I. In return to your enquiries concerning the story of the Wandering Jew,
and the question you ask me respecting it, which is, whether I have read
an account of such a person in any author deserving of credit, or who is
esteemed classical? I must answer, that I have read accounts of such a
man in various authors, some of whom are reckoned classical, but their
relations of him vary in particular circumstances.
II. The first, to the best of my remembrance, who made any mention of
him in a regular history, was the celebrated English historian Matthew
Paris; according to which author, there came to England in 1229, an
Armenian bishop, who was recommended by the pope, to be shewn the relics
of saints that were deposited in that kingdom; and the pope added in his
recommendation of him, a request that he might have all the information
he was desirous of respecting these matters, and every particular
relating to them. As it was current among the vulgar at that time,
that the Wandering Jew was then going about the Oriental Regions; some
curious people asked the bishop, whose habitation and diocese was in that
quarter, and who they on that account, thought must know whether those
reports were true or not, many questions concerning them; and desired
he would tell them, whether there really had been, or was then, such a
person as the Wandering Jew in that country; and if he was living now,
in what quarter he was travelling, what sort of man he was, and what
account he gave of himself? To which the bishop answered, that the said
Jew really now existed, and was at present strolling about Armenia. They
put the same questions to several others, who came as attendants on, or
companions to the bishop, who all gave the same answer; and one of them
gave a particular account of him and his adventures, who was a person
that could speak English, and express himself readily in Latin also.
III. This man told them, that the Wandering Jew, before his conversion,
was named Cataphilus, and had been the porter or door-keeper of Pilate;
and that, being at his station as such, when they brought our Saviour
from before the prætor, in order to crucify him, he, to make him move on
faster, at his going out of the door, gave him a blow with his fist on
the shoulders; upon which our Redeemer turning his head, said to him,
_The Son of Man is going, but you shall remain here till he returns_. The
porter upon this immediately became a convert to Christianity, and was
baptized by Ananias, who gave him the name of Joseph. This expression of
our Saviour’s to him, was understood to imply a prediction, that this Jew
should not die, till Christ’s return to judge the quick and the dead;
which prophecy had been verified with respect to the Jew to that day, who
was then more than twelve hundred and fifty years old, although at the
end of every hundred years of his age, he had always experienced some
threatenings of death, for at this period, he had been constantly visited
with a severe disease, which so far debilitated him, that it might be
said to have brought him to death’s door; but upon his recovery, his
youth seemed to have been renewed, for he did not appear a man of more
than thirty years old, which was the age of Christ, at the time of his
crucifixion.
IV. This person added, that the Jew Joseph was very well known to the
bishop, and had lived in his house but a little before he set out on his
journey to England.
V. The said historian, upon the authority we have been mentioning,
tells us further, that the Jew answered minutely, and in a grave, and
composed manner, to all questions that were asked him concerning antient
things, and gave a particular account of the opening of the graves, and
the rising of the dead, when our Saviour gave up the ghost, and also of
the lives and actions of the apostles; that he always seemed greatly
afraid that the day of judgment was near at hand, because that would
be the period of his life; and that he never failed to be seized with
great horror, when he was reminded of the sacrilegious disrespect he had
been guilty of to our Saviour; but he always expressed hopes of being
pardoned, on account of his great ignorance of the sin he committed.
VI. Jacob Basnage, a Protestant author, in his history of the Jews,
tells us of three wandering Jews. The first and most antient of whom,
was named _Samer_, and was condemned to wander, as a punishment, for his
having cast the first golden calf in the days of Moses. The other, was
the Cataphilus we have been speaking of, who was the porter to Pilate;
and the third was named Asuerus, and was a shoemaker at Jerusalem. He
says this last appeared in 1547 at Hamburgh, and the account he gave of
himself, was with only the variation of here and there a circumstance,
the same, that the Armenians gave of the person, whom they said they knew
in their own country. This man declared, that before his conversion, he
was called Asuerus, was a shoemaker by trade, and kept a shoemaker’s
shop near the gate of Jerusalem, at which our Saviour went out in his
way to Mount Calvari; who when he approached the gate, finding himself
much fatigued, was desirous of resting himself a little while in his
shop; but that he gave him a shove, and would not suffer him to enter
the door, and that then Christ said to him; _I shall soon be at rest,
but you shall wander about without ceasing till my return_. He said, the
prophecy began to take effect from that instant, and had continued in
force till then; for that he had constantly, ever since that æra, been
wandering without being able to settle himself in any province whatever.
He was a man of large stature, and had the appearance of one of about
fifty years of age; he was also apt to fetch frequent deep sighs, which
the by-standers imputed to the sadness that was caused in him by the
remembrance of his crime.
VII. Our great expositor Augustin Calmet, in his Dictionario Biblico,
testifies to have had in his possession, a letter written at London by
Lady Mazarine (who I suppose was she they called the Dutchess Hortensia
Mancini, and who was as famous for her labours, as her beauty) to the
Dutchess of Bullon, in which she relates, that at the time she wrote
the letter, there arrived a stranger in England, who gave the same sort
of account of himself, as that the Jew we mentioned before did. He
asserted, says Lady Hortensia, that he knew all the apostles, and gave a
particular description of their stature, their features, and the cloaths
they wore; he said, he had gone over all the regions of the earth, and
that he should not cease to wander till the end of the world. He boasted
that he could heal the diseased with his touch, and understood many
languages; and related with such exactness the events of all ages, that
every one listened to him with admiration. A gentleman who was eminently
learned addressed him in Arabic; and he answered him off hand in the
same language; nor could you mention to him the name of any person who
had been famous in former ages, that he did not affirm to have known. He
said he was at Rome, when it was set fire to by Nero, and that he had
conversed with Mahomet, and knew his father; that he had seen Saladine,
Tamerlan, Bajazet, Soliman the great, &c. and she added in her letter,
that simple people attributed many wonderful performances to him, but
that the wise and prudent looked upon him as an impostor.
VIII. The author of the Turkish Spy, whoever he might have been, which
is a fact that I don’t think has yet been ascertained, makes mention
in many of his letters, of the wandering Jew. Epist. 39. of his
second volume addressed to Ibrahim, and which was supposed to have
been written about the year 1643, is all taken up with particulars and
circumstances relating to the Wandering Jew, who he says he saw and
conversed with at Paris, and asked him many questions respecting the
things of antiquity. The Spy says, he told him his name was Michob Ader,
and that he had been door-keeper to the Divan at Jerusalem, together
with all the circumstances that Calmet says were related of him by the
Dutchess of Mazarine; to which was added, that he had travelled through a
variety of countries, had read much, and understood many languages. But
notwithstanding all this, the Spy was of opinion, that he was either a
madman, or an impostor.
IX. The same author in his fifth volume, epist. 50. addressed to his
friend Nathan Ben Saddi, a Jew, and which was written about the year
1666; I say the same author in this letter, relates to Ben Saddi, many
particulars and circumstances respecting the Wandering Jew, whom he tells
him he had seen and conversed with at Paris; and acquaints him with a
variety of things, that the said Jew had told him relating to the Jews in
the northern parts of Asia, which he believed to be the relicks of the
twelve dispersed tribes.
X. This author in his sixth volume, epist. 9. written in the year 1672,
to Gulielmus, tells him, towards the latter part of it, that they talked
in all places of a wandering Jew, who at that time was said to be at
Astracan, and there preaching, that Christianity would be at an end
in 1700. And in his seventh epistle addressed to Codabafrad Kheick, a
Mahometan, written in the same year of 1672, he gives him an account, of
all the Wandering Jew preached and prophesied at Astracan. The Spy says,
that a relation of his, named Fousi, was living there at the same time,
who had been a great traveller, and was a merchant; and adds, that he had
received a letter from him but a little while before, which gave him the
account of all these particulars respecting the wandering Jew.
XI. He prophesied, says the Spy, that in the year 1700 of the Hegira of
the Christians, the Turks would over-run all the continent of Europe,
and every part occupied by the Christians on the main land; that the
Christians would fly to England as an asylum, and that there a great
person would spring up, that would become their chief and leader, and
that he would conquer Jerusalem. The Jews would then open their eyes, and
acknowledge Jesus Christ for the true Messiah; but the Spy adds, that he
only relates these things, and does not believe them.
XII. Notwithstanding the foregoing, he in his seventeenth epistle of
the same volume, written in 1674, to the Turk Ali Bashaw, gives him to
understand towards the conclusion of the said letter, that he believes
the prophecy of the Wandering Jew, which perhaps he did to flatter the
Mahometans, because the Jew says that they will over-run all Europe in
the year 1700.
XIII. Finally, Father Louis Babenstuber, a German Benedictin, in a volume
which he divided into three books, which was printed at Augsburgh in the
year 1724, intitled _Prolusiones Academicæ_, where he institutes and
treats of fifty-one questions, which he terms _Quodlibeticas curiosas_;
and in the beginning of his 16th proposition of his third book, he
proposes the question, whether, except Elias and Henoch, there ever was
an older man in the world than Methusalem? and there after treating of
Elias and Henoch, he speaks of the Wandering Jew; and after having
related of him nearly the same that Jacob Basnage did; to Basnage’s
account of him, he adds, that he was examined at Hamburgh, by Paulus
Elizius, a Theologian, and then proceeds to say, _Visus est autem hic
Judæus ab innumeris mortalibus in multis Europæ partibus, nempè anno
Christi 1547. Hamburgi. anno 1575. Matrici in Hispania, anno 1599. Viennæ
in Austria, anno 1610. Lubecæ, anno 1634. in Moscovia, alia plura loca
sciens præterea._
XIV. These are all the informations we have of the Wandering Jew; by
which you may see that this extraordinary person appeared in the year
1229 in England. In that of 1547 at Hamburgh. In that of 1575 at Madrid.
In that of 1599 at Vienna. In that of 1610 at Lubec. In that of 1634 in
Muscovy. In that of 1643 at Paris. In that of 1672 at Astracan; and a
few years after at London; which was his second appearance in England. I
say a few years afterwards, without pretending to determine in what year
it was; because Calmet has omitted to give us the date of the Dutchess
Hortensia’s letter. But this Lady, as appears from her life written by
Monsieur St. Euvremont, and which is to be found in the fourth volume of
his works, came to England in 1675, and died there in 1699, from whence
it is plain, the second appearance of the Wandering Jew in that kingdom,
must have been some time between those two æras.
XV. But can we give any credit to these accounts? I think none at all;
and am inclined to disbelieve them; not so much because there is a great
variation in the writers who speak of this person, in their relations
of some circumstances concerning him, for this is not unfrequent in
histories of established reputation, but because the most antient
information we have of him, commences in the year 1229, which considering
the antiquity of the fact, is without doubt a very recent date. How is it
credible, that an event of such superlative magnitude, so extraordinary,
and so singular in its kind, and so well calculated to enforce the truth
of the Christian religion, and to defend it against the attacks of the
Gentiles, should never have been known to, and never made mention of,
by the fathers of the primitive ages? Even abstracted from its being
a circumstance of such weight and importance in the case we have just
mentioned, it would have reflected a very singular and brilliant lustre,
on the glorious passion of our Saviour, and was on that account not only
a worthy subject for the pens of the fathers to illustrate, but for those
of the evangelists also.
XVI. But upon a supposition that this was a fable, it might be asked,
what could have given rise to, or have been the origin of it? To this
I should answer, that I never give myself much trouble about enquiring
into the origin of fables, for that although they may have had their
foundation in some true event, which fiction, or the want of rightly
understanding, may have contributed so to disfigure, that no likeness of
the real and true event may ever have been discernable in them; still
fables have most commonly no other beginning, than in the invention of
the deceiver who takes it into his head to fabricate them; and this is
most frequent, when such an inventor has an interest in their passing for
truth; which without doubt was the case, with respect to the instance
we have been treating of. What pleasanter life, could an idle man of
talents, who was cautious, and well versed in history, and who could
speak eight or nine languages, lead, than that of wandering about the
world, and pretending to be the Jew we have been speaking of? He might
travel through all the kingdoms of Christendom, be well entertained,
and might have a free access even to the thrones of princes, and be
furnished at freecost, not only with every thing that was necessary for
him, but even with the superfluities of life, by persons of all ranks and
conditions, who might be induced to do all this, either from motives of
curiosity, or piety. What greater stimulus than this was necessary, to
excite the first man who practised this cheat, to feign such a story? and
what other incentives did it require, to cause other vagrants, who were
disposed to follow the same trade, to adopt the same pretence?
XVII. But if you are desirous of being informed of any thing more
respecting this matter, than what may be deduced from the common origin
of an infinite number of fables; I mean, if you are desirous of knowing
any particular principle, from which it is probable this story of the
Wandering Jew was derived; I will inform you, that it is not unlikely,
it might have originated from a remote true fact, and from a modern
fable, which was a disfiguration of that fact. The true fact, agreeable
to scripture, tradition, and the authority of the holy fathers, is the
preservation of the prophet Elias upon earth till the end of the world.
Upon this true foundation, the Mahometans erected a fable, which Herbelot
gives us a relation of, in his Bibliotheca Orientalis, page 932. See
the word Zerib. and for which relation, he quotes the author of a book
intitled Nighiaristan; under which title, there are many Persian books;
and Herbelot informs us, that Nighiaristan in the Persian language,
signifies a walk where people assemble to amuse themselves, or a place
of public entertainment and diversion; but he does not tell us the
particular book with this title, from whence he extracted the story,
which is as follows.
XVIII. In the sixth year of the Hegira, just after the Arabs had taken
the city of Holvan or Hulvan in Syria, three hundred cavaliers, who
were returning together from that expedition, a little before night,
encamped between two mountains. Their Chief, who was named Fadhilah,
ordered, that they should conformable to the Mahometan rites, repeat
the evening prayer, which begins with God is great; but they had no
sooner pronounced these words with an audible voice, than they heard them
repeated again from a quarter where no body appeared, nor could they
devise how, or by whom they were repeated, and thought at first that the
repetition was made by an echo; but upon finding that not only the words
at the beginning of the prayer, but all the other sentences also, were
repeated clearly and distinctly, they began to suspect, that this must be
done by some person whom they could not perceive. Upon which, Fadhilah
turning himself to the place from whence the repetition came, said in a
loud voice, _You who repeat our words, if you are of the order of the
angels, God be with you; but if you are one of the other sort of spirits,
I conjure you to depart; but if you are a man like myself come forth
and let me see you, that I may have the satisfaction of surveying your
person, and of conversing with you_. When he had made an end of speaking
these words, an old bald-headed man with a staff in his hand, who had
much the air of a Dervis, came forth, and stood before him, and upon
being asked his name by Fadhilah, said his name was Zerib. Bar. Elia.
and that he had taken up his abode in that quarter by the order of Jesus
Christ, who had appointed him to remain upon earth till the time of his
second coming. Fadhilah then asked him, when that second coming would
be? to which he replied, when men and women should mix together without
shame or distinction, as if they were of one sex; when the abundance of
provisions should not lower their price; when the poor, on account of
the total extinction of charity, should find no body to administer to
their distress; when the holy scriptures should be scoffed at and made a
joke of, and the mysteries contained in them, be derided in ridiculous
couplets; and when the temples dedicated to the true God, should be
occupied by idols; then we might conclude, the final day of judgment was
near at hand; and having said this, he disappeared.
XIX. There is involved in this story, a manifest inversion of that
part of the sacred text, which speaks of the snatching away of Elias,
in consequence of which, and its being corroborated by other parts
of the holy scripture, many of both Christians and Jews think alike,
with respect to the continuance of that prophet upon earth, until the
end of the world. Elias was destined to this near nine hundred years
before the coming of Christ; and this Mahometan account attributes this
destination of him to have been made by our Saviour; which is a shocking
anachronism. But we should not be surprized at this gross ignorance
of the Mahometans; who, together with their false prophet, in their
expositions of the scripture, confound times and persons, in the most
extravagant manner that can be conceived. In the third sura or chapter of
the alcoran, Mahomet identifies Mary the sister of Moses, and Mary the
mother of Christ, as one and the same person; the first of whom was much
more anterior to the last, than Elias was to Christ; and agreeable to the
seventeenth sura or chapter, according to the exposition given of it by
their famous commentator Gelaledin, the invasion of Palestine by the army
in which Goliah was, was a punishment, for the Israelites having put to
death Zacharias the father of John the Baptist, and the invasion of it by
Nebuchadnezzar, was for their having killed the Baptist himself.
XX. At sight of these, and other monstrous inversions of both the old and
new testament, which are very frequent in the alcoran, and the writings
of the Mahometan commentators, I have been inclined to think, that it
is probable some Mahometans, may have confounded John the Baptist with
John the Evangelist, and may have made two distinct sayings of Christ,
applicable to one and the same person, although one of them alludes
to the Baptist, and the other to the Evangelist. Christ said of the
Baptist (Matt. cap. ii.) _Ipse est Elias, qui venturus est_; and of the
Evangelist (John cap. xxi.) _Sic eum volo manere, donec veniam_. Which
words, the other disciples understood to amount to a decree of Christ’s,
that he should continue alive to the final day of judgment. From this
confounding different persons in one and the fame, might originate
among the blind Mahometans, the fiction or belief, that Elias by the
appointment of Christ, was to remain alive upon earth till the final day
of judgment.
XXI. The persuasion then, that Elias was the person of whom our Saviour
pronounced, _Sic eum volo manere, donec veniam_, might possibly give
rise to the Mahometan Nighiaristan story, which upon being published,
might put it into the head of some artful fellow, to assume the character
of a Wandering Jew, and under that disguise, to apply this prediction
delivered by Christ to himself.
XXII. But you will please to remember, that I observed before, there was
no occasion to rummage disfigured histories to seek for the origin of
numberless fables, as the imagination of man, is prodigiously fertile in
bringing forth these productions, and is capable of creating the whole of
a lie, without the auxiliary assistance of an atom of truth.
GOD keep you.