EIGHTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY.

And Elijah came unto all the people and said, How long halt

ye between two opinions? If the Lord be God, follow Him; but

if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a

word.--_1 Kings 18, 21._

It was a remarkable, but wise decision that King Solomon once

rendered in a difficult case which was brought before him. Two

women came to him with an infant to which they both asserted a

mother's claim, the one contending that the other had overlaid her

child, and taken hers from her before she was awake, and laid her

own dead child in its place, whilst the other asserted that the

contrary was the truth, saying, "The dead child is hers, and the

living is mine." And now it was for the King to decide. But how was

it to be done? Solomon calls for a sword. "Divide," he commands,

"the living child in two, and give half to the one and half to the

other." Then spake, says the Holy Record, the woman whose the living

child was unto the King, for her bowels yearned upon her son, "O

my lord, give her the living child, and in no wise slay it." But

the other said, "Let it be neither mine nor thine, but divide it."

Solomon instantly recognized the true mother's heart. "Give her

the child," he said. The same it is with God, our true heavenly

Parent. He does not want His children divided; He will have them

entirely, as a whole living sacrifice, or not at all. The sum of His

commandment and will regarding us, as repeated in to-day's Gospel

lesson, is: "Thou shalt love the Lord, thy God, with _all_ thy

heart, and with _all_ thy soul, and with _all_ thy mind." Of that

would we remind ourselves in our present worship, taking for our

instruction the Scripture read as our text.

With the aid of the Holy Spirit we note Elijah's challenge on Mount

Carmel,--_A call to Christian decision_. _I. The question at issue:

"Is the Lord God?"_ _II. The obligation involved, "Then follow Him."_

Israel had had many wicked kings since the suicide of its first

monarch, Saul, upon Mount Gilboa, but none more so than Ahab. The

crowning iniquity of this unprincipled and despicable prince was the

introduction of the idol called Baal into Israel. Baal signifies

governor or ruler, and was the name given in the East to the chief

male idol of the heathen. To the honor of this idol, temples

were erected, bloody sacrifices offered, and the most shameful

things perpetrated. Ahab had married Jezebel, the daughter of the

idolatrous King of the Sidonians, and under her sway the worship

of this idol had become sinfully popular in Israel. Four hundred

and fifty priests served at his altar, and nearly an equally large

number were appointed to the worship of his mate, Ashtaroth, for

every male idol was wont to have his goddess. This abominable form

of idolatry was going on in the land where God had thundered from

the sides of Sinai as His first requirement: "Thou shalt have no

other gods before me," and had declared: "My glory will I not give

to another, nor my praise to graven images"; and in consequence

the judgments of Jehovah were not slow to follow. No rain or dew

had fallen for the space of three years, the heaven was as brass,

and the earth like a nether grindstone.--Famine stalked throughout

the land, when one day, as Ahab was wandering up and down the

country searching for food, he met the stern and fearless prophet

of Jehovah, Elijah, called the Tishbite. "Art thou he," asks the

King, "that troubleth Israel?" Elijah retorts: "Not I have troubled

Israel, but thou and thy father's house, in that ye have forsaken

the commandment of the Lord, and thou hast followed Baalim."

And so the contest is on, not so much between Elijah and Ahab as

between the supremacy of Jehovah and Baal. How is the dispute to be

settled? Elijah proposes a method. All Israel should be convened

at a place specified, Mount Carmel. Two altars were to be erected,

one by the champions of Baal, another by himself. Sacrifice was to

be laid thereupon, and the God that would answer by fire to devour

the sacrifice should be recognized victor. The test is accepted.

You, as well-informed Bible readers, know the outcome. After futile

attempts by the priests of Baal to secure the hearing of their God,

Elijah addresses his God. In fervent prayer he raises his eyes and

hands and heart to heaven. No sooner had the last words escaped the

prophet's lips than down came the fire of God consuming the whole

sacrifice and the wood, the stones, and the dust, and licked up the

water that was in the trench, whilst the fickle people fell on their

faces, crying: "The Lord, He is God; the Lord, He is God." Elijah

then follows up his victory by commanding them to seize the whole

group of Baal's priests and slay them at the brook Kishon. Thus did

Jehovah terribly and surely vindicate His honor and majesty.

What lesson may be gathered from this thrilling story? Beloved, the

conflict between the forces of the true God and His opponents is

not yet over, and, as of old, that conflict, in the final issue,

centers in a question. At that time it was, "Is Jehovah the Lord

God?" Formulated by the Lord Himself in the Gospel-lesson of this

day, it now reads: "What think ye of Christ? Whose Son is he?" Or,

in other words, Is He, Jesus Christ, God? Around that question are

rallied the religious forces of to-day. The answer to that question

determines men's attitude, their position on the one side or on the

other; their answer to that question decides the destiny of every

individual soul. According as the Gospel of Jesus Christ is accepted

or rejected, will men stand or fall. What is it in its significance

but the conflict of Mount Carmel over again? And how is this vital

question to be decided? For the determining of the question, "Is

Jesus Christ God?" there are many proofs, all of them conclusive

and incontrovertible. We might point to Christ's spotless character

and His immaculate life. "Which of you," He challenged His enemies,

"convinceth me of sin?" And none who has ever examined into His

life and character but is unstinted in His admiration and praise.

"He was holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners"; He was

divine. We could point furthermore to His teaching. Merely human

mind and merely human lips never conceived and spake as He spake. As

you study our Lord's utterances, what loftiness in His maxims, what

profundity of wisdom in His discourses! The hearers of His time were

constrained to exclaim, "Never man spake as this man speaketh," and

He taught as one having authority and not as the scribes. No wonder,

for He was the teacher come from God,--He was God.

We could point out the divine influence His religion has exerted

upon the world. Why do the nations write 1912 in the enumeration

of time? Who has taken possession of everything great and grand in

our age? Rather, should I say, who has made that which is great

and grand in art, in music, in literature--the masterpieces, the

sublimest productions? Whom do they treat of? The civilization of

to-day--whose product is it but of His religion? thus stamping it

and its Founder as divine, as God.

But, my beloved, after all these and manifold other proofs have

been adduced, there remains one more which, more than any other

proof, brings home to us the conviction that Christ is God, not

only intellectually, but morally, spiritually. From the scene upon

Mount Carmel I would direct you to a scene upon another mount,

Mount Calvary. There, too, we witness a sacrifice; there, too, lies

a victim upon an altar, the altar of the cross. The fire of God's

wrath comes from heaven to consume that sacrifice. How is that a

proof of Christ's divinity? Because it solves, as nothing else

can solve, the great problem of Religion, "How can man be saved,

justified before God?" "No man can by any means redeem his brother,

nor give to God a ransom for him." It required one more than mere

man to do that--God Himself. What man can look upon that Calvary

scene and contemplate the significance of it, but exclaim with

the Roman centurion under the cross, "Truly, this was the Son of

God,"--nor gaze upon the print of the nails in His hands, and the

mark of the spear gash in His side, but confess, with the multitude

upon Mount Carmel, "Jehovah--Jesus, He is the God! Jehovah--Jesus,

He is the God!" There is no proof so powerful that Christ is God but

the sacrifice of Calvary; yea, he who accepts not that sacrifice,

together with the resurrection of Christ, believes not in Christ.

That Old Testament scene and sacrifice points, and is a type, of

the New Testament scene and sacrifice. May the impression and the

confession it produced be the same on the lips of every one of us,

as it was yonder on Mount Carmel,--"The Lord, even Christ, is God.

He is my God."

And now let us note the obligation it involved. The particular

offense with which Elijah charges the people on this occasion is

"halting." The word translated "halting" is old English. It does

not mean standing still, but limping. Elijah's question, "How long

halt ye between two opinions?" accordingly means, "Why do you not

make up your minds; why do you not take a positive stand one way or

the other and instead of vacillating between the worship of Baal

and the worship of Jehovah, accepting neither fully, seize on to

one or the other with full conviction, and follow that with _all_

your heart?" Decision, the taking of a position and holding to it,

is the appeal of the prophet. And is his appeal not applicable in

our own day? Is there no halting, limping, swaying, and swerving

between two opinions? It is of just such people that our modern and

immediate community is full; they take an intermediate position, a

sort of betwixt and between; they are not out and out Christians,

and still they wish to be rated as Christians. They admit their

reverence for the Bible; they would not question anything taught on

its testimony; they take delight in hearing occasionally a Christian

preacher, attending upon Christian services; there is scarcely a

mental or moral persuasion in favor of Christianity which they do

not cheerfully entertain; they would not think of having their

children grow up unchristened or a marriage in the family performed

without a Christian minister, and when trouble and sorrow comes

upon them, they look to Christian sources for consolation. And

still, when the test comes for them to confess themselves in the

appointed way as Christ's disciples, to take their places at the

family table of the Christian Church, they have their excuses; they

turn their backs and go off on to something else. "They've not

been confirmed"; perchance, "they want to consider." As stated,

our immediate neighborhood is full of such halting, compromising,

so-near-and-yet-so-far people. What they want is not to "consider,"

but to act. Time for deliberation they have had plenty and long

enough. One year, ten years, finds them still "considering." What

they need is decision, action, and not to arrive at that is to

remain in a state of sin and of danger, of ingratitude to God

and discomfort to their own soul. If I am addressing any such,

and I know that I am, let them not be offended, but earnestly

regard and give up a position so unworthy, unsatisfactory, God and

Christ-dishonoring.

But does the appeal of the prophet in no wise apply to those who

have made a pronounced confession, who have taken a stand, and whose

names appear on the roster as His followers? Is there no indecision

of conduct there, no limping, no dividing of one's heart between

Baal and Jehovah? The ordinary type of Christian and church-member

is not a person of fixedness, determination, neither in doctrine

nor in practice. Baal still has his altar, only decked out in a

different shape:--in the market-places of business, in the houses

of amusements, in the halls of secret organizations and lodges.

It is not an unusual thing to see men and women in our churches

going to the Lord's Sacrament and belonging to societies which know

not Christ and will have none of Him, reject His Godship and His

sacrifice upon Calvary. It is not an unusual thing to hear men and

women, young and old, singing hymns and doxologies and speaking

words of Christian prayer, and then lifting up their voices in

speech and song that tells not whose they are and whom they serve.

The trouble with all of us is that we are not as outspoken in our

testimony, as consistent and faithful, and unflinching as we ought

to be, as our Christian duty and the honor of our Lord calls for

and deserves. Having performed our vows and service to God in His

temple, we are content to go back to the world and to business,

forgetful that there, too, we should bear faithful witness for our

Lord. From the text of the day may you form the noble resolution:

"I will be always and altogether the servant of God, the follower of

Christ; in which resolution do Thou, Lord, sustain me to the end."

Thine forever! God of love,

Hear us from Thy throne above.

Thine forever may we be

Here and in eternity.

Amen.

Faith and Duty: Sermons on Free Texts, with Reference to the Church-Year · 第 68 / 76 题