perform

pennance in this church and sit upon the stool was a woman, who seems to

have been living as recently as 1836. A public pennance was exacted by

the Church from all frail maidens, who desired to obtain pardon for the

sins into which they had fallen. The ceremony consisted of parading the

aisles of the parish church with a candle in each hand, barefooted, and

clothed in white. Jane Breckal, of Poulton, was the last to undergo the

ceremony at that place, some time during the ministry of the Rev. Thos.

Turner, 1770 to 1810. The sobs and cries of the unfortunate girl aroused

the indignation of the inhabitants against the pennance, and the cruel

and degrading exhibition was never repeated.

Riding Stang was another plan of punishment formerly inflicted on

quarrelsome or adulterous persons, and a woman named Idle, of Great

Layton, is mentioned as being the last of its victims in that locality,

and very likely in the whole of the Fylde. There seem to have been two

ways adopted of Riding Stang, one of which was to mount the offending

party or parties on a ladder, supported at each end on the shoulders of

one or sometimes two men, and carry them about the neighbourhood for

several hours, accompanied by a band of men and boys beating tin kettles,

frying-pans, etc.; the other mode, and perhaps the more antique one, was

to place a youth astride a ladder, borne as in the previous case, and

arm him with a hand-bell, so that he was fully equipped to undertake

the duties of town crier. A procession was then formed, and, amidst the

discordant sounds of the instruments just alluded to, paraded through

the streets of the village, whilst the crier, who usually did his part

with great gusto, shouted out the following doggrel rhymes, varying some

portions of them when occasion required:—

“Ran a dan, ran a dan, dan, dan,

But for ... has been banging his good dame.

He banged her, he banged her, he banged her, indeed,

He banged her, poor woman, before she stood need;

For neither wasting his substance nor spending his brass,

But she was a woman, and he was an ass.

Now, all good people that live in this row,

I would have you take warning, for this is our law,

And if you do your good wives bang,

For you three nights we will ride this stang.

Hurrah! hurrah!”

When the offender happened to be some woman, who had inflicted

chastisement on the person of her spouse, the rhyme was altered to suit

her sex, and asserted that “he was a coward, and she was an ass.” The

remains of stocks in various states of preservation, are still to be seen

in many old villages, and their use is of too recent a date to require

any elucidation in this volume.

On the fifth Sunday in Lent, Carling Sunday, the villagers prepared a

feast, consisting chiefly of peas, first steeped in water, and afterwards

fried in butter, which were eaten on the afternoon of that day. Small

troops or companies of pace-egg mummers went from house to house in

Passion week enacting a short dramatic piece, and afterwards soliciting

money, or, in some cases, eggs, from their audience. The _dramatis

personæ_ usually represented St. George, the champion of England; a Turk,

dressed in national costume; the Doctor, of the quack fraternity; the

Fool; and one or two others. In the play, the Turk was wounded by St.

George, and being left for dead upon the field, guarded by the Fool, was

restored to health and strength by the Doctor, who opportunely arrived,

and concluded his self-laudatory harangue over the body of the apparently

defunct Turk, thus:—

“Here, Jack, take a little out of my bottle,

And let it run down thy throttle;

If thou be not quite slain,

Rise, Jack, and fight again.”

Easter mumming is now rapidly becoming obsolete, and at present amounts

to nothing more entertaining than the recital of a few weak, almost

meaningless, rhymes, by, usually, five young boys, decorated with ribbons

and coloured paper, and supposed to represent Lord Nelson, a Jack-Tar, a

Lovely Youth, Old Toss-pot, and Old Bessy Branbags.

“Lifting at Easter” was an old-established practice, existing in the

villages, of hoisting individuals in the air, either in a chair or by any

other means that might be convenient, until they purchased their release

by payment of a forfeit, generally some small coin. On Ascension-day

the parochial schoolmaster conducted his pupils, armed with peeled

willow wands, round the limits of the parish, and each pupil struck the

various boundary marks with his stick as he passed them. All-Hallows’

E’en was the time when the young people tested the durability of love or

friendship by burning nuts:—

“Two hazel nuts I threw into the flame,

And to each nut I gave a sweetheart’s name:

This with the loudest bounce, me sore amazed,

That in a flame of brightest colour blazed;

As blazed the nut, so may thy passion grow,

For ’twas thy nut that did so brightly glow!”[51]

Other pastimes contributed to the evening’s amusement, such as “ducking

for apples,” and “snatch apple”—a tub, in the former case, having been

nearly filled with water, and the fruit placed in it, each in turn, with

hands bound behind them, endeavoured to seize the prize with the teeth;

in the latter game, an apple was fastened to one extremity of a rod and a

lighted candle to the other, the whole being suspended by a string from

the ceiling, and the players, bound as before, snapped at the apple, and

avoided the flame as well as they were able.

Until within the last fifty or sixty years, the mosses of Marton and

the hills in the vicinity of the Fylde were illuminated with bonfires

on All-Hallows’ Eve, or Teanlay-night, as it was called, kindled by

the country people with the avowed object of succouring their friends

who were lingering in the imaginary regions of a middle state. A field

near Poulton received the name of “Purgatory” from the mummery of the

“Teanlays” having, on one occasion at least, been celebrated there.[52]

This ceremony was simple in its performance, and consisted merely of a

circle of men raising masses of blazing straw on high with pitch-forks.

On All Souls’ Day our Catholic forefathers were accustomed to bake cakes

of oatmeal and aromatic seeds, named Soul-cakes, and these, together with

pasties and furmety, formed a feast invariably eaten at that season.

Remnants of this custom existed even in late years amongst the youths of

Marton and some other townships and villages, who on the day of ancient

festival solicited money, under the name of Soul-pence, from their

neighbours.

We will now enumerate some of the superstitions and beliefs that have

prevailed in the Fylde more recently than those to which allusion has

been made in the earlier part of the chapter.

The following adage, showing the signification of certain marks on the

nails, will probably be familiar to many of our readers, and it is

questionable whether, even yet, it is not regarded by a few of the less

enlightened of the peasantry as something more than a mere saying:—

“Specks on the fingers,

Fortune often lingers;

Specks on the thumbs,

Fortune surely comes.”

No sick person could die if the bed or pillow upon which he lay contained

a pigeon’s feather; and, at an earlier date, the dwellers near the

coast firmly believed that life could only depart with the ebbing tide.

A horse-shoe nailed against the stable or barn-door, or a broom-stick

placed across the threshold of the dwelling, prevented the entrance of

witches or evil persons; also a hot heater placed in the churn, and

the mark of a cross, protected respectively the cream and baking of

dough from their presence. The advent of guests was made known to the

family circle by certain conditions of the fire-grate; thus, a flake

of soot hanging from the topmost bar foretold a boy visitor, from the

second a man, from the third a woman, and from the fourth a girl. Cats

were popularly supposed to have the power of drawing the breath, and

as a natural consequence the life, out of children when asleep, and

for this reason great care was taken to exclude them from bedchambers.

Should a dark complexioned person be the first to enter a dwelling on

New Year’s morning, the household looked forward with confidence to a

prosperous year; but if the person happened to be light, more especially

if he had red hair, the omen was regarded as unpropitious. Moon-beams

shining through the windows of bedrooms were considered injurious to the

sleepers, and even capable of distorting their features, or rendering

them imbecile. Children were taught to recite these simple lines whenever

the moon shone into their chambers:—

“I see the moon,

The moon sees me;

God bless the priest

That christened me.”

A tooth, after extraction, was sprinkled with salt and thrown into the

fire in order to insure peace and comfort to the person from whose mouth

it had been removed. A pair of shoes placed under the bed so that the

tips of the toes alone were visible, formed a certain remedy for cramp.

Warts were removed by rubbing them with a piece of stolen beef, which was

afterwards carefully and secretly buried to render the charm complete;

a snail hung on to a thorn was equally efficacious in removing these

excrescences, which gradually faded away as the snail itself melted and

vanished. A bag, containing small stones of the same number as the warts,

thrown over the left shoulder, transmitted them to the person who had

the misfortune to pick up the pebbles. People labouring under attacks of

ague, jaundice, or other ailments, applied for relief to the wise-men

of the neighbourhood, who professed to cure them by incantations. The

two following receipts are taken from an old medical work, published as

early as 1612, and in its time a highly popular authority on matters of

“Phisicke and Chirurgerie” amongst our rural populations:—

“A good Medicine to staunch the bleeding of the Nose, although it

bleed never so freely.

“Take an egg and breake it on the top, in such sorte that all

the white and yolke may issue cleane forthe of it; then fill the

egg-shell with some of the bloud of the party which bleedeth, and

put it in the fire, and there let it remaine until it be harde,

and then burne it to ashes, and it will staunch the bleeding

immediately without all doubt.”

“A very good Medicine to staunch bloud when nothing else will do

it, by reason the veine is cut, or that the wound is greate.

“Take a Toade and dry him very well in the sunne, and then put

him in a linen Bagge, and hang him about the necke of him that

bleedeth with a stringe, and let it hange so low that it may

touch his breaste on the left side neere unto his hart, and

commonly this will stay all manner of bleeding at the mouth,

nose, wound, or otherwise whatever. Probatum est.”

A woman named Bamber, living at Marton, attained to considerable

celebrity amongst the peasantry and others by her skill in checking

bleeding, which she is reported to have accomplished by the utterance of

some mystic words.

The people of the Fylde were not exempt from the common belief in the

miraculous power of the Royal touch in that particular form of disease

known as king’s evil, for amongst the records of the Thirty-men of

Kirkham is a notice that in 1632 a sum of money was “given to Ricd.

Barnes’s child, that had the king’s evil, to help him up to London,” to

be touched by Charles I.

The fairies of the Fylde were supposed, like those of other localities,

to reside in the earth; the vicinity of a cold spring, situated between

Hardhorn and Newton, was one of their legendary resorts, and from such

reputation acquired the name of “Fairies’ well.” Many stories are told

of the mischievous, or good-natured doings of these imaginary beings;

one or two of which we will here narrate:—A poor woman when filling her

pitcher at the above well, in order to bathe the weak eyes of her infant,

was gently addressed by a handsome man, who gave her a small box of

ointment, and told her at the same time that it would prove an infallible

remedy for the ailment of her child. The woman, although grateful for

the present, either overcome by that irresistible curiosity which is

commonly, but perhaps erroneously, supposed to attach itself to her sex,

or doubtful of the efficacy which the stranger had assigned to the drug,

applied it to one of her own eyes. A few days afterwards she had occasion

to go to Preston, and whilst there detected her benefactor in the act of

stealing corn from the open mouths of some sacks exposed for sale, and,

having accosted him, began to remonstrate with him on the wickedness of

his proceedings, when he inquired with evident surprise, how she became

enabled to observe him, as he was invisible to all else. She explained

the use that had been made of his ointment, and pointed to the powerful

eye; but hardly had the words been uttered and the organ of supernatural

vision indicated, before he raised his clenched hand, and with one blow

struck out the offending optic, or rather reduced it to a state of total

and irrecoverable blindness. Another anecdote refers to a milkmaid, who,

whilst engaged in her avocation, perceived a jug and sixpence placed

near to her by some invisible means; but no way disconcerted by the

singular event, and probably attributing it to the agency of one of the

elvan tribes, she filled the pitcher with milk, and, having watched its

mysterious disappearance and, with unerring commercial instinct, pocketed

the silver coin, took her departure. This episode was repeated for many

successive mornings, until the maiden, overjoyed at her good fortune,

revealed the curious adventures to her lover, and from that hour the

hobgoblins appear either to have grown less thirsty, or, annoyed at what

they might consider the betrayal of their secret, to have removed their

custom to some other dairy, for neither jug nor sixpence ever gladdened

the morning labours of the milkmaid again. A ploughman had his good

nature, in cheerfully repairing the broken “spittle” of a lady liberally

rewarded. The fairy, for such she proved to be, made known her presence

to the agriculturist by suddenly crying in a distressed tone—“I have

broken my speet,” and then held out in her hands the useless instrument

with a hammer and nails. No sooner had she received her property,

restored to a state of utility, than she vanished into the earth, but

not, however, without leaving a substantial acknowledgment of his skill

and kindness in the palm of the astonished husbandman.

We can only discover a record of one witch in the Fylde; this person of

unenviable notoriety is stated to have had her abode in Singleton, and

to have been known to the villagers as Mag Shelton. Her food, according

to local tradition, was composed of boiled groats mixed with thyme or

parsley, and numerous are the anecdotes related of her evil machinations

and doings in the neighbourhood—the cows of the country people were

constantly milked by her, whilst the pitcher walked before her in the

form of a goose; lives were blighted and prosperity checked by the

influence of her evil eye. Once, however, she was foiled by a girl, who

fastened her to a chair by sticking a bodkin, crossed with two weavers’

healds, about her dress when seated before a large fire.

Some idea of the spiritual condition of the peasantry may be obtained

from the perusal of the following prayer, a common one amongst the

children of the Fylde about one hundred years ago:—

“Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John,

Bless the bed that I lie on;

There are four corners to my bed,

And four angels overspread,

Two at the feet and two at the head.

If any ill thing me betide,

Beneath your wings my body hide.

Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John,

Bless the bed that I lie on.”

Bacon was considered to prove the finest and best if the hogs were

slaughtered before the moon began to wane, and in some month whose name

contained the letter R:—

“Unless your bacon you would mar

Kill not your pig without the R.”

The dumb-cake was made by unmarried women who wished to divine the

selection of fate as to their future husbands. The cake was baked in

strict silence by two maidens on Midsummer’s eve, and afterwards broken

into three pieces by another, who placed one under each of their pillows;

during sleep the expectant fair ones were rewarded with a vision of their

lovers, but the charm was ruined if only a single word were spoken.

Hemp-seed, also, was sown by young maidens, who whilst scattering it

recited the words “Hemp-seed I sow, hemp-seed I hoe, and he that is my

true-love come after me and mow.” After repeating the rhyme three times

it was only necessary to look over the shoulder, and the apparition of

the destined swain would never fail to appear:—

“At eve last Midsummer no sleep I sought,

But to the field a bag of hemp-seed brought;

I scattered round the seed on every side,

And three times, in a trembling accent cried:

‘This hemp-seed with my virgin hand I sow,

Who shall my true love be the crop shall mow.’

I straight looked back, and, if my eyes speak truth,

With his keen scythe behind me came a youth.”[53]

A spinster who fasted on Midsummer’s eve, and at midnight laid a clean

cloth, with bread, cheese, and ale, and sat down to the table as though

about to eat, would be gratified with a sight of the person to whom

she would be married. This individual was supposed to pass through the

doorway, left open for the purpose, as the clock struck twelve, and,

approaching the table, to salute his future partner with a bow and a

pretence of drinking her health, after which he vanished, and the maid

retired to her couch to rejoice or mourn, according as she admired or

contemned the prospect in store for her. Cuttings or combings from the

hair were thrown into the fire, and upon their blazing brightly or

smouldering away depended the duration of life likely to be enjoyed

by the person from whose head they had been taken. Wishing-wells and

gates were visited by credulous rustics, who were anxious to make use

of their mysterious power in obtaining their desires in matters of love

or business. The forefinger was deemed venomous, and on that account

children were instructed not to spread salve or ointment with it.

About a century ago oats formed the chief production, and nearly, if

indeed not quite, the only grain crop cultivated in the Fylde. When

reaped, in harvest time, this commodity was carried on the backs of

pack-horses to the markets of Poulton, Kirkham, Garstang, and Preston.

The “horse bridge” between Carleton and Poulton was originally a narrow

structure, capable only of affording passage to a single horse at once,

and it was from the practice of the farmers, with their laden cattle,

crossing the stream by its aid, when journeying to market, that the

bridge derived its name. These horses followed a leader ornamented

with a bell, and after they had arrived at their destination and been

relieved of their burdens, returned home in the same order without a

driver, leaving him to attend to his duties at the market. The old bridge

in use at the period to which we allude, still exists, but is built

over and hidden by the present erection. Later experience has taught

the agriculturist that the soil of the Fylde is capable of producing,

under proper tillage, other crops, equal in their abundance to the one

to which it appears formerly to have been mainly devoted, and it would

be difficult at the present day to enumerate with accuracy the many and

varied fruits of the earth that have found a home in the Corn-field of

Amounderness.

We mentioned about the commencement of the chapter that marl was in

general use as a manure in the Anglo-Saxon era, and here it is perhaps

hardly necessary to state that this substance, so rich in lime and so

adapted for giving consistency to the sandy soils, is still occasionally

had recourse to by the husbandman. Guano was first introduced into this

country about the year 1842, but it is probable that it was not commonly

used in our district until the beginning of 1845, when a cargo was

imported from Ichaboe to Fleetwood by Messrs. Kemp and Co., and offered

for sale to the farmers of the neighbourhood. Other cargoes followed.

Subjoined are arranged some tables showing the average market values of

certain productions of the Fylde in the two years given:—

1847. 1867.

Inclusive. Inclusive.

Jan. to July to Jan. to July to

June. Dec. June. Dec.

Wheat, per windle 39s. 6d. 25s. 6d. 31s. 8d. 32s. 6d.

Meal, per load 52s. 6d. 41s. 6d. 37s. 0d. 37s. 6d.

Beans, per windle 25s. 6d. 22s. 6d.

Oats, per bushel 5s. 10½d. 4s. 8d. 4s. 5d. 4s. 6d.

Potatoes, per windle 21s. 6d.[54] 7s. 0d. 12s. 8d. 11s. 6d.

Butter, per pound 1s. 1d. 1s. 1½d. 1s. 5d. 1s. 3d.

Eggs, per dozen 0s. 10d. 0s. 10d. 0s. 11d. 1s. 0d.

Pork, per pound 0s. 6d. 0s. 6d. 0s. 5½d. 0s. 6d.

Beef ” 0s. 6½d. 0s. 7½d. 0s. 7¾d. 0s. 6¾d.

Mutton ” 0s. 6¾d. 0s. 8½d. 0s. 8d. 0s. 7d.

Geese ” 0s. 6¾d.[55]

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

History of the Fylde of Lancashire · 第 4 / 17 章