II. MARCUS AURELIUS ON DEATH

Marcus Aurelius speaks of death as "nothing else than a dissolution of

the elements of which every human being is composed." May we say it is

like a redistribution of the type after the page is printed? The type is

unchanged, only the order of arrangement is broken up. In the death of

the body the component elements--water, lime, iron, phosphorus,

magnesia, and so on--remain the same, but their organization is changed.

Is that all? Is this a true analogy? The meaning of the printed page,

the idea embodied, is the main matter. Can this idea be said to exist

independent of the type? Only in the mind that reads the page, and then

not permanently. Then it is only an arrangement of molecules of matter

in the brain, which is certainly only temporary. On the printed page it

is a certain combination of white and black that moves the cells of the

brain through the eye to create the idea. So the conception in our minds

of our neighbor or friend--his character, his personality--exists after

he is dead, but when our own brain ceases to function, where is it then?

We rather resent being summed up in this way in terms of physics, or

even of psychology. Can you reconstruct the flower or the fruit from its

ashes? Physics and biochemistry and psychology describe all men in the

same terms; our component parts are all the same; but character,

personality, mentality--do not these escape your analysis? and are they

not also real?

Under the Maples · 第 69 / 87 题