C H A P. XXVII

THERE is nothing so foolish, when you are at the expence of making an

entertainment of this kind, as to order things so badly, as to let your

criticks and gentry of refined taste run it down: Nor is there any

thing so likely to make them do it, as that of leaving them out of the

party, or, what is full as offensive, of bestowing your attention upon

the rest of your guests in so particular a way, as if there was no such

thing as a critick (by occupation) at table.

——I guard against both; for, in the first place, I have left half a

dozen places purposely open for them;—and in the next place, I pay them

all court.—Gentlemen, I kiss your hands, I protest no company could

give me half the pleasure,—by my soul I am glad to see you———I beg only

you will make no strangers of yourselves, but sit down without any

ceremony, and fall on heartily.

I said I had left six places, and I was upon the point of carrying my

complaisance so far, as to have left a seventh open for them,—and in

this very spot I stand on; but being told by a Critick (tho’ not by

occupation,—but by nature) that I had acquitted myself well enough, I

shall fill it up directly, hoping, in the mean time, that I shall be

able to make a great deal of more room next year.

———How, in the name of wonder! could your uncle _Toby_, who, it seems,

was a military man, and whom you have represented as no fool,—be at the

same time such a confused, pudding-headed, muddle-headed, fellow, as—Go

look.

So, Sir Critick, I could have replied; but I scorn it.—’Tis language

unurbane,—and only befitting the man who cannot give clear and

satisfactory accounts of things, or dive deep enough into the first

causes of human ignorance and confusion. It is moreover the reply

valiant—and therefore I reject it; for tho’ it might have suited my

uncle _Toby_’s character as a soldier excellently well,—and had he not

accustomed himself, in such attacks, to whistle the _Lillabullero_, as

he wanted no courage, ’tis the very answer he would have given; yet it

would by no means have done for me. You see as plain as can be, that I

write as a man of erudition;—that even my similies, my allusions, my

illustrations, my metaphors, are erudite,—and that I must sustain my

character properly, and contrast it properly too,—else what would

become of me? Why, Sir, I should be undone;—at this very moment that I

am going here to fill up one place against a critick,—I should have

made an opening for a couple.

——Therefore I answer thus:

Pray, Sir, in all the reading which you have ever read, did you ever

read such a book as _Locke_’s Essay upon the Human

Understanding?——Don’t answer me rashly—because many, I know, quote the

book, who have not read it—and many have read it who understand it

not:—If either of these is your case, as I write to instruct, I will

tell you in three words what the book is.—It is a history.—A history!

of who? what? where? when? Don’t hurry yourself—It is a history-book,

Sir, (which may possibly recommend it to the world) of what passes in a

man’s own mind; and if you will say so much of the book, and no more,

believe me, you will cut no contemptible figure in a metaphysick

circle.

But this by the way.

Now if you will venture to go along with me, and look down into the

bottom of this matter, it will be found that the cause of obscurity and

confusion, in the mind of a man, is threefold.

Dull organs, dear Sir, in the first place. Secondly, slight and

transient impressions made by the objects, when the said organs are not

dull. And thirdly, a memory like unto a sieve, not able to retain what

it has received.—Call down _Dolly_ your chamber-maid, and I will give

you my cap and bell along with it, if I make not this matter so plain

that _Dolly_ herself should understand it as well as _Malbranch._——When

_Dolly_ has indited her epistle to _Robin_, and has thrust her arm into

the bottom of her pocket hanging by her right side;—take that

opportunity to recollect that the organs and faculties of perception

can, by nothing in this world, be so aptly typified and explained as by

that one thing which _Dolly_’s hand is in search of.—Your organs are

not so dull that I should inform you—’tis an inch, Sir, of red

seal-wax.

When this is melted and dropped upon the letter, if _Dolly_ fumbles too

long for her thimble, till the wax is over hardened, it will not

receive the mark of her thimble from the usual impulse which was wont

to imprint it. Very well. If _Dolly_’s wax, for want of better, is

bees-wax, or of a temper too soft,—tho’ it may receive,—it will not

hold the impression, how hard soever _Dolly_ thrusts against it; and

last of all, supposing the wax good, and eke the thimble, but applied

thereto in careless haste, as her Mistress rings the bell;——in any one

of these three cases the print left by the thimble will be as unlike

the prototype as a brass-jack.

Now you must understand that not one of these was the true cause of the

confusion in my uncle _Toby_’s discourse; and it is for that very

reason I enlarge upon them so long, after the manner of great

physiologists—to shew the world, what it did _not_ arise from.

What it did arise from, I have hinted above, and a fertile source of

obscurity it is,—and ever will be,—and that is the unsteady uses of

words, which have perplexed the clearest and most exalted

understandings.

It is ten to one (at _Arthur_’s) whether you have ever read the

literary histories of past ages;—if you have, what terrible battles,

’yclept logomachies, have they occasioned and perpetuated with so much

gall and ink-shed,—that a good-natured man cannot read the accounts of

them without tears in his eyes.

Gentle critick! when thou hast weighed all this, and considered within

thyself how much of thy own knowledge, discourse, and conversation has

been pestered and disordered, at one time or other, by this, and this

only:—What a pudder and racket in COUNCILS about χδια and υωοςασις; and

in the SCHOOLS of the learned about power and about spirit;—about

essences, and about quintessences;——about substances, and about

space.——What confusion in greater THEATRES from words of little

meaning, and as indeterminate a sense! when thou considerest this, thou

wilt not wonder at my uncle _Toby_’s perplexities,—thou wilt drop a

tear of pity upon his scarp and his counterscarp;—his glacis and his

covered way;—his ravelin and his half- moon: ’Twas not by ideas,—by

Heaven; his life was put in jeopardy by words.

The life and opinions of Tristram Shandy, gentleman(#1079) · 第 32 / 480 题