From the very earliest period of history, then, the conjoined human and

fish form was known to every generation of men. It was presented to

their sight in childhood by sculptures and pictures, and was a

conspicuous object in their religious worship. By the lapse of time its

original import was lost and debased; and, from being an emblem and

symbol, it came to be accepted as the corporeal shape and structure of

actually-existent sea-deities, who might present themselves to the view

of the mariner, in visible and tangible form, at any moment. Thus were

men trained and prepared to believe in mermen and mermaids, to expect to

meet with them at sea, and to recognise as one of them any animal the

appearance and movements of which could possibly be brought into

conformity with their pre-conceived ideas.

Accordingly, and very naturally, we find that from north to south this

belief has been entertained. Megasthenes, who was a contemporary of

Aristotle, but his junior, and whose geographical work was probably

written at about the period of the great philosopher's death, reported

that the sea which surrounded Taprobana, the ancient Ceylon, was

inhabited by creatures having the appearance of women. AElian stated that

there were "whales," or "great fishes," having the form of satyrs. The

early Portuguese settlers in India asserted that true mermen were found

in the Eastern seas, and old Norse legends tell of submarine beings of

conjoined human and piscine form, who dwell in a wide territory far

below the region of the fishes, over which the sea, like the cloudy

canopy of our sky, loftily rolls, and some of whom have, from time to

time, landed on Scandinavian shores, exchanged their fishy extremities

for human limbs, and acquired amphibious habits. Not only have poets

sung of the wondrous and seductive beauty of the maidens of these

aquatic tribes, but many a Jack tar has come home from sea prepared to

affirm on oath that he has seen a mermaid. To the best of his belief he

has told the truth. He has seen some living being which looked

wonderfully human, and his imagination, aided by an inherited

superstition, has supplied the rest.

Before endeavouring to identify the object of his delusion, it may be

well to mention a few instances of the supposed appearance of mermen and

mermaidens in various localities.

Pliny writes[42]: "When Tiberius was emperor, an embassy was sent to him

from Olysippo (Lisbon) expressly to inform him that a Triton, which was

recognised as such by its form, had shown itself in a certain cave, and

had been heard to produce loud sounds on a conch-shell. The Nereid,

also, is not imaginary: its body is rough and covered with scales, but

it has the appearance of a human being. For one was seen upon the same

coast; and when it was dying those dwelling near at hand heard it

moaning sadly for a long time. And the Governor of Gaul wrote to the

divine Augustus that several Nereids had been found dead upon the shore.

I have many informants--illustrious persons in high positions--who have

assured me that they saw in the Sea of Cadiz a merman whose whole body

was exactly like that of a man, that these mermen mount on board ships

by night, and weigh down that end of the vessel on which they rest, and

that if they are allowed to remain there long they will sink the ship."

[42] _Naturalis Historia_, Lib. ix. cap. v.

AElian in one of his short, jerky, disconnected chapters,[43] which

rarely exceed a page in length, and some of which only contain two

lines, writes: "It is reported that the great sea which surrounds the

island of Taprobana (Ceylon) contains an immense multitude of fishes and

whales, and some of them have the heads of lions, panthers, rams, and

other animals; and (which is more wonderful still) some of the cetaceans

have the form of satyrs. There are others which have the face of a

woman, but prickles instead of hair. In addition to these, it is said

there are other creatures of so strange and monstrous a kind that it

would be impossible exactly to explain their appearance without the aid

of a skilfully drawn picture: these have elongated and coiled tails,

and, for feet, have claws[44] or fins. And I hear that in the same sea

there are great amphibious beasts which are gregarious, and live on

grain, and by night feed on the corn crops and grass, and are also very

fond of the ripe fruit of the palms. To obtain these they encircle in

their embrace the trees which are young and flexible, and, shaking them

violently, enjoy the fruit which they thus cause to fall. When morning

dawns they return to the sea, and plunge beneath the waves."

[43] _De Natura Animalium_, Lib. xvi. cap. xviii.

[44] "_Forfices_," literally "shears," or "nippers," like the claws

of a lobster.

AElian seems to have derived this information from Megasthenes, already

referred to; but in another chapter,[45] he writes with greater

certainty concerning these semi-human whales, and claims divine

authority for his belief in the existence of tritons. "Although," he

says, "we have no rational explanation nor absolute proof of that which

fishermen are said to be able to affirm concerning the form of the

tritons, we have the sworn testimony of many persons that there are in

the sea cetaceans which from the head down to the middle of the body

resemble the human species. Demostratus, in his works on fishing, says

that an aged triton was seen near the town of Tanagra, in Boeotia, which

was like the drawings and pictures of tritons, but its features were so

obscured by age, and it disappeared so quickly, that its true character

was not easily perceptible. But on the spot where it had rested on the

shore were found some rough and very hard scales which had become

detached from it. A certain senator--one of those selected by lot to

carry on the administration of Achaia and the duties of the annual

magistracy" (the mayor, in fact,) "being anxious to investigate the

nature of this triton, put a portion of its skin on the fire. It gave

out a most horrible odour; and those standing by were unable to decide

whether it belonged to a terrestrial or marine animal. But the

magistrate's curiosity had an evil ending, for very soon afterwards,

whilst crossing a narrow creek in a boat, he fell overboard and was

drowned; and the Tanagreans all regarded this as a judgment upon him for

his crime of impiety towards the triton--an interpretation which was

confirmed when his decomposing body was cast ashore, for it emitted

exactly the same odour as had the burned skin of the triton. The

Tanagreans and Demostratus explain whence the triton had strayed, and

how it was stranded in this place. I believe," continues AElian, "that

tritons exist, and I reverentially produce as my witness a most

veracious god--namely, Apollo Didymaeus, whom no man in his senses would

presume to regard as unworthy of credit. He sings thus of the triton,

which he calls the sheep of the sea:

[45] Lib. xiii. cap. xxi.

'_Dum vocale maris monstrum natat aequore triton,

Neptuni pecus, in funes forte incidit extra

Demissos navim_';"

which I venture to translate as follows:

A triton, vocal monster of the deep,

One of a flock of Neptune's scaly sheep,

Was caught, whilst swimming o'er the watery plain,

By lines which fishers from their boat had lain.

"Therefore," AElian concludes, "if he, the omniscient god, pronounces

that there are tritons, it does not behove us to doubt their existence."

Sir J. Emerson Tennent, in his 'Natural History of Ceylon,' quoting

from the _Histoire de la Compagnie de Jesus_, mentions that the annalist

of the exploits of the Jesuits in India gravely records that seven of

these monsters, male and female, were captured at Manaar, in 1560, and

carried to Goa, where they were dissected by Demas Bosquez, physician to

the Viceroy, "and their internal structure found to be in all respects

conformable to the human." He also quotes Valentyn, one of the Dutch

colonial chaplains, who, in his account of the Natural History of

Amboyna,[46] embodied in his great work on the Netherlands' possessions

in India, published in 1727,[47] devoted the first section of his

chapter on the fishes of that island to a minute description of the

"Zee-Menschen," "Zee-Wyven," and mermaids, the existence of which he

warmly insists on as being beyond cavil. He relates that in 1663, when a

lieutenant in the Dutch service was leading a party of soldiers along

the sea-shore in Amboyna, he and all his company saw the mermen swimming

at a short distance from the beach. They had long and flowing hair of a

colour between grey and green. Six weeks afterwards the creatures were

again seen by him and more than fifty witnesses, at the same place, by

clear daylight. "If any narrative in the world," adds Valentyn,

"deserves credit it is this; since not only one, but two mermen together

were seen by so many eye-witnesses. Should the stubborn world, however,

hesitate to believe it, it matters nothing, as there are people who

would even deny that such cities as Rome, Constantinople, or Cairo,

exist, merely because they themselves have not happened to see them. But

what are such incredulous persons," he continues, "to make of the

circumstance recorded by Albrecht Herport[48] in his account of India,

that a merman was seen in the water near the church of Taquan on the

morning of the 29th of April, 1661, and a mermaid at the same spot the

same afternoon? Or what do they say to the fact that in 1714 a mermaid

was not only seen but captured near the island of Booro, five feet,

Rhineland measure, in height; which lived four days and seven hours,

but, refusing all food, died without leaving any intelligible account of

herself?" Valentyn, in support of his own faith in the mermaid, cites

many other instances in which both "sea-men and sea-women" were seen and

taken at Amboyna; especially one by a district visitor of the

church, who presented it to the Governor Vanderstel. Of this

"well-authenticated" specimen he gives an elaborate portrait amongst the

fishes of the island,[49] with a minute description of each for the

satisfaction of men of science.

[Illustration: FIG. 12.--MERMAID AND FISHES OF AMBOYNA. _After

Valentyn._]

[46] One of the Dutch spice-islands in the Banda Sea, between

Celebes and Papua.

[47] _Beschrijving van Oud en Nieuw Oost-Indien_, etc., 5 vols.

folio, Dordrecht and Amsterdam, 1727, vol. iii. p. 330.

[48] _Itinerarium Indicum_, Berne, 1669.

[49] With the permission and assistance of Messrs. Longman, the

accompanying wood-cut of this picture, and that of the Dugong, on

page 43, are copied from Sir J. Emerson Tennent's book published in

1861.

The fame of this creature having reached Europe, the British minister in

Holland wrote to Valentyn on the 28th of December, 1716, whilst the

Emperor Peter the Great, of Russia, was his guest at Amsterdam, to

communicate the desire of the Czar that the mermaid should be brought

home from Amboyna for his inspection. To complete his proofs of the

existence of mermen and merwomen, Valentyn points triumphantly to the

historical fact that in Holland, in the year 1404, a mermaid was driven,

during a tempest, through a breach in the dyke of Edam, and was taken

alive in the lake of Purmer. Thence she was carried to Haarlem, where

the Dutch women taught her to spin, and where several years after, she

died in the Roman Catholic faith;--"but this," says the pious

Calvinistic chaplain, "in no way militates against the truth of her

story." The worthy minister citing the authority of various writers as

proof that mermaids had in all ages been known in Gaul, Naples, Epirus,

and the Morea, comes to the conclusion that as there are "sea-cows,"

"sea-horses," "sea-dogs," as well as "sea-trees," and "sea-flowers,"

which he himself had seen, there are no reasonable grounds for doubt

that there may also be "sea-maidens" and "sea-men."

In an early account of Newfoundland,[50] Whitbourne describes a

"maremaid or mareman," which he had seen "within the length of a pike,"

and which "came swimming swiftly towards him, looking cheerfully on his

face, as it had been a woman. By the face, eyes, nose, mouth, chin,

ears, neck and forehead, it appeared to be so beautiful, and in those

parts so well proportioned, having round about the head many blue

streaks resembling hair, but certainly it was no hair. The shoulders and

back down to the middle were square, white, and smooth as the back of a

man, and from the middle to the end it tapered like a broad-hooked

arrow." The animal put both its paws on the side of the boat wherein its

observer sat, and strove much to get in, but was repelled by a blow.

[50] Whitbourne's 'Discourse of Newfoundland.'

In 1676, a description was given by an English surgeon named Glover, of

an animal of this kind. The author did not designate it by any name, but

the incident has the honour of being recorded in the _Philosophical

Transactions_.[51] About three leagues from the mouth of the river

Rappahannock, in America, while alone in a vessel, he observed, at the

distance of about half a stone-throw, he says, "a most prodigious

creature, much resembling a man, only somewhat larger, standing right up

in the water, with his head, neck, shoulders, breast and waist, to the

cubits of his arms, above water, and his skin was tawny, much like that

of an Indian; the figure of his head was pyramidal and sleek, without

hair; his eyes large and black, and so were his eyebrows; his mouth very

wide, with a broad black streak on the upper lip, which turned upwards

at each end like mustachios. His countenance was grim and terrible. His

neck, shoulders, arms, breast and waist, were like unto the neck, arms,

shoulders, breast and waist of a man. His hands, if he had any, were

under water. He seemed to stand with his eyes fixed on me for some time,

and afterwards dived down, and, a little after, rose at somewhat a

greater distance, and turned his head towards me again, and then

immediately fell a little under water, that I could discern him throw

out his arms and gather them in as a man does when he swims. At last, he

shot with his head downwards, by which means he cast his tail above the

water, which exactly resembled the tail of a fish, with a broad fane at

the end of it."

[51] Glover's 'Account of Virginia,' ap. Phil. Trans. vol. xi. p.

625.

Thormodus Torfaeus[52] maintains that mermaids are found on the south

coast of Iceland, and, according to Olafsen,[53] two have been taken in

the surrounding seas, the first in the earlier part of the history of

that island, and the second in 1733. The latter was found in the stomach

of a shark. Its lower parts were consumed, but the upper were entire.

They were as large as those of a boy eight or nine years old. Both the

cutting teeth and grinders were long and shaped like pins, and the

fingers were connected by a large web. Olafsen was inclined to believe

that these were human remains, but the islanders all firmly maintained

that they were part of "a marmennill," by which name the mermaid is

known among them.

[52] _Historia rerum Norvegicarum._

[53] _Voyage en Islande_, tom. iii. p. 223.

Of course the worthy bishop of Bergen, Pontoppidan, has something to

tell us about mermaids in his part of the world. "Amongst the sea

monsters," he says,[54] "which are in the North Sea, and are often seen,

I shall give the first place to the Hav-manden, or merman, whose mate is

called Hav-fruen, or mermaid. The existence of this creature is

questioned by many, nor is it at all to be wondered at, because most of

the accounts we have had of it are mixed with mere fables, and may be

looked upon as idle tales." As such he regards the story told by Jonas

Ramus in his 'History of Norway,' of a mermaid taken by fishermen at

Hordeland, near Bergen, and which is said to have sung an unmusical song

to King Hiorlief. In the same category he places an account given by

Besenius in his life of Frederic II. (1577), of a mermaid that called

herself Isbrandt, and held several conversations with a peasant at

Samsoe, in which she foretold the birth of King Christian IV., "and made

the peasant preach repentance to the courtiers, who were very much given

to drunkenness." Equally "idle" with the above stories is, in his

opinion, another, extracted from an old manuscript still to be seen in

the University Library at Copenhagen, and quoted by Andrew Bussaeus

(1619), of a merman caught by the two senators, Ulf Rosensparre and

Christian Holch, whilst on their voyage home to Denmark from Norway.

This sea-man frightened the two worshipful gentlemen so terribly that

they were glad to let him go again; for as he lay upon the deck he spoke

Danish to them, and threatened that if they did not give him his liberty

"the ship should be cast away, and every soul of the crew should

perish."

[54] 'Natural History of Norway,' vol. ii. p. 190.

"When such fictions as these," says Pontoppidan, "are mixed with the

history of the merman, and when that creature is represented as a

prophet and an orator; when they give the mermaid a melodious voice, and

tell us that she is a fine singer, we need not wonder that so few people

of sense will give credit to such absurdities, or that they even doubt

the existence of such a creature." The good prelate, however, goes on to

say that "whilst we have no ground to believe all these fables, yet, as

to the existence of the creature we may safely give our assent to it,"

and, "if this be called in question, it must proceed entirely from the

fabulous stories usually mixed with the truth." Like Valentyn, he argues

that as there are "sea-horses," "sea-cows," "sea-wolves," "sea-dogs,"

"sea-hogs," etc., it is probable from analogy, that "we should find in

the ocean a fish or creature which resembles the human species more than

any other." As for the objection "founded on self-love and respect to

our own species which is honoured with the image of God, who made man

lord of all creatures, and that, consequently, we may suppose he is

entitled to a noble and heavenly form which other creatures must not

partake of," he thinks "its force vanishes when we consider the form of

apes, and especially of another African creature called 'Quoyas Morrov'

described by Odoard Dapper" in his work on Africa, and which appears to

have been a chimpanzee. Pontoppidan regarded it as being the Satyr of

the ancients. He therefore claims that "if we will not allow our

Norwegian Hastromber the honourable name of merman, we may very well

call it the 'Sea-ape,' or the 'Sea-Quoyas-Morrov;'" especially as the

author already quoted says that, "in the Sea of Angola mermaids are

frequently caught which resemble the human species. They are taken in

nets, and killed by the negroes, and are heard to shriek and cry like

women."

The Bishop adds that in the diocese of Bergen, as well as in the manor

of Nordland, there were hundreds of persons who affirmed with the

strongest assurances that they had seen this kind of creature; sometimes

at a distance and at other times quite close to their boats, standing

upright, and formed like a human creature down to the middle--the rest

they could not see--but of those who had seen them out of water and

handled them he had not been able to find more than one person of credit

who could vouch it for truth. This informant, "the Reverend Mr. Peter

Angel, minister of Vand-Elvens Gield, on Suderoe," assured his bishop,

when he was on a visitation journey, that "in the year 1719, he (being

then about twenty years old) saw what is called a merman lying dead on a

point of land near the sea, which had been cast ashore by the waves

along with several sea-calves (seals), and other dead fish. The length

of this creature was much greater than what has been mentioned of any

before, namely, above three fathoms. It was of a dark grey colour all

over: in the lower part it was like a fish, and had a tail like that of

a porpoise. The face resembled that of a man, with a mouth, forehead,

eyes, etc. The nose was flat, and, as it were, pressed down to the face,

in which the nostrils were very visible. The breast was not far from the

head; the arms seemed to hang to the side, to which they were joined by

a thin skin, or membrane. The hands were, to all appearance, like the

paws of a sea-calf. The back of this creature was very fat, and a great

part of it was cut off, which, with the liver, yielded a large quantity

of train-oil." The author then quotes a description by Luke Debes[55] of

a mermaid seen in 1670 at Faroe, westward of Qualboe Eide, by many of

the inhabitants, as also by others from different parts of Suderoe. She

was close to the shore, and stood there for two hours and a half, and

was up to her waist in water. She had long hairs on her head, which hung

down to the surface of the water all round about her, and she held a

fish in her right hand.

[55] _Feroa Reserata_, or Description of the Faroe Islands. 8vo.

Copenhagen, 1673.

Pontoppidan mentions other instances of similar appearances, and says

that the latest he had heard of was of a merman seen in Denmark on the

20th of September, 1723, by three ferrymen who, at some distance from

the land, were towing a ship just arrived from the Baltic. Having caught

sight of something which looked like a dead body floating on the water,

they rowed towards it, and there, resting on their oars, allowed it to

drift close to them. It sank, but immediately came to the surface again,

and then they saw that it had the appearance of an old man,

strong-limbed, and with broad shoulders, but his arms they could not

see. His head was small in proportion to his body, and had short,

curled, black hair, which did not reach below his ears; his eyes lay

deep in his head, and he had a meagre and pinched face, with a black,

coarse beard, that looked as if it had been cut. His skin was coarse,

and very full of hair. He stood in the same place for half a quarter of

an hour, and was seen above the water down to his breast: at last the

men grew apprehensive of some danger, and began to retire; upon which

the monster blew up his cheeks, and made a kind of roaring noise, and

then dived under water, so that they did not see him any more. One of

them, Peter Gunnersen, related (what the others did not observe) that

this merman was, about the body and downwards, quite pointed, like a

fish. This same Peter Gunnersen likewise deposed that "about twenty

years before, as he was in a boat near Kulleor, the place where he was

born, he saw a mermaid with long hair and large breasts." He and his two

companions were, by command of the king, examined by the burgomaster of

Elsineur, Andrew Bussaeus, before the privy-councillor, Fridrich von

Gram, and their testimony to the above effect was given on their

respective oaths.

Brave old Henry Hudson, the sturdy and renowned navigator, who thrice,

in three successive years, gave battle to the northern ice, and was each

time defeated in his endeavour to discover a north-west or north-east

passage to China, though he stamped his name on the title-page of a

mighty nation's history, records the following incident: "This evening

(June 15th) one of our company, looking overboard, saw a mermaid, and,

calling up some of the company to see her, one more of the crew came up,

and by that time she was come close to the ship's side, looking

earnestly on the men. A little after a sea came and overturned her. From

the navel upward, her back and breasts were like a woman's, as they say

that saw her; her body as big as one of us, her skin very white, and

long hair hanging down behind, of colour black. In her going down they

saw her tail, which was like the tail of a porpoise and speckled like a

mackarel's. Their names that saw her were Thomas Hilles and Robert

Rayner."

Steller, who was a zoologist of some repute, reports having seen in

Behrings Straits a strange animal, which he calls a "sea-ape," and in

which one might almost recognise Pontoppidan's "Sea-Quoyas-Morrov." It

was about five feet long, had sharp and erect ears and large eyes, and

on its lips a kind of beard. Its body was thick and round, and it

tapered to the tail, which was bifurcated, with the upper lobe longest.

It was covered with thick hair, grey on the back, and red on the belly.

No feet nor paws were visible. It was full of frolic, and sported in the

manner of a monkey, swimming sometimes on one side of the ship and

sometimes on the other. It often raised one-third of its body out of the

water, and stood upright for a considerable time. It would frequently

bring up a sea-plant, not unlike a bottle-gourd, which it would toss

about and catch in its mouth, playing numberless fantastic tricks with

it.

Somewhat similar accounts have been brought from the Southern

Hemisphere, two, at least, of which are worth transcribing.

Sea Monsters Unmasked, and Sea Fables Explained · 第 8 / 15 段