XI

The history of the antecedents of hypnotism is rich in

suggestiveness. For the historian of the inductive sciences it

illustrates the influence of the circumstances accompanying

a discovery upon the status of the discovery itself; that

the acceptance of a discovery depends more upon its logical

concordance with current scientific conceptions, upon the manner

of its demonstration, than upon the intrinsic content of what is

demonstrated. It is as difficult in science as in real life to escape

the influences of unfortunate associates; the interesting state

which we now recognize as hypnosis was naturally discredited when it

consorted with animal magnetism and the marvels of somnambulism, but

was recognized when its credentials were expressed in intelligible

physiological and psychological terms. For the historian of human

error the story is equally significant. It illustrates again that the

mental attitude essentially influences truth and error alike; that

with all due allowance for ignorance, for faulty observation, for

defective organization of knowledge, error was due, more than to any

of these, to the lack of suitable concepts for the proper absorption

and appreciation of the phenomena in their true significance. For

lack of these there was misconception and oversight, and in their

stead prepossession by notions of a wholly irrelevant character.

Such notions were fostered by what we retrospectively recognize as

pseudo-science; such was the fictitious animal magnetism, an entity

never demonstrated, but supported only by a superficial analogical

plausibility. They were fostered also by the activity of the

marvel-loving impulse, which is unresponsive to the uniformities of

nature, and favors mystic fable, while overlooking sensible fact.

"Wer unmögliches geglaubt, könnt unmögliches verrichten." The

special form of belief, the name of the system, the nature of the

explanatory theory, seem almost accidental. Throughout all times, the

same intense craving to overthrow the limitations of the human mind

has been present, and has been satisfied by much the same beliefs and

theories. Mesmerism harks back to astrology; prophets and seers have

always existed; the mystery of the attractive force of the magnet

for long made magnetism a most popular explanation of any obscure

phenomena; the same performances that convinced the mesmerist of the

existence of the magnetic fluid are evidence to the electro-biologist

of the electro-vital force, of the "od" to the followers of

Reichenbach; and--more striking still--the outfit of the modern

spiritualistic medium, the trance, the clairvoyant discovery of one's

private affairs, the reading of messages in sealed envelopes, the

conversation with absent or departed friends, are all to be found in

the annals of somnambulism. Truly, history repeats itself; and the

endless forms of mysticism, error, and extravagance seem immortal;

they change in form and accommodate themselves to the advance in

knowledge and civilization, and parody the forms of statement and the

methods of science in an age which has learned to be impressed with

scientific demonstrations.

For the special student of hypnotism no lesson of the history of its

antecedents is more practically significant than its illumination

of the extent, variety, and subtlety of unconscious suggestion. If

Puységur's subjects prescribe for their own ills and see without

their eyes; if Pétetin's read what is placed on their stomachs; or

the interposition of poor electric-conductors prevent manifestations;

if one of the subjects examined by the commission of 1784 could not

be deprived of speech unless the magnetizing band passed below his

mouth; if one of the Salpêtrière subjects of 1829 could be cured only

by immersion in the river; if Deleuze's subjects respond differently

to the minute differences in manipulations, which he believed to be

essential; if the subjects whom Braid examined could prove the truth

of phrenology, and the mesmerist's subjects feel the magnetic fluid

streaming through their systems; if within recent times paralyses are

transferred from one arm to the other by the action of a magnet, or

Dr. Luys's subjects show the characteristic effects of a drug when

a sealed vial containing it is placed upon the subject's neck, or

respond to the puppets which he has manipulated,--surely it is as

obvious that some spontaneous caprice of the subject or unconscious

suggestions of the operator have originated these notions, and that

unconscious imitation has further contributed to their dissemination,

as it is obvious that all these in part mutually contradictory

phenomena cannot be true, objective facts. The significance of more

recent investigations in allied fields still turns upon the factor

which unconscious suggestion plays in their production. The advocates

of telepathy, whether occurring under hypnotic or more normal

conditions, feel confident that unconscious suggestion as well as all

other sources of error have been eliminated; the skeptical critics

point out overlooked and novel modes of unconscious suggestion, and

draw confidence from the history of the past, both of the unwarranted

flight to improbable hypothesis on the basis of an alleged absence

of a natural explanation, and of the solvent power which future

investigation may hold in store.

The story of the conquest of a realm of fable by a campaign of

enlightenment is always a tale of interest. The opening of a new

vista directs one's gaze outward over unexplored areas. It may be,

as our seventeenth-century chronicler tells us, that "we are all

Indians and Salvages in what we have not accustomed our senses," and

that, "what was Conjuring in the last age is Mathematiques in this";

but our more extensive acquaintance with the course of discovery

and the demonstration of truth has given us a more logical sense

of the probable and the improbable; and the evolution by which

conjuring becomes mathematics is more intimately understood. The

recent establishment of hypnotism in its scientific aspects furnishes

the proper perspective for the comprehension of its antecedents;

it gives confidence that its future development will incorporate

the spirit of present research, as it will avoid the aberrations of

the past; and it gives to the story of its vicissitudes a timely

pertinence as well as a psychological significance.

Fact and Fable in Psychology · 第 89 / 119 题