SECT. IV.

XVII. If the instruction of great masters was capable of making a man a

politician, Richard Cromwel, the son of Oliver, should have been one

of the greatest the world ever produced. The same Oliver, who after the

tragical death of Charles the First of England, which he had a principal

hand in accomplishing, erected himself into the tyrant of that kingdom,

under the title of a Protector; and without doubt, Cromwel the father

was one of the most able politicians which either that, or any other age

had ever seen. His industry and his valour, raised him from a middling

station of life, to the highest degree of military and magisterial rank.

His address and resolution, enabled him to accomplish that unexampled

attempt, of trying, and with all the formality of a legal process,

condemning his own Sovereign to an ignominious death. When the King

was dispatched, he abolished the house of Lords, and vested the whole

authority of parliament in the Commons; whom he afterwards divested

of all their power, by driving the members when they were assembled,

ignominiously out of their house; and as a testimony of the arbitrary

authority with which he acted, and to shew that was not a transitory

expulsion, he caused a board to be nailed on the outside of the door, on

which was the following inscription, _This house to be let_. In fine, he

ruled that kingdom to his last gasp, with a more absolute sway, than any

King who had ever gone before, or since his time has succeeded to the

throne; bringing about, that a parliament being convened by himself for

the purpose, should declare the title and office of Protector hereditary

in his family. All this he executed in a nation, so fierce and zealous

of their liberties as the English, which is the clearest proof that can

be given, of his supreme political abilities. In reality, I am disposed

to believe all circumstances considered, that there never to this day,

has appeared a man, who did so much, or has shewed so many, and so great

marks of political ability, as Oliver Cromwel.

XVIII. In the school of this great man, his son Richard was tutored

many years, and not only with instructions purely theoretical or

verbal, but practical and executive. He saw all the movements, and

various expedients, which his father exerted and played off, according

to the various exigencies of his affairs; neither was the reason of

proportioning these means, to attain particular ends, concealed from him.

And of what use was all this to the disciple? Of none, because instead

of teaching him how to acquire something more than he possessed, it

did not so much as instruct him how to preserve that which his father

had left him firmly established in; and before a year had passed over

his head after his father’s death, notwithstanding it had been secured

to him by act of parliament, he found himself deposed from the rank

of Protector, and obliged to live retired like a private gentleman, in

a country house. If within the same kingdom, and negotiating with the

same people, and in the same situation of affairs, where the views were

directed to the same objects, all the lessons both of theory and practice

which he had received from his father, were unprofitable to this man, who

did not retain one political arcanum, of the great number that had been

communicated to him from the vast fund of knowledge and penetration of so

able a master; and if a school of politics so circumstanced, was of no

use to him who studied in it for so many years, what occasion have we to

expect, that by the simple reading of books, a man should ever attain the

art, of skilfully directing the business of a state?

XIX. Nor is there any reason to suppose, that Richard was a stupid man,

and totally incapable of receiving instruction; for nobody has described

him as such; nor is it credible, if he had been such a sort of person,

that the English would have permitted him to have continued with the

rank of Protector as the successor to his father, for the little time

he enjoyed it. The truth is, that he was much inferior to his father

in natural talents; and that no political instructions were capable

of supplying this defect. Oliver was not only a man of great capacity,

but of a genius that was apt and suitable to every thing, and equally

understood how to command an army, or to direct a state. Over and above

this, he was magnanimous, and possessed a stout heart. There was not

known a more courageous soldier, in the age in which he lived. When

the town of Hull was besieged by King Charles, and in a weak state of

defence, Oliver at the head of only twelve horsemen, threw himself into

the place, by breaking through the centre of the royal army, exposed

to the fire of showers of bullets; and the preservation of the town,

was owing to the many prodigies of valour which Oliver exerted in its

defence. In one of the battles in which he was engaged, he took with his

own hands, two standards of cavalry, and the colours of a regiment of

infantry. In another battle, where one wing of the parliament army was

totally routed, and the Earl of Manchester the general put to flight,

Oliver, without giving himself scarce time to have a dangerous wound

he had received in the battle bound up, flew to stop the earl and the

fugitive troops, on whom his ardour and eloquence had so much weight,

that they returned with him to the charge, and intirely put to flight and

dispersed the royal army. These and other acts of extraordinary valour,

joined to the many victories he obtained by dint of his intrepid courage,

gained him the respect and esteem of the English, who are naturally

enamoured with bravery, and idolizers of military glory.

XX. To these great talents, Oliver added the lure of hypocrisy, which

has vast influence on the populace. At the same time that he was bathing

his hands in the blood of Great Britain, and striving to dethrone his

legitimate prince, in order to usurp the sovereign power, the name of God

was constantly in his mouth; who he endeavoured to make it believed, was

the especial director of his conduct, and that he himself was nothing

more than an instrument, who in obedience to the divine will, executed

the decrees of heaven for the public good, and to advance the prosperity

of the kingdom.

XXI. These good and bad qualities, were united in Oliver Cromwel, and all

conspired, to enable him to deprive a powerful monarch of his crown and

life, and to overturn a great state. But of what advantage was it to his

son Richard, to hear his father’s lessons, and to see these examples, if

he did not inherit his father’s talents?

XXII. I am already aware, that there will be some, who will be prepared

to urge as an excuse for Richard, the apology which Dionysius the

younger made for himself; who, when he was asked, how it came to pass

that his father from being a private man, acquired the principality of

Sicily, and that he who succeeded to him as a prince, found himself

reduced to live as a common subject; replied, my father left me his

crown, but did not leave me heir to his fortune. But with all this,

there is no doubt, that the fall of Richard was owing to his want of

ability to conduct himself, and it is very probable, that the disgrace

of Dionysius originated from the same cause. There is no indiscreet

man whatever, who does not impute to fortune, the mischiefs he brings

on himself by his imprudence. Dionysius the younger, was more cruel

than his father, and was nothing near equal to him in the capacity of

a warrior. Thus, the Syracusians experienced from him, severities that

irritated them, and also found, that he wanted the necessary power to

keep them in subjection. Between the Cromwels, this inequality was much

more conspicuous. The father had an able head, and a great heart. The

son had neither head nor heart; and it was for want of resolution, that

at the beginning of the revolt, he suffered himself to be overpowered by

the leaders of the opposite faction; and it was for want of judgment or

a head, that he placed such excessive confidence in the ties of kindred,

and relied wholly on his uncle and brother-in-law, who in their hearts

were unfriendly to him, and in the end were those who deposed him.

Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) · 第 63 / 86 题