CHAPTER III.

JAMES THE FIRST TO QUEEN VICTORIA.

On the accession of James I., in 1603, the crowns of England and Scotland

became legally united, although it was not until a considerable time

afterwards that they could be regarded as practically so. This monarch

was the first to assume the title of King of Great Britain.

A custom prevailed in former days of relieving the secular portion of

the community by imposing exclusive taxes on the clergy, and hence it

is seen, that in 1608 a rate was levied upon the latter by the Right

Reverend George Lloyd, D.D., the eighth bishop of Chester. The following

is a copy of the impost so far as the Hundred of Amounderness was

concerned:—

“_Archid. Decanatus_ Cestrie _in Com._ Lancastrie

A Rayte imposed by me George Bushoppe of Chestʳ upon the Clergie

within the Countye of Chesshyre and Lancashyre within the Dyoces

of Chest,ʳ By vertue of Ires from the lordes grace of Yorke

grounded upon + from the lordes and others of his maᵗᵉˢ most

honorable privye counsell for the fyndinge of horses, armes, and

other furniture, the XXVIIIth of October 1608.

Amounderness Decanatus Archid. Richm.

Mr. Porter, vicar of Lancastʳ a corslet furnished.

Mr. Paler, vicar of Preston ⎱ a musket furnished

Mr. Norcrosse, vicar of Ribchestʳ ⎰

Mr. Whyt, vicar of Poulton & ⎱ a musket furnished.

Mr. Greenacres, vicar of Kirkham ⎰

Mr. Aynsworth, vicar of Garstange ⎱ a musket furnished.

Mr. Woolfenden, vicar of St. Michael’s upon Wyre ⎰

Mr. Calver, vicar of Cockerham ⎱ a caliver furnished.

Mr. Parker, vicar of Chippin. ⎰

George Cestriensis.”[36]

Here it may be mentioned that, although about 636, Honorus, archbishop

of Canterbury, attempted to divide the kingdom into parishes, it was not

until many years later, in the reign of Henry VIII., that the diocese

to which Lancashire belonged was clearly defined. At that date Chester

was created a distinct bishopric, and the southern part of our county

included in the archdeaconry of Chester, whilst the northern portion was

attached to the archdeaconry of Richmond.

In 1617 James I., on his return journey from Scotland to London, was

entertained at Myerscough Lodge, near Garstang, by Edward Tyldesley,

the grandfather of the gentleman who erected Fox Hall, at Blackpool.

Thomas Tyldesley, a cousin of the owner of Myerscough Lodge, and

attorney-general of the county of Lancaster, had been knighted by the

monarch at Wimbleton in the previous year. From Myerscough the King

proceeded to Hoghton Tower, where a petition was presented to him by the

agricultural labourers, petty tradesmen, and ordinary servants in this

and other districts lying near Preston, praying that the edict of the

late queen, whereby sports and games had been prohibited on the Sabbath,

might be repealed. The prayer of the petitioners found favour with James,

and shortly afterwards he caused it to be proclaimed—“that his majesty’s

pleasure was, that the bishops of the diocese should take strict order

with all the puritans and precisians within the county of Lancaster, and

either constrain them to conform themselves, or to leave the countrie,

according to the laws of this kingdom and the canons of the church; and

for his good people’s recreation his pleasure was, that after the end

of divine service, they be not disturbed, letted, or discouraged from

any lawful recreation, such as dancing, either men or women; archery

for men, leaping, vaulting, or any such harmless recreation; nor having

of May-games, Whitson-ales, and Morice-dances, and the setting up of

May-poles, and other sports therewith used; so as the same be had in due

and convenient time, without impediment or neglect of divine service;

and that women should have leave to carry rushes to the church, for

decorating of it according to the old custom; but withal his majesty

did here account still as prohibited, all unlawful games to be used

on Sundays only, as bear and bull-baitings, interludes, and, at all

times, in the meaner sort of people, by law prohibited, bowling.” A few

months after this concession to the wishes of a portion of his subjects,

James issued a publication designated the “Book of Sports,” in which he

explained what were to be considered lawful sports to be indulged in on

“Sundays and Festivals.”

The gentlemen enumerated below were free-tenants, residing in the Fylde,

during his reign:—

Clifton, Sir Cuthbert, of Westby, knight.

Banister, Sir Robert, of Plumpton, knight.

Fleetwood, Edward, of Rossall, esq.

Westby, Thomas, of Mowbreck, esq.

Kirkby, William, of Upper Rawcliffe, esq.

Veale, Edward, of Whinney Heys, esq.

Burgh, Richard, of Larbrick, esq.

Leckonby, John, of Great Eccleston, esq.

Longworth, Richard, of St. Michael’s, esq.

Parker, John, of Bradkirk, esq.

Hesketh, William, of Mains, esq.

Singleton, Thomas, of Staining, esq.

Brown, James, of Singleton, gent.

Leigh, Robert, of Plumpton, gent.

Smith, John, of Kirkham, gent.

Sharples, Henry, of Kirkham, gent,

ffrance, John, of Eccleston, gent.

Thompson Wm., of Little Eccleston, gent.

Dobson, William, of Bispham, gent.

Hornby, Henry, of Bankfield, gent.

Bradley, James, of Bryning, gent.

Taylor, James, of Poulton, gent.

Bamber, Thomas, of Poulton, gent.

Bailey, Lawrence, of Layton, gent.

Bonny, Robert, of Kirkham, gent.

Whiteside, Robt., of Thornton, gent.

In the Registers of Kirkham is the annexed statement, from which it

appears that a few years from the death of James I. the Fylde, or at

least a considerable tract of it, was visited by some fatal epidemic,

but its peculiar nature cannot be ascertained:—“A.D. 1630. This year

was a great plague in Kirkham, in which the more part of the people of

the town died thereof. It began about the 25th of July and continued

vehemently until Martinmas, but was not clear of it before Lent; and

divers towns of the parish was infected with it, and many died thereof

out of them, as Treales, Newton, Greenall, Estbrick, Thistleton. N.B.—The

great mortality was in the year 1631; 304 died that year, and were buried

at Kirkham, of whom 193 in the months of August and September”. Charles

I. soon after ascending the throne in 1626, provoked a breach with his

parliament by endeavouring to enforce subsidies, with which to carry on

his foreign wars, and further, he alienated the affections and respect of

the Puritan section of his subjects by confirming the regulations of the

“Book of Sports.” Dissatisfaction and murmurings were quickly fermented

into rebellion, and the closing of the gates of Hull against the king

in 1642 initiated those fearful wars, which desolated and disorganised

the country for so many years. In 1641, Alexander Rigby,[37] esq., of

Layton Hall, Sir Gilbert de Hoghton, with eight other gentlemen, were

removed from the commission of the peace, by order of parliament, on

suspicion of being favourably disposed towards the royal party. The

chief supporters of the king in the ensuing conflicts were the nobility,

in great numbers; the higher orders of the gentry, and a considerable

portion of their tenantry; all the High-churchmen; and a large majority

of the Catholics. The parliamentarian army, on the other hand, was mainly

composed of freeholders, traders, manufacturers, Puritans, Presbyterians,

and Independents. An engagement near Wigan roused up the people in our

vicinity to a sense of the dangers menacing them, and a public meeting

of royalists was called at Preston under the presidency of the earl of

Derby. Amongst other gentlemen who took a prominent part in the assembly

were Thomas Clifton, esq., of Lytham, and Alexander Rigby, esq., of

Layton. Several resolutions were adopted, the most important being that

a sum of money, amounting to £8,700, should be raised and devoted to the

payment of a regiment, consisting of 2,000 foot and 400 horse, in the

following scale of remuneration:—

DRAGOONERS.

Captain 12s. 0d. per diem.

Lieutenant 6s. 0d. ” ”

Cornet 4s. 0d. ” ”

Sergeant 3s. 0d. ” ”

Corporal 2s. 0d. ” ”

Dragooner 1s. 6d. ” ”

Kettle-drum 2s. 0d. ” ”

FOOT.

Captain 10s. 0d. per diem.

Lieutenant 4s. 0d. ” ”

Sergeant 1s. 6d. ” ”

Drummer 1s. 3d. ” ”

Corporal 1s. 0d. ” ”

Private 0s. 9d. ” ”

HORSE.

Captain 16s. 0d. per diem.

Lieutenant 8s. 0d. ” ”

Cornet 6s. 0d. ” ”

Corporal 4s. 0d. ” ”

Trumpeter 5s. 0d. ” ”

Private 2s. 6d. ” ”

And to every Commissary 5s. 0d. per diem.

Parliamentary commissioners were sent this year, 1642, into all parts of

Lancashire to visit the churches and chapels and to remove therefrom all

images, superstitious pictures, and idolatrous relics, which any of them

might contain.

Preston and Lancaster were amongst the earliest towns to fall into

the hands of the Roundheads, and about ten days after the surrender

of the former place, when the people of this district were labouring

under the excitement of war on their very frontier, Alexander Rigby,

of Layton Hall, accompanied by Captain Thomas Singleton, of Staining,

and other officers, appeared near Poulton at the head of a number of

horsemen, and threw the inhabitants into a state of great consternation

and alarm, fortunately proving unnecessary, for the cavalcade had other

designs than that of bringing devastation and bloodshed to their own

doors, and continued their journey peaceably northward. A few weeks

later a Spanish vessel was seen at the entrance of Morecambe Bay, off

Rossall Point, and as it evinced no signs of movement, either towards

the harbour of Lancaster or out to sea, the yeomen and farm servants of

that neighbourhood at once surmised that some sort of an invasive attack

was meditated on their coast, nor were these fears in any way allayed

by the constant firing of a piece of cannon from the deck of the ship,

and it was not until the discharges had been repeated through several

days that they realised that distress and not bombardment was intended

to be indicated. On boarding the vessel they found that she contained a

number of passengers, all of whom, together with the crew, were reduced

to a pitiable and enfeebled condition through exposure and scarcity

of provisions, for, having lost their way in the heavy weather which

prevailed, they had been detained much over the time expected for the

voyage, blindly cruising about in the hope of discovering some friendly

haven or guide. The craft was piloted round into the mouth of the river

Wyre, opposite the Warren, and relief afforded to the sufferers. Rumour

of the presence of the ship was not long in reaching the ears of the earl

of Derby, who, with promptitude determined to march down and seize it in

the king’s name. On the Saturday he arrived at Lytham Hall with a small

troop of cavalry, where he sojourned for the night, with the intention

of completing his journey and effecting his purpose the following day

before the parliamentarians had got word of the matter; but here his

calculations were at fault, for the parliamentary leader had already

dispatched four companies of infantry, under Major Sparrow, to take

possession of the prize, and on the same Saturday evening they took up

their quarters at Poulton and Singleton, having arrived by a different

route to the earl, who had forded the river at Hesketh Bank. On the

Sunday Major Sparrow, who throughout showed a lively horror of risking

an encounter with the renowned nobleman, posted scouts with orders to

watch the direction taken by the latter, and convey the information

without delay to the chief station at Poulton, where the soldiers were

in readiness, not for action, as it subsequently turned out, but to put

a safe barrier between themselves and the enemy, for no sooner was it

ascertained that the earl, “all his company having their swords drawn,”

was marching along Layton Hawes towards Rossall, than Sparrow conducted

his force across the Wyre, at the Shard, and followed the course of the

stream towards its outlet “until he came over against where the shipp

lay, being as feared of the earle as the earle was of him.”[38] The earl

of Derby advanced along the shore line and across the Warren to the mouth

of the river without the naked weapons of his followers being called into

service, but finding when he boarded the ship that two parliamentary

gentlemen had forestalled his intention by seizing her for the powers

they recognized, he unhesitatingly took them prisoners, and set fire

to the vessel, whilst Sparrow and his men stood helplessly by, on the

opposite side of the water, where the gallant major perhaps congratulated

himself on his caution in having avoided a collision with so prompt and

vigorous a foe. Some of the Spaniards attached themselves to the train of

the earl, whilst others were scattered over the neighbourhood, depending

for subsistence upon the charity of the cottagers and farmers, but their

final destiny is unknown. The noble general, enraged at the unlooked for

frustration of the main object of his journey, determined that it should

not be altogether fruitless, and on his return forced admittance into

the mansion of the Fleetwoods, at Rossall, and bore off all the arms he

could lay hands upon. Resuming his march he re-passed through Lytham,

forded the Ribble, and finally made his way to Lathom House, his famous

residence.

Inactivity, however temporary, was ill suited to the temperament of the

earl, and on receiving the news that the solitary piece of artillery

belonging to the luckless Spanish vessel had been appropriated by

the parliamentary officials before he appeared upon the scene, and

transferred to their stronghold at Lancaster, he conceived the idea of

reducing the ancient castle on the Lune, and so taking vengeance on

those who had anticipated him in the Wyre affair, as well as removing a

formidable obstacle to the success of the royal arms. Before entering on

an undertaking of such importance it was necessary that his small body of

troops should be materially increased, and after exhausting the districts

south of the Ribble, he crossed it, in search of recruits amongst the

yeomanry and peasantry of the Fylde. The earl lodged his soldiers in

and about Kirkham, and fixed his own quarters at Lytham Hall. Dreadful

stories are related by the old historian, from whose work we have already

quoted, of the doings of the troops for the short time they remained

in the neighbourhood, but it is only fair to state that their rapacity

was directed exclusively against the property of those whose sympathies

were with their opponents, whose houses and farms they plundered most

mercilessly, driving off their horses, and carrying away ornaments,

bedding, and everything which could either be turned to immediate use

or offered a prospect of future gain. Warrants were issued on the first

day of their arrival, from the head quarters at Lytham, over the whole

of our section, calling upon every male above sixteen years of age and

under sixty, “upon payne of death to appear before his Honor at Kirkham

the next morning by eight of the clock, in their best weapons, to attend

the King’s service.”[39] The officers to whom fell the task of heralding

the mandate over the large area in the brief interval allowed, fulfilled

their duties with energy, and a goodly company responded to the arbitrary

summons of the commander. After having seen that the fresh levies were as

suitably equipped for warfare as means would permit, the earl appointed

John Hoole, of Singleton, and John Ambrose, of Wood Plumpton, as captains

over them, and gave the order to march. On reaching Lancaster Lord Derby

summoned the mayor and burgesses to surrender the town and castle into

his hands, to which the chief magistrate replied that the inhabitants

had already been deprived of their arms and were unresisting, but that

the fortress, now garrisoned by parliamentary troops, was out of his

keeping, an answer so far unsatisfactory to the besieger that he set fire

to the buildings, about one hundred and seventy of which were destroyed,

and inflicted other injury on the place. Colonel Ashton, of Middleton,

who had been sent to relieve the castle, arrived too late, when the earl

was some distance on his return towards Preston, from which town he

dislodged the enemy. A little later the tide of fortune turned against

the royalists, and the earl of Derby was one of the earliest to suffer

defeat. Colonel Thomas Tyldesley, a staunch partizan of the king, and

the father of Edward Tyldesley, of Fox Hall, Blackpool, retreated before

Colonel Ashton, from Wigan to Lathom, and afterwards to Liverpool, where

he was besieged and forced again to fly by his indefatigable opponent.

(Later he distinguished himself at Burton-on-Trent, by the desperate

heroism with which he led a cavalry charge over a bridge of thirty-six

arches, and for that display of valour as well as his faithful adherence

to Charles, he received the honour of knighthood.) Driven from Liverpool,

Tyldesley, in company with Lord Molyneux, withdrew the remnant of his

regiment towards the Ribble, crossed that stream, and quartered his men

in Kirkham, whilst Molyneux occupied the village of Clifton. In these

places they rested a night and a day, keeping a vigilant look out for

their pursuer, Ashton, from the old windmill, situated at the east end

of Kirkham. About one o’clock on the day succeeding the evening of their

arrival the soldiers, acting under orders, repaired to their several

lodgings to further refresh themselves after their prolonged fatigues,

but before four hours had elapsed, a report came from the outpost that

the enemy was approaching. An alarm spread through the camp, and with

difficulty Lord Molyneux and Colonel Tyldesley assembled their forces in

the town of Kirkham, where they elected once more to make a stand against

the victorious Ashton. Command was given that all the women and children

should confine themselves within doors, and preparations were hurried

forward to offer the parliamentarians a vigorous resistance; but as

daylight waned and the besiegers were momentarily expected, the courage

of the royal troops seems to have oozed away, and they precipitately

vacated the town, fording the Wyre, and flying towards Stalmine, whence

they continued their retreat to Cockerham, and so on northwards.

When Colonel Ashton entered Kirkham he found the enemy gone and the

inhabitants in a state of extreme trepidation, but their fears were soon

dismissed by the action of the gallant soldier who, on learning the

course taken by Tyldesley and Molyneux, pushed on without delay. Ashton

followed up the pursuit as far as the boundaries of Lancashire, without

overtaking any of the royalists, and then returned to Preston. The rear

of his troops diverged from the main road at Garstang, unknown to their

leader, and marched into the Fylde for plunder. They passed through St.

Michael’s, and visiting the residence and estate of Christopher Parker,

of Bradkirk, drove away many of his cattle, and stripped his house of

everything of value. In Kirkham they laid the people under heavy toll,

and even spared not those who were notoriously well affected towards

parliament. At Clifton they found more herds of cattle, which were joined

to those already with them; but at Preston they fell to quarrelling over

the booty, and it is questionable whether their ill-gotten stores did not

prove rather a curse than a blessing to them.

Towards the end of 1643, the year in which the events just narrated

occurred, Thurland Castle, the seat of Sir John Girlington, was captured

by the parliamentary colonel, Alexander Rigby, of Middleton, near

Preston. In the engagement the Lancashire troops were under the command

of Alexander Rigby, of Layton, who allowed his small regiment to be

surprised and routed by his namesake. After his success at Thurland,

Colonel Rigby, of Middleton, proceeded to raise fresh levies in

Amounderness. Mr. Clayton, of Fulwood Moor, was appointed to superintend

the whole of the recruiting and directed to place himself at the head of

the new regiment. Mr. Patteson, of Ribby, and Mr. Wilding, of Kirkham,

were each apportioned half of the parish bearing the latter name, in

which they were respectively ordered to raise a company. In the parishes

of Poulton and Bispham, Mr. Robert Jolly, of Warbreck, Mr. William

Hull, of Bispham, Mr. Richard Davis, of Newton, and Mr. Rowland Amon,

of Thornton, were made captains, and had similar duties imposed upon

them. In Lytham parish, Mr. George Sharples, of Freckleton, received a

commission, but was unable to muster more than a very few followers, as

the people of that neighbourhood reflected the loyal sentiments of the

lord of the manor, and could neither be coerced nor seduced from their

allegiance to the king. Captains Richard Smith and George Carter, of

Hambleton, raised companies in Stalmine, Hambleton, and the adjacent

townships and villages. Mr. William Swarbrick recruited a company in his

native parish of St. Michael’s, and Mr. Duddell obtained another in Wood

Plumpton.

At the siege of Bolton, in May, 1644, when the town was stormed and

surrendered after a valiant resistance, to Prince Rupert, with an army of

over nine thousand royalists, Duddell and Davis were amongst the officers

slain, whilst their companies were literally cut to pieces. Captain

George Sharples, of Freckleton, was taken prisoner, and dragged, almost

naked and barefooted, through the miry and blood-stained streets to the

spot where Cuthbert, the eldest son of Thomas Clifton, of Lytham, was

standing after the carnage, in which he had led a party of the besiegers.

Captain Clifton and others near him were in a mood for a somewhat rude

and ungenerous entertainment, and placed the hapless Sharples, in his

dilapidated attire, in a prominent position and, thrusting a Psalter into

his hand, compelled him to sing a Psalm for their delectation. After

they had amused themselves in such fashion for some time the prisoner

was handed over to the guard, from whom he ultimately made his escape.

Captain Cuthbert Clifton was elevated to the rank of colonel as an

acknowledgment of his gallant services at Bolton, after which he returned

for a few days into the Fylde, where he engaged himself in procuring a

fresh detachment of soldiers, who readily flocked to his standard. For

their provision and comfort he did not hesitate or scruple to appropriate

a number of cattle on Layton Hawes, and to relieve some of the Puritans

of Kirkham, Bispham, and Poulton, of their bedding, etc. Having fully

supplied his commissariat department by these means, he marched to

Liverpool, and joining Prince Rupert, was present at the sacking of that

town.

The Civil War had proved most disastrous to Lancashire, where the

constant movements and frequent collisions of the contending parties

had ruined the towns, destroyed almost all attempts at agriculture,

and reduced the inhabitants to a state of wretchedness and poverty,

in many instances to the verge of starvation; and notwithstanding the

fact that in not one single instance had the Fylde been the scene of an

encounter, the people of this section were in as lamentable a condition

of penury and suffering as those of the less fortunate districts, a

circumstance not to be wondered at when the incessant plunderings are

taken into consideration, and when it is remembered that the youth and

strength of the neighbourhood were serving as volunteers or recruits,

either under the banner of parliament or that of the king. The 12th of

September, 1644, was appointed by the Puritans as a day of solemn prayer

and fasting throughout the country, and parliament decreed that half of

the money collected “in all the churches within the cities of London and

Westminster and within the lines of communication,” should be devoted to

the relief of the distressed and impoverished in this county.

Sir Thomas Tyldesley accompanied the army of Prince Rupert to York, near

to where the sanguinary and famous battle of Marston Moor, in which no

less than sixty thousand men were engaged on both sides, was fought on

the 2nd of July, 1644. Oliver Cromwell commanded the parliamentarians

in person, and after a fierce struggle discomfited the troops of Prince

Rupert and drove them in confusion from the field. Sir Thomas Tyldesley

retreated with his shattered regiment in hot haste towards Amounderness,

where he made diligent search for arms and ammunition, but hearing

that the enemy, under Sir John Meldrum, was marching in quest of him

he hurried to the banks of the Ribble, and crossed the ford into the

Fylde. This latter incident happened towards the end of the week, and

on Saturday he was joined in his ambush by the immense royalist force

of Colonel Goring, so great indeed that “before the last companies had

marched over the bridge at St. Michael’s Church the first company was

judged to be at Kirkham.”[40] There is probably some little exaggeration

in the quoted statement, but even allowing it to be verbally correct,

there can be no doubt that it is unintentionally misleading, as the

extreme length of road covered would be due more to the wide intervals

between the companies and the straggling manner in which they proceeded

than to their actual numerical strength. Nevertheless the detachment,

chiefly composed of cavalry, was enormous, and completely inundated the

towns and villages in the parishes of Poulton, Kirkham, and Lytham.

The men were lodged twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, and even sixty in a

house, and on the Sunday morning they set out on an errand of pilfering

without respect to persons, pillaging those who were friendly with as

much eagerness and apparent satisfaction as others who were inimical to

their cause, an impartiality so little appreciated by the inhabitants

that they are said to have blessed the Roundheads by comparison with

these insatiate freebooters. Horses, money, clothes, sheets, everything

that was portable or could be driven, was greedily seized upon, and, in

spite of threats and entreaties, remorselessly borne away. Hundreds of

households were stripped not only of their ornaments, bedding, etc., but

even of the very implements on which the family depended for subsistence.

It is in truth no figure of speech to state that by far the larger share

of the people were reduced to utter and seemingly hopeless destitution,

and grateful indeed were they when their portion of the parliamentary

grant of collections in the metropolis, before mentioned, was distributed

amongst them, coming like manna from the heavens to comfort their

desolated homes. To add insult to injury the graceless troopers compelled

their entertainers to employ the Sabbath in winnowing corn in the fields

for their chargers, and even refused to allow them to erect the usual

curtains to protect the grain from being carried away by the high wind,

so that the loss and waste amounted to barely less than the quantity

utilised as fodder, and completely exhausted the fruits of their harvest.

Sir Thomas Tyldesley, Lord Molyneux, and others of the leaders, fixed

their lodgment near the residence of a gentleman named Richard Harrison,

and were supplied with necessaries from Mowbreck Hall. Freckleton marsh

was the rendezvous, and there the entire forces assembled on the morning

of Monday, but were compelled to remain until one o’clock at noon before

the Ribble was fordable, when they took their departure, to the intense

joy of all those who had trembled for their lives and suffered ruin in

their small properties during their brief sojourn. Sir John Meldrum

appeared in the district only a few hours after the royalists had left,

and thus the Fylde had again a narrow escape of adding one more to

the long list of unnatural battles, most truly described as suicidal

massacres of the nation, where men ignoring the ties of friendship or

kinship imbrued their swords in the blood of each other with a relentless

and inhuman savagery, reviving as it seemed the horrid butcheries of the

dark ages. Sir John Meldrum hastened in the direction of the retreating

foe, but failed to overtake them.

“In 1645,” writes Rushworth, “there remained of unreduced garrisons

belonging to the king in Lancashire only Lathom House and Greenhalgh

Castle.”[41] This castle was erected about half a mile eastward of

Garstang, overlooking the Wyre, by Thomas, the first earl of Derby, in

1490, after the victory of Bosworth Field, as a protection from certain

of the outlawed nobles, whose estates in that vicinity had rewarded the

services of the earl to Henry VII. The castle was built in a rectangular

form almost approaching to a square, with a tower at each angle. The

edifice was surrounded and protected by a wide moat. The garrison

occupying the small fortress at the date under consideration held out

until the death of the governor, when a capitulation was made, and,

about 1649, the castle was dismantled. In 1772 Penant spoke of the “poor

remains of Greenhalgh Castle.”[42]

The fall of Lathom House and other strongholds of the king and the

surrender of Charles himself to the Scotch army of Puritans, brought

the contests for a time to a close in 1647, and Sir Thomas Tyldesley,

with several more, received instructions to disband the troops under

his command. During the foregoing struggles parliament, in order to

provide the necessary funds for the increased expenditure, had allowed

“delinquents, papists, spies, and intelligencers” to compound for their

sequestered estates, and amongst those connected with this locality who

had taken advantage of the permission were:—

Brown, Edward, of Plumpton, compounded for £127 8s. 0d.

Breres, Alexander, of Marton, gent., ” £82 4s. 5d.

Bate, John, of Warbreck, ” £11 0s. 0d.

Leckonby, Richard, of Elswick, esq., ” £58 6s. 0d.

Nicholson, Francis, of Poulton, yeoman ” £133 3s. 4d.

Rigby, Alexander, of Layton, esq., ” £381 3s. 4d.

Walker, William, of Kirkham, gent., ” £175 0s. 0d.

Westby, John, of Mowbreck, esq., ” £1,000 0s. 0d.

Presbyterianism became the national, or at least, the state religion, and

for the regulation of ecclesiastical matters the Assembly of Divines, at

Westminster, suggested that the country should be divided into provinces,

whose representatives should hold annual conferences at the larger towns.

The county of Lancaster was divided into nine Classical Presbyteries,

and the seventh Classis, embracing the parishes of Preston, Kirkham,

Garstang, and Poulton, consisted of—

Mr. Isaac Ambrose, of Preston, minister.

Mr. Robert Yates, of Preston, minister.

Mr. Ed. Fleetwood, of Kirkham, minister.

Mr. Thos. Cranage, of Goosnargh, minister.

Mr. Chr. Edmondson, of Garstang, minister.

Mr. John Sumner, of Poulton, minister.

LAYMEN.

Alexander Rigby, of Preston, Esq.

William Langton, Esq.

Alderman Matt. Addison, of Preston, gent.

Alderman Wm. Sudall, of Preston, gent.

Alderman Wm. Cottam, of Preston, gent.

Edward Downes, of Wesham, gent.

Edmund Turner, of Goosnargh, yeoman.

Thomas Nickson, of Plumpton, gent.

Robt. Crane, of Layton, gent.

Wm. Latewise, of Catterall, gent.

Wm. Whitehead, of Garstang, gent.

Edward Veale, of Layton, Esq.

Rd. Wilkins, of Kirkham, yeoman.

One of the duties of these Classes was to examine, ordain, and appoint

ministers, or presbyters, as they were called, whenever vacancies

occurred in the district over which, respectively, they had jurisdiction;

subjoined is the certificate given in the case of Cuthbert Harrison,

B.A., when selected and appointed presbyter of Singleton chapel:—

“Whereas Cuthbert Harrison, B.A., aged 30 years, hath addressed

himself to us, authorised by ordinance of parliament of 22 Aug.

1646, for ordination of ministers, desiring to be ordained a

presbyter, being chosen by the inhabitants within the chapelry

of Singleton to officiate there; and having been examined by us

the ministers of the Seventh Classis, and found sufficiently

qualified for the ministerial functions, according to the rules

preserved in the said ordinance, and thereupon approved—we have

this day solemnly set him apart to the office of presbyter and

work of the ministry of the gospel, by laying on of hands by us

present, with fasting and prayer, by virtue whereof we declare

him to be a lawful and sufficiently authorised minister of Jesus

Christ. In testimony whereof we have hereunto put our hands the

27th Nov., 1651.”

(Here follow the signatures.)

In 1648 General Langdale, a royalist officer, appealed to the loyalty

of the northern counties to attempt a rescue of the imprisoned monarch

from the hands of his enemies. Many rushed to his standard, and the

parliamentarians of the Fylde shared the general consternation which

pervaded Lancashire at the success of his effort to rekindle the still

smouldering embers of civil war. There is no necessity to trace the steps

of this ill-judged enterprise to its disastrous issue, but suffice it to

say that the defeat and routing of the little army was followed at a very

short interval by the execution of Charles I., after a formal trial in

which he disclaimed the jurisdiction of the court.

On the 22nd of June, 1650, a meeting of Commissioners under the Great

Seal of England was held at Preston—“for inquiring into and certeifying

of the certeine numbers and true yearely value of all parsonages and

vicariges presentative, of all and every the sp’uall and eccli’call

benefices, livings, and donatives within the said countye”; and after

examining the good and lawful men of Kirkham and Lytham, it was

recommended by the assembly that Goosnargh and Whittingham should be

formed into a separate parish on account of their great distance from

the church at Kirkham. At this inquiry it was also stated that—“the

inhabitants of Newsham desired to be annexed to Woodplumpton; the

inhabitants of Clifton and Salwick, together with the inhabitants of

Newton-cum-Scales, and the upper end of Treales, desired to be united in

one parish. Singleton chappell, newly erected, desired that it might be

made a parish. The inhabitants of Weeton-cum-Preese desired that that

township might be made a parish, and the inhabitants of Rawcliffe desired

to be annexed to it. The townships of Rigby-cum-Wraye, and of Warton, and

of Kellamore-cum-Bryning, and Westbye-cum-Plumpton, all humbly desired to

be made a parish. The several townships of Eccleston Parva-cum-Labrecke,

and the inhabitants of Medlar and Thistleton, and the inhabitants of

Rossaker-cum-Wharles, desired to be annexed to Elswick, and that it

might be made a parish.” Although at that time these petitions failed

in obtaining their objects, much the same thing has been accomplished in

more recent years by Lord Blandford’s Act, by which separate parochial

districts, as far as ecclesiastical matters are concerned, have been

appropriated to each church, thus rendering it independent of the

mother-church of the ancient parish in which it might happen to be

situated.

In 1651 the son of the unfortunate monarch, who had been proclaimed king

by the Scotch under the title of Charles II., crossed the frontier and

invaded England with a force of fourteen thousand men. That year the earl

of Derby, Sir Thomas Tyldesley, and several other officers, sailed from

the Isle of Man, whither they had retired, in obedience to the call of

the young prince, and landed either on the Warren, at the mouth of the

river Wyre, or at Skippool higher up the stream, with a regiment of two

hundred and fifty infantry and sixty cavalry. Two of the vessels grounded

during the operation of disembarking the horses, and in the heavy winds

that ensued were reduced to total wrecks. As soon as the news of the

earl of Derby’s arrival on the banks of the Wyre was rumoured abroad,

“all the ships,” says the _Perfect Diurnall_, “were wafted out of the

rivers of Liverpool, and set sail with a fair wind fore Wirewater, where

the Frigots rid that brought the Lord Derby over with his company, to

surprise them and prevent his Lordship escaping any way by water.” The

earl marched through the Fylde, but the martial ardour of the inhabitants

was not so readily excited as on former occasions, for the recollection

of their abusive and piratical treatment by the troopers of Colonel

Goring, in 1644, was still fresh in their minds, and effectually checked

any feelings of enthusiasm at seeing the royal banners once again

unfurled in their midst. A scattered few, however, there were who were

willing to forget the misdeeds of the agents in their eagerness for the

success of the cause, and with such meagre additions to his strength the

earl hastened on. At Preston he raised six hundred horse, and shortly

afterwards encountered the parliamentarians, under Colonel Lilburne,

at Wigan-lane, where the royalists were defeated with great slaughter.

Sir Thomas Tyldesley was slain, and the gallant earl escaped from the

field only to be taken prisoner in Cheshire and suffer the fate of his

late regal master, Charles I. Alexander Rigby, the grandson of the

Alexander Rigby, of Layton, before mentioned, and only seventeen years of

age, also took part in this eventful engagement, and twenty-eight years

subsequently, when High Sheriff of the county of Lancaster, erected a

monument to the memory of Major-General Sir Thomas Tyldesley near the

spot where he fell. So universally esteemed was the valiant knight for

his bravery and honourable conduct that the title of “Chevalier sans peur

et sans reproche” was conferred upon him alike by friends and enemies.

Charles II., after the overthrow of his army by Cromwell, adopted the

disguise of a peasant, and having narrowly escaped detection by hiding

himself amidst the foliage of an oak tree, fled at the first opportunity

over to France. Cromwell was now installed in the chief seat of authority

and held the reins of government under the style of Lord Protector.

In 1660, two years after the death of Cromwell, Charles II. was recalled

and placed upon the throne; and in 1662 a law was passed by which it was

enacted that before St. Bartholomew’s Day of that year, all ministers

should arrange their services according to the rules contained in the new

book of Common Prayer, under pain of dismissal from their preferments.

The following letter was received by the churchwardens of Garstang,

ordering the ejectment of the Rev. Isaac Ambrose, who was a member of the

family of Ambrose of Ambrose Hall, in Wood Plumpton, from his benefice on

account of his refusal to conform to the arbitrary regulation:—

“Whereas in a late act of Parliament for uniformitie, it is

enacted that every parson, vicar, curate, lecturer, or other

ecclesiasticall person, neglecting or refusing, before the Feast

Day of St. Bartholomew, 1662, to declare openly before their

respective congregations, his assent and consent to all things

contained in the book of common prayer established by the said

act, _ipso facto_, be deposed, and that every person not being in

holy orders by episcopall ordination, and every parson, vicar,

curate, lecturer, or other ecclesiasticall person, failing in

his subscription to a declaration mentioned in the said act to

be subscribed before the Feast Day of St. Bartholomew, 1662,

shall be utterly disabled, and _ipso facto_ deprived, and his

place be void, as if the person so failing be naturally dead. And

whereas Isaac Ambrose, late Vicar of Garstang, in the county of

Lancaster, hath neglected to declare and subscribe according to

the tenor of the said act, I doe therefore declare the church of

Garstang to be now void, and doe strictly charge the said Isaac

Ambrose, late vicar of the said church, to forbear preaching,

lecturing, or officiating in the said church, or elsewhere in

the diocese of Chester. And the churchwardens of the said parish

of Garstang are hereby required (as by duty they are bound) to

secure and preserve the said parish church of Garstang from any

invasion or intrusion of the said Isaac Ambrose, disabled and

deprived as above said by the said act, and the churchwardens are

also required upon sight hereof to show this order to the said

Isaac Ambrose, and cause the same to be published next Sunday

after in the Parish Church of Garstang, before the congregation,

as they will answer the contrary.—Given under my hand this 29th

day of August, 1662.

“Geo. Cestriens.

“To the Churchwardens of Garstang, in the County Palatine of

Lancaster.”

In this county sixty-seven ministers refused to submit to the mandate,

and were removed from their churches by the authority of documents

similar to the above, and prohibited from officiating in their priestly

capacity anywhere within the diocese. Amongst the number, so interdicted,

were the Rev. W. Bullock, of Hambleton, the Rev. Joseph Harrison, of Lund

chapel, and the Rev. Nathaniel Baxter, M.A., of St. Michael’s-on-Wyre.

The Nonconformists were subsequently subjected to even greater harshness

and injustice by an act which decreed that no clergyman, belonging to any

of their sects, should reside within five miles of the town or place at

which he had last preached, unless he took an oath as under:—

“I do swear that it is not lawful, upon any pretence whatsoever,

to take arms against the king, and that I do abhor the traitorous

position of taking arms against his authority; against his

person; or against those that are commissioned by him, in

pursuance of such commissions; and that I will not at any time

endeavour any alteration of government either in church or state.”

The sufferings experienced by those ministers who had been deprived

of their benefices are described as having been extreme, nay, almost

intolerable, and it was doubtless owing to the great severity practised

towards the body of Nonconformists that the old creed gained such little

popularity for some time after its re-establishment.

Charles II., soon after the restoration of monarchy at his coronation,

determined to create a new order of knighthood, to be called the “Royal

Oak,” as a reward to some of the more distinguished of his faithful

adherents, and amongst the number selected for the honour were Col.

Kirkby, of Upper Rawcliffe, Richard Butler, of Out Rawcliffe, and Edward

Tyldesley, of Fox Hall, Blackpool.[43] The design was shortly abandoned

by the advice of the crown ministers, who foresaw that the necessarily

limited distribution of the distinction would give rise to jealousy and

animosity amongst those who had been active in the late wars.

In 30 Charles II. a statute was passed entitled “An act for lessening the

importation of linen from beyond the seas, and the encouragement of the

woollen and paper manufactories of the kingdom”; and by it was provided,

under a penalty of £5, half of which was to be distributed to the poor of

the parish, that at every interment throughout the country a certificate

should be presented to the officiating minister stating that the winding

sheet of the deceased person was composed of woollen material and not of

linen, as heretofore. The certificate ordered to be used at every burial

ran thus:—

“_A_, of the parish of _B_, in the county of _C_, maketh Oath

that _D_, of the parish of _B_, in the county of _C_, lately

deceased, was not put in, wrapt or wound up or Buried, in any

Shirt, Shift, Sheet, or Shroud, made or mingled with Flax, Hemp,

Silk, Hair, Gold, or Silver, or other than that which is made

of Sheep’s Wool only. Nor in any Coffin lined or faced with any

cloth, stuff, or anything whatsoever, made or mingled with Flax,

Hemp, Silk, Hair, Gold, or Silver, or any other material but

Sheep’s Wool only.

“Dated the ... day of ... in the xxxth year of the reign of our

Sovereign Lord, Charles the second, king of England, Scotland,

France, and Ireland, etc.

“Sealed and Subscribed by us, who were present and witnesses to

the Swearing of the above said affidavit

(Signatures of two witnesses.)

“I, ..., esq., one of the King’s Majesties Justices of the Peace

for the County above said, do hereby certify that the day and

year above said _A_ came before me and made such affidavit as is

above specified according to the late Act of Parliament, entitled

An Act for burying in Woollen.

(Signature.)”

The foregoing statute was amended two years later, and the modified

enactment continued in force for some time, when it was repealed. In the

registers of old churches, such as Bispham, Poulton, Kirkham, and St.

Michael’s-on-Wyre, where they have been preserved, notices of burials

according to this regulation during the two years it was in operation,

may be seen; and amongst the records of the Thirty-men, or governing body

of Kirkham, is an entry of expenses incurred when they went “to justice

Stanley” to obtain his authority to “demand 50s. for Tomlinson’s wife

buried in linen,” contrary to the law.

Three years from the accession of James II., his repeated attempts to

curtail the civil and religious liberties of his subjects had so far

incensed them against him that William, Prince of Orange, was invited

over to free them from his rule. In 1688 James abdicated the throne, and

the following year William and Mary were crowned at Westminster. Annexed

is a list of the gentry residing in the Fylde from the reign of Henry

VIII., to their accession, as prepared from original records and private

manuscripts:—

Allen of Rossall Hall.

Ambrose of Ambrose Hall.

Bradley of Bryning.

Bradshaw of Preese and Scales.

Butler of Rawcliffe Hall.

Butler of Layton and Hackensall.

Clifton of Westby.

Eccleston of Great Eccleston Hall.

Fleetwood of Plumpton.

Fleetwood of Rossall Hall.

Hesketh of Mains Hall.

Kirkby of Upper Rawcliffe.

Kirkby of Mowbreck.

Leigh of Singleton.

Longworth of St. Michael’s Hall.

Lowde of Kirkham.

Massey of Carleton.

Molyneux of Larbrick Hall.

Parker of Bradkirk Hall.

Rigby of Layton Hall.

Sharples of Freckleton.

Shuttleworth of Larbrick.

Singleton of Singleton.

Singleton of Staining Hall.

Stanley of Great Eccleston Hall.

Tyldesley of Fox Hall, Blackpool.

Veale of Whinney Heys.

Westby of Rawcliffe.

Westby of Mowbreack and Burn Halls.

James II., when force of circumstances had driven him into exile, left

a considerable number of supporters behind him, chiefly amongst the

Roman Catholics, who were not dilatory in devising schemes for his

re-establishment. On the 16th of May, 1690, Robert Dodsworth deposed

upon oath, before Lord Chief Justice Holt, that the following Popish

gentry of the Fylde, amongst others, had entered into a conspiracy to

restore James, and that they had received commissions as indicated for

the purpose of raising troops to carry out the enterprise:—Colonel

Thomas Tyldesley, son of the late Sir Thomas; Captains Ralph Tyldesley,

son of the late Sir Thomas; Thomas Tyldesley, of Fox Hall, nephew to

the two preceding; Richard Butler, of Rawcliffe Hall, and Henry, his

eldest son; Thomas Westby, of Mowbreck Hall, and William, his third

son, who was designated a lieutenant; and Lieutenant Richard Stanley,

of Great Eccleston Hall. Nothing is recorded as to the result of the

above information, but in 1694 Sir Thomas Clifton, brother to Cuthbert

Clifton, of Lytham, was arraigned, with several more, on a charge of

treason in connection with a reported Jacobite plot, but was acquitted,

as also were those with him. During the course of the trial, Thomas

Patten, of Preston, as witness to the loyalty of Sir Thomas Clifton to

the existing government, stated that “in 1689 he received orders from

the Lord Lieutenant to secure several Popish gentlemen, and that amongst

them Sir Thomas Clifton was one who was taken and brought prisoner to

Preston upon the 16th day of June in that year; that Sir Thomas being a

very infirm man and unfit to be carried so far as Manchester, which was

the place where the rest of the Popish gentlemen then made prisoners were

secured, he undertook for Sir Thomas, and prevailed to have him kept

at his (Patten’s) own house in Preston, where he continued prisoner,

and was not discharged until the January following, at which time all

the gentlemen were set at liberty; that during Sir Thomas Clifton’s

confinement he expressed to him much zeal and affection to the present

government, saying how much the persons of his religion ought to be

satisfied with their usage, as putting no difference betwixt them and

other subjects save the public exercise of their religion, so long as

they themselves would be quiet, and protested for himself that he could

never endure to think of practising any change.” Further Mr. Patten

affirmed “that he knew Sir Thomas’s disposition to have always been

peaceful and quiet.” During the time that James II. was engaged in

inciting the Irish nation to espouse his cause and furnish him with an

army to invade England and regain his throne, Thomas Tyldesley, of Fox

Hall, prepared a secret chamber in that mansion for his reception. The

disastrous battle of the Boyne, however, in which James was vanquished

by William, Prince of Orange, and King of England, crushed all hope of

future success in the fallen monarch, and at the earliest opportunity he

escaped to France. In 1715, during the reign of George I., his son, the

Chevalier de St. George was proclaimed king in Scotland under the title

of James III. The earl of Mar and several other influential supporters

of the Stuarts assembled a large force and marched southwards; on

arriving at the border five hundred of the Highlanders refused to proceed

further, but the remainder passed through the northern counties as far

as Preston. Here they were besieged by the loyal troops under Generals

Carpenter and Wills, who stormed the town and forced the rebels to an

unconditional surrender. Many of the leaders were executed, whilst others

were incarcerated for various terms; the general treatment of their

unfortunate followers may be gleaned from the journal of William Stout,

of Lancaster, in which it is written:—“After the rebellion was suppressed

about 400 of the rebels were brought to Lancaster Castle, and a regiment

of Dragoons was quartered in the town to guard them. The king allowed

them each 4d. a day for maintenance, viz., 2d. in bread, 1d. in cheese,

and 1d. in small beer. And they laid on straw in stables most of them,

and in a month’s time about 100 of them were conveyed to Liverpool to be

tried, where they were convicted and near 40 of them hanged at Preston,

Garstang, Lancaster, etc.; and about 200 of them continued a year, and

about 50 of them died, and the rest were transported to America.” Thomas

Tyldesley, of Fox Hall, died in 1715, just before the outbreak of the

rebellion, but his son Edward, who succeeded him, joined the rebels.

For this act of treason he was put on his trial, but escaped conviction

and punishment through the favour of the jury, by whom he was acquitted

in spite of clear and reliable evidence that he had entered Preston at

the head of a company of insurgents with a drawn sword in his hand.

After the capitulation, when the king’s troops had entered the town and

were marching along the streets, many men from our district, who had

congregated on Spiral’s Moss, armed with fowling pieces and implements

of husbandry, joined their ranks, and a huge duck-gun belonging to a

yeoman named Jolly, from Mythorp, near Blackpool, was instrumental in

doing good service to the besiegers by slaying one Mayfield, of the

Ashes, Goosnargh. The rebel had secreted himself behind a chimney on one

of the houses, and was engaged in picking off the loyal soldiers as they

made their way along the thoroughfare below. His murderous fire was at

length put an end to by a charge from the famed gun of Jolly, whose keen

eye had detected the assassin in his hiding place. Jolly himself appears

to have had an aversion to causing the death of a fellow-creature in

cold blood, even though a rebel, and the credit of the shot is due to

a soldier, whose own weapon failed in reaching the object. The Rev. W.

Thornber tells us in his History of Blackpool, that the family of the

Jollys, for many years, treasured up the wonderful gun, and that the tale

of its exploit was circulated far and wide in the neighbourhood of their

home. From the remarks of the Rev.—Patten, who accompanied the army of

the Chevalier, as chaplain to General Forster, we learn that those who

joined the insurgents in Lancashire were chiefly Papists, and that the

members of the High-church party held aloof, much to the disappointment

and chagrin of General Forster, who, in his anger, declared “that for

the time to come he would never again believe a drunken tory.” Edward

Tyldesley, Henry Butler, of Rawcliffe Hall, and his son Richard Butler,

were the most distinguished personages amongst the small body of men

belonging to this section who openly espoused the cause of the Pretender.

The paucity of the recruits attracted by the insurgent standard from our

neighbourhood is easily to be accounted for, when it is remembered that

for many years the county of Lancashire had enjoyed an immunity from

strifes and disturbances, so that the inhabitants of the rural districts,

such as the Fylde, had settled down to the cultivation of the soil, and

would care little to assist in a work which as far as they were privately

concerned, could only terminate in the devastation of their fields,

and, probably, in the ruin of many of their households. Especially,

in 1715, would the people be disinclined to take part in or encourage

insurrectionary and warlike proceedings, for in that year extraordinarily

bountiful harvests had rewarded their labours, and general prosperity

had taught them the blessings of peace.[44] After the rebellion of 1715

many Papists registered their estates and the respective yearly values

thereof, according to an Act of Parliament passed in the reign of George

I., and amongst the number may be observed the names of sundry local

personages as:—

Annual Value.

Sherburne, Sir Nicholas, of Carleton, Hambleton, and

Stonyhurst £1210 6s. 3½d.

Butler, Mary, ⎱ wife and only child of Rich. Butler, 100 0 0

Butler, Catherine,⎰ who died in gaol, 537 0 0

Butler, Elizabeth, of Kirkland, afterwards the third

wife of Henry Butler, of Rawcliffe, 11 10 0

Butler, Christopher, second son of H. Butler, of Rawcliffe, 10 19 6

Brockholes, John, of Claughton, etc., 522 19 1

Clifton, Thomas, of Lytham, Clifton, etc., 1548 16 10½

Clifton, Bridget, 3 10 0

Blackburne, Thomas, of Wood Plumpton, 1 6 0

Blackburne, Richard, of Stockenbridge, near St. Michael’s, 21 2 0

Hesketh, William, of Mains, 198 3 4½

Hesketh, George, brother to W. Hesketh, 13 6 8

Hesketh, Margaret, widow of Thos. Hesketh, of Mains, 57 0 0

Singleton, Anne, of Staining and Bardsea, 76 15 10

Stanley, Anne, widow of Richard Stanley of Great

Eccleston, 118 15 0

Swartbreck, John, of Little Eccleston, 23 15 0

Tyldesley, Edward, of Fox Hall, and Myerscough, 720 9 2

Tyldesley, Agatha, half-sister of Edward Tyldesley, 52 10 0

Threlfall, Cuthbert, of Wood Plumpton, 31 12 6

Westby, John, of White Hall, St. Michael’s, 119 11 1

Westby, John, of Mowbreck, 230 5 1½

Westby, Thomas, ⎱ bros. of J. Westby, of Mowbreck, 20 0 0

Westby, Cuthbert, ⎰ 20 0 0

Leckonby, William, of Leckonby House, Elswick, etc., 79 11 6

Walley, Thurstan, of Kirkham, 12 0 8

Charnock, Anne, of Salwick, 1 4 0

Knott, Thomas, of Thistleton, 20 0 0

Prince Charles Edward, the son of the former Pretender, landed in the

Hebrides, in 1745, with a well-officered force of two thousand men, and

after defeating Sir John Cope, seized the city of Edinburgh and commenced

his march southwards. Crossing the border, he passed through Lancashire,

and arrived at Preston with an army barely six thousand strong. At

Preston he met with an enthusiastic welcome, the church bells were rung,

and loud cheers greeted the proclamation of his father, the Chevalier,

as king of Great Britain and Ireland. His sojourn in the town was brief,

and on the 27th of November the rebel troops set out for Manchester,

inspirited by the lively strains of “The King shall have his own again.”

Arriving at that city, they continued their march towards Derby, where,

on receiving the news that the Duke of Cumberland was at Lichfield on his

way to intercept them, Prince Charles Edward hastened to beat a retreat,

and on the 12th of December re-passed through the streets of Preston, the

wearied feet of his followers keeping time to the doleful but appropriate

air of “Hie the Charlie home again.”

The battle on the moor of Culloden, in which the rebel army was defeated

by the Duke of Cumberland, finally decided the fate of the House of

Stuart, and after experiencing many hardships, Prince Charles Edward

escaped across the channel into France. James, the son of Edward

Tyldesley who took part in the insurrection of 1715, served in the army

of the Young Pretender. During the excitement and alarm produced by these

rebellions, silver spoons, tankards, and other household treasures,

were deposited for safety in a farm house at Marton; cattle and other

farm-stock were driven to Boonley, near Blackpool, whilst money and

articles of jewelry were buried in the soil of Hound Hill in that town.

The Scots who accompanied Prince Charles were so renowned for their

voracious appetites that the householders of the Fylde prepared for their

expected visit by laying in an abundant supply of eatables, hoping that

a good repast, like a soft answer, would turn away wrath. Mr. Physic, of

Poulton, was an exception to the general rule, and having barricaded his

house, determined vigorously to resist any attack of the rebels either

on his larder or his purse. Hotly pursued by the Duke of Cumberland in

their retreat towards Scotland, the insurgents were quickly hurried

through the country, but some of the stragglers found their way to Mains

Hall, where they were liberally provided with food by Mrs. Hesketh. It

is probable that these rebels formed part of the number of Highlanders,

who were afterwards captured at Garstang, and that one of them was the

bare-footed Scot who seized the boots of John Miller, of Layton, dragging

them from his feet with the cool remark—“Hout mon, but I mon tak’ thy

brogues.” William Hesketh, of Mains, had considered it prudent to secrete

himself on the warren at Rossall until the excitement had subsided, as

in some way or other he had been mixed up with the former outbreak, and

wished to avoid any suspicion of having been implicated in this one

also. At the sanguinary and decisive battle of Culloden, two notorious

characters from Layton and Staining were present; one of them, named

Leonard Warbreck, served in the capacity of hangman at the executions

following the rebellion, whilst the other, James Kirkham, generally known

as Black Kirkham, was a gallant soldier, remarkable for his giant-like

size and immense strength. The country people near his home were wont

to declare that, for a small wager, this warrior carried his horse and

accoutrements round the cross at Wigan to the astonishment and admiration

of the by-standers. One incident of these times, reflecting little credit

on this neighbourhood, but which, as faithful recorders, we are bound

to relate, was the journey of Henry Hardicar, of Little Poulton, to

London, a distance of two hundred and thirty-three miles, all of which

he travelled on foot, solely to gratify a morbid taste by witnessing the

legal tragedies performed on Tower Hill. “I saw the lords heided” was his

invariable answer to all inquiries as to the wonders he had seen in the

metropolis. In this rising, as in the earlier one, the inhabitants of

the Fylde evinced their prudence and good sense by remaining as nearly

neutral as their allegiance to the reigning monarch would permit them.

Those insurgents who found their way into the district were treated

with kindness, but no encouragement was given them to prolong their

stay, either by professions of sympathy or offers of assistance in their

insurrectionary enterprise.

We have at last come to the end of the long chain of wars and

disturbances which from the period of the struggles between the Houses

of York and Lancaster, had exercised their baneful influence on the

territory and population of the Fylde, and are now entering on an era of

peace and unbroken prosperity. The small water-side hamlets of Blackpool

and Lytham put forth their rival claims to the patronage of the inland

residents,—

“And had their claims allow’d.”

In 1788, Mr. Hutton described the former place as consisting of about

fifty houses and containing four hundred visitors in the height of

the season. This historian also informs us, that the inhabitants were

remarkable for their great longevity, and relates the anecdote of a woman

who, forming one of a group of sympathising friends around the couch

of a dying man, exclaimed—“Poor John! I knew him a clever young fellow

four score years ago.” Lytham, also, attracted a considerable number of

visitors during the summer, and for many years was a more popular resort

than Blackpool. In Mr. Baines’s account of Lytham, published in 1825, we

read as follows:—“This is one of the most popular sea-bathing places in

the county of Lancashire; and if the company is less fashionable than at

Blackpool, it is generally more numerous, and usually very respectable.”

A list of the Catholic Chapels and Chaplains, together with the number of

their respective congregations, in the county of Lancaster, was collected

in 1819, and subjoined are enumerated those situated in the Hundred of

Amounderness:—

Place. Chapels. Priest. No. of

Congregation.

Preston 2 Revd. ⸺ Dunn ⎫

” ” ⸺ Morris⎬ 6,000

” ” ⸺ Gore ⎪

” ” ⸺ Bird ⎭

Alston Lane 1 ” ⸺ Cowburne 400

Fernyhalgh 1 ” ⸺ Blakoe 500

The Hill 1 ” ⸺ Martin 450

Claughton 1 ” ⸺ Gradwell 800

Scorton 1 ” ⸺ Lawrenson 350

Garstang 1 ” ⸺ Storey 600

New House 1 ” ⸺ Marsh 600

Cottam 1 ” ⸺ Caton 300

Lea 1 ” ⸺ Anderton 400

Willows 1 ” ⸺ Sherburne 600

Westby 1 ” ⸺ Butler 300

Lytham 1 ” ⸺ Dawson 500

Poulton 1 ” ⸺ Platt 400

Great Eccleston 1 ” ⸺ Parkinson 450

---- ------

Total 16 [45]12,650

In 1836 the first house of Fleetwood was erected, and in a few years the

desolate warren at the mouth of the Wyre was converted into a rising and

prosperous town. The rapidity of its early growth may be inferred from

the following paragraph, extracted from a volume on Lancashire, published

during the infancy of this new offspring of the Fylde:—“As a bathing

place, it possesses very superior attractions: hot water baths, inns, and

habitations of all kinds have sprung as if by magic on one of the most

agreeable sites it is possible to imagine, very superior to any other

in Lancashire, admitting, as from a central point, excursions by land

and water in all directions, amongst some of the most beautiful scenery

in the empire. A couple of hours steaming takes the tourist across

Morecambe Bay to the Furness capital, and into the heart of a district of

surpassing interest. Charming indeed is Fleetwood in the height of the

summer, with its cool sands, northern aspect, and delightful prospects.

First there is a noble bay in front, an ocean of itself when the tide is

in; and when it is out offering firm sands of vast extent, for riding

or walking.” Sir Peter Hesketh Fleetwood, bart., of Rossall Hall, lord

of the manor, and founder of the town to which he gave his name, was

returned on four occasions as one of the parliamentary representatives of

Preston:—

MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR PRESTON.

1832.—Peter Hesketh Fleetwood, and the Hon. Henry Thos. Stanley.

1835.—Peter Hesketh Fleetwood, and the Hon. Henry Thos. Stanley.

1837.—Peter Hesketh Fleetwood, and Robert Townley Parker.

1841.—Sir Peter Hesketh Fleetwood, Bart., and Sir Geo. Strickland, Bart.

The year 1840 was an auspicious one in the history of the Fylde. On the

25th of July, the Preston and Wyre Railway, running through the heart of

this district, was completed and declared open for traffic. By its means

the farmer became enabled to convey his produce to the extensive market

of Preston; and Kirkham, Poulton, and Garstang were no longer the only

towns accessible to our agriculturists for the sale of their crops. The

early appreciation of the utility and benefit of the line is apparent

from the rapid increase of its traffic, as shown by the annexed tables,

in which the official returns of passengers and goods for the week ending

Dec. 14th, 1842, and the corresponding weeks of the four succeeding years

are stated:—

Week ending Dec. 14th, 1842. 911 Passengers. £65 10s. 5d.

Goods. 62 8 1

-----------

127 18 6

-----------

Corresponding week in 1843. 1105 Passengers. 88 1 6

Goods. 140 11 9

-----------

228 13 3

-----------

Corresponding week in 1844. 1601 Passengers. 139 4 6

Goods. 163 18 11

-----------

303 3 5

-----------

Corresponding week in 1845. 1997 Passengers. 144 12 1

Goods. 234 13 4

-----------

379 5 5

-----------

Corresponding week in 1846. 2820 Passengers. 243 19 0

Goods. 308 18 5

-----------

552 17 5

-----------

At the present date, 1876, the average weekly traffic on this railway and

its branches to Lytham and Blackpool, amounts in round numbers to £1,200

for passengers, and £800 for goods.

The Preston and Wyre Railway was amongst the earliest formed, and the

impression made on the natives of this district, who had been accustomed

to the slow-going coaches, must have been one of no little amazement,

when, for the first time, they beheld the “iron horse” steaming along

the rails at a speed which their past experience of travelling would

make them regard as impossible. The following lines were written by a

gentleman named Henry Anderton, a resident in the Fylde, on the opening

of the railway:

“Some fifty years since and a coach had no power,

To move faster forward than six miles an hour,

Till Sawney McAdam made highways as good,

As paving-stones crushed into little bits could.

The coachee quite proud of his horse-flesh and trip,

Cried, ‘Go it, ye cripples!’ and gave them the whip,

And ten miles an hour, by the help of the thong,

They put forth their mettle and scampered along.

The Present has taken great strides of the Past,

For carriages run without horses at last!

And what is more strange,—yet it’s truth I avow,

Hack-horses themselves have turned passengers now!

These coaches alive go in sixes and twelves,

And once set in motion they travel themselves!

They’ll run thirty miles while I’m cracking this joke,

And need no provisions but pump-milk and coke!

And with their long chimneys they skim o’er the rails,

With two thousand hundred-weight tied to their tails!

While Jarvey in stupid astonishment stands,

Upturning both eyes and uplifting both hands,

‘My nags,’ he exclaims, betwixt laughing and crying,

‘Are good ’uns to go, but yon devils are flying.’”

The fares on the Preston and Wyre Railway at its commencement were:—

1st class. 2nd class. 3rd class.

Preston to Fleetwood or Blackpool 4s. 6d. 3s. 0d. 2s. 0d.

Preston to Poulton 3s. 6d. 2s. 6d. 1s. 6d.

Preston to Kirkham 2s. 0d. 1s. 3d. 0s. 9d.

Preston to Lytham 3s. 0d. 2s. 6d. 1s. 6d.

Until the opening of the branch lines to Lytham and Blackpool

respectively, in 1846, passengers completed their journies from Kirkham

and Poulton to those watering places by means of coaches. Three trains

ran from the terminus at Fleetwood to Preston on each week-day, and one

on Sunday, a similar number returning.

In consequence of the severe distress prevailing throughout the country,

a proclamation was issued by Her Majesty for a General Fast to be held on

Wednesday, the 24th of March, 1847; and from the public prints of that

date it is evident that the occasion was observed with great solemnity

in our division—the shops of the different towns were closed during the

whole of the day, the streets were quiet, the hotels deserted, whilst

the churches were crowded even to overflowing. This distress was caused

by an almost complete failure in the potatoe harvests; and at that time

these necessary articles of diet were sold at 26s. per load in the local

markets, whilst meal, also scarce, rose to 52s. per load.

In September of the same year, the Fylde was honoured by a passing visit

from Queen Victoria and the late Prince Consort, who arrived at Fleetwood

in the Royal Yacht on their return journey from Scotland to London. An

address was presented by Sir P. H. Fleetwood, bart., the Rev. St. Vincent

Beechey, Frederick Kemp, esq., James Crombleholme, esq., and Daniel

Elletson, esq., on behalf of the inhabitants of Fleetwood, and received

by Lord Palmerston, who promised that it should be laid before the

Queen. In the course of a few days an acknowledgment was received from

the metropolis. In Her Majesty’s book, published in 1868, and entitled

“Leaves from our Highland Journal,” these diarian entries relating to

the above event appear:—

“Monday, September 20th, 1847.

“We anchored at seven in Fleetwood Harbour; the entrance was

extremely narrow and difficult. We were lashed close to the pier,

to prevent our being turned by the tide; and when I went on

deck there was a great commotion, such running and calling, and

pulling of ropes, etc. It was a cheerless evening, blowing hard.”

“Tuesday, September 21st, 1847.

“At ten o’clock we landed, and proceeded by rail to London.”

In 1860, a project was launched for a comprehensive scheme of water

supply for the towns of this district; a company was established, and, in

the session of 1861, an act of parliament was obtained “for incorporating

the Fylde Waterworks Company, and for authorising them to make and

maintain waterworks, and to supply water at Kirkham, Lytham, Blackpool,

Fleetwood, Poulton, Rossall, Garstang, South-shore, and Bispham, in the

county palatine of Lancaster, and to shipping at Fleetwood and Lytham.”

The act granted power to take the water from Grizedale Brook, a tributary

of the Wyre, which rises in Grizedale Fell, one of the Bleasdale range,

and, flowing through the gorge or pass, called Nickey Nook, divides

the township of Nether-Wyersdale and Barnacre-with-Bonds, and falls

into the Wyre a mile or so before that river reaches Garstang. A dam

or embankment, upwards of 20 feet high, 70 feet wide at the base, and

12 feet wide at the top, was raised across the valley, converting the

upper portion of it into a reservoir. At the west end of the reservoir,

below the embankment, is a culvert, through which the water passes to

a guage, where a stipulated quantity is turned into the brook, and the

rest enters the pipe for the Fylde. Twelve miles of twelve inch pipes

carry the water to the service reservoir at Weeton. The course is down

Grizedale, under the railway, through Greenhalgh Green, Bowgrave, leaving

Garstang to the right, then past Catterall Mill, through the grounds of

Catterall Hall, and onward to the east of St. Michael’s, through Elswick,

to Weeton. The service reservoir, situated on the most elevated ground,

called Whitprick Hill, in the township of Weeton, has a diameter at the

base of 400 feet, and at the top 468 feet. The embankment is at the base

70 feet in diameter, and 12 feet at the top, with a puddle trench in it,

varying from 8 feet 8 inches to 6 feet wide. To the south a 10 inch main

takes the supply of water for Kirkham and Lytham; and from the west

side a main of similar size takes the water for Fleetwood and Blackpool,

the supply for the former place branching off near Great Marton, and

going by Bispham and Rossall. The Weeton reservoir was formed capable

of containing fifteen million gallons of water. An additional pipe,

running from Weeton through Singleton, Skippool, and Thornton, to join

the Fleetwood main at Flakefleet, near Rossall, was laid in 1875; and a

new reservoir, to hold 190,000,000 gallons, is in course of formation at

Barnacre, above Grizedale.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

History of the Fylde of Lancashire · 第 3 / 17 章