Contradiction in Terms

We pay higher and higher in proportion to the service rendered till we

get to the highest services, such as becoming a Member of Parliament, and

this must not be paid at all. If a man would go yet higher and found a

new and permanent system, or create some new idea or work of art which

remains to give delight to ages—he must not only not be paid, but he will

have to pay very heavily out of his own pocket into the bargain.

Again, we are to get all men to speak well of us if we can; yet we are to

be cursed if all men speak well of us.

So when the universe has gathered itself into a single ball (which I

don’t for a moment believe it ever will, but I don’t care) it will no

sooner have done so, than the bubble will burst and it will go back to

its gases again.

Contradiction in terms is so omnipresent that we treat it as we treat

death, or free-will, or fate, or air, or God, or the Devil—taking these

things so much as matters of course that, though they are visible enough

if we choose to see them, we neglect them normally altogether, without

for a moment intending to deny their existence. This neglect is

convenient as preventing repetitions the monotony of which would defeat

their own purpose, but people are tempted nevertheless to forget the

underlying omnipresence in the superficial omniabsence. They forget that

its opposite lurks in everything—that there are harmonics of God in the

Devil and harmonics of the Devil in God.

Contradiction in terms is not only to be excused but there can be no

proposition which does not more or less involve one.

It is the fact of there being contradictions in terms, which have to be

smoothed away and fused into harmonious acquiescence with their

surroundings, that makes life and consciousness possible at all. Unless

the unexpected were sprung upon us continually to enliven us we should

pass life, as it were, in sleep. To a living being no “It is” can be

absolute; wherever there is an “Is,” there, among its harmonics, lurks an

“Is not.” When there is absolute absence of “Is not” the “Is” goes too.

And the “Is not” does not go completely till the “Is” is gone along with

it. Every proposition has got a skeleton in its cupboard.

The Note-Books of Samuel Butler · 第 497 / 602 题