THE OLD STORY OF SELFISHNESS

It might be maintained that the symptoms of true affection--altruistic

devotion to the verge of self-sacrifice--are revealed, at any rate, in

the _conjugal_ love of Savitri and of Damayanti. Savitri follows the

god of death as he carries away her husband's spirit, and by her

devotion and entreaties persuades Yama to restore him to life; while

Damayanti (whose story we did not finish) follows her husband, after

he has gambled away all his kingdom, into the forest to suffer with

him. One night, while she sleeps, he steals half of her only garment

and deserts her. Left alone in the terrible forest with tigers and

snakes, she sobs aloud and repeatedly faints away from fear. "Yet I do

not weep for myself," she exclaims; "my only thought is, how will you

fare, my royal master, being left thus all alone?" She is seized by a

huge snake, which coils its body around her; yet "even in this

situation she thinks not so much of herself as she bewails the fate of

the king." A hunter saves her and proceeds to make improper advances,

but she, faithful to her lord, curses the hunter and he falls dead

before her. Then she resumes her solitary roaming in the gloomy

forest, "_distressed by grief for her husband's fate_," unmindful of

his cruelty, or of her own sad plight.

It is needless to continue the tale; the reader cannot be so obtuse as

not to notice the _moral_ of it. The stories of Savitri and of

Damayanti, far from exemplifying Hindoo conjugal devotion, simply

afford fresh proof of the hoggish selfishness of the male Hindoo. They

are intended to be _object-lessons_ to wives, teaching them--like the

laws of Manu and the custom of widow burning--that they do not exist

for their own sakes, but for their husbands. Reading the stories in

the light of this remark, we cannot fail to note everywhere the subtle

craft of the sly men who invented them. If further evidence were

needed to sustain my view it would be found in the fact related by F.

Reuleaux, that to this day the priests arrange an annual

"prayer-festival" of Hindoo women at which the wife must in every way

show her subjection to her husband and master. She must wash his feet,

dry them, put a wreath around his neck, and bring offerings to the

gods, praying that _he_ may prosper and live long. Then follows a meal

for which she has prepared all _his_ favorite dishes. And as a climax,

_the story of Savitri is read_, a story in which the wife lives only

for the husband, while he, as he rudely tells her--after all her

devotion--_lives only for his parents_!

If these stories were anything else than slyly planned object-lessons

calculated to impress and subjugate the women, why is it that the

_husband_ is never chosen to act the self-sacrificing part? He does,

indeed, sometimes indulge in frantic outbursts of grief and maudlin

sentimentality, but that is because he has lost the young woman who

pleased his senses. There is no sign of soul-love here; the husband

never dreams of devoting his life to her, of sacrificing it for her

sake, as she is constantly exhorted to do for his sake. In a word,

masculine selfishness is the keynote of Hindoo life. "When in danger,

never hesitate to sacrifice your goods and your wife to save your

life," we read in the _Hitopadesa_ (25); and No. 4112 of Boehtlingk's

_Hindu Maxims_ declares bluntly that a wife exists for the purpose of

bearing sons, and a son for the purpose of offering sacrifices after

his father's death. There we have masculine selfishness in a nutshell.

Another maxim declares that a wife can atone for her lack or loss of

beauty by faithful subjection to her husband. And in return for all

the devotion expected of her she is utterly despised--considered

unworthy of an education, unfit even to profess virginity--in a word,

looked on "as scarcely forming a part of the human species." In the

most important event in her life--marriage--her choice is never

consulted. The matter is, as we have seen, left to the family barber,

or to the parents, to whom questions of caste and wealth are of

infinitely more importance than personal preferences. When those

matters are arranged the man satisfies himself concerning the

inclinations of the chosen girl's _kindred_, and when assured that he

will not "suffer the affront of a refusal" from _them_ he proceeds

with the offer and the bargaining. "To marry or to buy a girl are

synonymous terms in this country," says Dubois (I., 198); and he

proceeds, to give an account of the bargaining and the disgraceful

quarrels this leads to.

Primitive Love and Love-Stories · 第 475 / 548 题