Since then the Convocation of York has been regularly summoned, met,

adjourned, and been prorogued, without even the dutiful address to the

crown, which is regularly discussed and adopted in Canterbury. In the

year 1847, a spasmodic attempt at life was manifested in this venerable

and ill-used institution. Archbishop Harcourt had consented that an

address to the crown should be adopted, and himself procured a draft to

be approved by the bishops. His grace however died before the day of

meeting. Some difficulty was experienced by the officials, both in York

and London, as to the course to be pursued; but a precedent having been

pointed out in the reign of James I., when Archbishop Hutton died after

summoning the Convocation and before its assembly, a writ was issued

from the crown to the dean and chapter at York to elect a _praeses_ for

the Convocation during the vacancy of the archbishoprick. They appointed

the canon who happened to be in residence; an unusually large attendance

was given; the Convocation was opened, the names called over, and then

the officials had reached the limit of their experience; according to

_their_ precedents we ought all to have been sent away. The address

however was called on by the _praeses_, being apparently quite unaware

that a _prolocutor_ should be chosen by the clergy before they proceeded

to business. Such an officer probably seemed to the dignitary already in

the chair like a _second King of Brentford_ "smelling at one rose," and

the demand was refused. Further difficulties ensued, of course, the

moment the debate was opened; and finally, the _praeses_, determined not

to be tempted out of his depth, rose all at once, and read the fatal

_formula_ which restored our glorious Chapter House to its silent

converse with the ghosts. The Convocation has never since been heard of.

CAN EBOR.

THE OLD COUNTESS OF DESMOND.

(Vol. iv., p. 305.)

If your correspondent A. B. R. will refer to Walpole's _Fugitive Pieces_

he will find a minute inquiry into the person and age of this long-lived

lady. This is doubtless the dissertation alluded to by C. (Vol. ii., p.

219.) Pennant has _two_ notices of the countess in his Scotch tours. In

that of 1769 (which somewhat strangely follows the one of 1772), he

gives at p. 87. the engraving spoken of (Vol. iv., p. 306.), apparently

taken from the original at Dupplin Castle. It differs a little from R.'s

description of another portrait, as the cloak is strapped over the

chest, not held by a button. In 1772 Pennant again describes this

portrait in his _Tour in Scotland_, vol. ii. p. 88., and speaks of four

others, viz., first, at Devonshire House; second, at the Hon. John

Yorke's seat, near Cheltenham; third, at Mr. Scott's, printer; and the

fourth, in the Standard Closet, Windsor Castle. At the back of the last

is written with a pen "Rembrandt." "A mistake (says P.) as Rembrandt was

not fourteen years of age (he was indeed only eight) in 1614, at which

time it is certain the countess was not living."

In my copy of the _Fugitive Pieces_ (the Strawberry Hill edition,

presented by Walpole to Cole), I find the following manuscript note by

Cole; _an amplification of the_ passage from Walpole's letters quoted at

p. 306.:--

"Being at Strawberry Hill in April, 1773, I saw there a copy of

the picture commonly attributed to the old Countess of Desmond;

but Mr. Walpole told me that there is sufficient proof that it is

a painter's mother, I think Rembrandt's. However, by a letter from

Mr. Lort, April 15, 1774, he assures me that on Mr. Pennant's

calling at Strawberry Hill to see this picture, he was much

chagrined at having a print of it engraved for his book, till Mr.

Lort revived him by carrying him to a garret in Devonshire House,

where was a picture of this same countess with her name on it,

exactly corresponding to his engraved print. I remember a

tolerable good old picture of her at Mr. Dicey's, prebendary of

Bristol, at Walton in Bucks."

Walpole could not dismiss Pennant without a disparaging remark. He is "a

superficial man, and knows little of history or antiquity; but he has a

violent rage for being an author." Those who live in glass houses should

not throw stones: Pennant would not have displayed the ignorance which

Walpole exhibits in the instance before us. In an inscription, which the

latter gives, on a Countess of Desmond buried at Sligo, occurs the

following contraction: "Desmoniae _Noie_ Elizabetha." Walpole says

(_Fugitive Pieces_, p. 204.), "This word I can make no sense of, but

_sic originale_; I take it to be redundancy of the carver. It seems to

be a repetition of the last three syllables of Desmoniae!"

The sarcastic observations which Walpole passes on the Society of

Antiquaries, its members, and its publications, are so frequent and so

bitter, that they must have been founded on some offence not to be

pardoned. Were the remarks on the "Historic Doubts" by the president,

Dean Milles, and by the Rev. Robert Masters (printed in the first two

volumes of the _Archaeologia_), regarded as satisfactorily confuting

Walpole's arguments; or did he aim, but unsuccessfully, at the

president's chair?

J. H. M.

Bath.

COINS OF VABALATHUS.

(Vol. iv., p. 255.)

There have been many attempts to explain the puzzling VCRIMDR, on the

supposition that a Latin sentence was concealed under these letters.

Pinkerton suggested "Voluntate Caesaris Romani Imperatoris Maximi Domini,

Rex." I hope to offer a better solution, which, although not new, has

been passed over, I believe, by all subsequent writers. The Rev. George

North, in the _Museum Meadianum_, p. 97., gives the following note:

"Apud Arabes accepi verbum Karama significare Honoravit, a quo Ucrima,

et Ucrim; quo sensu respondet hoc Arabicum [Greek: To Sebasto] apud

Graecos." On applying to a well-known scholar and linguist here, I found

that from the verb _Karama_ there was derived the adjective _Kar[=i]mat_

(nobilis), from which again the superlative _Akram_ comes. There can, I

think, be little doubt that the word VCRIMDR is originally derived from

this verb _Karama_, and that it is most probably equivalent to

_Nobilissimus_, a title so common shortly afterwards, as applied to the

heirs to the empire.[3]

[Footnote 3: "_Nobilissimus_, in the Byzantine historians, is

synonymous with Caesar."--_Niebuhr._]

The word [Greek: SROIAS] or [Greek: SRIAS], which appears on the

Alexandrian coins of this prince, is of more difficult explanation. Some

think it a praenomen, some a Syriac or other Eastern title, perhaps

corresponding to VCRIMDR. Pellerin thought so. I hope some Oriental

scholar will direct his attention to this point. These coins are very

often ill struck, so that the part of the legend below the head, where

the word in question is found, is indistinct, for which reason I suppose

MR. TAYLOR has followed the erroneous reading of Banduri, [Greek:

HERMIAS] (properly [Greek: HERMIAS], with lunate epsilon) for [Greek:

SROIAS], which has been corrected by Eckhel. Of three specimens which I

possess, one only reads clearly [Greek: SROIAS], from the

above-mentioned cause, but it is unquestionably the correct reading on

all. The best arrangement of the legend, from analogy with those forms

used by the Romans, is as follows:

[Greek: AUTokrator . SROIAS . OUABALLATHOS . ATHENOdorou . Huios.]

The existence of coins, of which I possess a specimen also, reading

[Greek: A . SRIAS . OUABALLATHOS . ATHEN . U.]

shows that we must not read [Greek: ATHENOU] as one word, but must

divide it as above. I think MR. TAYLOR will find his specimen to read as

the last-mentioned coin, the [Greek: ER] (properly [Greek: ER]) being

[Greek: SR], and the [Greek: AU] in like manner [Greek: AS]. My coin

gives the whole legend distinctly, and I can vouch for the exactitude of

the above legend.

I believe there appeared some years ago, in the _Revue de Numismatique_,

an article on the coins of the Zenobian family, but I do not remember

when it was published, nor the conclusions to which the writer came.

That is, however, the most recent investigation of the subject, and to

it I must refer MR. TAYLOR, as I have not access to that periodical

here.

Sir Gardner Wilkinson has published in the _Numismatic Chronicle_, vol.

vii. or viii., an inscription containing the names of Zenobia and

Vabalathus. After the name of Vabalathus, who has the title of

Autocrator, is the word [Greek: ATHENODOROU], which justifies the

reading [Greek: Athenodorou Huios] on the coins. Vabalathus is thus

probably the son of Zenobia by a former husband, Athenodorus, while

bearing himself the same name, as Vabalathus (better Vaballathus, as on

the Alexandrian coins) is said to be equivalent to Athenodorus, Gift of

Pallas.

W. H. S.

Edinburgh.

MARRIAGE OF ECCLESIASTICS.

(Vol. iv., pp. 57, 125, 193, 196, 298.)

I entirely agree with you that your pages are not a fit battle-ground

for theological controversy. Still, since the question of the

translation of Heb. xiii. 4. has been mooted, I beg with much deference

to suggest that it will not be quite right to let it fall to the ground

unsettled, especially since CEPHAS has thought fit to charge those of

our Reformers who translated the Scriptures with mistranslating

advisedly, and with propagating new doctrines.

CEPHAS'S version of the passage is right, and our English version is

wrong; but the fault lies in the ignorance of our translators, an

ignorance which they shared with all the scholars of their day, and many

not bad scholars of our own, of the effect produced on the force of the

article by the relation in which it stands to the other words in the

clause, in point of order. [Greek: ho timios gamos] is "the honourable

marriage;" [Greek: ho timios gamos esti] is "the honourable marriage

is;" [Greek: ho gamos timios] is untranslateable, unless you supply

[Greek: esti], and then it means "the marriage" (or, marriage in

general, in the abstract) "is honourable." But [Greek: esto] might be

supplied, as it is in Heb. xiii. 4., when it will mean, "let marriage be

honourable:" and [Greek: timios ho gamos] has just the same meaning,

with perhaps this difference, that the emphasis falls more distinctly on

[Greek: timios]. The circumstance that the mere assertion that marriage

is honourable in all (men or things), true as it is in itself, ill

accords with the tenor of the passage of which it forms a part, which is

hortatory, not assertive, is a good reason why CEPHAS'S version should

be preferred. But when we find afterwards the words [Greek: kai he koite

amiantos], it is impossible to deny this hortatory force to the

sentence; for those words cannot mean "the undefiled bed:" and to

translate them "the (or their) bed is undefiled"--which is the only

version which they will here bear, but one--would give but a feeble

sense. That sole remaining sense is, "the bed (let it) be undefiled;"

subaudite [Greek: esto] in the verse is, "Let marriage be honourable in

all" (men or things), "and the bed be undefiled; but (or for)

whoremongers and adulterers God will judge." Had our translators known

that [Greek: he koite amiantos] could not mean "the bed undefiled," they

would at once have been driven to see that the verse is a commandment:

and the commandment that marriage should be held honourable in all men

(or in all respects), would have served the purpose of their doctrines

quite as well as the affirmative form which they have given to their

present version. I say, it would have served their purpose; but I say

more: they heeded not what did or would serve their purpose. They looked

only for the truth and disregarded all else in their pursuit of it. With

regard to the controversy about [Greek: en pasi], it is immaterial which

version be adopted. MR. WALTER is right in the rule which he enunciates,

if he means that in those cases of adjectives in which the masculine and

neuter forms are the same, "man" or "men," not "thing" or "things," must

be understood: but it is not always observed, even in classical writers,

either in Latin or in Greek. There is no reason why it should be broken

here; and I do not believe it is broken. It must have been only by a

slip of CEPHAS'S pen that he called [Greek: pasi] a feminine adjective.

It undoubtedly refers to both sexes. I wish E. A. D. had given the Greek

of the passages from Chrysostom and Augustine, of which he has

communicated the Oxford translation, which is as likely to err, perhaps,

as any other. Jerome's Latin, like the Vulgate, though the words are not

precisely the same, gives a literal version of the Greek, without

supplying any verb at all, either _est_ or _sit_, and, since the Latin

has not that expressive power in cases like this which the article gives

to the Greek, leaves the passage obscure and undecided.

THEOPHYLACT.

Replies to Minor Queries.

_"Crowns have their Compass," &c._ (Vol. iv., p. 294.).--The lines

alluded to by your correspondent MR. ABSALON form a inscription on a

portrait of King James I. in the Cracherode Collection. (Vide Beloe's

_Anecdotes_, vol. i. p. 210.)

"Crownes have their compasse, length of dayes their date,

Triumphes their tombes, felicitie her fate;

Of more than earth can earth make none partaker,

But knowledge makes the king most like his Maker."

I am aware that this reference does not go to the "root of the matter,"

if MR. ABSALON wishes to ascertain the author's name; but it may serve

as a clue to further discovery.

MARGARET GATTY.

Ecclesfield.

It is quite obvious what lines your correspondent alludes to, though the

above quotation which he gives as the commencement of them is not quite

correct, nor were they written with the object he supposes.

I send a correct copy of them below, taken from Mr. Payne Collier's very

interesting _Life of Shakspeare_, to whom they have always been

attributed; and, it is said, with every show of reason. It is supposed

they were written by him in the shape of a complimentary allusion to

King James I., in grateful acknowledgment of the patronage bestowed by

that monarch upon the stage. The subject is fully discussed at pp. 202,

203. of Mr. Knight's volume, whence, indeed, the above information is

derived; and he publishes the lines, as follows, stating then to be

copied from a coeval manuscript in his possession:--

"SHAKSPEARE ON THE KING.

"Crowns have their compass--length of days their date--

Triumphs their tomb--felicity, her fate--

Of nought but earth can earth make us partaker,

But knowledge makes a king most like his Maker."

Some one, to make the allusion more complete, that is, to over-do it,

changed "_a_ king" into "_the_ king" in a subsequent publication of the

lines. But this, as Mr. Payne Collier very justly feels, completely

spoils the whole complexion of the epigram, and perverts a fine allusion

into a raw personality.

J. J. A.

_The Rev. Richard Farmer_ (Vol. iv., pp. 379.[4] 407.).--The

observations of BOLTON CORNEY upon my incidental mention of Dr. Farmer,

are, I think, wholly unwarranted, both in substance and manner,

especially as he himself furnishes ample confirmation of its truth.

[Footnote 4: At page 379., second column, fifth line from bottom,

for "thrice" read "twice."]

Taking his quotations in due order--

1. The certificate of Dr. Farmer's character for learning and ability is

unnecessary, because neither was impugned; nor does an allegation of

atrocity in taste and judgment necessarily imply deficiency in mere

book-learning.

2. As for Isaac Reed's opinion in favour of Farmer's Essay, it might be

met by many of directly opposite tendency, and of at least equal weight.

3. In the only point really in question, BOLTON CORNEY "cannot deny that

Farmer related the anecdote of the _wool-man_" (that being the reputed

trade of Shakspeare's father); but to what end was it related, if not

to suggest an application of which Steevens was only the interpreter?

But BOLTON CORNEY thinks the character of the witness suspicious; he

forgets that only just before he had stated that the anecdote and its

application had been repeated in three editions, extending over thirteen

years, all within the lifetime of Dr. Farmer!

A. E. B.

Leeds.

_Earwig_ (Vol. iv., pp. 274. 411.).--The correspondent who asserts the

_curious fact_ that Johnson, Richardson, and Webster do not notice the

word _earwig_ must have consulted some expurgated editions of the works

of those celebrated lexicographers--or else we must consider his

assertion as a _curious fact_ in the history of literary oversights.

BOLTON CORNEY.

Miscellaneous.

NOTES ON BOOKS, SALES, CATALOGUES, ETC.

Although there are few books which have proved of greater utility to

inquirers into the more recent history of England than Beatson's

_Political Index_, yet it is also true that there are few which have

more frequently or more justly caused the reader to feel the want of a

new and improved edition. A very short examination, however, of Mr.

Haydn's recently published Beatson's _Political Index Modernised, The

Book of Dignities, containing Rolls of the Official Personages of the

British Empire, Civil, Ecclesiastical, Judicial, Military, Naval, and

Municipal, &c._, will satisfy the reader that such want has at length

been supplied in a manner the most ample and the most satisfactory. For

though we have referred to Beatson's well-known work for the purpose of

furnishing a better idea of the _Book of Dignities_, we are bound to

acknowledge that Mr. Haydn is justified in stating, that in the work in

question he owes little more than the plan to Beatson. Mr. Haydn's

volume not only contains many lists (among them the "Administrations of

England, and the Judges of the Ecclesiastical Courts") not to be found

in the _Political Index_, but the author has had the advantage of being

permitted to search the various official records with the view of

enabling him to give complete and accurate information. The result, of

course, is obvious; namely, that just in the same proportion that our

author surpasses Beatson in the extent and accuracy of his various

lists, does the _Book of Dignities_ exceed its predecessor in usefulness

to the official man, the historian, and the scholar.

Mr. Hunt's experience as a public lecturer at the various literary and

scientific institutions of the country, having convinced him that for

the majority of the members of those institutions most of the existing

works on natural philosophy are of too abstruse and technical a

character--are, in short, sealed books,--he has been led to publish a

small volume which we have no doubt will soon become extremely popular.

It is entitled _Elementary Physics, an Introduction to the Study of

Natural Philosophy_; and, as its object is to teach physical science so

far as to render all the great deductions from observation and

experiment satisfactorily clear, without encountering the difficulty of

mathematics,--and no one is better able to do this, and throw a charm

over such a subject, than the author of the _Poetry of Science_,--the

work, which is illustrated with upwards of two hundred woodcuts, will be

found eminently useful; not only to those who have neither time nor

opportunity to carry their studies beyond its pages, but especially as a

"first book" to those in whom it may awaken the desire for a more

perfect knowledge of the beautiful and important truths of which it

treats.

The nature of the _Hand Atlas of Physical Geography, consisting of a

Series of Maps and Illustrations, showing the Geographical Distribution

of Natural Phenomena, embracing the Divisions of Geology, Hydrography,

Meteorology, Natural History: from the Physikalischer Atlas of Berghaus,

and the Maps of the Erdkunde, drawn by and under the immediate

Superintendence of Drs. Ritter and Kiepert, Oetzel, Grimm, &c., by the

Editor of the University Atlas of the Middle Ages_, is sufficiently

described by its ample title-page; which shows, moreover, that the work

is not a mere copy or reduction of the great atlas of Berghaus, on which

it is founded. As a companion to the works of Humboldt, Mrs. Somerville,

and other writers on physical geography, it will be found most useful;

while its convenient size, and moderate price, place it within the reach

of almost all classes of readers.

CATALOGUES RECEIVED.--Nattali and Bond's (23. Bedford Street) Catalogue

Part II. of Ancient and Modern Books; Adam Holden's (60. High Street,

Exeter) Catalogue Part XXXIII. of Second-hand Books in Excellent

Condition; B. Quaritch's (16. Castle Street, Leicester Square) Catalogue

No. 37. of Books in Oriental Literature; J. Russell Smith's (4. Old

Compton Street, Soho) Catalogue Part VII. of an Extensive Collection of

Choice, Useful, and Curious Books.

BOOKS AND ODD VOLUMES

WANTED TO PURCHASE.

HUNTER'S DEANERY OF DONCASTER. Vol. I. Large or small paper.

CLARE'S RURAL MUSE.

CHRISTIAN PIETY FREED FROM THE DELUSIONS OF MODERN ENTHUSIASTS. A.D.

1756 or 1757.

AN ANSWER TO FATHER HUDDLESTONE'S SHORT AND PLAIN WAY TO THE FAITH AND

CHURCH. By Samuel Grascombe. London, 1703. 8vo.

REASONS FOR ABROGATING THE TEST IMPOSED UPON ALL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT.

By Samuel Parker, Lord Bishop of Oxon. 1688. 4to.

LEWIS'S LIFE OF CAXTON. 8vo. 1737.

CATALOGUE OF JOSEPH AMES'S LIBRARY. 8vo. 1760.

TRAPP'S COMMENTARY. Folio. Vol. I.

WHITLAY'S PARAPHRASE ON THE NEW TESTAMENT. Folio. Vol. I. 1706.

LONG'S ASTRONOMY. 4to. 1742.

MAD. D'ARBLAY'S DIARY. Vol. II 1842.

ADAMS' MORAL TALES.

AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF DR. JOHNSON. 1805.

[Star symbol] Letters, stating particulars and lowest price,

_carriage free_, to be sent to MR. BELL, Publisher of "NOTES AND

QUERIES," 186. Fleet Street.

Notices to Correspondents.

J. NORTH _will find his Query respecting the_ Zollverein _answered in

our_ 3rd Vol. p. 451. _His others shall appear shortly._

LOVELACE'S POEMS. D. H. M. C. _is informed that these were reprinted in

1817, under the editorship of our valued correspondent_ MR. SINGER.

J. RAYNER, _who asks for names of present reigning sovereigns, of

presidents of the United States for the last thirty years, and of the

governors-general of India, is referred to Mr. Haydn's_ Book of

Dignities _(noticed in our present number), where he will find all the

information of which he is in search._

W. S. W. _Many thanks for your kind reminder. The article is in type,

although omitted this week from want of room._

J. S. B. _is thanked. Such a list would be most useful._

REPLIES RECEIVED.--_Pope's Honest Factor--Serpent with Human

Head--Marriage of Ecclesiastics--Hobbes's Leviathan--Definition of

Truth--Wearing Gloves before Royalty--Derivation of Earwig--Dictionary

of Hackneyed Quotations--Passage in Campbell--"'Tis Twopence

now"--Cozens the Painter--"Acu tinali meridi"--Nightingale and Thorn,

&c.--Theodolite--Temple of AEgina--Ashen Fagots--Cause of

Transparency--Praed's Charade--Marriages in ruined Churches--Age of

Trees--Joceline's Legacy--St. Bene't Fink--Bristol Tables--"A little

Bird told me"--Lycian Inscriptions--Tuden Aled._

_Copies of our_ Prospectus, _according to the suggestion of_ T. E. H.,

_will be forwarded to any correspondent willing to assist us by

circulating them._

VOLS. I., II., _and_ III., _with very copious Indices, may still be had,

price 9s. 6d. each, neatly bound in cloth._

NOTES AND QUERIES _is published at noon on Friday, so that our country

Subscribers may receive it on Saturday. The subscription for the Stamped

Edition is 10s. 2d. for Six Months, which may be paid by Post-office

Order drawn in favour of our Publisher_, MR. GEORGE BELL, 186 Fleet

Street; _to whose care all communications for the Editor should be

addressed._

_Errata._--Page 345, for "FERMILODUM" read "FERMILODVNI;" p. 394. col.

1. l. 34. for "Danish" read "Dutch;" p. 395. col. 1. l. 19. for

"Dunfe_r_line" read "Dunfermline."

This day are published at the

UNIVERSITY PRESS, OXFORD,

THE LIFE OF JAMES DUKE OF ORMOND; containing an account of the

most remarkable affairs of his time, and particularly of Ireland

under his government: with an Appendix and a Collection of

Letters, serving to verify the most material facts in the said

History. A new Edition, carefully compared with the original MSS.

6 vols. 8vo. Price 2_l._ 6_s._ in boards.

NOVUM TESTAMENTUM GRAECUM. Accedunt parallela S. Scripturae loca,

necnon vetus capitulorum notatio et canones Eusebii. 18mo. Price

3_s._ in boards.

THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENT CONNECTED in the History of the Jews and

Neighbouring Nations, from the declension of the Kingdoms of

Israel and Judah to the time of Christ. By HUMPHREY PRIDEAUX, Dean

of Norwich. 2 vols. 8vo. Price 14_s._ in boards.

FASTI HELLENICI. The Civil and Literary Chronology of Greece and

Rome, from the CXXIVth Olympiad to the Death of Augustus. By HENRY

FYNES CLINTON, Esq., M.A. late Student of Christ Church. Second

Edition, with additions. 4to. Price 1_l._ 12_s._ in boards.

An EPITOME of the the Civil and Literary Chronology of Greece from

the earliest Accounts to the Death of Augustus, By HENRY FYNES

CLINTON, Esq., M.A. late Student of Christ Church. 8vo. Price

6_s._ 6_d._ in boards.

AESCHYLI Tragoediae Superstites et Deperditarum Fragmenta ex

recensione G. DINDORFII. Tomus III. Scholia Graeca ex Codicibus

aucta et emendata. 8vo. Price 8_s._ 6_d._ in boards.

Sold by JOHN HENRY PARKER, Oxford; and 377. Strand, London: and E.

GARDNER, 7. Paternoster Row, London.

THE BEST IS THE CHEAPEST.

Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 109, November 29, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 2 / 4 段