"Hum, chrm, chrum, chrm. Well, my dear Peter, it would not be

generous to press you, but I trust you will remember that this money

has not been spent upon my private enjoyment. It has gone for the

glory of our Mutual Position; pray do not forget that, Peter; and

remember also that if you have to pay interest, so have I, so have

I. We are all in the same boat, Peter, sink or swim; sink or

swim...." Then his face brightened, he patted Peter genially on the

shoulder and added: "Do not think me harsh, Peter. It is necessary

that I should keep to a strict, business-like way of doing things,

for I have a large property to manage; but you may be sure that my

friendship for you is of more value to me than a few paltry

sovereigns. I will lend you the sum you owe to the interest on the

Common Debt, and though in strict right you alone should pay the

interest on this new loan I will call half of it my own and you

shall pay but £1 a year on it for ever."

Peter's eyes swam with tears at Paul's generosity, and he thanked

his stars that his lot had been cast with such a man. But when Paul

came again with a grave face and said to him, "Peter, my boy, we

must insure at once against burglars: the underwriters demand a

hundred pounds," his heart broke, and he could not endure the

thought of further payments. Paul, however, with the quiet good

sense that characterised him, pointed out the necessity of the

payment and, eyeing Peter with compassion for a moment, told him

that he had long been feeling that he (Peter) had been unfairly

taxed. "It is a principle" (said Paul) "that taxation should fall

upon men in proportion to their ability to pay it. I am determined

that, whatever happens, you shall in future pay but a third of the

interest that may accrue upon further loans." It was in vain that

Peter pointed out that, in his case, even a thirtieth would mean

starvation; Paul was firm and carried his point.

The wretched Peter was now but skin and bone, and his earning power,

small as it had ever been, was considerably lessened. Paul began to

fear very seriously for his invested funds: he therefore kept up

Peter's spirits as best he could with such advice as the following:--

"Dear Peter, do not repine; your lot is indeed hard, but it has its

silver lining. You are the member of a partnership famous among all

other bachelor-residences for its display of fireworks and its fine

furniture. So valuable is the room in which you live that the

insurance alone is the wonder and envy of our neighbours. Consider

also how firm and stable these loans make our comradeship. They give

me a stake in the rooms and furnish a ready market for the spare

capital of our little community. The interest WE pay upon the fund

is an evidence of our social rank, and all London stares with

astonishment at the flat of Peter and Paul, which can without an

effort buy such gorgeous furniture at a moment's notice."

But, alas! these well-meant words were of no avail. On a beautiful

spring day, when all the world seemed to be holding him to the joys

of living, Peter passed quietly away in his little truckle bed,

unattended even by a doctor, whose fees would have necessitated a

loan the interest of which he could never have paid.

Paul, on the death of Peter, gave way at first to bitter

recrimination. "Is this the way," he said, "that you repay years of

unstinted generosity? Nay, is this the way you meet your sacred

obligations? You promised upon a thousand occasions to pay your

share of the interest for ever, and now like a defaulter you abandon

your post and destroy half the revenue of our firm by one

intempestive and thoughtless act! Had you but possessed a little

property which, properly secured, would continue to meet the claims

you had incurred, I had not blamed you. But a man who earns all that

he possesses has no right to pledge himself to perpetual payment

unless he is prepared to live for ever!"

Nobler thoughts, however, succeeded this outburst, and Paul threw

himself upon the bed of his Departed Friend and moaned. "Who now

will pay me an income in return for my investments? All my fortune

is sunk in this flat, though I myself pay the interest never so

regularly, it will not increase my fortune by one farthing! I shall

as I live consume a fund which will never be replenished, and within

a short time I shall be compelled to work for my living!"

Maddened by this last reflection, he dashed into the street, hurried

northward through-the-now-rapidly-gathering-darkness, and drowned

himself in the Regent's Canal, just where it runs by the Zoological

Gardens, under the bridge that leads to the cages of the larger

pachyderms.

Thus miserably perished Peter and Paul, the one in the thirtieth,

the other in the forty-seventh year of his age, both victims to

their ignorance of _Mrs. Fawcett's Political Economy for the

Young_, the _Nicomachean Ethics_, Bastiat's _Economic Harmonies, The

Fourth Council of Lateran on Unfruitful Loans and Usury, The Speeches

of Sir Michael Hicks-Beach and Mr. Brodrick (now Lord Midleton), The

Sermons of St. Thomas Aquinas_, under the head "Usuria,"

Mr. W. S. Lilly's First _Principles in Politics_, and other works

too numerous to mention.

ON LORDS

"_Saepe miratus sum_," I have often wondered why men were

blamed for seeking to know men of title. That a man should be blamed

for the acceptance of, or uniformity with, ideals not his own is

right enough; but a man who simply reveres a Lord does nothing so

grave: and why he should not revere such a being passes my

comprehension.

The institution of Lords has for its object the creation of a high

and reverend class; well, a man looks up to them with awe or

expresses his reverence and forthwith finds himself accused! Get rid

of Lords by all means, if you think there should be none, but do not

come pestering me with a rule that no Lord shall be considered while

you are making them by the bushel for the special purpose of being

considered--_ad considerandum_ as Quintillian has it in his

highly Quintillianarian essay on I forget what.

I have heard it said that what is blamed in snobs, _snobinibus

quid reatumst_, is not the matter but the manner of their

worship. Those who will have it so maintain that we should pay to

rank a certain discreet respect which must not be marred by crude

expression. They compare snobbishness to immodesty, and profess that

the pleasure of acquaintance with the great should be so enjoyed

that the great themselves are but half-conscious of the homage

offered them: this is rather a subtle and finicky critique of what

is in honest minds a natural restraint.

I knew a man once--Chatterley was his name, Shropshire his county,

and racing his occupation--who said that a snob was blamed for the

offence he gave to Lords themselves. Thus we do well (said this man

Chatterley) to admire beautiful women, but who would rush into a

room and exclaim loudly at the ladies it contained? So (said this

man Chatterley) is it with Lords, whom we should never forget, but

whom we should not disturb by violent affection or by too persistent

a pursuit.

Then there was a nasty drunken chap down Wapping way who had seen

better days; he had views on dozens of things and they were often

worth listening to, and one of his fads was to be for ever preaching

that the whole social position of an aristocracy resided in a veil

of illusion, and that hands laid too violently on this veil would

tear it. It was only by a sort of hypnotism, he said, that we

regarded Lords as separate from ourselves. It was a dream, and a

rough movement would wake one out of it. Snobbishness (he said) did

violence to this sacred film of faith and might shatter it, and

hence (he pointed out) was especially hated by Lords themselves. It

was interesting to hear as a theory and delivered in those

surroundings, but it is exploded at once by the first experience of

High Life and its solid realities.

There is yet another view that to seek after acquaintance with men

of position in some way hurts one's own soul, and that to strain

towards our superiors, to mingle our society with their own, is

unworthy, because it is destructive of something peculiar to

ourselves. But surely there is implanted in man an instinct which

leads him to all his noblest efforts and which is, indeed, the

motive force of religion, the instinct by which he will ever seek to

attain what he sees to be superior to him and more worthy than the

things of his common experience. It seems to be proper, therefore,

that no man should struggle against the very natural attraction

which radiates from superior rank, and I will boldly affirm that he

does his country a good service who submits to this force.

The just appetite for rank gives rise to two kinds of duty, one or

the other of which each of us in his sphere is bound to regard.

There is first for much the greater part of men the duty of showing

respect and deference to men of title, by which I do not mean only

Lords absolute (which are Barons, Viscounts, Earls, Marquises and

Dukes), but also Lords in gross, that is the whole body of lords,

including lords by courtesy, ladies, their wives and mothers,

honourables and cousins--especially heirs of Lords, and to some

extent Baronets as well. Secondly, there is the duty of those few

within whose power it lies to become Lords, Lords to become, lest

the aristocratic element in our Constitution should decline. The

most obvious way of doing one's duty in this regard if one is

wealthy is to purchase a peerage, or a Baronetcy at the least, and

when I consider how very numerous are the fortunes to which a sum of

twenty or thirty thousand pounds is not really a sacrifice, and how

few of their possessors exercise a tenacious effort to acquire rank

by the disbursement of money, I cannot but fear for the future of

the country! It is no small sign of our times that we should read so

continually of large bequests to public charities made by men who

have had every opportunity for entering the Upper House but who

preferred to remain unnoted in the North of England and to leave

their posterity no more dignified than they were themselves.

There is a yet more restricted class to whom it is open to become

Lords by sheer merit. The one by gallant conduct in the field,

another by a pretty talent for verse, a third by scientific

research. And if any of my readers happen to be a man of this kind

and yet hesitate to undertake the effort required of him, I would

point out that our Constitution in its wisdom adds certain very

material advantages to a peerage of this kind. It is no excuse for a

man of military or scientific eminence to say that his income would

not enable him to maintain such a dignity. Parliament is always

ready to vote a sufficient grant of money, and even were it not so,

it is quite possible to be a Lord and yet to be but poorly provided

with the perishable goods of this world, as is very clearly seen in

the case of no fewer than eighty-two Barons, fourteen Earls, and

three dukes, a list of whom I had prepared for printing in these

directions but have most unfortunately mislaid.

Again, even if one's private means be small, and if Parliament by

some neglect omit to endow one's new splendour, the common sense of

England will come to the help of any man so situated if he is worth

his salt. He will with the greatest ease obtain positions of

responsibility and emolument, notably upon the directorate of public

companies, and can often, if he finds his salary insufficient,

persuade his fellow-directors to increase it, whether by threatening

them with exposure or by some other less drastic and more convivial

means.

If after reading these lines there is anyone who still doubts the

attitude that an honest man should take upon this matter, it is

enough to point out in conclusion how Providence itself appears to

have designed the whole hierarchy of Lords with a view to tempting

man higher and ever higher. Thus, if some reader of this happens to

be a baron, he might think perhaps that it is not worth a further

effort to receive another grade of distinction. He would be wrong,

for such an advance gives a courtesy title to his daughters; one

more step and the same benefit accrues to his sons. After that there

is indeed a hiatus, nor have I ever been able to see what advantage

is held out to the viscount who desires to become a marquis--unless,

indeed, it be marquises that become viscounts. Anyhow, it is the

latter title which is the less English and the less manly and which

I am glad to hear it is proposed to abolish by a short, one-clause

bill in the next Session of Parliament. Above these, the dukes in

the titles of their wives and the mode in which they are addressed

stand alone. There is, therefore, no stage in a man's upward

progress upon this ancient and glorious ladder where he will not

find some great reward for the toil of ascending. In view of these

things, I for my part hope, in common with many another, that the

foolish pledge given some years ago when the Liberal Party was in

opposition, that it would create no more Lords, will be revised now

that it has to consider the responsibilities of office; a revision

for which there is ample precedent in the case of other pledges

which were as rashly made but of which a reconsideration has been

found necessary in practice.

NOTE.--_I find I am wrong upon Viscounts, but as I did not

discover this until my book was in the press I cannot correct it.

The remainder of the matter is accurate enough, and may be relied on

by the student._

ON JINGOES: IN THE SHAPE OF A WARNING

BEING

The sad and lamentable history of Jack Bull, son of the late John

Bull, India Merchant, wherein it will be seen how this prosperous

merchant left an heir that ran riot with 'Squires, trainbands, Black

men, and Soldiers, and squandered all his substance, so that at last

he came to selling penny tokens in front of the Royal Exchange in

Threadneedle Street, and is now very miserably writing for the

papers.

John Bull, whom I knew very well, drove a great trade in tea, cotton

goods, and bombazine, as also in hardware, all manner of cutlery,

good and bad, and especially sea-coal, and was very highly respected

in the City of London, of which he was twice Sheriff and once Lord

Mayor. When he went abroad some begged of him, and to these he would

give a million or so at a time openly in the street, so that a crowd

would gather and cry, "Lord! what a generous fellow is this Mr.

Bull!" Some, again, of better station would pluck his sleeve and

take him aside into Broad Street Corner or Mansion House Court, and

say, "Mr. Bull, a word in your ear. I have more paper about than I

care for in these hard times, and I could pay you handsomely for a

short loan." These always found Mr. Bull willing and ready, sure and

silent, and, withal, cheaper at a discount than any other. For

buying cloth all came to Bull; and for buying other wares his house

was preferred to those of Frog and Hans and the rest, because he was

courteous and ready, always to be found in his office (which was

near the Wool-pack in Leaden Hall Street, next to Mr. Marlow's, the

Methodist preacher), and moreover he was very attentive to little

things. This last habit he would call the soul of business. In such

fashion Mr. Bull had accumulated a sum of five hundred thousand

million pounds, or thereabouts, and when he died the neighbours said

this and that spiteful thing about his son Jack whom he had trained

up to the business, making out that _they knew more than they

cared to say_, that _Jack was not John_, that _they had heard of Pride

going before a fall_, and so much tittle-tattle as jealousy will breed.

But they were very much disappointed in their malice, for this same

Jack went sturdily to work and trod in his father's steps, so that

his wealth increased even beyond what he had inherited, and he had at

last more risks upon the sea in one way and another than any other

merchant in the City. And if you would know how Jack (who was, to

tell the truth, more flighty and ill-informed than his father) came to

go so wisely, it was thus: Old John had left him a few directions writ

up in pencil on the mantelpiece, which ran in this way:---

1. Never go into an adventure unless the feeling of your neighbours

be with you.

2. Spend no more than you earn--nay, put by every year.

3. Put out no money for show in your business but only for use, save

only on the occasion of the Lord Mayor's Show, your taking of an

office, or on the occasion of public holidays, as, when the King's

wife or daughter lies in.

4. Live and let live, for be sure your business can only thrive on

the condition that others do also.

5. Vex no man at your door; buy and sell freely.

6. Do not associate with Drunkards, Brawlers and Poets; and God's

blessing be with you.

Now when Jack was grown to about thirty years old, he came, most

unfortunately, upon a certain Sir John Snipe, Bart., that was a very

scandalous young squire of Oxfordshire, and one that had published

five lyrics and a play (enough to warn any Bull against him), who

spoke to him somewhat in this fashion:---

"La! Jack, what a pity you and I should live so separate! I'll be

bound you're the best fellow in the world, the very backbone of the

country. To be sure there's a silly old-fashioned lot of Lumpkins in

our part that will have it you're no gentleman, but I say, 'Gentle

is as Gentle does,' and fair play's a jewel. I will enter your

counting-house as soon as drink to you, as I do here."

Whereat Jack cried--

"God 'a' mercy, a very kind gentleman! Be welcome to my house. Pray

take it as your own. I think you may count me one of you? Eh? Be

seated. Come, how can I serve you?": and at last he had this

Jackanapes taking a handsome salary for doing nothing.

When Jack's friends would reproach him and say, "Oh, Jack, Jack,

beware this fine gentleman; he will be your ruin," Jack would

answer, "A plague on all levellers," or again, "What if he be a

gentleman? So that he have talent 'tis all I seek," or yet further,

"Well, gentle or simple, thank God he's an honest Englishman."

Whereat Jack added to the firm, Isaacs of Hamburg, Larochelle of

Canada, Warramugga of Van Dieman's Land, Smuts Bieken of the Cape of

Good Hope, and the Maharajah of Mahound of the East Indies that was

a plaguey devilish-looking black fellow, pock-marked, and with a

terrible great paunch to him.

So things went all to the dogs with poor Jack, that would hear no

sense or reason from his father's old friends, but was always seen

arm in arm with Sir John Snipe, Warra Mugga, the Maharajah and the

rest; drinking at the sign of the "Beerage," gambling and dicing at

"The Tape," or playing fisticuffs at the "Lord Nelson," till at last

he quarrelled with all the world but his boon companions and, what

was worse, boasted that his father's brother's son, rich Jonathan

Spare, was of the company. So if he met some dirty dog or other in

the street he would cry, "Come and sup to-night, you shall meet

Cousin Jonathan!" and when no Jonathan was there he would make a

thousand excuses saying, "Excuse Jonathan, I pray you, he has

married a damned Irish wife that keeps him at home"; or, "What!

Jonathan not come? Oh! we'll wait awhile. He never fails, for we are

like brothers!" and so on; till his companions came to think at last

that he had never met or known Jonathan; which was indeed the case.

About this time he began to think himself too fine a gentleman to

live over the shop as his father had done, and so asked Sir John

Snipe where he might go that was more genteel; for he still had too

much sense to ask any of those other outlandish fellows' advice in

such a matter. At last, on Snipe's bespeaking, he went to Wimbledon,

which is a vastly smart suburb, and there, God knows, he fell into a

thousand absurd tricks so that many thought he was off his head.

He hired a singing man to stand before his door day and night

singing vulgar songs out of the street in praise of Dick Turpin and

Molly Nog, only forcing him to put in his name of Jack Bull in the

place of the Murderer or Oyster Wench therein celebrated.

He would drink rum with common soldiers in the public-houses and

then ask them in to dinner to meet gentlemen, saying "These are

heroes and gentlemen, which are the two first kinds of men," and

they would smoke great pipes of tobacco in his very dining-room to

the general disgust.

He would run out and cruelly beat small boys unaware, and when he

had nigh killed them he would come back and sit up half the night

writing an account of how he had fought Tom Mauler of Bermondsey and

beaten him in a hundred and two rounds, which (he would add) no man

living but he could do.

He would hang out of his window a great flag with a challenge on it

"to all the people of Wimbledon assembled, or to any of them

singly," and then he would be seen at his front gate waving a great

red flag and gnawing a bone like a dog, saying that he loved Force

only, and would fight all and any.

When he received any print, newspaper, book or pamphlet that praised

any but himself, he would throw it into the fire in a kind of

frenzy, calling God to witness that he was the only person of

consequence in the world, that it was a horrible shame that he was

so neglected, and Lord knows what other rubbish.

In this spirit he quarrelled with all his fellow-underwriters and

friends and comrades, and that in the most insolent way. For knowing

well that Mr. Frog had a shrew of a wife, he wrote to him daily

asking "if he had had a domestic broil of late, and how his poor

head felt since it was bandaged." To Mr. Hans, who lived in a small

way and loved gardening, he sent an express "begging him to mind his

cabbages and leave gentlemen to their greater affairs." To Niccolini

of Savoy, the little swarthy merchant, he sent indeed a more polite

note, but as he said in it "that he would be very willing to give

him charity and help him as he could" and as he added "for my father

it was that put you up in business" (which was a monstrous lie, for

Frog had done this) he did but offend. Then to Mr. William Eagle,

that was a strutting, arrogant fellow, but willing to be a friend,

he wrote every Monday to say that the house of Bull was lost unless

Mr. Eagle would very kindly protect it and every Thursday to

challenge him to mortal combat, so that Mr. Eagle (who, to tell the

truth, was no great wit, but something of a dullard and moreover

suffering from a gathering in the ear, a withered arm, and poor

blood) gave up his friendship and business with Bull and took to

making up sermons and speeches for orators.

He would have no retainers but two, whose common names were Hocus

and Pocus, but as he hated the use of common names and as no one had

heard of Hocus' lineage (nor did he himself know it) he called him,

Hocus, "Freedom" as being a high-sounding and moral name for a

footman and Pocus (whose name was of an ordinary decent kind) he

called "Glory" as being a good counterweight to Freedom; both these

were names in his opinion very decent and well suited for a

gentleman's servants.

Now Freedom and Glory got together in the apple closet and put it to

each other that, as their master was evidently mad it would be a

thousand pities to take no advantage of it, and they agreed that

whatever bit of jobbing Hocus Freedom should do, Pocus Glory should

approve; and contrariwise about. But they kept up a sham quarrel to

mask this; thus Hocus was for Chapel, Pocus for Church, and it was

agreed Hocus should denounce Pocus for drinking Port.

The first fruit of their conspiracy was that Hocus recommended his

brother and sister, his two aunts and nieces and four nephews, his

own six children, his dog, his conventicle-minister, his laundress,

his secretary, a friend of whom he had once borrowed five pounds,

and a blind beggar whom he favoured, to various posts about the

house and to certain pensions, and these Jack Bull (though his

fortune was already dwindling) at once accepted.

Thereupon Pocus loudly reproached Hocus in the servants' hall,

saying that the compact had only stood for things in reason, whereat

Hocus took off his coat and offered to "Take him on," and Pocus,

thinking better of it, managed for his share to place in the

household such relatives as he could, namely, Cohen to whom he was

in debt, Bernstein his brother-in-law and all his family of five

except little Hugh that blacked the boots for the Priest, and so was

already well provided for.

On Nothing & Kindred Subjects · 第 7 / 12 段