IV

The consideration of the effects of a prepossession in favor of a

belief in spirit-agency leads naturally to a consideration of the

origin of the belief. This tendency to believe in the return to

earth of the spirits of the departed, is probably to be viewed as a

form of expression of the primitive animism that dominates savage

philosophy, that pervades the historical development of religion

and of science, and that crops out in various ways throughout all

grades of civilization and all levels of society. Combined with

it is an equally fundamental love for the marvelous, and a more

or less suppressed belief in the significance of the obscure, the

mysterious, the occult. These belief-tendencies, accordingly, have

an anthropological significance and an historical continuity which

Mr. Lang thus presents: "These instances prove that, from the

Australian blacks in the Bush, who hear raps when the spirits come,

to ancient Egypt, and thence to Greece, and last, in our own time,

and in a London suburb, similar experiences real or imaginary are

explained by the same hypothesis. No 'survival' can be more odd and

striking, none more illustrative of the permanence, in human nature,

of certain elements. To examine these psychological curiosities may,

or may not, be 'useful,' but, at the lowest, the study may rank as

a branch of mythology or folk-lore." Mr. Tylor fully concords with

this view: "The received spiritualistic theory," he says, "belongs

to the philosophy of savages.... Suppose a wild North American

Indian looking on at a spirit-séance in London. As to the presence

of disembodied spirits, manifesting themselves by raps, noises,

voices, and other physical actions, the savage would be perfectly

at home in the proceedings; for such things are part and parcel

of his recognized system of nature." Mr. Podmore's comment upon

the spiritualistic hypothesis expresses a kindred thought. "As the

peasant referred the movement of the steam-engine to the only motive

force with which he was acquainted, and supposed that there were

horses inside, so the spiritualists, recognizing, as they thought,

in the phenomena the manifestations of will and intelligence not

apparently those of any person visibly present, invoked the agency of

the spirits of the dead. We can hardly call this belief an hypothesis

or an explanation; it seems indeed at its outset to have been little

more than the instinctive utterance of primitive animism."

The strongly rooted, anti-logical tendencies of our nature, thus

indicated, come to the surface in various and unexpected ways,

and give rise to views and cults that have much in common with

the manifestations and beliefs of Spiritualism. It is this very

community that forms one of the recognizable stigmata of such

movements; everywhere there is an appeal to the yearning for the

mysterious, for special signs and omens that may reinforce the

personal interpretation of the events of the universe, and reveal the

transcendence of the limitations of natural law. These movements,

too, seem at different epochs to flare up and spread into true

epidemics, utterly consuming all inherent foundations of logic and

common sense, in the white heat of the emotional interest with which

they advance. It seems to matter little how trivial, how absurd,

how vulgar, how ignorant, or how improbable the manifestations may

be, the passion for belief in their mysterious origin sets all

aside. Why returning spirits should devote their energies to playing

tambourines, and conjuring with slates, to Indian dances, and vapid,

bombastic, and ungrammatical "inspirational" speeches, seems not even

to be considered. It requires as little evidence and as ridiculous

evidence to prove a spirit to a spiritualist as it did to prove a

witch to a witch-finder. Those whose feelings are not appealed to by

the doctrines of Spiritualism will assuredly never be attracted by

its logic.

The psychologist who observes the natural history of the belief in

Spiritualism,--its origin, and mode of propagation, its blossoming

and fruitage, is naturally led to consider the nature of its decline.

That it declines rapidly in the presence of newer rivals for popular

favor, appealing to much the same mental and emotional traits, and

therefore finding a similar constituency, has been made evident

in the vicissitudes of its career. It suffered considerably at the

period when the meteoric showers of Theosophy passed over our planet;

it is subject to the waning of interest that always accompanies

familiarity, and that makes even the most exciting experiences pale

with time. Such familiarity also gives opportunity for the return

of a calm and critical investigative attitude, such as the last two

decades, in particular, have brought about. That such investigation

is destined seriously to influence opinion, and eventually to triumph

over error and superstition, no one with confidence in the ultimate

rationality of mankind will be inclined to doubt. In the case of

Spiritualism, logic will find a worthy ally in the more discerning

development of the moral sensibilities which true culture always

brings with it. When it is realized that a system that aims to

instruct men in regard to beliefs appealing most earnestly and deeply

to the human heart appears in the light of exact investigation as

a tottering framework, held together by gross fraud, covered over

with innocent self-deception, but also with vulgar sham; when it is

realized that under the shelter of such a system men and women all

over our land are daily and hourly preying upon the credulity of

simple-minded folk, and obtaining a livelihood by means for which

the law provides punishment,--the moral indignation following upon

this realization will impart vigor to the protest against such

practices, which a mere sense of their irrationality would fail to

incite. The moral and æsthetic aversion which many of the practices

and tenets of Spiritualism arouses in those whose ideals are sound

and steadfast may prove to be a more serious menace to the spread of

the belief, a more potent source of its decay, than even its inherent

inconsistencies and improbabilities.

Fact and Fable in Psychology · 第 78 / 119 题