CHAPTER XXXIX. OFFICIAL AND OCCASIONAL WORKS.

FROM a practical point of view, Mozart's "Don Giovanni" did no more

than his "Figaro" towards improving his position in Vienna. His painful

pecuniary circumstances may be gathered from his letters to Puchberg

in June, 1788. A glance at the catalogue of his compositions after his

return from Prague is sufficient to indicate the fact of their having

been produced at the pleasure of pupils or patrons:--

1787. December 11. Lied, "Die kleine Spinnerin" (531 K.).

1788. January 3. Allegro and andante for pianoforte in F major (533 K.).

January 14, 23, 27. Tänze (534-536 K.).

February 24. Pianoforte concerto in D major (537 K., part 20). March

4. Air for Madame Lange, "Ah se in ciel" (538 K.). March 5. Teutsches

Kriegslied for Baumann (539 K.).

March 19. Adagio for pianoforte, B minor (540 K.).

March 24, 28, 30. Pieces for insertion in "Don Giovanni" (525, 527, 528

K.).

In May. Arietta for Signor Albertarelli, "Un bacio di mano" in the opera

of "Le Gelosie Fortunate" (541 K.).

June 22. Terzet for piano, violin, and violoncello, E major (542 K.).

{OFFICIAL AND OCCASIONAL WORKS.}

(216)

1788. June 26. Symphony, E flat major (543 K.).

A short march for violin, flute, viola, horn, and violoncello, in D

major, unknown (544 K.).

A short pianoforte sonata for beginners in C major (545 K.).

A short adagio for two violins, viola, and bass, to a fugue in C minor

(546 K.).

July 10. Short pianoforte sonata for beginners, with violin, F major

(547 K.).

July 14. Terzet for piano, violin, and violoncello, in C major (548 K.).

July 16. Canzonette a 2 soprani e basso, "Più non si trovano" (549 K.).

July 25. Symphony in G minor (550 K.).

August 10. Symphony in C major (551 K.).

August 11. Ein Lied beim Auszug ins Feld, unknown (552 K.).[1]

September 2. Eight four-part and two three-part Canoni (553-562 K.).

September 27. Divertimento for violin, viola, and violoncello, in E flat

major (563 K.).

October 27. Terzet for piano, violin, and violoncello, in G major (564

K.).

October 30, December 6, December 24. Tänze (565, 567, 568 K.).

1789. January. German air, "Ohne Zwang aus freiem Triebe" (569 K.).

February. Pianoforte sonata in B flat major (570 K.).

February 21. Tänze (571 K.).

The symphonies in E flat major, G minor, and C major, written in the

three summer months of 1788, show that the inner strength was not

slumbering; but Mozart's appointment as chamber-composer to the Emperor

gave him no impulse to composition, and his official duties were

limited to the preparation of music for the masked balls in the imperial

Redoutensale.[2]

These Redoutensale are situated in the wing of the Hof-burg, which forms

the right side of the Josephsplatz, and originally contained a theatre,

where, upon festive occasions, operas and ballets were performed before

the court; after the erection of the Burgtheater, in 1752, the old

Hoftheater was

{MASKED BALLS.}

(217)

converted into the large and small Redoutensaal now existing, and

concerts, balls, and other entertainments given there. The balls were

masked, and took place on every Carnival Sunday, on Shrove-Tuesday, and

on the three last days of Carnival. Joseph II. favoured them as a means

of drawing different classes together, and frequently appeared at them

with his court; all ranks mixed freely, and considerable license was

allowed. The usual dances were minuets, country dances, and waltzes,

in the last of which only the lower classes joined, on account of the

crowding--just as is the case in "Don Giovanni" (p. 163). The

management of the Redoute was generally in the same hands as that of the

Opera-Theatre, the two being farmed out together. The court monopolised

the Opera-Theatre in 1778 and the Kàrnthnerthortheater in 1785, and kept

the control over them until August, 1794. Thus it came about that the

court theatrical-director ordered the dance music, and although the

pay was only a few ducats for a set of dances, the services of good

composers were claimed for the purpose; Haydn, Eybler, Gyrowetz, Hummel,

and Beethoven all composed for the Redoute, as well as Mozart.[3] During

the years succeeding his appointment--1788, 1789, 1791--Mozart composed

a number of different dances for the masked balls:--

1788. January 14. Country dance "Das Donnerwetter" (534 K.).

January 23. Country dance, "Die Bataille" (535 K.).

January 27. Six waltzes (536 K.).

October 30. Two country dances (565 K.).

December 6. Six waltzes (567 K.).

December 24. Twelve minuets (568 K.).

1789. February 21. Six waltzes (571 K.).

December. Twelve minuets (585 K.).

Twelve waltzes. N.B.--A country dance, "Der Sieg vom Helden Coburg"

(against the Turks, October, 1789) (586, 587 K.).

1791. January 23. Six minuets for the Redoute (599 K.).

January 29. Siz waltzes (600 K.).

February 5. Four minuets and four waltzes (601, 602 K.).

Two country dances. (603 K.).

{OFFICIAL AND OCCASIONAL WORKS.}

(218)

1791. February 12. Two minuets and two waltzes (604, 605 K.).

February 28. Country dance, "II. Trionfo delle Donne" (607 K.).

March 6. Country dance, "Die Leyer" (610 K.).[4]

Waltz with Leyer-trio (611 K.).[5]

No dances are chronicled in 1790, the illness and subsequent death of

the Emperor (February 20) having doubtless put a temporary stop to such

entertainments. Those in the list are for the most part composed for

full orchestra, and those with which I am acquainted make no claim to be

considered otherwise than as actual dance music, with pleasing melodies

and fresh rhythm--innocent recreations, betraying the master's hand in

touches here and there.[6] As the only musical task imposed upon him

by virtue of his office, they might well give rise to his bitter remark

that his salary was too high for what he did, too low for what he could

do (Vol. II., p. 276).

A commission more worthy his fame was intrusted to him by Van Swieten,

who, having brought with him from Berlin an enthusiastic admiration for

Handel's oratorios, sought to introduce them in Vienna. He not only gave

frequent concerts at his residence in the Renngasse, for the exclusive

performance of classical music, but he arranged grand performances of

Handel's oratorios, supported by all the vocal and instrumental forces

at his command. He induced several art-loving noblemen (among them the

Princes Schwarzen-berg, Lobkowitz, and Dietrichstein, Counts Appony,

Batthiany, Franz Esterhazy, &c.) to cover by a subscription the cost of

these performances. They took place generally in

{ARRANGEMENT OF HANDEL'S ORATORIOS.}

(219)

the great hall of the Court Library (of which Van Swieten was chief

director); sometimes at the palace of one or other of the patrons, and

always in the afternoon, by daylight. There was no charge for admission,

the audience being invited guests. The performances were arranged

according to circumstances, taking place generally in the spring, before

the nobility left Vienna for their country estates. The performers were

principally members of the Court-Kapelle and of the operatic orchestra,

and the preparation was undertaken entirely by Van Swieten, in whose

house the rehearsals took place. He himself arranged "Athalia," and very

probably also "The Choice of Hercules," for a performance after Mozart's

death. The conductorship was at first intrusted to Joseph Starzer, who

had arranged "Judas Maccabæus";[7] after his death, on April 22,

1787, Mozart took his place, and young Joseph Weigl accompanied on the

pianoforte.[8]

"Acisand Galatea" was first performed, Mozart's arrangement of it

appearing in his own catalogue, in November, 1788; Caroline Pichler

retained in her old age a lively recollection of the impression made on

her by this performance.[9] It was followed by the "Messiah," in March,

1789.[10] Great expectations were excited by this oratorio, by reason

of the magnificent performances of it which had been given at the London

Handel festivals in 1784 and 1785,[11] at the cathedral

{OFFICIAL AND OCCASIONAL WORKS.}

(220)

in Berlin, by Hiller, on May 19, 1786 (with Italian words),[12] at the

University Church in Leipzig,[13] on November 3,1786, and May 11,1787,

and at Breslau[14] on May 30,1788. Finally, in July, 1790, Mozart

arranged the "Ode for St. Cecilia's Day" and the "Feast of Alexander."

It was considered necessary, in order not to distract the attention of

the public by the unusual effects of Handel's orchestra, to modify

the instrumentation.[15] Even Hiller remarks (Nachricht, p. 14), "Many

improvements may be made in Handel's compositions by the employment of

the wind instruments, according to the fashion of the present day. In

the whole of the 'Messiah,' Handel appears never to have thought of the

oboes, flutes, or French horns, all of which are so often employed to

heighten or strengthen the effect in our present orchestras. I need not

remark that the alterations must be made with care and discretion." But

he went far beyond these "innocent" views; he shortened and altered the

composition itself, especially in the airs and recitatives, and wrote

"an entirely new score, as far as may be what Handel would himself have

written at the present day" (Betracht-ungen, p. 16). He was convinced

that "only a pedantic lover of old fashions, or a pedantic contemner

of what is good in the new ones" would find fault with this proceeding

(Betracht-ungen, p. 18). The object with which Mozart undertook to

rearrange the instrumentation of Handel's works was the strengthening

and enriching of the orchestra to enable it to dispense with the organ

or harpsichord, to which the working-out of the harmonies had originally

been intrusted. This was principally effected by the introduction of

wind

{ARRANGEMENT OF HANDEL'S ORATORIOS.}

(221)

instruments. Mozart's autograph scores of "Acis and Galatea" (566 K.),

of "The Ode for St. Cecilia's Day" (592 K.),[16] and of the "Feast of

Alexander" (591 K.),[17] preserved in the Royal Library in Berlin, show

how he set about his task. The voice parts and stringed instruments have

been transferred to his score, and left as Handel wrote them, with the

exception that where Handel has provided a violin part, Mozart

employs the second violin and viola to fill in the harmonies. The wind

instruments have been altogether omitted by the copyist in order

to leave Mozart free play. Wherever Handel has employed them

characteristically, they are so preserved, but when, as often happens,

the oboes are the sole representatives of the wind instruments, Mozart

has proceeded independently, sometimes replacing them by other single

instruments, frequently clarinets--flutes only very occasionally,

sometimes introducing the whole body of wind instruments. This he does

also in some places where Handel has not even employed oboes, if it is

needed to give force or fulness to the whole.

The frequent introduction of the clarinets replaced the full and

powerful organ tones, but without any express imitation of that

particular sound-effect by Mozart. The whole character of the

instrumentation was necessarily modified, and even the portions which

were literally

{OFFICIAL AND OCCASIONAL WORKS.}

(222)

transcribed from Handel's original have a very different effect in their

altered surroundings. Mozart has proceeded quite as independently in

dealing with the harpsichord parts. Not content with filling in the

prescribed or suggested harmonies and regulating the due succession of

chords, he has also made an independent disposition of the middle

parts and given them free movement. The subjects employed by Handel are

further developed, and sometimes a new motif has occurred to him as

an enlivenment to the accompaniment, in which case the additional wind

instruments are employed to advantage. The harpsichord is treated, in

the main, as might be expected from a first-rate organist of that time,

and it is difficult at the present day to reproduce what so much depends

upon the free co-operation of the performer.[18] The objection

which may be raised against the alteration and partial remodelling of

a carefully thought-out and finished work by a strange hand is

unanswerable. The most loving and intelligent treatment cannot avoid

inequality and incongruity; compared with what has been literally

transmitted, every modification reflects, both in kind and degree, the

individual learning and taste of the adapter. On the whole, however,

Mozart's arrangements evince the greatest reverence for Handel, combined

with a masterly use of all available resources, and they afford a

proof as interesting as it is instructive of the study which Mozart had

bestowed upon Handel, of the spirit in which he undertook his task, and

of his thorough and delicate apprehension of foreign creations.

Mozart had heard the "Messiah" in 1777 at Mannheim, but apparently it

had made no more lasting impression upon him than upon the public. Now,

however, he approached the masterpiece with far other predilections,

and the adaptation opened to him many points of interest. The three

oratorios already mentioned were so moderate in length as to be suited

for performance entire, but the greatly

{THE "MESSIAH."}

(223)

disproportionate length of the "Messiah" made its curtailment a

necessary part of its adaptation (572 K.). Several pieces were omitted,

and others were shortened; but a proof that other and more important

alterations were contemplated is afforded by a letter from Van Swieten

to Mozart (March 21, 1789), given by Niemetschek (p. 46): "Your idea

of turning the words of the unimpassioned air into a recitative is

excellent; and in case you should not have retained the words, I have

copied and now send them to you. The musician who is able to adapt and

to amplify Handel's work so reverently and so judiciously, that on

the one side he satisfies modern taste, and on the other preserves the

integrity of his subject, has appreciated the great master's work, has

penetrated to the source of his inspiration, and will doubtless draw

from the same well himself. It is thus that I regard what you have

accomplished, and I need not therefore again assure you of my entire

confidence, but only beg you to let me have the recitative as soon as

possible." Nevertheless, this idea, judging from the published score,

was not carried out. In the arrangement of the orchestra, Mozart has

gone further than in the previous works. Sometimes there has been an

external necessity for altering even characteristic instrumentation,

as in the air, "The trumpet shall sound" (No. 44). There were no solo

trumpeters such as existed in Handel's time, and an attempt was made to

preserve the effect as far as possible by rearrangement. He has altered,

however, even without such occasion as this, and many instances of

instrumental arrangement might be cited as far transgressing the bounds

within which interference with a work of art is justifiable.[19]

In themselves these same portions are admirable alike in their

sound-effects and musical treatment, and in the delicate discrimination

with which Mozart has made his additions appear as the natural

development of Handel's ideas; we can see how the fascination of

continuing the weaving of the threads from the master's hands has

tempted

{OFFICIAL AND OCCASIONAL WORKS.}

(224)

him to overstep the boundary. In doing so, however, the connection of

the parts has been lost, and the unity of the whole has been disturbed.

One of the most remarkable examples is the air, "The people that walked

in darkness," in which the wind instruments added by Mozart are foreign

to Handel's purpose, but nevertheless of very fine effect, and certainly

not deserving of the reproach of "doleful sound-painting" ("betrübter

Malerei").[20] It was to be expected that Mozart's adaptation should

attract both praise[21] and blame,[22] while those, such as Rochlitz[23]

and Zelter,[24] who went deeper into the subject found much that was

excellent and also much that was faulty in the work, at the same time

that they gave due consideration to the occasion that called it forth

and the design with which it was undertaken.

It must not be forgotten that these adaptations were undertaken by

Mozart solely for Van Swieten's performances, and that his individual

taste and the exigences of the representation must have exercised

considerable influence upon them. He must certainly not be credited with

the wish to improve upon Handel;[25] his intention has rather been so to

popularise his works as to bring them home to the

{ADAPTATIONS OF EARLIER WORKS.}

(225)

public, without altering any of the more important parts. That the

adaptations should have been published and accepted as regular improved

editions of the original was not his fault, though he has often had to

do penance for it. It must be remembered also that the historic theory

which holds that every work of art should be carefully preserved in the

form wherein its author has embodied it was then non-existent.

The majority of compositions have been directly the result of

circumstances determining the direction of the artist's energies; they

laboured for the future while seeking to satisfy the present. They

therefore made free use of their works for subsequent elaboration,

altering what was needful, and adapting them to the particular occasions

on which they were performed by means of additions, omissions, and

alterations. The same freedom was thought allowable with the works of

other masters, especially those of an earlier time, so that the public

might the more easily and comfortably enjoy what was set before it. A

knowledge of what was then thought excusable in this direction[26] will

serve to increase our respect for the artistic spirit in which Mozart

performed his task.[27] The scientific and historic ideas which have

permeated the cultivation of our times require the enjoyment of a work

of art to be founded upon historical insight and appreciation, and to

this end it must be represented exactly as the artist has produced it.

But this principle, true as it is in itself, can only be applied with

considerable practical limitations, and it is doubtful how far the

general public is capable of apprehending and approving it; in any case

it is much to be desired that the fashion in such matters should not be

set by pedants.[28]

FOOTNOTES OF CHAPTER XXXIX.

[Footnote 1: Wien. Ztg., 1789, No. 69, Anh., advertises Frûhlingslied and

Kriegslied by Mozart.]

[Footnote 2: In the grand pasticcio arranged by Da Ponte, "L'Ape Musicale," a

couple of airs by Mozart are inserted (Wien. Ztg., 1789, No. 23, Anh.).]

[Footnote 3: I owe these particulars to the courtesy of Sonnleithner.]

[Footnote 4: Wien. Ztg., 1791, No. 44, Anh., announces thirteen German

waltzes, thirteen trios and coda, among which are the "Leyer" and

"Schlittenlahrt."]

[Footnote 5: André's Catalogue includes, besides five minuets signed "Di

Wolfgango Amadeo Mozart, Vienna, 1784" (461 K.), and the Prague

"Teutschen" (509 K.) already mentioned (Vol. III., p. 125), several

other dances, certainly belonging to an earlier date. Printed and

written collections of dances in the most varied arrangements have been

circulated under Mozart's name, although of very doubtful authenticity.]

[Footnote 6: Under Mozart's name an "Anleitung soviel Walzer oder Schleifer

mit zwei Wurfeln zu componiren, soviel man will, ohne musikalisch zu

verstehen," was published in four languages by Hammel (Amsterdam, Berlin

and elsewhere). I am not aware whether he had any share in it.]

[Footnote 7: The often-expressed opinion that Mozart arranged "Judas Maccabæus"

(A. M. Z., XXII., p. 30) has been corrected by Sonnleithner (Cäcilia,

XVIII., p. 242). "Judas Maccabæus" was performed as early as 1779, at

the Concert for the Pensionsinstitut (Wien. Mus. Ztg., 1842, p. 70).]

[Footnote 8: These particulars, communicated to me by Sonnleithner, rest partly

on the testimony of the University Apparitor, Joh. Schönauer, who had

assisted at these performances as a boy.]

[Footnote 9: Car. Pichler, Denkw., IV., p. 21. Schönauer said that Mozart gave

a benefit performance of "Acis and Galatea" in Jahn's Hall, at which

Mdlle. Cavalieri, Adamberger, and Gsur sang the solo parts.]

[Footnote 10: Carpani mentions a performance of the "Messiah" in the

Schwarzenberg Palace; perhaps a later one (Hayd., p. 64).]

[Footnote 11: Burney's "Nachricht," translated by Eschenburg (Berlin, 1785). The

first time there were over 500, the second time over 660 performers. In

consequence of this the "Messiah" was performed in Copenhagen in March,

1786. (Cramer, Mag. f. Mus., II., p. 960.)]

[Footnote 12: J. A. Hiller, Nachricht von der Auftuhrung des Händelschen Messias

(Berlin, 1786, 4), with Hiller's portrait. There were about 300

performers.]

[Footnote 13: This again gave rise to some explanatory pamphlets from Hiller:

Fragment aus Handel's Messias; Ueber Alt und Neu in der Musik; Der

Messias von Handel nebst angehängten Betrachtungen darûber. On this

occasion there were more than 200 performers; the enthusiasm of the

audience was great, as was testified by a then youthful member of it

(Reichardt's Mus. Ztg., I., p. 126. Cf. Rochlitz, Für Freunde der Tonk.,

I., p. 22. A. M. Z., XXX., p. 491).]

[Footnote 14: Hiller gave explanatory comments on the words. They were published

in the Schles. Provinzial-Blätter, 1788, p. 549. Particulars are given

by Baumgart, Abh. d. Schles. Ges. Phil. hist. Abth., 1862, I., p. 46.]

[Footnote 15: The pastoral, "Acis and Galatea," was composed by Handel at Cannons

in 1720 (Chrysander, Handel, I., p. 479).]

[Footnote 16: In pursuance of an old custom of celebrating St. Cecilia's Day by

music, a musical society had been founded in London, which instituted

a grand performance on that day; the music and words were expressly

written for the occasion, and the praise of music formed the subject. A

long list of celebrated poems and compositions by the first masters was

the result. W. H. Husk (An Account of the Musical Celebrations on St.

Cecilia's Day, London, 1857. Chrysander, Handel, II., p. 412. Pohl.

Mozart u. Haydn in London, p. 12). Dryden's Song for St. Cecilia's Day,

"From harmony, from heavenly harmony, this universal frame began," was

written in 1687, and set to music by Draghi; Handel composed the same

poem in the autumn of 1739. (Chrysander, Handel, II., p. 430.)]

[Footnote 17: Dryden's "Alexander's Feast" was written in 1697, and performed

with Jer. Clark's music. Handel composed it in 1736; at the second

performance in 1737, a duet and chorus, the words by Newburgh Hamilton,

were added, but are not included in Mozart's arrangement. (Chrysander,

Handel, II., p. 413).]

[Footnote 18: The excellent pianoforte arrangement, which is published by the

German Handel Society with the score of "Acis and Galatea," shows

throughout a similar working-out and arrangement.]

[Footnote 19: Mozart is not answerable for all that stands in the printed score.

The air, "If God is for us" (No. 48), with bassoon accompaniment, is, as

Baumgarten has proved (Niederrh. Mus. Ztg., 1862, No. 5, p. 35), taken

from Hiller's arrangement.]

[Footnote 20: Thibaut, Ueb. Reinheit d. Tonk., p. 66.]

[Footnote 21: In Fr. Th. Mann's musik. Taschenb. for 1805, we read (p. 3): "Der

genielle Mozart erhob jene bis zur Manier getriebene Simplicitat, jene

lang-weilige ermüdende Leere durch Ausfullung der Begleitung. Göttliche

Zierden sind es, die Mozart aus der Fülle seiner Harmonie hier zusetzte,

die aber bei diesem fur solche Schönheit unorganisirten Werk so isolirt

stehen, dass sie einen zweiten Bestandtheil ausmachen!"]

[Footnote 22: A notice from Hamburg (Reichardt's Mus. Ztg., I., p. 197) says

of Mozart's arrangement: "Michel Angelo's Gemälde muss kein David

über-malen wollen." Setzte doch Handel zu Mozart's Opern keine Orgel u.

s. w. oder vielmehr strich keine--weg"; whereupon Reichardt remarks that the

omitted word is illegible in the "esteemed correspondent's" handwriting.]

[Footnote 23: Jen. Allg. Litt. Ztg., 1804, I., p. 601. Rochlitz names himself as

the author of the detailed review (Fur Freunde der Tonk., I., p. 259).

Cf. A. M. Z., IX., p. 476; XV., p. 428; XXIX., p. 692.]

[Footnote 24: Reichardt's Mus. Ztg., I., p. 41. Zelter, who owns to this review

to Goethe (Briefw., II., p. 302; III., p. 418), used to perform the

"Messiah" in Mozart's version, with alterations and omissions (Berl.

Allg. Mus. Ztg., 1824, p. 427).]

[Footnote 25: Cf. Parke, Mus. Mem., II., 76.]

[Footnote 26: Thus Hiller not only rearranged the instrumentation of Pergolese's

"Stabat Mater," but adapted it partially as a four-part chorus; J. A.

Schulze turned six instrumental adagios, by J. Haydn, into a cantata,

"Der Versöhnungstod," for chorus and orchestra. And how was Mozart's

church music treated! (App. 2.)]

[Footnote 27: Gerber undertook, in all seriousness, to perform the choruses of

the "Messiah" in Mozart's version, but to have all the airs recomposed

by approved composers (A. M. Z., XX., p. 832).]

[Footnote 28: The conclusion to Gluck's overture to "Iphigenie in Aulis," which

has been, without proof, ascribed to Mozart, is, according to Marx

(Gluck, II., p. 71), by J. P. Schmidt.]

===

MOZART 40

BY DAVID WIDGER

Life of Mozart, Vol. 3 (of 3) · 第 7 / 13 章