Total 26,196

Here, then, are twenty-six thousand human beings, fashioned in the image

of God, the fitted temples of His Holy Spirit, held by the government in

the abhorrent chains of slavery. The power to emancipate them is clear.

It is indisputable. It does not depend upon the twenty-five slave votes

in Congress. It lies with the free states. Their duty is before them:

in the fear of God, and not of man let them perform it.

Let them at once strike off the grievous fetters. Let them declare that

man shall no longer hold his fellow-man in bondage, a beast of burden, an

article of traffic, within the governmental domain. God and truth and

eternal justice demand this. The very reputation of our fathers, the

honor of our land, every principle of liberty, humanity, expediency,

demand it. A sacred regard to free principles originated our

independence, not the paltry amount of practical evil complained of. And

although our fathers left their great work unfinished, it is our duty to

follow out their principles. Short of liberty and equality we cannot

stop without doing injustice to their memories. If our fathers intended

that slavery should be perpetual, that our practice should forever give

the lie to our professions, why is the great constitutional compact so

guardedly silent on the subject of human servitude? If state necessity

demanded this perpetual violation of the laws of God and the rights of

man, this continual solecism in a government of freedom, why is it not

met as a necessity, incurable and inevitable, and formally and distinctly

recognized as a settled part of our social system? State necessity, that

imperial tyrant, seeks no disguise. In the language of Sheridan, "What

he does, he dares avow, and avowing, scorns any other justification than

the great motives which placed the iron sceptre in his grasp."

Can it be possible that our fathers felt this state necessity strong upon

them? No; for they left open the door for emancipation, they left us the

light of their pure principles of liberty, they framed the great charter

of American rights, without employing a term in its structure to which in

aftertimes of universal freedom the enemies of our country could point

with accusation or reproach.

What, then, is our duty?

To give effect to the spirit of our Constitution; to plant ourselves upon

the great declaration and declare in the face of all the world that

political, religious, and legal hypocrisy shall no longer cover as with

loathsome leprosy the features of American freedom; to loose at once the

bands of wickedness; to undo the heavy burdens, and let the oppressed go

free.

We have indeed been authoritatively told in Congress and elsewhere that

our brethren of the South and West will brook no further agitation of the

subject of slavery. What then! shall we heed the unrighteous

prohibition? No; by our duty as Christians, as politicians, by our duty

to ourselves, to our neighbor, and to God, we are called upon to agitate

this subject; to give slavery no resting-place under the hallowed aegis

of a government of freedom; to tear it root and branch, with all its

fruits of abomination, at least from the soil of the national domain.

The slave-holder may mock us; the representatives of property,

merchandise, vendible commodities, may threaten us; still our duty is

imperative; the spirit of the Constitution should be maintained within

the exclusive jurisdiction of the government. If we cannot "provide for

the general welfare," if we cannot "guarantee to each of the states a

republican form of government," let us at least no longer legislate for a

free nation within view of the falling whip, and within hearing of the

execrations of the task-master and the prayer of his slave!

I deny the right of the slave-holder to impose silence on his brother of

the North in reference to slavery. What! compelled to maintain the

system, to keep up the standing army which protects it, and yet be denied

the poor privilege of remonstrance! Ready, at the summons of the master

to put down the insurrections of his slaves, the outbreaking of that

revenge which is now, and has been, in all nations, and all times, the

inevitable consequence of oppression and wrong, and yet like automata to

act but not speak! Are we to be denied even the right of a slave, the

right to murmur?

I am not unaware that my remarks may be regarded by many as dangerous and

exceptionable; that I may be regarded as a fanatic for quoting the

language of eternal truth, and denounced as an incendiary for

maintaining, in the spirit as well as the letter, the doctrines of

American Independence. But if such are the consequences of a simple

performance of duty, I shall not regard them. If my feeble appeal but

reaches the hearts of any who are now slumbering in iniquity; if it shall

have power given it to shake down one stone from that foul temple where

the blood of human victims is offered to the Moloch of slavery; if under

Providence it can break one fetter from off the image of God, and enable

one suffering African

"To feel

The weight of human misery less, and glide

Ungroaning to the tomb,"

The Works of John Greenleaf Whittier, Volume VII, Complete The Conflict with Slavery, Politics and Reform, the Inner Life, and Criticism · 第 12 / 83 题