RESPONSE IN LIVING AND NON-LIVING

He began an examination of inorganic matter in the same way as a

biologist examines a muscle or a nerve. He subjected metals to various

kinds of stimulus--mechanical, thermal, chemical, and electrical. He

found that all sorts of stimulus produce an excitatory change in them.

And this excitation sometimes expresses itself in a visible change of

form and sometimes not; but the disturbance produced by the stimulus

always exhibits itself in an _electric response_. He next subjected

plants and animal tissues to various kinds of stimulus and also found

that they also give an _electric response_. Finding that a universal

reaction brought together metals, plants and animals under a common law,

he next proceeded to a study of _modifications in response_, which occur

under various conditions. He found that they are all benumbed by cold,

intoxicated by alcohol, wearied by excessive work, stupified by

anaesthetics, excited by electric currents, stung by physical blows and

killed by poison--they all exhibit essentially the same phenomena of

fatigue and depression, together with possibilities of recovery and of

exaltation, yet also that of permanent irresponsiveness which is

associated with death--they all are responsive or irresponsive under the

same conditions and in the same manner. The investigations showed that,

in the entire range of response phenomena (inclusive as that is of

metals, plants and animals) there is no breach of continuity; that "the

living response in all its diverse modifications is only a repetition of

responses seen in the inorganic" and that the phenomena of response "are

determined, not by the play of an unknowable and arbitrary _vital

force_, but by the working of laws that know no change, acting equally

and uniformly throughout the organic and inorganic matter."[14]

Sir Jagadis Chunder Bose, His Life and Speeches · 第 16 / 169 题