I. Your reproving me for the Eulogiums bestowed on you in my letter,
convinces me thoroughly that they were just and merited; as modesty
and an aversion to being praised, are qualities that always accompany
elevated worth. I shall therefore not dwell longer on this head, but
proceed in the best manner I am able, to give you the satisfaction you
desire, with respect to what I said in a former letter, that my Lord
Bacon was the first who told the philosophers, that pursuing systems,
was going on in a mistaken road to search for truth; and who in his
writings, pointed out to them the path they should pursue in order to
arrive at this object; but as he perceived that Aristotle was the leader
and master of the literary world, that is, that his philosophical system
was almost universally received and adopted, he found it necessary, in
order to induce them to follow his advice, to attempt to discredit the
authority of Aristotle, which he in a great measure accomplished, and
brought many eminent men to concur with him in opinion.
II. You deny that Bacon was the first who engaged in the undertaking of
discrediting Aristotle, and attacking his systems; for that Bernardinus
Telesius, a celebrated philosopher, and native of Cosenza, attempted it
before him; and although Bacon made great advances in this matter, he
only improved an undertaking begun by another man, and worked upon his
plan.
III. My good Sir, in investigating this point, we shall find there are
two distinct things to be considered, and that the consequences to be
deduced from them, are by no means reciprocal or the same. One of them
is, whether Bacon was the first who formed the project of discrediting
all systems; and the other is, whether he was the first who undertook to
attack Aristotle. I affirm that he took the lead in attacking all systems
in general; but not that he was the first who attacked the doctrines of
Aristotle. Indeed I could not assert this last circumstance, without
falling not only into a gross error, but into a manifest contradiction of
myself; for in the fourth volume of the Theatrico Critico, I have said,
that not only Bernardinus Telesius, preceded Bacon, in the attempt of
combating Aristotle; but I also pointed out many others, who had preceded
him in the same attempt; and instanced Gemistus, Plethon, Cardinal
Bessarion, Franciscus Patricius, Theophrastus Paracelsus, together with
Peter del Ramo.
IV. I also declared in the same place, after making mention of
Paracelsus, that Bernardinus Telesius (nearly at the same time with him)
who was a native of the city of Cosenza in the kingdom of Naples, and
a man of subtle ingenuity, declared himself averse to the physics of
Aristotle; and endeavoured to establish the system of his own, upon the
principles, which, with a little variation, were afterwards adopted by
Campænela.
V. I there also, in express words, declared, that Bacon was posterior
to Telesius in his attack upon the doctrines of Aristotle, as may be
seen by the order in which I ranged Aristotle’s impugners; for after
mentioning the philosopher Cosentinus, and many others of them, I
proceeded to speak of Bacon, which I did in the following words; _After
these came that great and sublime genius Francis Bacon, earl of Verulam,
&c._ and you will please to observe, that the words after these, as they
stand in the context, clearly imply, that Bacon was not only posterior to
Telesius, but to all the others; both with respect to the time in which
he lived, and also in his attack upon Aristotle. By all this you may see
clearly, that I can make no objection to your well-grounded assertion,
that as Telesius was considerably anterior to Bacon, he could borrow no
lights from Bacon’s works.
VI. But did Bacon borrow any from Telesius to assist him in his
endeavours of demonstrating, that all philosophical systems are
erroneous; and in pointing out to the philosophers, the track they
should pursue in order to arrive at truth? This is the point in which we
differ, and this is the only point of view in which I insist that Bacon
stands single, or at least, that this is an undertaking in which he never
was preceded, either by Telesius, or any other. Telesius, it is true,
attacked the doctrines of Aristotle before Bacon; but did he declare
himself averse to all systems, or systematic modes of philosophizing?
Nothing like it, for he himself was a rigorous systematic philosopher,
and a follower of the antient doctrine of Parmenides, who constituted
heat and cold as the first principles of all things.
VII. If further proof in this matter was necessary, Bacon’s Treatise on
the Philosophical Doctrines of Parmenides, Telesius, and Democritus,
where he intentionally and expressly, attacks and reprobates all their
philosophical tenets, seems decisive; for he there, so far from shewing
himself a follower of Telesius, or a worker upon his plan, studiously
and seriously applies himself, to taking to pieces and overturning the
whole plan of Telesius; and in another part of his works, that is in his
Treatise _de Auxiliis mentis, et accensione luminis naturalis_; he treats
his system as a theatrical fable: _Quin etiam nudiustertius Bernardinus
Telesius scenam conscendit, et novam fabulam egit, nec plausu celebrem,
nec argumento elegantem_.
VIII. From these premises it must follow, that Bacon could borrow no
lights from Telesius, to assist him in pointing out to the philosophers,
the path they should pursue to arrive at truth; and this path which he
pointed out to them, was that of experience, which never once occurred
to Telesius. Or indeed, how can it be supposed that such a man as
Telesius, should point out to others the road of experience, as the only
one by which they could arrive at a knowledge of philosophical truths,
when he was pre-occupied and pre-possessed, in favour of the system of
Parmenides, which he recommended to every one, as the only mode, by which
that knowledge could be attained? An author never directs his readers to
follow any other road, than that which he pursues himself; nor does he
lead them by any other, than that which he himself travels.
IX. I have not seen the Philosophical Works of Telesius, but I have in
my possession all those of Campanela, who no one doubts was a faithful
sectary of Telesius; but I can find nothing in them that is at all
like Bacon; although it is by no means unlikely, that Bacon, when he
was combating some particular propositions in Aristotle, might make
use of some arguments that had before been urged by Telesius; but upon
the whole, the plans and the objects of the two men, were very widely
different. Telesius endeavoured to throw down the system of Aristotle, in
order to build up that of Parmenides on the ruins of it. Bacon strove to
demolish that of Aristotle, that of Parmenides, and the systems of all
other philosophers whatever; and recommended to all those who employed
themselves in philosophical speculations, to apply themselves solely to
the study of experimental observations.
X. This is what has occurred to me on the subject of your objection,
which I submit to your consideration and correction; and beg leave to
return you my thanks for the honour you have done me in dedicating your
little new book to me.
GOD keep you.
A LETTER On the Subject of the WANDERING JEW.
In Answer to one written to Feyjöö, asking his Opinion of that Matter.