PART XXIV.

EARLY ARTILLERY.

It is stated that some sort of cannon was known to the Moors very

early, and that artillery was used in Spain during the second half

of the thirteenth century in the defence of fortified places; but this

is believed to be merely traditional, and that the piece of ordnance

stated to be mentioned in the Archives of Ghent[46] as being in

possession of that town in 1313, was probably a very rough weapon and

highly tentative in character. Without wishing to cast doubt on this

statement, occurring in a work published in 1843, we may remark that

frequent efforts have since been made to find the passage, but without

success.

[Illustration: Fig. 48.--Principle of the Ballista.]

[Illustration: Fig. 49.--Staff and Club Weapons, etc.]

The earliest firearms were only adapted for throwing fire into

fortified places by means of a hollow tube, such as those described

by the Princess Anna Comnena in the _Alexiad_, “tubes fixed to the

prows of the Emperor’s galleys for throwing Greek fire,” and cannon

discharging missiles by the agency of detonating gunpowder were

probably not invented before the fourteenth century. All guns made in

this century were of the crudest description, fastened on to blocks

of wood, and were of wrought iron, loaded at the breech, and used

principally in sieges.

There is frequent mention of firearms in German and Italian

“chronicles” late in the first half of the fourteenth century, but

these references are invariably characterised by extreme vagueness.

Froissart frequently alludes to cannon, and says that these weapons

were used by the besieged at Cambray in 1339;[47] his remarks

concerning them are quite casual, and convey the impression that he

attached very little importance to them. A French MS. of about 1338,

in the Republican Library at Paris, mentions ordnance. This occurs in

an account of the war treasurers, “To Henri de Vaumechon for buying

powder and other necessaries for cannon;” and a year later reference

is made to cannon in the Archives of Bruges, “niewen enginen di men

heet ribaude.” The statement of Villani, so often repeated, that

artillery was in operation at the battle of Creçy, in 1346, is open

to very considerable question, as it is tolerably certain that there

were no field-pieces so early, or indeed any cannon whatever that could

be moved about to any useful purpose in a battle. Froissart makes no

mention of any used in campaigning; but he refers to a bombard at the

siege of Oudenarde, “the noise of its discharge could be heard five

leagues away,” and he also states that bombards and cannon were in

operation at the siege of Quesnoy in 1340--“Those of Quesnoy let them

hear their cannon,” when huge bolts were used as missiles; and that

artillery was in use at the siege of Vannes, both by the besieged and

the attacking English.[48] What gave rise to the tradition, if it be

one, is probably the fact that Edward III. had established an ordnance

factory, for siege guns, two years before the battle. Artillery of

this date was quite unsuitable for field operations, and was only

employed with other engines, as these examples show, in the reduction

of fortified places. Demmin gives a drawing of a breech-loading cannon,

open at both ends, strengthened by iron coils, which he states came

from the field of Creçy, but we know not on what authority. This weapon

was of forged iron, like all the earlier ordnance. Grose, in his

_History of the English Army_,[49] cites a MS., which has already been

referred to in these pages, giving the force constituting the English

army in Normandy and before Calais, in the twentieth year of the reign

of Edward III., in which items appear for payments to gunners and

artillerymen; but it would seem that their duty consisted in serving

siege guns before Calais. Still, why should there be mention of what

would appear to be two classes of gunners?

There was a gun foundry in France in 1346, Germany in 1378, in

Switzerland in 1371. The first mention of any guns cast in England

was, we believe, in 1521, when, according to Stone, brass cannon were

first “cast” there; the founder’s name was Hugget, of Uckfield, in

Sussex, and there are some specimens of about this date at Woolwich.

Early cannon were fired by a live coal; later, by a slow match. There

is nothing to indicate the date of the wooden cannon strengthened

with iron coils, brought from Cochin China, and now in the Musée des

Invalides at Paris. There is a mortar in the arsenal at Vienna, made

in several layers of coiled hempen rope, with an outside covering

of leather, which is said to have been captured from the Turks.

There are also mortars made of paper, covered with leather, in the

arsenal at Malta, but without any reliable record concerning their

origin--doubtless they also came from the East. In Johnes’s version of

_Froissart_, vol. ii., p. 252, is an account of a sea-fight between

the English and Spanish fleets off Calais, King Edward commanding in

person. It is there stated that the Spanish ships were amply provided

with artillery, and a later passage specially mentions “cannon,”--this

was probably the year after the battle of Creçy;[50] but in 1340 these

weapons are referred to in connection with the naval battle of Sluys.

In 1372 some of the French ships undoubtedly carried ordnance at the

battle of Rhodes; and the Venetians used bombards a few years later at

the battle before Chioggia, when some of the guns burst on the first

discharge; one of these weapons, which is made of leather, is still

preserved at the Vienna arsenal. Leathern cannon were also used at the

siege of Hohensalzburg in 1525, and by Gustavus Adolphus in 1631. We

may take it that some time before this both artillery and hand-guns

were regularly used in battle, but side by side with catapultæ and

other engines of war, thus clearly showing that they were at this time

largely experimental. They were still but sparingly found at sea in the

middle of the fifteenth century, when an English war vessel sometimes

carried only one gun, and the largest ships never more than eight;

and each piece of ordnance was then only provided with thirty rounds

of ammunition for a month’s cruise. After this time, however, the

progress was rapid, and some of the Mediterranean galleys of late in

the sixteenth century were armed with as many as two hundred guns. In

1377, Thomas Norbury was directed by King Richard II. to provide “two

great and two less engines called cannon,” to be sent to the castle of

Bristol. The first reliable mention of field guns is on the occasion of

a battle between the forces of Bruges and Ghent in 1382.

The first piece of ordnance was probably a mortar, the earliest form

of which was a hollow tube, like an inverted cone, the butt-end being

blocked with wood--they were short pieces of large bore.

The earliest artillery was breech-loading and called bombards, and

some of these, towards the end of the century (the fourteenth), were

capable of throwing two hundredweight shot, describing a parabolic

curve of a radius of only three hundred yards, showing that the powder

must have been very weak. In 1388, a stone shot, weighing 195 pounds,

was discharged from a bombard called the “Trevisan.”[51] Drawings

of these engines may be seen in MSS. 851 and 852 in the Nat. Lib.,

Paris. One is on a flat wooden stand, the other on a low platform

with small solid wheels. Fig. 50 exhibits one of these weapons. These

guns, at first without trunnions, were made of bars of wrought iron,

in overlapping coils or sections, welded together on a mandrel, and

then hooped--in fact, similar in principle to the “Armstrong” gun.

There is a breech-block in which the charge was previously laid, and

fitted into the body of the piece by means of a wedge, but no apparent

arrangement for sustaining the recoil. The Scottish cannon, “Mons Meg,”

is forged in this fashion, and a rent near the breech is instructive

in laying bare the system of construction. It is of fifteenth century

date, and is said to have been wrought at Mons in Flanders, but there

is no evidence of this being the case--indeed, it was probably made in

Scotland about the middle of the century. The calibre is 20 inches, and

length 13 feet 6 inches. The projectiles used were stone shot, weighing

330 lb. The powder-chamber is less in diameter than the barrel.

Culverins were long pieces, whose projectiles were usually of lead.

Bronze bombards were made by Aran of Augsburg as early as 1378; but it

was considerably later before these pieces began to be cast in iron.

A very early iron specimen may be seen in the Rotunda collection at

Woolwich.

Breech-loading cannon were pieces of small calibre, and were followed

by those constructed on the movable chamber system, and after that

by muzzle-loaders. There is an interesting piece preserved at the

Artillery Museum, St. Petersburg, dating from the end of the fourteenth

or beginning of the fifteenth century; it is strengthened with coils:

also some good fifteenth century specimens. To judge from the quantity

of old arms of all sorts found in Belgium, that country must have been

as much the cockpit of Europe during the middle ages as it was in much

more recent times. At the Porte de Hal Museum at Brussels are pieces of

artillery of the fifteenth century, including some very early examples

of considerable interest, and among these is a breech-loading cannon,

mounted on a carriage with wooden wheels which are encircled by studded

iron hoops. The weapon is of wrought iron, clasped round with thick

iron coils--length, 0.74. There is another of similar construction

and date--calibre, 0.135; length, 0.77. The carriages have been

reconstructed. A bombardelle, the calibre of which is 0.13, and length,

1.30.

The muzzle-loading crapeaudeau of the first half of the fifteenth

century is a small iron tube, mounted in a thick piece of wood,

which stands on a small square block, with side handles for

transportation--calibre, 32 mm.; it is a model executed from an

old MS. A small culverin, the progenitor of the early petronel and

later blunderbuss--length with mount, 1.80; barrel, 1.15; calibre,

25 mm. A breech-loading culverin of the first half of the fifteenth

century--calibre, 0.065; length, 1.97. This weapon was found at

Luxemburg during the demolition of part of the ramparts; it has a ring

for hoisting.

There is a serpentin forged on the “Mons Meg” principle, the carriage

of which is constructed from an ancient MS. (Fig. 50). A ship falconet

(Fig. 50), early sixteenth century, breech-loader; turning on a

pivot--calibre, 0.035; length, 1.31. The collection of early ordnance

at the Königl. Zeughaus at Berlin contains some interesting specimens.

Among them is an example of the short early bombard, dating from the

close of the fourteenth century; and a long serpent cannon, shooting

a projectile of two and a half pounds weight, of the year 1419 (these

two weapons have been constructed after contemporary drawings); two

cannon, eighty-pounders; a seven-pounder bombard used by Charles the

Bold, and taken by the Swiss at the battle of Nancy. There are also

many others similar in character to specimens described in these pages.

An interesting series of drawings of late fifteenth century artillery

exists in the ordnance books of the Emperor Maximilian I., where you

have examples of the bombard, serpentin, snakes, falconets, mortar,

and orgue. The lighter guns are mounted on rude carriages, with heavy

wooden wheels encircled with iron-hooping.

[Illustration: Fig. 50.--Early Artillery.]

The elbow bombard, used in Italy early in the fifteenth century, was a

tube fixed at right angles on to a carriage--the angle was capable of

manipulation by a prop, and the breech-block is inserted in the side.

The orgue, the prototype of the modern mitrailleuse, was invented

early in the fifteenth century--examples are mentioned with as many as

thirty and forty barrels, and even more. There is an early specimen

in the museum at Sigmaringen; and one dating from the beginning of

the sixteenth century, with forty barrels, in the Imperial collection

at Vienna. Another with five barrels, dating from about the end

of the fifteenth century, and one a century later with sixty-four

barrels; both in the collection of the Königl. Zeughaus at Berlin. A

breech-loading gun of the fifteenth century may be seen in Fig. 50.

The connecting link between artillery and hand-guns has been mentioned

in an example at the Porte de Hal Museum, Brussels, and there are

many other specimens there, called bâton à feu. Among them is a

harquebus-mitrailleuse; this weapon, which is only twenty-five inches

long, has nine barrels, moves on a pivot, and is fired by a wheel-lock.

The transport of the heavy and cumbrous guns of the fourteenth century

was found to be attended with so much difficulty and expense that

lighter cannon were introduced in the century following for field use,

and rude carriages on wheels drawn by oxen were added. The bombard thus

mounted was called “cerbotana ambulatoria.” Gun carriages were vastly

improved during the reign of Henry VIII., when horses were employed

to draw them. Means of sighting and convenience for trajectory had

to be thought of, and trunnions were invented towards the middle of

the fifteenth century. There was another contrivance for raising and

depressing by means of a long thin prolongation, a sort of tail in

fact, attached to the piece behind, and a fork was sometimes used for

holding up the breech. There is a specimen with this adjustment at the

Musée d’Artillerie at Paris, with an inscription bearing the date 1490.

Projectiles of iron did not become common until a little later, but

there was nothing specially new in a metal projectile, for such had

long been used for early war engines, throwing balls both cold and hot.

The English army before Orleans in 1428 had a train of fifteen

breech-loading mortars. Valturio, an Italian, writing in 1472 describes

the engines of war then in use, including cannon.

Specimens of ancient ordnance are not very numerous in England. There

is a very interesting wrought-iron bombard in the collection at the

Rotunda, Woolwich, dating from the commencement of the fifteenth

century, or possibly somewhat earlier. It is lined with cast-iron,[52]

has a calibre of 15.1 inches; interior diameter of chamber, 14

inches; capacity of chamber, about 3.5 lb.; length of chase, 34

inches; present weight, 6 cwts. Also a wrought-iron cannon of about

the same date--length, 24 inches; original calibre about 2 inches,

without trunnions or cascabel, but provided with a couple of rings for

transportation.

Double cannon, strengthened with coils, were common at this period,

with the breech in the centre, and barrels running in two opposite

directions. There are specimens at Woolwich, and at the Porte de Hal

Museum, Brussels. There are several wrought-iron pieces at Woolwich,

of the reign of Henry VI., and among them a serpent gun 8 feet 6

inches long, without trunnions, but provided with two rings for

lifting--calibre, 4.25 inches; weight, about 9 cwts. A wrought-iron

breech-loading gun with carriage was recovered from the wreck of the

_Mary Rose_, sunk off Spithead in 1545, which is now at Woolwich;

original calibre about 8 inches; the gun is a tube 9 feet 8 inches

long, strengthened by a succession of heavy hoops, and is fixed by iron

bolts to a beam of wood. The breech-block being removed for loading and

charge inserted, the block is replaced and wedged, and the recoil was

sustained by an upright piece of wood. There is no arrangement visible

for raising or lowering the gun for taking aim. Similar guns may be

seen at the Tower.

During the early days of artillery guns were constantly taken and

retaken in battle after a first discharge, the process of reloading

being so protracted that cavalry, or even infantry, were upon them long

before the operation could be completed.

The fourteenth or early fifteenth century bombardier was clad in

chain-mail, when stone shot was fired. He ignited his charge with a hot

iron, guarding his face with his left hand from the sparks thrown off

by the old-fashioned powder.

During the fifteenth century cannon were usually entrusted to the

care of foreign mercenaries who were better disciplined than mere

feudal or communal levies, and much less liable to panic. John Jedd

was appointed Master of Ordnance in England, 1483, and the office was

not abolished before 1852. Hand-grenades appear in 1536. Each gun was

known by a special name, of which “Mons Meg” is a familiar example. The

general estimation of the use of cannon in campaigning was for long

discredited by reason of the manifold imperfections of the weapons,

the frequency of their capture by the enemy, and the dangers attending

their discharge; they were for long employed simultaneously with the

more ancient projectile engines, and the latter were preferred by many

commanders to the former; but the dawn of the sixteenth century saw

such manifest improvements that artillery then began to take the first

place among projectile weapons. The petard was an invention of the

Flemings in the sixteenth century.

Ordnance of the sixteenth century varies very much in size, cannon

throwing a projectile of from thirty to forty pounds; culverins,

bastard-culverins, falcons, falconets, and many other varieties

discharging balls from sixteen pounds down to a single pound.

Mortars were greatly used in the middle of the sixteenth century, and

howitzers for throwing hollow balls a little later.

Gunpowder first became granulated during the second half of the

fifteenth century, up to which time the powder was of a fine dust, and

divided from the stone projectile by a wooden wad. There were coarse

and fine granulations made for charging and priming respectively. That

made in the seventeenth century had become much more powerful, and a

proportionate amount of metal had to be allowed in the construction of

cannon. Mr. John Hewitt quotes the author of _Pallas Armata_, which

states “that a culverin that shot 16 pounds of iron had but a hundred

pound of metal allowed for every pound of her shot, and so she weighed

then but 1,600 pounds; but now and long before this she weighs 4,300

pounds, and consequently hath the allowance of near 270 pounds of metal

for every pound of shot.”

All the gunlocks we are accustomed to associate with hand-guns were

used with ordnance; they were fixed to the vent-field by pins passing

laterally through it, or by side screws.

The first mention of bombs occurs in 1588.

Artillery had now become an important and independent arm in all

campaigning, and it will be seen how numerous cannon had become when it

is stated that the train of guns attached to the army of the Emperor

Ferdinand in 1556 consisted of fifty-four heavy and one hundred and

twenty-seven light pieces of artillery.

Rifled cannon, the principle of which was first applied to hand-arms in

Germany, were introduced in this century; examples of which may be seen

in the arsenal at Berlin, and in the museums of Nuremberg and the Hague.

Viscount Dillon, P.S.A., writing in _Archæologia_, vol. li., quotes

Lord Herbert of Cherbury, who consulted the records for the compilation

of his history of the reign of Henry VIII. Lord Herbert writes that

“great brass ordnance, as cannons and culverins, were first cast in

England by one John Owen in 1535; and that about 1544 iron pieces and

grenades were first cast.” Viscount Dillon remarks “that the facts as

to time and place seem to be different, for in September 1516 there

occurs a payment of £33 6s. 8d. to John Rutter of London, for “hurts

and damages by him sustained in a tenement to him belonging wherein the

king’s great gun called the ‘Basiliscus’ was cast, and for rent.” In

1532 Carlo Capello, the Venetian, writes that Henry “visited the Tower

daily to hasten the works then going on there, and was founding cannon

and heavy gunpowder made.” This was in anticipation of the Scottish war.

A valuable account of the guns in the Tower, numbering 64 of brass

and 351 of iron, of which follow some abridged extracts, may be seen

in some notes by Viscount Dillon, appearing in _Archæologia_, vol.

li., pp. 223–225. He states “that there are two bronze guns, octagonal

externally, with bores 2½ and 2¾ inches, corresponding in form with

types of 1500–1530, presumably of Venetian make. The ‘Brode Fawcon,

shooting iij shotte,’ is rectangular externally, has three bores side

by side, and the three spaces for placing the three chambers, as in

early breech-loading cannon. The ‘French gonnes of Brasse’ may have

been part of the spoils of Boulogne in 1554, or else the work of the

same Peter Bawde who cast brass guns for King Henry at Houndsditch

as early as 1525.” His lordship is of opinion that the seventeen

“Scottishe gonnes of Brasse” would include some of the pieces taken at

Flodden, which, according to Hall, consisted of “5 great curtalls, 2

great culverynges, 4 sacres (hawks), and 5 serpentynes, etc.” Viscount

Dillon mentions in his notes that the Scotch made cannon in 1460,

and that the iron guns in the Tower comprise eleven of the numerous

varieties in use in Henry VIII.’s time, and he gives the names of

makers of that period, both English and foreign. These notes, of which

this is but a very imperfect outline, should be read _in extenso_ by

all specially interested in the subject.

The Defensive Armour and the Weapons and Engines of War of Mediæval Times, and of the "Renaissance." · 第 24 / 25 章