I shook my head violently. I was too exhausted to speak.

'You remember the remark? The master commented on the fact that Arthur

is a member of the first eleven. I forget Tom's exact words, but the

substance of them is this, that, though on his merits Arthur was not

worth his place, he thought it would do him such a lot of good being in

the team. Do I make myself plain, sir? He--thought--it--would--do--

him--such--a--lot--of--good--being--in--the--team!!!'

There was a pause. We sat looking at one another, forming silently with

our lips the words that still echoed through the carriage.

'Burkett-Smith,' continued my companion, 'makes a great deal of that

remark. His peroration is a very fine piece of composition. "Whether

(concludes he) the captain of a school cricket team who could own

spontaneously to having been guilty of so horrible, so terrible an act

of favouritismical jobbery, who could sit unmoved and see his team

being beaten in the most important match of the season (and, indeed,

for all that the author tells us it may have been the only match of the

season), for no other reason than that he thought a first eleven cap

would prove a valuable tonic to an unspeakable personal friend of his,

whether, I say, the Tom Brown who acted thus could have been the Tom

Brown who headed the revolt of the fags in part one, is a question

which, to the present writer, offers no difficulties. I await with

confidence the verdict of a free, enlightened, and conscientious public

of my fellow-countrymen." Fine piece of writing, that, sir?'

'Very,' I said.

'That pamphlet, of course, caused a considerable stir. Opposing parties

began to be formed, some maintaining that Burkett-Smith was entirely

right, others that he was entirely wrong, while the rest said he might

have been more wrong if he had not been so right, but that if he had

not been so mistaken he would probably have been a great deal more

correct. The great argument put forward by the supporters of what I may

call the "One Author" view, was, that the fight in part two could not

have been written by anyone except the author of the fight with

Flashman in the school-house hall. And this is the point which has led

to all the discussion. Eliminate the Slogger Williams episode, and the

whole of the second part stands out clearly as the work of another

hand. But there is one thing that seems to have escaped the notice of

everybody.'

'Yes?' I said.

He leant forward impressively, and whispered. 'Only the actual fight is

the work of the genuine author. The interference of Arthur has been

interpolated!'

'By Jove!' I said. 'Not really?'

'Yes. Fact, I assure you. Why, think for a minute. Could a man capable

of describing a fight as that fight is described, also be capable of

stopping it just as the man the reader has backed all through is

winning? It would be brutal. Positively brutal, sir!'

'Then, how do you explain it?'

'A year ago I could not have told you. Now I can. For five years I have

been unravelling the mystery by the aid of that one clue. Listen. When

Mr Hughes had finished part one, he threw down his pen and started to

Wales for a holiday. He had been there a week or more, when one day, as

he was reclining on the peak of a mountain looking down a deep

precipice, he was aware of a body of men approaching him. They were

dressed soberly in garments of an inky black. Each had side whiskers,

and each wore spectacles. "Mr Hughes, I believe?" said the leader, as

they came up to him.

'"Your servant, sir," said he.

'"We have come to speak to you on an important matter, Mr Hughes. We

are the committee of the Secret Society For Putting Wholesome

Literature Within The Reach Of Every Boy, And Seeing That He Gets It.

I, sir, am the president of the S.S.F.P.W.L.W.T.R.O.E.B.A.S.T.H.G.I."

He bowed.

'"Really, sir, I--er--don't think I have the pleasure," began Mr

Hughes.

'"You shall have the pleasure, sir. We have come to speak to you about

your book. Our representative has read Part I, and reports unfavourably

upon it. It contains no moral. There are scenes of violence, and your

hero is far from perfect."

'"I think you mistake my object," said Mr Hughes; "Tom is a boy, not a

patent medicine. In other words, he is not supposed to be perfect."

'"Well, I am not here to bandy words. The second part of your book

must be written to suit the rules of our Society. Do you agree, or

shall we throw you over that precipice?"

'"Never. I mean, I don't agree."

'"Then we must write it for you. Remember, sir, that you will be

constantly watched, and if you attempt to write that second part

yourself--"' (he paused dramatically). 'So the second part was written

by the committee of the Society. So now you know.'

'But,' said I, 'how do you account for the fight with Slogger

Williams?'

'The president relented slightly towards the end, and consented to Mr

Hughes inserting a chapter of his own, on condition that the Society

should finish it. And the Society did. See?'

'But--'

'Ticket.'

'Eh?'

'Ticket, please, sir.'

I looked up. The guard was standing at the open door. My companion had

vanished.

'Guard,' said I, as I handed him my ticket, 'where's the gentleman who

travelled up with me?'

'Gentleman, sir? I haven't seen nobody.'

'Not a man in tweeds with red hair? I mean, in tweeds and owning red

hair.'

'No, sir. You've been alone in the carriage all the way up. Must have

dreamed it, sir.'

Possibly I did.

Tales of St. Austin's · 第 56 / 57 题