CHAPTER XXI

IN EDINBURGH

1778-1790. _Aet._ 55-67

On settling in Edinburgh Smith took a house in the Canongate--Panmure

House, at the foot of Panmure Close, one of the steep and narrow wynds

that descend from the north side of the Canongate towards the base of

the Calton Hill; and this house was his home for the rest of his days,

and in it he died. The Canongate--the old Court end of the Scottish

capital--was still at the close of last century the fashionable

residential quarter of the city, although Holyrood had then long lain

deserted--as Hamilton of Bangour called it,

A virtuous palace where no monarch dwells.

The Scottish nobility had their town-houses in its gloomy courts, and

great dowagers and famous generals still toiled up its cheerless

stairs. Panmure House itself had been the residence of the Panmure

family before Smith occupied it, and became the residence of the

Countess of Aberdeen after his death. Most of his own more particular

friends too--the better aristocracy of letters and science--lived

about him here. If it was to Edinburgh, as Gibbon remarks, that "taste

and philosophy seemed to have retired from the smoke and hurry of the

immense capital of London," it was in the ancient smoke and leisure of

the Canongate they found their sanctuary. Robertson flitted out,

indeed, to the Grange House; Black--Smith's special crony in this

Edinburgh period--to the present Blind Asylum in Nicolson Street, then

a country villa; and Adam Ferguson to a place at the Sciennes which,

though scarce two miles from the Cross, was thought so outrageously

remote by the people of the compact little Edinburgh of those days,

that his friends always called it Kamtschatka, as if it lay in the

ends of the earth. But Kames and Hailes still lived in New Street, Sir

John Dalrymple and Monboddo and many other notabilities in St. John

Street, Cullen in the Mint, and Dugald Stewart in the Lothian Hut (the

town-house of the Marquis of Lothian) in the Horse Wynd.

Panmure House is still standing. It is a much more modern structure

than the houses near it, having been built towards the middle of last

century; and although its rooms are now mostly tenantless, and its

garden a cooper's yard, it wears to this day an air of spacious and

substantial comfort which is entirely wanting in the rest of the

neighbourhood. William Windham, the statesman, who dined in it

repeatedly when he was in Edinburgh with Burke in 1785, thought it a

very stately house indeed for a philosopher. "House magnificent," he

enters in his diary, "and place fine," and one can still imagine how

it would appear so when the plastered walls were yet white, and the

eye looked over the long strip of terraced garden on to the soft green

slopes of the Calton. There was then no building of any kind on or

about the Calton Hill, except the Observatory, and Dugald Stewart, who

was very fond of rural scenery, always said that the great charm of

his own house a few closes up was its view of the Calton crags and

braes.

Smith brought over his mother and his cousin, Miss Douglas, from

Kirkcaldy, and a few months later the youngest son of his cousin,

Colonel Douglas of Strathendry, who was to attend school and college

with a view to the bar, and whom he made his heir. Windham, after

visiting them, makes the same note twice in his diary, "Felt strongly

the impression of a family completely Scotch." Smith's house was

noted for its simple and unpretending hospitality. He liked to have

his friends about him without the formality of an invitation, and few

strangers of distinction visited Edinburgh without being entertained

in Panmure House. His Sunday suppers were still remembered and spoken

of in Edinburgh when M'Culloch lived there as a young man. Scotch

Sabbatarianism had not at that time reached the rigour that came in

with the evangelical revival in the beginning of this century, and the

Sunday supper was a regular Edinburgh institution. Even the

Evangelical leaders patronised it. Lord Cockburn and Mrs. Somerville

both speak with very agreeable recollections of the Sunday supper

parties of the Rev. Sir Harry Moncreiff, and Boswell mentions being

invited to one by another Evangelical leader, Dr. Alexander Webster.

His mother, his friends, his books--these were Smith's three great

joys. He had a library of about 3000 volumes, as varied a collection

in point of subject-matter as it would be possible to find. Professor

Shield Nicholson, who saw a large portion of it, says: "I was most

struck by the large number of books of travel and of poetry, of some

of which there were more than one edition, and occasionally _éditions

de luxe_. I had hoped to find marginal notes or references which might

have thrown light on the authorities of some passages in the _Wealth

of Nations_ (for Smith gives no references), but even the ingenious

oft-quoted author of the _Tracts on the Corn Laws_ has escaped without

a mark. At the same time pamphlets have been carefully bound together

and indexes prefixed in Smith's own writing."[284]

Mr. James Bonar has been able to collect a list of probably two-thirds

of Smith's books--about 1000 books, or 2200 volumes.[285] Nearly a

third of the whole are in French, another third in Latin, Greek, and

Italian, and a little more than a third in English. According to Mr.

Bonar's analysis, a fifth of them were on Literature and Art; a fifth

were Latin and Greek classics; a fifth on Law, Politics, and

Biography; a fifth on Political Economy and History; and the remaining

fifth on Science and Philosophy. One cannot help remarking, as an

indication of the economist's tastes, the almost complete absence of

works in theology and prose fiction. Hume's _Dialogues on Natural

Religion_ and Pascal's _Pensées_ belong as much to philosophy as

theology; Jeremy Taylor's _Antiquitates Christianae_, Father Paul

Sarpi's _History of the Council of Trent_, and Ruchat's _Histoire de

la Reformation de la Suisse_ belong as much to history; and except

these the only representatives of theology on Smith's shelves were the

English Bible, Watson's edition, 1722--probably his parents' family

Bible--a French translation of the Koran, and Van Maestricht's

_Theologia_. The only sermons, except those of Massillon in French,

are the _Sermons of Mr. Yorick_. Those sermons, however, were the only

representative of Sterne. Goldsmith was represented by his poems, but

not by his fiction; and Defoe, Fielding, Richardson, and Smollett were

not represented at all. One or two French novels were there, but

except Gulliver, which came in with the complete edition of Swift's

works in 1784, the only English novel Smith seems to have possessed

was the _Man of the World_, by his friend Henry Mackenzie. It is

perhaps stranger that he ignored the novel than that he ignored

theology, for the novel was then a very rising and popular literary

form, and Smith began life as a professed literary critic. His mind

seems to have been too positive to care much for tales. On the other

hand, of the Greek and Latin classics he not unfrequently had several

different editions. He had eight, for example, of _Horace_, who seems

to have been an especial favourite.

Like most men who are fond of books, he seems to have bound them well,

and often elegantly. Smellie, the printer, says that the first time he

happened to be in Smith's library he was "looking at the books with

some degree of curiosity, and perhaps surprise, for most of the

volumes were elegantly, and some of them superbly bound," when Smith,

observing him, said, "You must have remarked that I am a beau in

nothing but my books."[286] M'Culloch, however, who had seen the

books, doubts whether their condition warranted the account given of

them by Smellie, and says that while they were neatly, and in some

cases even elegantly bound, he saw few or none of which the binding

could with propriety be called superb.

The Custom House was on the upper floors of the Royal Exchange, in

Exchange Square, off the High Street; and Kay, standing in his shop

over at the corner of the Parliament Close, must often have seen Smith

walk past from his house to his office in the morning exactly as he

has depicted him in one of his portraits,--in a light-coloured coat,

probably linen; knee-breeches, white silk stockings, buckle shoes, and

flat broad-brimmed beaver hat; walking erect with a bunch of flowers

in his left hand, and his cane, held by the middle, borne on his right

shoulder, as Smellie tells us was Smith's usual habit, "as a soldier

carries his musket." When he walked his head always moved gently from

side to side, and his body swayed, Smellie says, "vermicularly," as if

at each alternate step "he meant to alter his direction, or even to

turn back." Often, moreover, his lips would be moving all the while,

and smiling in rapt conversation with invisible companions. A very

noticeable figure he was as he went up and down the High Street, and

he used to tell himself the observations of two market women about him

as he marched past them one day. "Hegh sirs!" said one, shaking her

head significantly. "And he's weel put on too!" rejoined the other,

surprised that one who appeared from his dress to be likely to have

friends should be left by them to walk abroad alone.

There were five Commissioners in the Scotch Board of Customs, but

Smith's colleagues were none of them men of any public reputation at

the time, and they are now mere names; but the name of the Secretary

of the Board, R.E. Phillips, may be mentioned for the circumstance

that, after living to the great age of 104, he was buried--for what

reason I know not--in the same grave with Adam Smith in Canongate

Churchyard. The business of the office was mostly of a routine and

simple character: considering appeals from merchants against the local

collector's assessments; the appointment of a new officer here, the

suppression of one there; a report on a projected colliery; a plan for

a lighthouse, a petition from a wine importer, or the owner of a

bounty sloop; a representation about the increase of illicit trade in

Orkney, or the appearance of smuggling vessels in the Minch; the

despatch of troops to repress illegal practices at some distillery, or

to watch a suspected part of the coast; the preparation of the annual

returns of income and expenditure, the payment of salaries, and

transmission of the balance to the Treasury.

Smith attended to those duties with uncommon diligence; he says

himself, in his letter to the Principal of Glasgow College in 1787 on

his appointment to the Rectorship, that he was so regular an attendant

at the Custom House that he could "take the play for a week at any

time" without giving offence or provoking comment. He was evidently a

very conscientious and on the whole, no doubt, a satisfactory

administrator, though he may have been in some things slower than a

clerk bred to business would have been, and caused occasionally a

ludicrous mistake through his incidental absence of mind. Sir Walter

Scott relates two anecdotes illustrative of that weakness, on the

authority of one of Smith's colleagues on the Board of Customs. Having

one day to sign an official document as Commissioner, Smith, instead

of signing his own name, wrote an imitation of the signature of the

Commissioner who had written before him. The other story, though,

possibly enough, embellished unconsciously by the teller in some

details, is yet of too distinct and peculiar a character to be easily

rejected, and for the same reason will best be given in Scott's own

words:--

"That Board (the Board of Customs) had in their service as porter a

stately person, who, dressed in a huge scarlet gown or cloak covered

with frogs of worsted lace, and holding in his hand a staff about

seven feet high as an emblem of his office, used to mount guard before

the Custom House when a Board was to be held. It was the etiquette

that as each Commissioner entered the porter should go through a sort

of salute with his staff of office, resembling that which officers

used formerly to perform through their spontoon, and then marshal the

dignitary to the hall of meeting. This ceremony had been performed

before the great economist perhaps five hundred times. Nevertheless

one day, as he was about to enter the Custom House, the motions of

this janitor seem to have attracted his eye without their character or

purpose reaching his apprehension, and on a sudden he began to imitate

his gestures as a recruit does those of his drill serjeant. The porter

having drawn up in front of the door, presented his staff as a soldier

does his musket. The Commissioner, raising his cane and holding it

with both hands by the middle, returned the salute with the utmost

gravity. The inferior officer, much annoyed, levelled his weapon,

wheeled to the right, stepping a pace back to give the Commissioner

room to pass, lowering his staff at the same time in token of

obeisance. Dr. Smith, instead of passing on, drew up on the opposite

side and lowered his cane to the same angle. The functionary, much out

of consequence, next moved upstairs with his staff upraised, while the

author of the _Wealth of Nations_ followed with his bamboo in

precisely the same posture, and his whole soul apparently wrapped in

the purpose of placing his foot exactly on the same spot of each step

which had been occupied by the officer who preceded him. At the door

of the hall the porter again drew off, saluted with his staff, and

bowed reverentially. The philosopher again imitated his motions, and

returned his bow with the most profound gravity. When the Doctor

entered the apartment the spell under which he seemed to act was

entirely broken, and our informant, who, very much amused, had

followed him the whole way, had some difficulty to convince him that

he had been doing anything extraordinary."[287]

This inability to recollect in a completely waking state what had

taken place during the morbid one separates this story from all the

rest that are told of Smith's absence of mind. For his friends used

always to observe of his fits of abstraction what a remarkable faculty

he possessed of recovering, when he came to himself, long portions of

the conversation that had been going on around him while his mind was

absent. But here there is an entire break between the one state and

the other; the case seems more allied to trance, though it doubtless

had the same origin as the more ordinary fits of absence, and, like

them, was only one of the penalties of that power of profound and

prolonged concentration to which the world owes so much; it was

thinker's cramp, if I may use the expression. In one way Smith took

more interest in his official work than ordinary Commissioners would

do, because he found it useful to his economic studies. In 1778 he

wrote Sir John Sinclair, who had desired a loan of the French inquiry

entitled _Mémoires concernant les Impositions_, that "he had frequent

occasion to consult the book himself both in the course of his private

studies and in the business of his present employment," and Sir John

states that Smith used to admit "that he derived great advantage from

the practical information he derived by means of his official

situation, and that he would not have otherwise known or believed how

essential practical knowledge was to the thorough understanding of

political subjects."[288] This is confirmed by the fact that most of

the additions and corrections introduced into the third edition of the

_Wealth of Nations_--the first published after his settlement in the

Customs--are connected with that branch of the public service.

Still his friends were perhaps right in lamenting that the duties of

this office, light though they really were, used up his time and

energy too completely to permit his application to the great work on

government which he had projected. "Though they required little

exertion of thought, they were yet," says Dugald Stewart, "sufficient

to waste his spirits and dissipate his attention; and now that his

career is closed, it is impossible to reflect on the time they

consumed without lamenting that it had not been employed in labours

more profitable to the world and more equal to his mind. During the

first years of his residence in this city his studies seemed to be

entirely suspended, and his passion for letters served only to amuse

his leisure and to animate his conversation. The infirmities of age,

of which he very early began to feel the approach, reminded him at

last, when it was too late, of what he yet owed to the public and to

his own fame. The principal materials of the works which he had

announced had been long ago collected, and little probably was wanting

but a few years of health and retirement to bestow on them that

systematical arrangement in which he delighted."[289]

His leisure seems to have been passed during these later years of his

life very largely in the study of the Greek poets, and he frequently

remarked to Dugald Stewart, when found in his library with Sophocles

or Euripides open before him on the table, that of all the amusements

of old age, the most grateful and soothing was the renewal of

acquaintance with the favourite studies and the favourite authors of

our youth.[290] Besides, the work of composition seems to have grown

really more arduous to him. He was always a slow composer, and had

never acquired increased facility from increased practice. Much of his

time too was now given to the enjoyments of friendship. I have already

mentioned his Sunday suppers, but besides these he founded, soon after

settling in Edinburgh, in co-operation with the two friends who were

his closest associates during the whole of this last period of his

career--Black the chemist, and Hutton the geologist--a weekly dining

club, which met every Friday at two o'clock in a tavern in the

Grassmarket. Dr. Swediaur, the Paris physician, who spent some time in

Edinburgh in 1784 making researches along with Cullen, and was made a

member of this club during his stay, writes Jeremy Bentham: "We have a

club here which consists of nothing but philosophers. Dr. Adam Smith,

Cullen, Black, Mr. M'Gowan, etc., belong to it, and I am also a member

of it. Thus I spend once a week in a most enlightened and agreeable,

cheerful and social company." And of Smith, with whom he says he is

intimately acquainted, he tells Bentham he "is quite our man"--in

opinion and tendencies, I presume. Ferguson was a member of the club,

though after being struck with paralysis in 1780 he never dined out;

but among the constant attenders were Henry Mackenzie, Dugald Stewart,

Professor John Playfair, Sir James Hall the geologist; Robert Adam,

architect; Adam's brother-in-law, John Clerk of Eldin, inventor of the

new system of naval tactics; and Lord Daer--the "noble youthful

Daer"--who was the first lord Burns ever met, and taught the poet that

in a lord he after all but "met a brither," with nothing uncommon

about him,

Except good sense and social glee,

An' (what surprised me) modesty.

Lord Daer was the eldest son of the fourth Earl of Selkirk, and, on

the outbreak of the French Revolution, a few years after Burns met

him, became one of the most ardent of the "Friends of the People"; and

was intimate with Mirabeau, to whom he ventured to speak a word for

the king's safety, and was told that the French would not commit the

English blunder of cutting off their king's head, because that was the

usual way to establish a despotism.[291] Great expectations were

cherished of Lord Daer's future, but they were defeated by his

premature death in 1794. The Mr. M'Gowan mentioned by Swediaur is

little known now, but he was an antiquary and naturalist, a friend and

correspondent of Shenstone, Pennant, and Bishop Percy. M'Gowan kept

house with a friend of his youth, who had returned to him after long

political exile, Andrew Lumisden, Prince Charlie's Secretary, who was

also a warm friend of Smith, and whose portrait by Tassie is one of

the few relics of Smith's household effects which still exist.

Lumisden had been Hamilton of Bangour's companion in exile at Rouen,

and was no doubt also a member of this club.

According to Playfair, the chief delight of the club was to listen to

the conversation of its three founders. "As all the three possessed

great talents, enlarged views, and extensive information, without any

of the stateliness and formality which men of letters think it

sometimes necessary to affect, as they were all three easily amused,

and as the sincerity of their friendship had never been darkened by

the least shade of envy, it would be hard to find an example where

everything favourable to good society was more perfectly united, and

everything adverse more entirely excluded."[292] This friendship of

Smith, Black, and Hutton, if not so famous as the friendship between

Smith and Hume, was not less really memorable. Each of them had

founded--or done more than any other single person to found--a

science; they may be called the fathers of modern chemistry, of modern

geology, and of modern political economy; and for all their great

achievements, they were yet men of the most unaffected simplicity of

character. In other respects they were very different from one

another, but their differences only knit them closer together, and

made them more interesting to their friends.

Black was a man of fine presence and courtly bearing, grave, calm,

polished, well dressed, speaking, what was then rare, correct English

without a trace of Scotch accent, and always with sense and insight

even in fields beyond his own. Smith used to say that he never knew a

man with less nonsense in him than Dr. Black, and that he was often

indebted to his better discrimination in the judgment of character, a

point in which Smith, not only by the general testimony of his

acquaintance, but by his own confession, was by no means strong,

inasmuch as he was, as he acknowledges, too apt to form his opinion

from a single feature. Now the judgment of character was, according to

Robison, Black's very strongest point. "Indeed," says Robison, "were I

to say what natural talent Dr. Black possessed in the most uncommon

degree, I should say it was his judgment of human character, and a

talent which he had of expressing his opinion in a single short

phrase, which fixed it in the mind never to be forgotten."[293] He was

a very brilliant lecturer, for Brougham, who had been one of his

students, said that he had heard Pitt and Fox and Plunket, but for

mere intellectual gratification he should prefer sitting again on the

old benches of the chemistry classroom, "while the first philosopher

of his age was the historian of his own discoveries"; and, adored as

he was by his students, he was the object of scarce less veneration

and pride to the whole body of his fellow-citizens. Lord Cockburn

tells us how even the wildest boys used to respect Black. "No lad,"

says he, "could ever be irreverent towards a man so pale, so gentle,

so elegant, and so illustrious."

Hutton was in many respects the reverse of Black. He was a dweller

out of doors, a man of strong vitality and high spirits, careless of

dress and appearance, setting little store by the world's prejudices

or fashions, and speaking the broadest Scotch, but overflowing with

views and speculations and fun, and with a certain originality of

expression, often very piquant. Every face brightened, says Playfair,

when Hutton entered a room. He had been bred a doctor, though he never

practised, but, devoting himself to agriculture, had been for years

one of the leading improvers of the Border counties, and is said,

indeed, to have been the first man in Scotland to plough with a pair

of horses and no driver, the old eight-ox plough being then in

universal use. Between his early chemical studies and his later

agricultural pursuits, his curiosity was deeply aroused as he walked

about the fields and dales, not merely concerning the composition but

the origin of the soils and rocks and minerals that lay in the crust

of the globe, and he never ceased examining and speculating till he

completed his theory of the earth which became a new starting-point

for all subsequent geological research. He was a bold investigator,

and Playfair distinguishes him finely in this respect from Black by

remarking that "Dr. Black hated nothing so much as error, and Dr.

Hutton nothing so much as ignorance. The one was always afraid of

going beyond the truth, and the other of not reaching it." He went

little into general society, but Playfair says that in the more

private circles which he preferred he was the most delightful of

companions.

The conversation of the club was often, as was to be expected from its

composition, scientific, but Professor Playfair says it was always

free, and never didactic or disputatious, and that "as the club was

much the resort of the strangers who visited Edinburgh from any

objects connected with art or with science, it derived from them an

extraordinary degree of vivacity and interest."[294]

Its name was the Oyster Club, and it may be thought from that

circumstance that those great philosophers did not spurn the delights

of more ordinary mortals. But probably no three men could be found who

cared less for the pleasures of the table. Hutton was an abstainer;

Black a vegetarian, his usual fare being "some bread, a few prunes,

and a measured quantity of milk diluted with water"; and as for Smith,

his only weakness seems to have been for lump sugar, according to an

anecdote preserved by Scott, which, trivial though it be, may be

repeated here, under the shelter of the great novelist's example and

of Smith's own biographical principle that nothing about a great man

is too minute not to be worth knowing.

Scott, speaking apparently as an eye-witness, says: "We shall never

forget one particular evening when he (Smith) put an elderly maiden

lady who presided at the tea-table to sore confusion by neglecting

utterly her invitation to be seated, and walking round and round the

circle, stopping ever and anon to steal a lump from the sugar basin,

which the venerable spinster was at length constrained to place on her

own knee, as the only method of securing it from his uneconomical

depredations. His appearance mumping the eternal sugar was something

indescribable." It is probably the same story Robert Chambers gives in

his _Traditions of Edinburgh_, and he makes the scene Smith's own

parlour, and the elderly spinster his cousin, Miss Jean Douglas. It

may have been so, for Scott, as a school companion of young David

Douglas, would very likely have been occasionally at Panmure House.

FOOTNOTES:

[284] Nicholson's edition of _Wealth of Nations_, p. 8.

[285] Bonar's _Catalogue of the Library of Adam Smith_, p. viii.

[286] Smellie's _Life of Smith_, p. 297.

[287] _Quarterly Review_, xxxvi. 200.

[288] _Sir J. Sinclair's Correspondence_, i. 389.

[289] Stewart's _Works_, x. 73.

[290] Stewart's _Life of Reid_, sec. iii.

[291] Sinclair's _Old Times and Distant Places_, p. 7.

[292] Stewart's _Life of Reid_, sec. iii.

[293] Black's _Works_, I. xxxii.

[294] _Transactions_, R.S.E., v. 98.

Life of Adam Smith · 第 21 / 32 章