CHAPTER V

UNIVERSITY HALL--_DAVID GRIEVE_ AND "STOCKS"

1889-1892

The conversations with Stopford Brooke and Lord Carlisle mentioned in

the last chapter contained the germ of all that public work which was to

claim henceforth so large a share of Mrs. Ward's life. Up to this point

she had hardly taken any part in London committees; indeed, those

spacious days were still comparatively free from them, and it is

remembered that when the first meeting of the group with whom she was

discussing her new scheme took place at Russell Square,[15] one

irreverent child in the schoolroom next door said to its fellow, "What's

a committee?" "Oh," said the elder, in the manner of one who imparts

information, "it's when the grown-ups get together, and first they

think, and then they talk, and then they think again." At the moment no

sound was audible through the wall. "They must be thinking now," said

the instructor carelessly, leaving his junior to the solemn belief, held

for many years, that a committee was a sort of prayer-meeting.

That first group, who discussed and finally approved Mrs. Ward's draft

circular announcing the foundation of a "Hall for Residents" in London,

consisted of the following men and women besides herself: Dr. Martineau,

Dr. James Drummond, of Manchester College, Oxford, Mr. Stopford Brooke,

Lord Carlisle, Rev. W. Copeland Bowie, Dr. Estlin Carpenter, Mr.

Frederick Nettlefold, the Dowager Countess Russell, Miss Frances Power

Cobbe, and lastly, Dr. Blake Odgers, Q.C., who acted as Hon. Treasurer.

Mr. Copeland Bowie, who helped Mrs. Ward for several months as a "kind

of assistant secretary," has recorded his impressions of those crowded

days in an article which he wrote for the _Inquirer_ on April 3, 1920:

"We met in the dining-room at Russell Square. Mrs. Ward was the

moving and executive force; the rest of us were simply admiring and

sympathetic spectators of her enterprise and zeal. It is delightful

to recall her abounding activity and enthusiasm. Difficulties were

overcome, criticisms were answered, work was carried on with

extraordinary devotion and skill. Several meetings were devoted to

the consideration of how to proceed, for the pathway was beset by

many difficulties. At last, early in March, 1890, a scheme for the

establishment of a Settlement at University Hall, Gordon Square, in

a part of the old building belonging to Dr. Williams's Trustees,

was agreed upon. The religious note is very prominent. University

Hall would encourage 'an improved popular teaching of the Bible and

the history of religion, in order to show the adaptability of the

faith of the past to the needs of the present.'"

The aims of the new movement were, in fact, set forth in the original

circular in these words:

"It has been determined to establish a Hall for residents in

London, somewhat on the lines of Toynbee Hall, with the following

objects in view:

"1. To provide a fresh rallying point and enlarged means of common

religious action for all those to whom Christianity, whether by

inheritance or process of thought, has become a system of practical

conduct, based on faith in God, and on the inspiring memory of a

great teacher, rather than a system of dogma based on a unique

revelation. Such persons especially, who, while holding this point

of view, have not yet been gathered into any existing religious

organization, are often greatly in want of those helps towards the

religious life, whether in thought or action, which are so readily

afforded by the orthodox bodies to their own members. The first aim

of the new Hall will be a religious aim.

[Illustration: MRS. WARD IN 1889 (Bassano, photo.)]

"2. The Hall will endeavour to promote an improved popular teaching

of the Bible and of the history of religion. To this end

continuous teaching will be attempted under its roof on such

subjects as Old and New Testament criticism, the history of

Christianity, and that of non-Christian religions. A special effort

will be made to establish Sunday teaching both at the Hall and, by

the help of the Hall residents, in other parts of London, for

children of all classes. The children of well-to-do parents are

often worse off in this matter of careful religious teaching than

those of their poorer neighbours. There can be little doubt that

many persons are deeply dissatisfied with the whole state of

popular religious teaching in England. Either it is purely

dogmatic, taking no account of the developments of modern thought

and criticism, or it is colourless and perfunctory, the result of a

compromise which satisfies and inspires nobody. Yet that a simpler

Christianity can be frankly and effectively taught, so as both to

touch the heart and direct the will, is the conviction and familiar

experience of many persons in England, America, France and Holland.

But the new teaching wants organizing, deepening and extending. It

should be the aim of the proposed Hall to work towards such an

end."

It was natural that such ideals as these should appeal in a peculiar way

to the Unitarian community, and we find in fact that the first

subscription list, which guaranteed an income of about £700 to

University Hall for three years, contains a preponderance of Unitarian

names. Lord Carlisle and Mr. Stopford Brooke were in favour of calling

it frankly a Unitarian Settlement. "There is a life and spirit about the

things which are done by Dissenters," wrote Lord Carlisle, "which I

believe can never be got out of people who have a lingering feeling for

the Church of England." But the majority on the Committee, including

Mrs. Ward and Dr. Martineau, thought that this would be setting

unnecessary limits to the movement, which they rather intended to be a

leaven permeating the lump both of orthodoxy and of indifferentism. It

was therefore agreed not to use the word in the preliminary circular,

though all the world could see from the names on the Committee that the

tone of the new Settlement would be largely that of the younger and

freer Unitarianism which had founded Manchester College, Oxford. It was

one of Mrs. Ward's most characteristic achievements that while she

herself never sympathized with Unitarianism as an organization, she was

yet able to work closely with Unitarians in this her first great

enterprise, sharing with them their enthusiasm for the Christian message

and their austere devotion to truth, while herself cherishing that

"lingering feeling for the Church of England" which forbade her to

identify herself with any outside body while there was still hope of

influencing and widening the national Church. Yet for all practical

purposes the breach between the "new religion," as its critics

contemptuously dubbed it, and the Establishment was complete enough, and

the foundation of University Hall only confirmed the orthodox in their

disapproval of Mrs. Ward and all her works.

Besides its definitely religious aim, the new Settlement was to have a

well-marked social side as well. This is set forth in another paragraph

of the circular:

"It is intended that the Hall shall do its utmost to secure for its

residents opportunities for religious and social work, and for the

study of social problems, such as are possessed by the residents at

Toynbee Hall or those at Oxford House. There will be a certain

number of rooms in the Hall which can be used for social purposes,

for lectures, for recreative and continuation classes and so on.

Though the Hall itself is in one of the West Central Squares, it is

surrounded on three sides by districts crowded with poor. A room

could be taken for workers from the Hall in any of these districts

or in the Drury Lane neighbourhood. In addition, the Hall is close

to Gower Street Station, so that it would be comparatively easy for

the residents to take part in any of the organizations already

existing in the East or South of London, for the help of the poor

and the study of social problems."

And in spite of the religious ardour of its founders, it was in this

aspect of the work of University Hall that the germ of future

developments really lay. But the future lay hidden as yet from Mrs. Ward

and her gifted band of associates and fellow-workers.

Many difficulties were encountered in the appointment of a suitable

Warden, for a combination of qualities was required which was not easy

to find, especially in the limited circle of those whose views in

matters of faith agreed broadly with those of the Committee. Month after

month went by while Mrs. Ward and Dr. Martineau interviewed many

candidates, often assisted by Canon Barnett, of Toynbee, whose interest

in the new venture was as sincere as it was generous. Applications from

possible residents came in fast, showing that the work would not lack

support in that direction, but even in August the Warden was still to

seek. At length, however, in September, the ideal choice was made in Mr.

Philip Wicksteed, who was then holding the office of minister at the

Unitarian chapel in Little Portland Street. He was already beginning to

be widely known outside his regular work as a lecturer on Biblical

subjects and on Dante, and Mrs. Ward had already sounded him once or

twice in this matter of the Wardenship. But he had hitherto evaded it on

the ground that his election would identify the Hall with Unitarianism.

At last, however, Mrs. Ward won his acceptance at an interview she had

with him at Russell Square, in which she greeted him with the words "I

want to _wrestle_ with you!" He dealt frankly with her on the subject of

the religious aims of the Hall, and in a letter written to her a few

days after his acceptance said:

"You remember when first you spoke to me on this matter how I told

you that I had never been clear as to the exact thing contemplated

in the Hall, and had never felt that it had any programme. Under

those circumstances I felt that it would be false to myself and in

reality false to you to allow myself to be overcome by your

splendid faith and enthusiasm and take it up without any true

inspiration in pity that so noble a 'quest' should find no

knight-errant to try it.

"My work with you has considerably cleared my vision, and has

inspired me with growing _hopes_ for the institution, but I cannot

honestly say that it has given me any deep _faith_ in its success.

You know how anxious I have been throughout about our audience for

lectures, and how doubtful about the existence of any large public

seriously interested in Biblical studies. My fears are not allayed;

though I hope the result may put them to shame."

With Mr. Wicksteed's acceptance of the Wardenship, the arrangements for

lectures and the preparations for the reception of Residents were

pushed on apace, while the Committee decided that a formal opening

ceremony must be held in order to plant the flag of the new Settlement's

faith and ideals. The Portman Rooms were taken for the purpose; the

venerable Dr. Martineau consented to be in the chair, and Mrs. Ward was

to make the principal speech. She had never spoken in public before, and

was genuinely terrified at the prospect (three years later she put into

_Marcella's_ experience in the East End her own horror of extempore

speaking); but she prepared her address with great care, and was

afterwards told that her voice carried to the farthest limits of the

room, packed as it was with a keenly expectant audience. Her plea was

that the time had come for a reconstruction of the basis of Christian

belief; that the results both of Darwinian inquiry and of historical

criticism must be faced, especially in the teaching of children, but

that when the "search for an exacter truth, which is the fate and

mission of humanity" had been met, a possibility of faith remained which

would be the future hope of the world. To the elucidation of this faith

the efforts of the Hall, on its teaching and lecturing side, would be

devoted. And in speaking of the "social and practical effort which is an

_essential_ part of our scheme," she pleaded that it was "yet not its

most distinctive nor its most vital part. The need of urging it on

public attention is recognized in all camps. Yet, meanwhile, there are

hundreds of men and women who spend themselves in these works of charity

and mercy who are all the time inwardly starved, crying for something

else, something more, if they could but get it. What matters to them,

first and foremost--what would give fresh life to all their

efforts--would be the provision of a new motive power, a new hope for

the individual life in God, a new respect for man's destiny. Let me

recall you for a moment from the gospel of works to the great Pauline

gospel of faith, and the inner life! It is in the bringing back of

_faith_--not the faith which confuses legend with history, or puts

authority in the place of knowledge, but the faith which springs from

moral and spiritual fact, and may be day after day, and hour after hour,

again verified by fact--that the great task of our generation lies."

Thus was the new venture launched, amid a mingled chorus of admiration

and criticism from that section of the world which was affected by the

movement of ideas. The lecturing at University Hall was soon in full

swing, and was maintained at a very high level during the years 1891 and

1892, so that when Mrs. Ward went on a speaking tour to some of the

northern towns in the autumn of the latter year in order to appeal for

funds for a further period of three years (an appeal in which she was

completely successful), she was able to give a very remarkable account

of it. Many courses on both Old and New Testament criticism had been

given, by Mr. Wicksteed, by Dr. Estlin Carpenter, by M. Chavannes, of

Leyden; on the Fourth Gospel by that fine scholar, Mr. Charles Hargrove;

on Theism by Prof. Knight, and on the Gospel of St. Luke by Dr.

Martineau himself. These latter took place on Sunday afternoons during

the spring of 1891. "Sunday after Sunday," said Mrs. Ward, "the Hall of

Dr. Williams's Library was crowded to the doors, and, I believe by many

to whom the line of thought followed in the lectures was of quite fresh

help and service; and it will be long indeed before many of us forget

the last Sunday--the venerable form, the beautiful voice, the note of

unconquerable hope as to the future of faith, and yet of unconquerable

courage as to the rights of the mind! I at least shall always look back

to that hour as to a moment of consecration for our young Institution,

disclosing to us at once its opportunities and its responsibilities." In

the non-Biblical sphere Mrs. J. R. Green had given a series of lectures

on the development of the English towns[16]; Miss Beatrice Potter (soon

to become Mrs. Sidney Webb) a course on the Co-operative Movement, which

became the foundation of her great book on that subject; Mr. Graham

Wallas on "The English Citizen"; Mr. Stopford Brooke on "The English

Poets of the Nineteenth Century"; while the Warden lectured to large

audiences on Dante, and "ground away" (in his own words) at political

economy, thinking aloud before his band of students and "forging forward

on new lines." It was all very stimulating, very much alive; but

whether, as the months passed on, it was exactly carrying out the aims

and intentions of that opening day, some sympathetic observers began to

doubt.

"I was uneasy all the time," wrote Mr. Wicksteed afterwards to J.

P. T., "because though I thought I was working honestly and in a

way usefully, yet I could never quite feel that the Settlement was

doing the work it set out to do, or that it was quite justifying

its subscription list. But I don't believe your mother, in spite of

a great measure of personal disappointment, ever had the smallest

doubt or misgiving in this matter. She thoroughly believed in the

significance and value of what _was_ being done, and cared for it

with a vivid faith and affection, and supported it with an

inventive enthusiasm, that have always seemed to me the expression

of a generosity and magnanimity of a type and quality that were

quite distinctive."

An energetic attempt was made to interest the young men employed in the

big shops of Tottenham Court Road in the Hall's activities; but the

times were premature; not until the Great War had loosed the foundations

of our society did the young men of Tottenham Court Road find their way

into the Y.M.C.A. "The young men of Tottenham Court Road," wrote Mr.

Copeland Bowie, "gave no sign that they wished to partake of the food

provided for them at University Hall." Then, somewhat apart from the

lecturing scheme of the Hall, there grew up the body of Residents, young

men of divers attainments and tastes who were hard to mould into the

original scheme, some of whom were even greatly concerned to show that

they depended in no way for their ideas on the author of _Robert

Elsmere_. Occasionally there were difficult moments at the Council

meetings, when the Residents' views clashed with those of the older

members, but it was at those moments, and generally in her gift for

bowing to the inevitable when it came, that Mrs. Ward endeared herself

most to her fellow-workers by her rare great-heartedness. During their

first winter's work at the Hall the Residents had discovered, in the

squalid neighbourhood to the east of Tavistock Square, a dingy building

that went by the name of Marchmont Hall, which they decided to take as

the scene of their regular social activities. They raised a special fund

for its expenses, and under the leadership of a young solicitor, who

combined much shrewdness and ability with a glowing enthusiasm for the

service of his fellow-men, the late Mr. Alfred Robinson, the suspicions

of the neighbourhood were overcome and a fruitful programme of boys'

clubs, men's clubs, concerts and lectures launched by the autumn of

1891. Mrs. Ward was deeply interested in the experiment, and hoped

against hope that it might lead to those opportunities for Christian

teaching which still lay very near her heart. A year later she was able

to give the following account of their first attempts in that direction:

"The Sunday evening lectures are preceded by half an hour's music,

and have been from the first more definitely ethical and religious

in tone than those given on Thursday. But it is only quite recently

we have felt that we could speak freely, without danger of

misunderstanding, upon those subjects which are generally

identified by the working-classes with sectarian and ecclesiastical

propaganda. Now that we are known we need have no fear; and on

November 12 the Warden, who had already spoken on the prophets of

Israel and other kindred topics, gave an address on the life and

character of Jesus. It was received with warm feeling, and more

lectures of the same kind have already been arranged for. Next term

we hope a class in the Gospels, already begun, may take larger

proportions. Among the boys and young men of the Hall, often

intelligent and well-educated as they are, there is an

extraordinary amount of sheer ignorance and indifference as to the

Christian story and literature, even when they have had their full

share of the usual Sunday School training. To some of us there

could be no more welcome task, to be undertaken at once with

eagerness and with trembling, than that of making old things new to

eyes and hearts still capable of that 'admiration, hope, and love'

by which alone we truly live."

But the movement never developed, for in truth there was no Elsmere to

lead it; Mrs. Ward herself went three times to take a boy's class on

Sunday afternoons, but could not, in the midst of her other work,

maintain the effort; the Warden, versatile as he was, did not regard it

as his _first_ interest, while from the body of Residents came a dumb

sense of antagonism, not amounting to direct opposition, but just as

effective, which in the end prevailed. The "School" of Biblical studies

at University Hall continued as before, appealing to a definite class of

students and educated persons of the middle-class, but the attempt to

fuse it with the social work at Marchmont Hall was doomed to succeed as

little as the attempt to attract to it the half-educated shopmen of

Tottenham Court Road. Gradually the human interest of the experiment,

the sense of romance and adventure, went over from the lecturing side to

the work at Marchmont Hall, where the popular lectures and discussions,

the Saturday evening concerts and the Saturday morning "play-rooms" for

children were making a real mark on the life of the district. But Mrs.

Ward was fully able to recognize this, and accepted in an ungrudging

spirit the different direction which circumstances had given to her own

cherished dreams.

"It will be seen readily enough," wrote Mr. Wicksteed in the

memorial pamphlet issued by the Passmore Edwards Settlement, "that

it was on the side of the School rather than on that of the

Residence that Mrs. Ward's ideals seemed to have the best chance of

fulfilling themselves. Yet in truth it was in the Residence that

the germ of future development lay. The greatness of Mrs. Ward's

character was shown in her recognition--painful and unwilling

sometimes, but always brave and loyal--of this fact. She could not

and did not relinquish her "Elsmerean" ideals. The romance of

_Richard Meynell_, published twenty-three years after _Robert

Elsmere_, shows them in unabated ardour. The failure of the

Residence to amalgamate with the School was the source of deep

distress to her. She sometimes suggested measures for overcoming it

that did not approve themselves to her colleagues, but throughout

she never suspected their loyalty, and never failed in her own. It

needed rare magnanimity. Patience seems too passive a word to apply

to so ardent a spirit, but something that did the work of patience

was very truly there. And as she came to recognize that with the

available material the Settlement could not be the embodiment of

her full ideal, she withdrew her vital energies from the attempt to

force a passage where none was possible, she steadily refused to

let blood flow through a wound that could be and should be healed,

and she threw all the strength of her inventive and resourceful

mind--and what is more the full stream of her affection and joy in

accomplished good--into the development of such branches of her

purpose as by that agency could be furthered."

By the year 1893 the situation as between University Hall and Marchmont

Hall had become a curious one, since the former was too large and

expensive for its purpose and the latter not nearly large enough. Mrs.

Ward and her friends came to the conclusion that some scheme must be

devised for combining the activities of both institutions under one

roof; but since no suitable building existed anywhere in the

neighbourhood of Marchmont Hall, where deep roots had been struck in the

affections of the working population, it became obvious that the only

solution was to build. Through the early spring of 1894 Mrs. Ward

laboured to interest the old friends of University Hall in an appeal for

a Building Fund of £5,000; but it was uphill work; her health had

suffered greatly from the long strain, and there were moments when hope

sank very low. Then, one evening in May of that year, the postman's

knock sounded below, and one of us went down as usual to fetch the

letters. There was but a single dull-looking letter in an ordinary

"commercial envelope." "Only a bill," announced the bearer, as it was

placed in Mrs. Ward's hands. She opened it, glanced at the signature,

read it rapidly through, and then, with a little cry, exclaimed: "Mr.

Passmore Edwards is going to build us a Settlement!"

She had written to him at last, knowing of him--as all that generation

knew--mainly as the generous founder of Free Libraries, but without much

hope that he would seriously take up the Marchmont Hall building scheme.

At that time the Committee were in favour of a site in Somers Town,

north of the Euston Road, the advantages of which Mrs. Ward had set

forth in her letter to Mr. Edwards. His answer ran as follows:

_May 30, 1894._

MY DEAR MADAM,--

Since I received your letter in Italy I have considered your

suggestion in reference to the extension in ampler premises of

University Hall Settlement, and thereby planting as you say a

Toynbee Hall in the Somers Town district. I have also visited the

district in and around Clarendon Sq., and am convinced that such an

Institution is as much wanted in North London as it was wanted in

East London. I therefore cheerfully respond to your appeal, and

undertake to provide the necessary building within the limits of

the sum you indicate, if somebody will provide a suitable site. The

vacant place in Clarendon Sq. would, I consider, be a convenient

spot for the Settlement. As a matter of course, provision must be

made that the building shall be permanently devoted to the purpose

now intended. In my opinion we have the two things most necessary

in the Somers Town district for a Toynbee Hall: we have a numerous

working population requiring educational assistance and advantages;

and we have in the neighbourhood many able and willing workers

ready to assist in works of intellectual, moral and social culture.

I remain,

Yours faithfully,

J. PASSMORE EDWARDS.

This was her first great victory on the road to the building of the

Passmore Edwards Settlement. That road was still to be a long and

difficult one, but she was not to be discouraged, and where many lesser

souls would have fallen out by the wayside, wearied by ill-health and by

the multiplication of obstacles, she persisted, and won in the end a

vantage-ground in the fine buildings of the Settlement, whence, in the

course of time, she could pass on to new and various achievements.

Heavy and exacting as the work of University Hall was during the first

three years of its existence, and glum as the face of our coachman was

wont to look at the reiterated orders to drive there (for he disapproved

of his horse being kept waiting in the street while people were just

talking), Mrs. Ward never allowed it to absorb her mind completely.

Indeed, these years saw the writing of her second three-volume novel,

_The History of David Grieve_, as well as many important developments in

our domestic affairs. The house on Grayswood Hill, near Haslemere, was

rising fast during the early months of 1890, while the principles of the

new Settlement were being thrashed out in the study at Russell Square,

and at length Mrs. Ward tore herself away from London, stipulating for a

six weeks' break from the affairs of University Hall, buried herself in

a neighbouring house named "Grayswood Beeches," wrote _David_ hard, and

kept a watchful eye on the plasterers and painters at work on "Lower

Grayswood" below. She took the keenest interest in every detail of the

new house, planning it out in daily letters to her husband, and yet as

it drew near completion she could not help rebelling at its very

newness, at the half-made garden and the plantations of birch and larch

and pine which covered much of the nine acres of ground, while of real

trees there was hardly one. Waves of longing would assail her for

Hampden House, with its silence and its spaciousness, its old lawns and

trees, and its complete absence of neighbours. "How I have been

hankering after Hampden lately!" she writes to her father in June, 1890,

and to her husband she confesses that she has been to the agent's to

inquire whether Hampden could be let for a term of years. "They don't

think so. I told them to inquire without mentioning our names at all."

Hampden, however, was not to be had, and when once she was established

in Lower Grayswood, Mrs. Ward took more kindly to the house, which had

from its windows one of the most astonishing views in all the South of

England. Yet still she wrote to her father: "I doubt whether I shall be

content ultimately without an old house and old trees! If one may covet

anything, I think one may covet this kind of inheritance from the past

to shelter one's own later life in. Life seems so short to make anything

quite fresh. Meanwhile, Lower Grayswood is very nice, and more than we

deserve!"

The verdict of children and friends was indeed unanimous in praise of

the poor new house, whence endless fishing expeditions were made to

muddy little brooks in the plain below, almost compensating for the loss

of Forked Pond and the other barbarian delights of Borough Farm. But

even the children realized that there were "too many people about" for

the health of their mother's work. The pile of cards on the hall table

grew ominously thick. Americans walked in, taking no denial, and once in

mid-August, when the youngest child tactlessly won a junior race at the

Lythe Hill Sports, with all Haslemere looking on, there were paragraphs

in the evening papers. It would not do, and I think the house at

Haslemere was doomed from that day onwards. Still, for two years it

played its part delightfully in the web of Mrs. Ward's life, giving her

quiet, especially in the autumn and winter, for the writing of _David

Grieve_, giving her deep draughts of beauty which were not forgotten in

after years. The lodge was made a home for tired Londoners, whether boys

or mothers or factory-girls, and the house itself was never long empty

of guests.

There, too, in the book-lined room which she had made her study, she

would on Sunday evenings carry out in practice those ideas on the

teaching of the Bible which she had striven to inculcate at University

Hall. The audience sat on low stools or lay on the floor, while she read

to them usually a part of the Gospels, making the scene live again, as

only she could make it, not only by her intimate knowledge of the times,

but by her gift of presentation. Systematically, making us use our minds

to follow her, she would work through a section of St. Mark or St.

Matthew, comparing each with the other, showing the touches of the

"later hand," taking us deep into the fascinating intricacies of the

Synoptic Problem. But all the time the central figure would grow clearer

and clearer, in simple majesty of parable or act of healing, while at

the greatest moments commentary fell away and only the old words broke

the stillness. She was immensely interested in the problem of the

Master's own view of himself and his mission, following him step by step

to the declaration at Cæsarea Philippi, then tracing the gathering

conviction that in himself was to be fulfilled Isaiah's prophecy of the

Suffering Servant. She was inclined to reject the prophecies of the

Second Coming as showing too obviously the feeling of the second

generation, as being unworthy of him who said, "The Kingdom of God is

within you." But in later years she came to regard them as probably

based on utterances of his own, for was he not, after all, the child of

his time and country? With an episode like the Transfiguration she would

show us the elements of popular legend from which it was put together,

fitting piece into piece till the whole stood out with a new freshness,

throwing its light backwards over the age-long Jewish expectations of

the return of Moses and Elijah. So with the Resurrection stories; she

bade us always remember the teeming soil from which they sprang, in that

long-past childhood of the world; how none of them were written down

till forty years, most of them not till sixty and seventy years, had

passed since the Crucifixion; how the return from Hades on the third day

is at least as old as Alcestis. These things, she said, forbade us to

accept them as literal fact; but it was impossible to listen to her

reading of the Walk to Emmaus, or the finding of the empty tomb, without

coming under the spell of an emotion as deep as it was austere. For the

fact that we in these latter days had outgrown our childhood and must

distinguish truth from phantasy was no reason in her mind, why we should

renounce the poetic value of scenes and pictures woven into the very

fabric of our being. And so, Sunday after Sunday, our little minds drank

in a teaching which she would fain believe could have been spread

broadcast among our generation, could the ideals of University Hall but

reach the masses. She did not realize how unique her teaching was, nor

how few among her generation combined such knowledge as hers with such a

power of instilling it into other minds and hearts.

* * * * *

The writing of _David Grieve_ was a long-sustained effort, extending

over the best part of three years, and too often performed under the

handicap of writer's cramp and sleeplessness. But Mrs. Ward was at the

prime of her powers, and felt herself more thoroughly master of her

material in this book than she had done in the case of _Robert Elsmere_,

so that the revision, when it came, was a matter of weeks and not of

months. Her visits to Manchester and Derbyshire for the local colour of

the book had inspired her with a vivid faith in the working population

of the north, which finds expression in a letter written to her father

in September, 1890, in reply to criticisms which he, with his Catholic

prepossessions, had made on the unloveliness of their lives:

"You and I would not agree about New Mills, I am afraid! At least,

if New Mills is like Bacup and the towns along the Irwell, as I

suppose it is. After seeing those mill-colonies among the moors, I

came home cheered and comforted in my mind for the future of

England--so differently may the same things affect different

people. Beatrice Potter told me that she had stayed for some time

incog. as one of themselves with a family of mill-hands at Bacup,

and that to her mind they were 'the salt of the earth,' so good and

kind to each other, so diligent, so God-fearing, so truly

unworldly. She attributed it to their religion, to those hideous

chapels, which develop in them the keenest individual sense of

responsibility to God and man, to their habit of combination for a

common end as in their Co-op. Societies and Unions, and to their

real sensitiveness to education and the things of the mind, up to a

certain point, of course. And certainly all that I saw last autumn

bore her out. I imagine that if you were to compare Lancashire with

any other manufacturing district in Europe, with Belgium, with

Lyons, with Catalonia, it would show favourably as regards the type

of human character developed. All the better men and women are

interested in the things that interested St. Paul--grace and

salvation, and the struggle of the spirit against the flesh, and

for the rest they work for their wives and children, and learn

gradually to respect those laws of health which are, after all, as

much 'set in the world,' to use Uncle Matt's phrase, as beauty and

charm, and in their own way as much a will and purpose of God. Read

the books about Lancashire life a hundred years ago, and see if

they have not improved--if they are not less brutal, less earthy,

nearer altogether to the intelligent type of life. That they have

far to go yet one cannot deny. But altogether, when London fills me

with despair, I often think of Lancashire and am comforted for the

future. I think of the people I had tea with at Bacup, all

mill-hands, but so refined, gentle and good; and I think of the

wonderful development of the civic sense in a town like Oldham,

with all its public institutions, its combinations of workpeople

for every possible object, and its generally happy and healthy

tone. I wish the streets were less ugly, but after all, our climate

is hard and drives people indoors three-parts of the year, and the

race has very little artistic gift."

Meanwhile, the Copyright Committee was again hard at work in the United

States, arousing much anxious speculation in Mrs. Ward's mind as to

whether their Bill would be through Congress in time for her new book;

but in the end the victory came more easily and swiftly than was

expected. Congress passed it in November, 1890, and it became law in the

following March. The effect on Mrs. Ward's fortunes was not long in

making itself felt. Mr. George Smith had been negotiating for her with

an American firm that offered good but not magnificent terms for _David

Grieve_; he was dissatisfied, and in his wise heart bethought him of her

old friends the Macmillans, who had an "American house." The sequel must

be told in his own words:

15, WATERLOO PLACE, S.W.

_June 13, 1891._

DEAR MRS. HUMPHRY WARD,--

I met Frederick Macmillan in the Park this morning. It flashed on

my mind that I would sell him the American copyright of your book,

and after a long talk (which made me late for breakfast) I promised

him that if he made me a firm offer of seven thousand pounds for

the American copyright, including Canada, before one o'clock

to-day, I would accept it on your behalf. He has just called here

and written the enclosed note. I am rather pleased with myself, and

I hope that you will not reproach me. I write in haste, for I shall

feel rather anxious until I have a line from you on the subject.

Believe me,

Yours sincerely,

G. M. SMITH.

Needless to say, the "line" was forthcoming, and Mrs. Ward was left to

contemplate, with some emotion, the fact that she was mistress of a

little fortune. Whether the Macmillans remained as contented with their

bargain as she was is, however, a point of some obscurity. Certainly

they desired her next book (_Marcella_), which amply made up to them for

any shortcomings on _David Grieve_, but during the negotiations for it

some uncomfortable tales leaked out. "Mr. Brett told me," wrote Mrs.

Ward to George Smith, eighteen months after the appearance of _David_,

"that owing to the description of profit-sharing in _David Grieve_ and

the interest roused by it in America, their American branch adopted it

last year for all their employés. Then in consequence of _David_ there

were no profits to divide! I don't know whether to laugh or cry over the

situation, and I am quite determined that if there are losses this time

I will share them."

But as yet the prospect was unclouded, and the summer of 1891 was spent

in a hard wrestle with the remaining chapters of the book--with the

tragedy of Lucy and the sombre fate of Louie Grieve--but at length, on

September 24, the last words of _David Grieve_ were written, and on

October 16 she and Mr. Ward fled for nine weeks to Italy.

It was not their first visit, for in the spring of 1889 they had spent

eight days in Rome, making their first Italian friendships and learning

something of the spell of that city of old magic. "In eight days one can

but scratch the surface of Rome," she had written to her father on that

occasion. "Still, I think Lord Acton was quite right when he said to us

at Cannes, 'If you have only three days, go!' To have walked into St.

Peter's, to have driven up on to the Janiculan and seen the view of

Rome, the Alban Hills, the Campagna and Soracte which you get from

there, to have wandered about the Forum and Colosseum and to have

climbed the Palatine and the Capitol, is something after all, even if

one never saw this marvellous place again."

Now this second time she was so tired that they passed Rome by on the

outward journey and went instead to Naples, Amalfi and Ravello, where

the good Signora Palumbo, landlady of the famous little inn, tended her

as she lay quite fallow, browsing in books or gazing at sea and sky and

sunny coast. But a visit to Pompeii could still arouse all her

historical instincts:

"To sit in the Forum there," she writes to her sister, Mrs. Leonard

Huxley, "or in one of the bright gaily painted houses, or

restaurants with the wine-jars still perfect in the marble

counters, and to think that people were chatting and laughing in

those very courts and under those very pictures while Jesus was

before Pilate, or Paul was landing at Puteoli, on the same coast

some twenty miles north, made an electric moment in life. It is so

seldom one actually _feels_ and _touches_ the past. After seeing

those temples with their sacrificial altars and _cellæ_, their

priests' sleeping-rooms and dining-rooms, I read this morning St.

Paul's directions to the Corinthians about meat offered to

idols--in fact, the whole first letter--with quite different eyes."

To the same beloved sister she was indebted for the inimitable tales of

her small boy, Julian, which enliven the later pages of _David Grieve_;

for Sandy Grieve was taken direct from this little grandson of the

Professor--an "impet" indeed, in his mother's expressive phrase. "Your

stories of Julian have been killing," wrote Mrs. Ward from Naples; "I

was sorry one of them arrived too late for _David_. By the way, I have

not yet written to Willie to say that Sandy is merely an imperfect copy

of Julian. He writes 'We both _love_ Sandy.' And I am sure when the book

comes out that Sandy will be the making of some of the last part."

A month after Mrs. Ward's return to England, that is on January 22,

1892, _David Grieve_ appeared, and was at once greeted with a chorus of

praise, criticism and general talk. "Were there ever such contradictory

judgments!" wrote Mrs. Ward to her publisher when the book had been out

a week. "The Master of Balliol writes to me that it is 'the best novel

since George Eliot'--'extraordinarily pathetic and interesting'--and

that Louie is a sketch that Victor Hugo might have drawn. A sledgehammer

article in the _British Weekly_ to-night says 'it is an almost absolute

failure.' Mr. Henry Grenfell and Mr. Haldane have been glued to it till

they finished it. According to other people it is 'ordinary and

tedious.' Well, one must possess one's soul a little, I suppose, till

the real verdict emerges." The reviews were by no means all laudatory,

much criticism being bestowed on the "Paris episode" of David's

entanglement with Elise Delaunay, but the general verdict certainly was

that it showed a marked advance on _Robert Elsmere_ in artistic

treatment, as well as a power of character-drawing that had not been

seen since _Middlemarch_. This feeling was summed up in Walter Pater's

sentence: "It seems to me to have all the forces of its predecessor at

work in it, with perhaps a mellower kind of art--a more matured power of

blending disparate literary gifts in one." Letters poured in upon her

again, both from old friends and strangers. "Max Creighton," now Bishop

of Peterborough, who was never tired of poking fun at Mrs. Ward about

the "higher criticism," found time to dash off ten closely written

sheets of pseudo-solemn investigation into the authenticity of David's

life-story, beginning: "Though I am prepared to believe that David

Grieve was a real personage, it is clear that many mythical elements

have been incorporated into his history, and it is the function of

criticism to disentangle the real man from the legendary accretions

which have gathered round him." Mrs. Ward replied in suitable vein, and

confided to her friend that a few of the reviews had made her very sore.

"I am very sorry to hear," he replied, "that some criticism has been

ungenerous.... But I think that we all have to learn the responsibility

attached to undertaking the function of a teacher, and the inevitable

antagonism which the claim arouses. It has been so always. No amount of

rectitude or good intentions avail."

But the warm admiration expressed by those for whose opinion she cared

amply made up for the hostility of these reviews. As she said of it in

her _Recollections_: "It has brought me correspondence from all parts

and all classes, more intimate and striking perhaps than in the case of

any other of my books." Many pages might be filled with these letters,

but at a distance of thirty years two only shall be saved from oblivion,

for the sake of that mere quality of delight which pervades them both

and which endeared their writers beyond other men to the company in

which they moved. The first is from Professor Huxley; the second from

Sir Edward Burne-Jones.

HODESLEA, STAVELEY ROAD,

EASTBOURNE.

_February 1, 1892._

MY DEAR MARY,--

You will think I have taken my time about thanking you for _David

Grieve_; but a virtuous resolution to stick to a piece of work I

have had on hand for a long time interfered with my finishing it

before last night. The temptation was severe, and as I do not often

stick to virtuous resolutions under these circumstances, I parade

the fact.

I think the account of the Parisian episode of David's life the

strongest thing you have done yet. It is alive--every word of

it--and without note or comment produces its ethical effect after

the manner of that "gifted authoress," Dame Nature, who never

moralizes.

Being "nobbut a heathen," I should have liked the rest to be in the

same vein--the picture of a man hoping nothing, rejecting all

speculative corks and bladders--strong only in the will "im Ganzen,

Guten, Wahren resolut zu leben," and accepting himself for more or

less a failure--yet battling to the end. But you are on the side of

the angels.

We are very proud of Julian's apotheosis. He is a most delightful

imp, and the way in which he used to defy me, on occasion, when he

was here, was quite refreshing. The strength of his conviction that

people who interfere with his freedom are certainly foolish,

probably wicked, is quite Gladstonian.

My wife joins in love.

Ever yours affectionately,

T. H. HUXLEY.

* * * * *

THE GRANGE,

49, NORTH END ROAD,

WEST KENSINGTON, W.

_Saturday morning._

MY DEAR MRS. WARD,--

The book has just come--and to my pride and delight with such a

pretty autograph: so that to-day I am mightily set up. I cannot

tell you how comforting the words read to me--and how sunny they

have made this grey day. By the messenger who takes this I send a

little drawing, done in gold, which for a whole year past I have

meant for you--it was to reach you by your last birthday, but I was

ill then with this vile plague that is devastating us, and after

that there seemed no reason for sending it one day more than

another, and as I looked at it again it didn't seem good enough,

and I thought one day you would come and choose a little souvenir

of friendship--one perhaps more to your liking--but this day has

never come, and all the year through illnesses big or little have

pursued me and nipped all plans. But will you take it with my

love--real grateful love; it's a kind of Urania sort of person, and

will be proud to live in your bower in the country.

We are a poor lot--my wife kept to her room for about a month; Phil

imprisoned in a room with carbolic curtains round him as if he were

a leper, and I--too ignominious at present to be spoken

about--longing to go out and see an omnibus--I _should_ like to

see an omnibus again!

My love to you all,

Yours, E. B. J.

P.S.--The first day I can get out I shall call and take my chance

of seeing you. Don't dream of writing about the poor little

drawing; I should be ashamed, and you are full of work.

The "kind of Urania sort of person" shed a radiance all her own over our

house from that day onwards, and was removed before long to a "country

bower" after Mrs. Ward's own heart.

For early in 1892 her attention was drawn by her old friend, Mr. (now

Sir James) Thursfield, who lived near Berkhamsted, to the fact that some

five miles farther from London, in the heart of a district as rural and

unspoilt as any that could be found in England, stood a comfortable

eighteenth-century house of medium size which happened recently to have

come into the market. Sir Edward Grey had just inherited it through his

mother under the will of old James Adam Gordon, its possessor in the

'forties and 'fifties; but since the place was far from any trout-stream

he did not propose to live in it, but wished instead to find a tenant to

take it for a term of years. Its name was simply "Stocks," and though

the house itself was only 120 years old, a far older manor-house had

been pulled down to make way for it; while the little estate--"the

stokkes of the parish of Aldbury"--is mentioned in a fifteenth-century

charter as forming an outlying part of the huge diocese of Lincoln. Mr.

Thursfield persuaded Mr. and Mrs. Ward to come and see it, winter though

it was. They fell in love with it there and then, and within a few weeks

it was decided that Grayswood should be sold and Stocks taken for seven

years. Mrs. Ward felt that she had found at last the home she had been

seeking.

"You know how we have always hankered after an old place with old

trees," she wrote to her brother Willie, "and when the Thursfields

made us come down and see the place and declared we must and should

take it we couldn't in the end resist! It has such an old walled

garden, such a beautiful lime avenue, such delicious old hollies

and oaks, such woods behind it and about it! The house is bigger in

the way of bedrooms than Haslemere, but otherwise not more

formidable, and though the inside has no particular features (the

outside is charming) we shall manage I think to make it habitable

and pretty. One great attraction to me is that it is so near Euston

and therefore to the Hall and all its works. I don't mean to say

that we are taking it on any but the most ordinary selfish

principles!--but still, I like to think that I can make Marchmont

Hall, and the people who congregate about it, free of it as I

cannot do of Haslemere, and that there is a hungry demand in that

part of London for the fruit and flowers with which the place must

overflow in the summer. I believe also that the change will help me

a good deal in my work, and that at Stocks I shall be able to see

something of the genuine English country life which I never could

at Haslemere. But we had got to love Haslemere all the same, and it

is an up-rooting."

The little house on Grayswood Hill was indeed loath to let her go. She

went there alone at the end of February, when plain and hill lay steeped

in a flood of spring sunshine. "If only the place had not looked so

lovely yesterday and to-day!" she wrote. "We have been hung in infinite

air over the most ethereal of plains." But when Stocks finally received

her, at midsummer, 1892, she knew in her heart that all was well; that

"something" deep down in her nature "that stands more rubs than anything

else in our equipment" was satisfied--satisfied with the quiet lines of

the chalk hills, with the beechwoods that clothed their sides, and

stretched away, she knew, for miles beyond the horizon; with the

neighbourhood of that ancient life of the soil that surrounded her in

village and scattered farm. She had found her home; she was to live in

it and love it for eight-and-twenty years.

The Life of Mrs. Humphry Ward · 第 5 / 15 章