REGULATION OF COMMERCE.
The constitution of the United States gives to Congress the power
to regulate commerce with foreign nations. That power has not yet
been executed, in the sense intended by the constitution: for the
commercial treaties made by the President and the Senate are not
the legislative regulation intended in that grant of power; nor are
the tariff laws, whether for revenue or protection, any the more
so. They all miss the object, and the mode of operating, intended
by the constitution in that grant--the true nature of which was
explained early in the life of the new federal government by those
most competent to do it--Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Madison, and Mr. Wm.
Smith of South Carolina,--and in the form most considerate and
responsible. Mr. Jefferson, as Secretary of State, in his memorable
report "On the restrictions and privileges of the commerce of the
United States in foreign countries;" Mr. Madison in his resolutions
as a member of the House of Representatives in the year 1793, "For
the regulation of our foreign commerce;" and in his speeches in
support of his resolutions; and the speeches in reply, chiefly by
Mr. William Smith, of South Carolina, speaking (as it was held),
the sense of General Hamilton; so that in the speeches and writing
of these three early members of our government (not to speak of
many other able men then in the House of Representatives), we have
the authentic exposition of the meaning of the clause in question,
and of its intended mode of operation: for they all agreed in
that view of the subject, though differing about the adoption
of a system which would then have borne most heavily upon Great
Britain. The plan was defeated at that time, and only by a very
small majority (52 to 47),--the defeat effected by the mercantile
influence, which favored the British trade, and was averse to any
discrimination to her disadvantage, though only intended to coerce
her into a commercial treaty--of which we then had none with her.
Afterwards the system of treaties was followed up, and protection
to our own industry extended incidentally through the clause in
the constitution authorizing Congress to "Lay and collect taxes,
duties, imports and excises," &c. So that the power granted in the
clause, "To regulate commerce with foreign nations," has never
yet been exercised by Congress:--a neglect or omission, the more
remarkable as, besides the plain and obvious fairness and benefit
of the regulation intended, the power conferred by that clause was
the potential moving cause of forming the present constitution, and
creating the present Union.
The principle of the regulation was to be that of reciprocity--that
is, that trade was not to be free on one side, and fettered on the
other--that goods were not to be taken from a foreign country, free
of duty, or at a low rate, unless that country should take something
from us, also free, or at a low rate. And the mode of acting was
by discriminating in the imposition of duties between those which
had, and had not, commercial treaties with us--the object to be
accomplished by an act of Congress to that effect; which foreign
nations might meet either by legislation in their imposition of
duties; or, and which is preferable, by treaties of specified and
limited duration. My early study of the theory, and the working of
our government--so often different, and sometimes opposite--led me
to understand the regulation clause in the constitution, and to
admire and approve it: and as in the beginning of General Jackson's
administration, I foresaw the speedy extinction of the public debt,
and the consequent release of great part of our foreign imports
from duty, I wished to be ready to derive all the benefit from the
event which would result from the double process of receiving many
articles free which were then taxed, and of sending abroad many
articles free which were now met by heavy taxation. With this view,
I brought a bill into the Senate in the session 1829-'30, to revive
the policy of Mr. Madison's resolutions of 1793--without effect
then, but without despair of eventual success. And still wishing
to see that policy revived, and seeing near at hand a favorable
opportunity for it in the approaching extinction of our present
public debt--(and I wish I could add, a return to economy in the
administration of the government)--and consequent large room for the
reduction and abolition of duties, I here produce some passages from
the speech I delivered on my bill of 1830, preceded by some passages
from Mr. Madison's speech of 1793, in support of his resolutions,
and showing his view of their policy and operation--not of their
constitutionality, for of that there was no question: and his
complaint was that the identical clause in the constitution which
caused the constitution to be framed, had then remained four years
without execution. He said:
"Mr. Madison, after some general observations on the report,
entered into a more particular consideration of the subject.
He remarked that the commerce of the United States is not, at
this day, on that respectable footing to which, from its nature
and importance, it is entitled. He recurred to its situation
previous to the adoption of the constitution, when conflicting
systems prevailed in the different States. The then existing
state of things gave rise to that convention of delegates from
the different parts of the Union, who met to deliberate on some
general principles for the regulation of commerce, which might
be conducive, in their operation, to the general welfare, and
that such measures should be adopted as would conciliate the
friendship and good faith of those countries who were disposed
to enter into the nearest commercial connections with us. But
what has been the result of the system which has been pursued
ever since? What is the present situation of our commerce? From
the situation in which we find ourselves after four years'
experiment, he observed, that it appeared incumbent on the
United States to see whether they could not now take measures
promotive of those objects, for which the government was in a
great degree instituted. Measures of moderation, firmness and
decision, he was persuaded, were now necessary to be adopted, in
order to narrow the sphere of our commerce with those nations
who see proper not to meet us on terms of reciprocity.
"Mr. M. took a general view of the probable effects which the
adoption of something like the resolutions he had proposed,
would produce. They would produce, respecting many articles
imported, a competition which would enable countries who did not
now supply us with those articles, to do it, and would increase
the encouragement on such as we can produce within ourselves.
We should also obtain an equitable share in carrying our own
produce; we should enter into the field of competition on equal
terms, and enjoy the actual benefit of advantages which nature
and the spirit of our people entitle us to.
"He adverted to the advantageous situation this country is
entitled to stand in, considering the nature of our exports and
returns. Our exports are bulky, and therefore must employ much
shipping, which might be nearly all our own: our exports are
chiefly necessaries of life, or raw materials, the food for the
manufacturers of other nations. On the contrary, the chief of
what we receive from other countries, we can either do without,
or produce substitutes.
"It is in the power of the United States, he conceived, by
exerting her natural rights, without violating the rights, or
even the equitable pretensions of other nations--by doing no
more than most nations do for the protection of their interests,
and much less than some, to make her interests respected; for,
what we receive from other nations are but luxuries to us,
which, if we choose to throw aside, we could deprive part of the
manufacturers of those luxuries, of even bread, if we are forced
to the contest of self-denial. This being the case, our country
may make her enemies feel the extent of her power. We stand,
with respect to the nation exporting those luxuries, in the
relation of an opulent individual to the laborer, in producing
the superfluities for his accommodation; the former can do
without those luxuries, the consumption of which gives bread to
the latter.
"He did not propose, or wish that the United States should, at
present, go so far in the line which his resolutions point to,
as they might go. The extent to which the principles involved
in those resolutions should be carried, will depend upon
filling up the blanks. To go the very extent of the principle
immediately, might be inconvenient. He wished, only, that the
Legislature should mark out the ground on which we think we can
stand; perhaps it may produce the effect wished for, without
unnecessary irritation; we need not at first, go every length.
"Another consideration would induce him, he said, to be moderate
in filling up the blanks--not to wound public credit. He did
not wish to risk any sensible diminution of the public revenue.
He believed that if the blanks were filled with judgment, the
diminution of the revenue, from a diminution in the quantity of
imports, would be counterbalanced by the increase in the duties.
"The last resolution he had proposed, he said, is, in a manner,
distinct from the rest. The nation is bound by the most sacred
obligation, he conceived, to protect the rights of its citizens
against a violation of them from any quarter; or, if they cannot
protect, they are bound to repay the damage.
"It is a fact authenticated to this House by communications
from the Executive, that there are regulations established
by some European nations, contrary to the law of nations, by
which our property is seized and disposed of in such a way that
damages have accrued. We are bound either to obtain reparation
for the injustice, or compensate the damage. It is only in the
first instance, no doubt, that the burden is to be thrown upon
the United States. The proper department of government will,
no doubt, take proper steps to obtain redress. The justice
of foreign nations will certainly not permit them to deny
reparation when the breach of the law of nations evidently
appears; at any rate, it is just that the individual should
not suffer. He believed the amount of the damages that would
come within the meaning of this resolution, would not be very
considerable."
Reproducing these views of Mr. Madison, and with a desire to fortify
myself with his authority, the better to produce a future practical
effect, I now give the extract from my own speech of 1830:
"Mr. Benton said he rose to ask the leave for which he gave
notice on Friday last; and in doing so, he meant to avail
himself of the parliamentary rule, seldom followed here, but
familiar in the place from whence we drew our rules--the British
Parliament--and strictly right and proper, when any thing new
or unusual is to be proposed, to state the clauses, and make an
exposition of the principles of his bill, before he submitted
the formal motion for leave to bring it in.
"The tenor of it is, not to abolish, but to provide for the
abolition of duties. This phraseology announces, that something
in addition to the statute--some power in addition to that
of the legislature, is to be concerned in accomplishing the
abolition. Then the duties for abolition are described as
unnecessary ones; and under this idea is included the twofold
conception, that they are useless, either for the protection of
domestic industry, or for supplying the treasury with revenue.
The relief of the people from sixteen millions of taxes is based
upon the idea of an abolition of twelve millions of duties;
the additional four millions being the merchant's profit upon
the duty he advances; which profit the people pay as a part of
the tax, though the government never receives it. It is the
merchant's compensation for advancing the duty, and is the
same as his profit upon the goods. The improved condition of
the four great branches of national industry is presented as
the third object of the bill; and their relative importance,
in my estimation, classes itself according to the order of my
arrangement. Agriculture, as furnishing the means of subsistence
to man, and as the foundation of every thing else, is put
foremost; manufactures, as preparing and fitting things for our
use, stands second, commerce, as exchanging the superfluities of
different countries, comes next; and navigation, as furnishing
the chief means of carrying on commerce, closes the list of
the four great branches of national industry. Though classed
according to their respective importance, neither branch is
disparaged. They are all great interests--all connected--all
dependent upon each other--friends in their nature--for a long
time friends in fact, under the operations of our government:
and only made enemies to each other, as they now are by a
course of legislation, which the approaching extinguishment
of the public debt presents a fit opportunity for reforming
and ameliorating. The title of my bill declares the intention
of the bill to improve the condition of each of them. The
abolition of sixteen millions of taxes would itself operate a
great improvement in the condition of each; but the intention
of the bill is not limited to that incidental and consequential
improvement, great as it may be; it proposes a positive, direct,
visible, tangible, and countable benefit to each; and this I
shall prove and demonstrate, not in this brief illustration of
the title of my bill, but at the proper places, in the course
of the examination into its provisions and exposition of its
principles.
"I will now proceed with the bill, reading each section in its
order, and making the remarks upon it which are necessary to
explain its object and to illustrate its operation."
_The First Section._
"That, for the term of ten years, from and after the first day
of January, in the year 1832, or, as soon thereafter as may be
agreed upon between the United States and any foreign power,
the duties now payable on the importation of the following
articles, or such of them as may be agreed upon, shall cease and
determine, or be reduced, in favor of such countries as shall,
by treaty, grant equivalent advantages to the agriculture,
manufactures, commerce, and navigation, of the United States.
"This section contains the principle of abolishing duties by
the joint act of the legislative and executive departments. The
idea of equivalents, which the section also presents, is not
new, but has for its sanction high and venerated authority, of
which I shall not fail to avail myself. That we ought to have
equivalents for abolishing ten or twelve millions of duties on
foreign merchandise is most clear. Such an abolition will be an
advantage to foreign powers, for which they ought to compensate
us, by reducing duties to an equal amount upon our productions.
This is what no law, or separate act of our own, can command.
Amicable arrangements alone, with foreign powers, can effect it;
and to free such arrangements from serious, perhaps insuperable
difficulties, it would be necessary first to lay a foundation
for them in an act of Congress. This is what my bill proposes
to do. It proposes that Congress shall select the articles
for abolition of duty, and then leave it to the Executive to
extend the provisions of the act to such powers as will grant
us equivalent advantages. The articles enumerated for abolition
of duty are of kinds not made in the United States, so that my
bill presents no ground of alarm or uneasiness to any branch of
domestic industry.
"The acquisition of equivalents is a striking feature in the
plan which I propose, and for that I have the authority of him
whose opinions will never be invoked in vain, while republican
principles have root in our soil. I speak of Mr. Jefferson,
and of his report on the commerce and navigation of the United
States, in the year '93, an extract from which I will read."
_The Extract._
"Such being the restrictions on the commerce and navigation of
the United States, the question is, in what way they may best be
removed, modified, or counteracted?
"As to commerce, two methods occur: 1. By friendly arrangements
with the several nations with whom these restrictions exist:
or, 2. By the separate act of our own legislatures, for
countervailing their effects.
"There can be no doubt, but that, of these two, friendly
arrangements is the most eligible. Instead of embarrassing
commerce under piles of regulating laws, duties, and
prohibitions, could it be relieved from all its shackles, in
all parts of the world--could every country be employed in
producing that which nature has best fitted it to produce, and
each be free to exchange with others mutual surplusses, for
mutual wants, the greatest mass possible would then be produced,
of those things which contribute to human life and human
happiness, the numbers of mankind would be increased, and their
condition bettered.
"Would even a single nation begin with the United States this
system of free commerce, it would be advisable to begin it
with that nation; since it is one by one only that it can be
extended to all. Where the circumstances of either party render
it expedient to levy a revenue, by way of impost on commerce,
its freedom might be modified in that particular, by mutual and
equivalent measures, preserving it entire in all others.
"Some nations, not yet ripe for free commerce, in all its
extent, might be willing to mollify its restrictions and
regulations, for us, in proportion to the advantages which an
intercourse with us might offer. Particularly they may concur
with us in reciprocating the duties to be levied on each side,
or in compensating any excess of duty, by equivalent advantages
of another nature. Our commerce is certainly of a character to
entitle it to favor in most countries. The commodities we offer
are either necessaries of life, or materials for manufacture, or
convenient subjects of revenue; and we take in exchange either
manufactures, when they have received the last finish of art and
industry, or mere luxuries. Such customers may reasonably expect
welcome and friendly treatment at every market--customers, too,
whose demands, increasing with their wealth and population, must
very shortly give full employment to the whole industry of any
nation whatever, in any line of supply they may get into the
habit of calling for from it.
"But, should any nation, contrary to our wishes, suppose it
may better find its advantage by continuing its system of
prohibitions, duties, and regulations, it behooves us to
protect our citizens, their commerce and navigation, by counter
prohibitions, duties, and regulations, also. Free commerce and
navigation are not to be given in exchange for restrictions and
vexations; nor are they likely to produce a relaxation of them."
* * * * *
"The plan which I now propose adopts the idea of equivalents and
retaliation to the whole extent recommended by Mr. Jefferson.
It differs from his plan in two features: first, in the mode of
proceeding, by founding the treaties abroad upon a legislative
act at home; secondly, in combining protection with revenue, in
selecting articles of exception to the system of free trade.
This degree of protection he admitted himself, at a later period
of his life. It corresponds with the recommendation of President
Washington to Congress, in the year '90, and with that of our
present Chief Magistrate, to ourselves, at the commencement of
the present session of Congress.
"I will not now stop to dilate upon the benefit which will
result to every family from an abolition of duties which will
enable them to get all the articles enumerated in my bill for
about one third, or one half less, than is now paid for them.
Let any one read over the list of articles, and then look to
the sum total which he now pays out annually for them, and from
that sum deduct near fifty per cent., which is about the average
of the duties and merchant's profit included, with which they
now come charged to him. This deduction will be his saving
under one branch of my plan--the abolition clause. To this must
be added the gain under the clause to secure equivalents in
foreign markets, and the two being added together, the saving in
purchases at home being added to the gain in sales abroad, will
give the true measure of the advantages which my plan presents.
"Let us now see whether the agriculture and manufactures of
the United States do not require better markets abroad than
they possess at this time. What is the state of these markets?
Let facts reply. England imposes a duty of three shillings
sterling a pound upon our tobacco, which is ten times its value.
She imposes duties equivalent to prohibition on our grain and
provisions; and either totally excludes, or enormously taxes,
every article, except cotton, that we send to her ports. In
France, our tobacco is subject to a royal monopoly, which makes
the king the sole purchaser, and subjects the seller to the
necessity of taking the price which his agents will give. In
Germany, our tobacco, and other articles, are heavily dutied,
and liable to a transit duty, in addition, when they have to
ascend the Rhine, or other rivers, to penetrate the interior. In
the West Indies, which is our great provision market, our beef,
pork, and flour, usually pay from eight to ten dollars a barrel:
our bacon, from ten to twenty-five cents a pound; live hogs,
eight dollars each; corn, cornmeal, lumber, whiskey, fruit,
vegetables, and every thing else, in proportion; the duties in
the different islands, on an average, equalling or exceeding
the value of the articles in the United States. We export
about forty-five millions of domestic productions, exclusive
of manufactures, annually; and it may be safely assumed that
we have to pay near that sum in the shape of duties, for the
privilege of selling these exports in foreign markets. So much
for agriculture. Our manufactures are in the same condition.
In many branches they have met the home demand, and are going
abroad in search of foreign markets. They meet with vexatious
restrictions, peremptory exclusions, or oppressive duties,
wherever they go. The quantity already exported entitles them to
national consideration, in the list of exports. Their aggregate
value for 1828 was about five millions of dollars, comprising
domestic cottons, to the amount of a million of dollars; soap
and candles, to the value of nine hundred thousand dollars;
boots, shoes, and saddlery, five hundred thousand dollars;
hats, three hundred thousand dollars; cabinet, coach, and other
wooden work, six hundred thousand dollars; glass and iron, three
hundred thousand dollars; and numerous smaller items. This large
amount of manufactures pays their value, in some instances more,
for the privilege of being sold abroad; and, what is worse, they
are totally excluded from several countries from which we buy
largely. Such restrictions and impositions are highly injurious
to our manufactures; and it is incontestably true, the amount of
exports prove it, that what most of them now need is not more
protection at home, but a better market abroad; and it is one of
the objects of this bill to obtain such a market for them.
"It appears to me [said Mr. B.] to be a fair and practicable
plan, combining the advantages of legislation and negotiation,
and avoiding the objections to each. It consults the sense of
the people, in leaving it to their Representatives to say on
what articles duties shall be abolished for their relief; on
what they shall be retained for protection and revenue; it then
secures the advantage of obtaining equivalents, by referring
it to the Executive to extend the benefit of the abolition to
such nations as shall reciprocate the favor. To such as will
not reciprocate, it leaves every thing as it now stands. The
success of this plan can hardly be doubted. It addresses itself
to the two most powerful passions of the human heart--interest
and fear; it applies itself to the strongest principles of
human action--profit and loss. For, there is no nation with
whom we trade but will be benefited by the increased trade of
her staple productions, which will result from a free trade in
such productions; none that would not be crippled by the loss
of such a trade, which loss would be the immediate effect of
rejecting our system. Our position enables us to command the
commercial system of the globe; to mould it to our own plan,
for the benefit of the world and ourselves. The approaching
extinction of the public debt puts it into our power to abolish
twelve millions of duties, and to set free more than one-half
of our entire commerce. We should not forego, nor lose the
advantages of such a position. It occurs but seldom in the
life of a nation, and once missed, is irretrievably gone, to
the generation, at least, that saw and neglected the golden
opportunity. We have complained, and justly, of the burthens
upon our exports in foreign countries; a part of our tariff
system rests upon the principle of retaliation for the injury
thus done us. Retaliation, heretofore, has been our only
resource: but reciprocity of injuries is not the way to enrich
nations any more than individuals. It is an 'unprofitable
contest,' under every aspect. But the present conjuncture,
payment of the public debt, in itself a rare and almost
unprecedented occurrence in the history of nations, enables us
to enlarge our system; to present a choice of alternatives:
one fraught with relief, the other presenting a burthen to
foreign nations. The participation, or exclusion, from forty
millions of free trade, annually increasing, would not admit
of a second thought, in the head of any nation with which we
trade. To say nothing of her gains in the participation in
such a commerce, what would be her loss in the exclusion from
it? How would England, France, or Germany, bear the loss of
their linen, silk, or wine trade, with the United States? How
could Cuba, St. Domingo, or Brazil, bear the loss of their
coffee trade with us? They could not bear it at all. Deep and
essential injury, ruin of industry seditions, and bloodshed,
and the overthrow of administrations, would be the consequence
of such loss. Yet such loss would be inevitable (and not to the
few nations, or in the articles only which I have mentioned,
for I have put a few instances only by way of example), but to
every nation with whom we trade, that would not fall into our
system, and throughout the whole list of essential articles to
which our abolition extends. Our present heavy duties would
continue in force against such nations; they would be abolished
in favor of their rivals. We would say to them, in the language
of Mr. Jefferson, free trade and navigation is not to be given
in exchange for restrictions and vexations! But I feel entire
confidence that it would not be necessary to use the language
of menace or coercion. Amicable representations, addressed to
their sense of self-interest, would be more agreeable, and not
less effectual. The plan cannot fail! It is scarcely within the
limits of possibility that it should fail! And if it did, what
then? We have lost nothing. We remain as we were. Our present
duties are still in force, and Congress can act upon them one or
two years hence, in any way they please.
"Here, then, is the peculiar recommendation to my plan, that,
while it secures a chance, little short of absolute certainty,
of procuring an abolition of twelve millions of duties upon our
exports in foreign countries, in return for an abolition of
twelve millions of duties upon imports from them, it exposes
nothing to risk, the abolition of duty upon the foreign article
here being contingent upon the acquisition of the equivalent
advantage abroad.
"I close this exposition of the principles of my bill with the
single remark, that these treaties for the mutual abolition
of duties should be for limited terms, say for seven or ten
years, to give room for the modifications which time, and the
varying pursuits of industry, may show to be necessary. Upon
this idea, the bill is framed, and the period of ten years
inserted by way of suggestion and exemplification of the plan.
Another feature is too obvious to need a remark, that the time
for the commencement of the abolition of duties is left to the
Executive, who can accommodate it to the state of the revenue
and the extinction of the public debt."
The plan which I proposed in this speech adopted the principle
of Mr. Madison's resolutions but reversed their action. The
discrimination which he proposed was a levy of five or ten per cent.
_more_ on the imports from countries which did not enter into our
propositions for reciprocity: my plan, as being the same thing in
substance, and less invidious in form, was a levy of five or ten per
cent. less on the commerce of the reciprocating nations--thereby
holding out an inducement and a benefit, instead of a threat and a
penalty.