G. Sand

CIV. TO GEORGE SAND

Croisset, Tuesday, 2 February, 1869

My dear master,

You see in your troubadour a worn-out man. I have spent a week in

Paris, looking up wearisome information (from seven to nine hours in

fiacres every day, which is a fine way to make money out of

literature). Oh, well!

I have just reread my outline. All that I have still to write

horrifies me, or rather disgusts me, so that I want to vomit. It is

always so, when I get to work. It is then that I am bored, bored,

bored! But this time exceeds all others. That is why I dread so much

interruptions in the daily grind. I could not do otherwise, however.

I dragged about at funerals at Pere-Lachaise, in the valley of

Montmorency, through shops of religious objects, etc.

In short, I have enough material for four or five months now. What a

big "Hooray" I shall utter, when it is finished, and when I am not

in the midst of remaking the bourgeois! It is high time that I

enjoyed life.

I saw Sainte-Beuve and the Princess Mathilde, and I know thoroughly

the story of their break, which seems to me irrevocable. Sainte-

Beuve was outraged against Dalloz and has gone to le Temps. The

princess begged him not to do anything about it. He did not listen

to her. That is all. My opinion on it, if you wish to know it, is

this. The first wrong was done by the princess, who was hasty; but

the second and the worst was by pere Beuve, who did not behave as a

courteous man. If one has a friend, a rather good fellow, and that

friend has given one thirty thousand francs a year income, one owes

him some consideration. It seems to me that in Sainte-Beuve's place

I should have said, "That displeases you, let us talk no more about

it." He lacked manners and poise. What disgusted me a little,

between ourselves, was the way he praised the emperor to me! yes, he

praised Badinguet, to me!--And we were alone!

The princess had taken the thing too seriously from the beginning.

I wrote to her, saying that Sainte-Beuve was right; he, I am sure,

found me rather cold. It was then, in order to justify himself to

me, that he made these protestations of isidorian love, which

humiliated me a little; for it was as if he took me for a complete

imbecile.

I think that he is preparing for a funeral like Beranger's, and that

Hugo's popularity makes him jealous. Why write for the papers, when

one can make books, and when one is not perishing of hunger? He's no

sage, Sainte-Beuve. Not like you!

Your strength charms me and amazes me. I mean the strength of your

entire being, not only that of your brain.

You speak of criticism in your last letter to me, telling me that it

will soon disappear. I think, on the contrary, that it is, at most,

only at its dawning. They are on a different tack from before, but

nothing more. At the time of La Harpe, they were grammarians; at the

time of Sainte-Beuve and of Taine, they are historians. When will

they be artists, only artists, but really artists? Where do you know

a criticism? Who is there who is anxious about the work in itself,

in an intense way? They analyze very keenly the setting in which it

was written, and the causes that produced it; but the UNCONSCIOUS

poetic expression? Where it comes from? its composition, its style?

the point of view of the author? Never.

That criticism would require great imagination and great sympathy.

I mean a faculty of enthusiasm that is always ready, and then

TASTE, a rare quality, even among the best, so much so that one

does not talk about it any longer.

What irritates me every day, is to see a master-piece and a

disgrace put on the same level. They exalt the little, and they

lower the great, nothing is more imbecile nor more immoral.

At Pere-Lachaise I was seized with a profound and sorrowful disgust

for humanity. You can not imagine the fetichism of the tombs. The

real Parisian is more of an idolater than a negro is! It made me

long to lie down in one of the graves.

And the PROGRESSIVES think that there is nothing better than to

rehabilitate Robespierre! Note Hamel's book! If the Republic

returned they would bless the liberty poles out of policy and

believing that measure strong.

When shall I see you? I plan to be in Paris from Easter to the end

of May, This spring I shall go to see you at Nohant, I swear it.

CV. TO GUSTAVE FLAUBERT

Nohant, 11 February, 1869

While you are running around to get material for your novel, I am

inventing all sorts of pretexts not to write mine. I let myself be

distracted by guilty fancies, something I am reading fascinates me

and I set myself to scribbling on paper that will be left in my

desk and bring me no return. That has amused me, or rather that has

compelled me, for it would be in vain for me to struggle against

these caprices; they interrupt me and force me...you see that I have

not the strength of mind that you think.

As for our masculine friend, he is ungrateful, while our feminine

friend is too exacting. You were right; they are both wrong and it

is not their fault, it is the social machinery which insists on it.

The kind of recognition, that is to say, submission that she exacts,

depends on a tradition that the present time still profits by (there

lies the evil); but does not accept any longer as a duty. The

notions of the obliged are changed, those of the obliger ought to

change also. It must be said that one does not buy moral liberty by

any kindness,--and as for him, he should have foreseen that he would

be considered enchained. The simplest thing would have been not to

care about having thirty thousand francs a year. It is so easy to do

without it. Let him extricate himself. They won't entangle us in it:

we aren't so foolish!

You say very good things about criticism. But in order to do as you

say, there must be artists, and the artist is too much occupied with

his own work, to forget himself in estimating that of others.

Heavens, what fine weather! Don't you enjoy it, at least from your

window? I'll wager that the tulip tree is in bud. Here, the peaches

and the apricots are in flower. It is said that they will be ruined;

that does not stop them from being pretty and not tormenting

themselves about it.

We have had our family carnival: my niece, my grandchildren, etc.

We all put on fancy dress; it is not difficult here, one only has to

go to the wardrobe and one comes down again as Cassandra, Scapin,

Mezzetin, Figaro, Basile, etc., all that is very pretty. The pearl

was Lolo as a little Louis XIII in crimson satin, trimmed with white

satin fringed and laced with silver. I spent three days in making

this costume, which was very chic; it was so pretty and so funny on

that little girl of three years, that we were all amazed in looking

at her.

Then we played charades, had supper, and frolicked till daylight.

You see that banished to a desert, we keep up a good deal of

vitality. And that I delay all I can, the trip to Paris and the

chapter of business. If you were there, I would not need to be

urged. But you are going there the end of March if and I can not

afford to wait till then. To conclude, you swear to come this

summer and we count on it absolutely. Sooner than not have you come

I shall go to drag you here by the hair. I embrace you most warmly

on this good hope.

The George Sand-Gustave Flaubert Letters · 第 95 / 277 题