ART OF THE NORTH PACIFIC COAST OF NORTH AMERICA[100]

[100] The present chapter is a revised edition of my essay, “The

Decorative Art of the Indians of the North Pacific Coast of America”

(Bulletin American Museum of Natural History, Vol. IX, pp. 123-176,

1897).

The general principles discussed in the preceding chapters, may now be

elucidated by a discussion of the style of the decorative art of the

Indians of the North Pacific Coast of North America.

Two styles may be distinguished: the man’s style expressed in the art

of wood carving and painting and their derivatives; and the woman’s

style which finds expression in weaving, basketry, and embroidery.

The two styles are fundamentally distinct. The former is symbolic, the

latter formal. The symbolic art has a certain degree of realism and

is full of meaning. The formal art has, at most, pattern names and no

especially marked significance.

We shall discuss the symbolic art first. Its essential characteristics

are an almost absolute disregard of the principles of perspective,

emphasis of significant symbols and an arrangement dictated by the form

of the decorative field.

While the Eskimo of Arctic America, the Chukchee and Koryak of Siberia,

the Negroes and many other people use carvings in the round which

serve no practical ends, but are made for the sake of representing a

figure,—man, animal, or supernatural being,—almost all the work of

the Indian artist of the region that we are considering serves at

the same time a useful end. When making simple totemic figures, the

artist is free to shape his subjects without adapting them to the

forms of utensils, but owing to their large size, he is limited by the

cylindrical form of the trunk of the tree from which they are carved.

The native artist is almost always restrained by the shape of the

object to which the decoration is applied.

[Illustration: Fig. 154. Tlingit helmet.]

[Illustration: Fig. 155. Mask representing dying warrior, Tlingit.]

The technical perfection of carvings and paintings, the exactness and

daring of composition and lines prove that realistic representations

are not beyond the powers of the artist. This may also be demonstrated

by a few exquisite examples of realistic carvings. The helmet shown

in fig. 154 is decorated with the head of an old man affected with

partial paralysis. Undoubtedly this specimen must be considered a

portrait head. Nose, eyes, mouth and the general expression, are highly

characteristic. In a mask (fig. 155) representing a dying warrior, the

artist has shown faithfully the wide lower jaw, the pentagonal face,

and the strong nose of the Indian. The relaxing muscles of mouth and

tongue, the drooping eyelids, and the motionless eyeballs, mark the

agonies of death. Plate IX represents a recent carving, a human figure

of rare excellence. Posture and drapery are free of all the formal

characteristics of North West coast style. Only the treatment of the

eye and the facial painting betray its ethnic origin. Here belongs

also the realistic head previously referred to, made by the Kwakiutl

Indians of Vancouver Island (fig. 156), which is used in a ceremony and

intended to deceive the spectators who are made to believe that it is

the head of a decapitated dancer.[101]

[101] The selection of North West Coast art given by Herbert Kühn

(Die Kunst der Primitiven, pp. 100, 104, Plates 48, 50, 51 are

characteristic only of realistic representations. Only Plates 47, 49

and part of 52 are stylistically typical).

[Illustration: PLATE IX.

Primitive art · 第 40 / 72 题