167. Dignity is the salt of art.

_Coroll._--In the Salutation of Michael Angelo,[35] the angelic

messenger emerges from solitary twilight, his countenance seems to

labour with the awful message, and his knees to bend as he approaches

the mysterious personage: with virgin majesty and humble grace Mary bows

to the extended arm of the lucid herald, as if waked from sacred

meditation, and appears entranced by celestial sounds.

The Madonnas of Raffaelle, whether hailed parents of a God, or pressing

the divine offspring to their breast, whether receiving him from his

slumbers, or contemplating his infant motions, are uniformly transcripts

from the daily domestic images of common life and of some favourite face

matronized: the eyes of his Fornarina beamed with other fires than those

of sanctity; the sense and native dignity of her lover could veil their

fierceness, but not change their language.

The Madonna of Titiano receives her celestial visitant under an open

portico of Palladian structure, and skirted by gay gardens; the usual

ray precedes the floating angel; gold-ringleted and in festive attire,

he waves a lily wand: in sable weeds the Virgin receives the gorgeous

homage, proudly devout, like a young abbess amidst her cloistered lambs.

Tintoretto has turned salutation into irruption. The angel bursts

through the shattered casement and terrifies a vulgar female; but his

wings are tipped in heaven.[36]

168. Dignity gives probability to the impossible: we listen to the

monstrous tale of Ulysses with all the devotion due to a creed. By

dignity, even deformity becomes an instrument of art: Vulcan limps like

a god at the hand of Homer: the hump and withered arm of Richard are

engines of terror or persuasion in Shakspeare; the crook-back of Michael

Angelo strikes with awe.

169. Luxuriance of ornament destroys simplicity and repose, the

attendants of dignity.

_Coroll._--"Simon Mosca, one of the most distinguished sculptors of

ornament and foliage in the sixteenth century, when proposed by Vasari

to embellish by his designs the monument of the Cardinal di Monte, was

discountenanced by Michael Angelo on this principle." Vasari, vita de

Simone Mosca.

170. Judge not an artist from the exertions of accidental vigour or some

unpremeditated flights of fancy, but from the uniform tenor, the

never-varying principle of his works: the line and style of Titian

sometimes expand themselves like those of Michael Angelo; the heads and

groups of Raphael sometimes glow and palpitate with Titiano's tints; and

there are masses of both united in Correggio: but if you aim at

character, let Raphael be your guide; if at colour, Tiziano; if harmony

allure, Correggio: they indulged in alternate excursions, but never lost

sight of their own domain.

_Coroll._--No one, of whatever period of art, of whatever eminence or

school, out-told Rembrandt in telling the story of a subject, in the

choice of its real crisis, in simplicity, in perspicuity: still, as the

vile crust that involves his ore, his local vulgarity of style, the

ludicrous barbarity of his costume, prepossess eyes less penetrating

than squeamish against him, it requires some confidence to place him

with the classics of invention. Yet with all these defects, with every

prejudice or superiority of taste and style against him, what school has

produced a work (M. Angelo's Creation of Adam, and the Death of Ananias

by Raffaelle excepted,) which looks not pale in the superhuman splendour

that irradiates his conception of Christ before Pilate, unless it be the

raising of Lazarus by Lievens, a name comparatively obscure, whose awful

sublimity reduces the same subject as treated by Rembrandt and

Sebastian of Venice, to artificial parade or common-place?

The Life and Writings of Henry Fuseli, Volume 3 (of 3) · 第 51 / 93 题