52. One shell mask, one shell gorget, one shell ornament.

These objects are now in the U. S. National Museum and in my department.

The list is taken from the official catalogue, and they number from 115505

to 115684. I have had the opportunity of comparing the objects with this

description and find their general agreement. Dr. Palmer, the finder, was

an employé of the Bureau of Ethnology, is a man of the highest character,

of great zeal as an archæologist and naturalist, and has been for many

years, and is now, in the employ of the Bureau or Museum, always with

satisfaction and confidence. Mr. Emmert was also an employé of the Bureau

for many years, and equally reliable.

The specimens of shell in this and several other mounds, some of which are

herein figured, were in an advanced stage of decay, pitted, discolored,

and crumbling, requiring to be handled with the utmost care to prevent

disintegration. They were dried by the collector, immersed in a weak

solution of glue, and forwarded immediately (in 1885), with other relics

from the neighborhood, to the Bureau of Ethnology and National Museum at

Washington, where they have remained ever since. There is not the

slightest suspicion concerning the genuineness or antiquity of this

specimen or of those bearing the Swastika as belonging to the

mound-building epoch in the valley of the Tennessee.

[Illustration: Fig. 239. SHELL GORGET. Two fighting figures with

triangular breech-clout, garters and anklets, and dots and circles. Fains

Island, Tennessee. Third Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, p. 452,

fig. 128. Cat. No. 62930, U. S. N. M.]

Other figures of sufficient similarity to the Swastika have been found

among the aborigines of North America to show that these do not stand

alone; and there are also other human figures which show a style of work

so similar and such resemblance in detail of design as to establish the

practical identity of their art. One of these was a remarkable specimen of

engraved shell found in the same mound, Fains Island, which contained the

first Swastika (fig. 237). It is described in the Second Annual Report of

the Bureau of Ethnology, page 301, under the name of McMahon's mound. It

is a large polished Fulgur shell disk which, when entire, has been nearly

5 inches in diameter (fig. 239). A little more than one-third has crumbled

away, and the remaining portion has been preserved only by careful

handling and immediate immersion in a solution of glue. It had been

engraved on the concave side. The design represents two human figures

plumed and winged, armed with eagles' talons and engaged in mortal

combat. The design apparently covered the entire shell, leaving no space

for encircling lines. The two figures are in profile and face each other

in a fierce onset. Of the right-hand figure, only the body, one arm, and

one leg remain. The left-hand figure is almost complete. The outline of

the face, one arm, and one foot is all that is affected. The right hand is

raised above the head in the act of brandishing a long knife pointed at

both ends. The other combatant, clutching in his right hand a

savage-looking blade with its point curved, seems delivering a blow in the

face of his antagonist. Of the visible portions of the figures, the hands

are vigorously drawn, the thumbs press down upon the outside of the

forefingers in a natural effort to tighten the grasp. The body, arms, and

legs are well defined and in proper proportion, the joints are correctly

placed, the left knee is bent forward, and the foot planted firmly on the

ground, while the right is thrown gracefully back against the rim at the

left, and the legs terminate in well-drawn eagles' feet armed with curved

talons. The head is decorated with a single plume which springs from a

circular ornament placed over the ear; an angular figure extends forward

from the base of this plume, and probably represents what is left of the

headdress proper. In front of this--on the very edge of the crumbling

shell--is one-half of the lozenge-shaped eye, the dot representing the

pupil being almost obliterated. The ankles and legs just below the knee

and the wrists each have three lines representing bracelets or anklets. It

is uncertain whether the leg is covered or naked; but between the

waistband and the leggings, over the abdomen, is represented on both

figures a highly decorated triangular garment, or, possibly coat of mail,

to which particular attention is called.[252] In the center, at the top,

just under the waistband, are four circles with dots in the center

arranged in a square; outside of this, still at the top, are two

triangular pieces, and outside of them are two more circles and dots;

while the lower part of the triangle, with certain decorations of incised

lines, completes the garment. This decoration is the same on both figures,

and corresponds exactly with the Buddha figure. An ornament is suspended

on the breast which shows three more of the circles and dots. The earring

is still another. The right-hand figure, so far as it can be seen, is a

duplicate of the left, and in the drawing it has, where destroyed, been

indicated by dotted lines. It is remarkable that the peculiar clothing or

decoration of these two figures should be almost an exact reproduction of

the Buddha figure (pl. 10). Another interesting feature of the design is

the highly conventionalized wing which fills the space beneath the

uplifted arm. This wing is unlike the usual specimens of aboriginal art

which have been found in such profusion in that neighborhood. But it is

again remarkable that this conventionalized wing and the bracelets,

anklets, and garters should correspond in all their peculiarities of

construction and design with the wings on the copper and shell figures

from the Etowah mound, Georgia (figs. 240, 241, and 242)[253]. Behind the

left-hand figure is an ornament resembling the spreading tail of an eagle

which, with its feather arrangement and the detail of their mechanism,

correspond to a high degree with the eagle effigies in repoussé copper

(fig. 243) from the mound in Union County, Ill., shown in the Fifth

Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology (p. 105) and in the Twelfth

Annual Report (p. 309).

[Illustration: Fig. 240. COPPER PLATE. Entowah Mound, Georgia. Fifth

Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, fig. 42. Cat. No. 91113, U. S.

N. M.]

[Illustration: Fig. 241. COPPER PLATE. Repoussé work. Entowah Mound,

Georgia. Cat. No. 91117, U. S. N. M.]

[Illustration: Fig. 242. ENGRAVED SHELL. Triangular breech-clout with dots

and circles. Entowah Mound, Georgia. Cat. No. 91443, U. S. N. M.]

_Hopewell Mound, Chillicothe, Ross County, Ohio._--A later discovery of

the Swastika belonging to the same period and the same general

locality--that is, to the Ohio Valley--was that of Prof. Warren K.

Moorehead, in the fall and winter of 1891-92, in his excavations of the

Hopewell mound, seven miles northwest of Chillicothe, Ross County,

Ohio.[254] The locality of this mound is well shown in Squier and Davis's

work on the "Monuments of the Mississippi Valley" (pl. 10, p. 26), under

the name of "Clark's Works," here reproduced as pl. 11. It is the large

irregular unnumbered triple mound just within the arc of the circle shown

in the center of the plan. The excavation contemplated the destruction of

the mound by cutting it down to the surrounding level and scattering the

earth of which it was made over the surface; and this was done.

Preparatory to this, a survey and ground plan was made (pl. 12). I

assisted at this survey and can vouch for the general correctness. The

mound was surrounded by parallel lines laid out at right angles and marked

by stakes 50 feet apart. The mound was found to be 530 feet long and 250

feet wide. Squier and Davis reported its height at 32 feet, but the

excavation of the trenches required but 18 and 16 feet to the original

surface on which the mound was built. It was too large to be cut down as a

whole, and for convenience it was decided by Mr. Moorehead to cut it down

in trenches, commencing on the northeast. Nothing was found until, in

opening trench 3, about five feet above the base of the mound, they struck

a mass of thin worked copper objects, laid flat one atop the other, in a

rectangular space, say three by four feet square. These objects are unique

in American prehistoric archæology. Some of them bore a resemblance in

form to the scalloped mica pieces found by Squier and Davis, and described

by them in their "Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley" (p.

240), and also those of the same material found by Professor Putnam in the

Turner group of mounds in the valley of the Little Miami. They had been

apparently laid between two layers of bark, whether for preservation or

mere convenience of deposit, can only be guessed.

[Illustration: PLATE 11. PLAN OF NORTH FORK (HOPEWELL) WORKS. Ross County,

Ohio. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Vol. I, Pl. X.]

[Illustration: PLATE 12. PLAN OF HOPEWELL MOUND, IN WHICH ABORIGINAL

COPPER SWASTIKAS WERE FOUND. Ross County, Ohio. Moorehead, "Primitive Man

in Ohio," Pl. XXXIV.]

[Illustration: Fig. 243. COPPER PLATE SHOWING FIGURE OF EAGLE. Repoussé

work. Union County, Ill. Cat. No. 91507, U. S. N. M.]

[Illustration: Fig. 244. SWASTIKA CROSS OF THIN COPPER. Hopewell Mound,

Ross County, Ohio. 1/4 natural size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 245. FLAT RING OF THIN COPPER. Hopewell Mound, Ross

County, Ohio. 1/5 natural size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 246. STENCIL ORNAMENT OF THIN COPPER. Hopewell Mound,

Ross County, Ohio. 1/8 natural size.]

The following list of objects is given, to the end that the reader may see

what was associated with these newly found copper Swastikas: Five Swastika

crosses (fig. 244); a long mass of copper covered with wood on one side

and with squares and five similar designs traceable on the reverse;

smaller mass of copper; eighteen single copper rings; a number of double

copper rings, one set of three and one set of two; five pan lids or

hat-shaped rings; ten circular disks with holes in center, represented in

fig. 245, originally placed in a pile and now oxidized together; also

large circular, stencil-like ornaments, one (fig. 246) 7-1/2 inches in

diameter; another (fig. 247) somewhat in the shape of a St. Andrew's

cross, the extreme length over the arms being 8-3/4 inches.

About five feet below the deposit of sheet copper and 10 or 12 feet to the

west, two skeletons lay together. They were covered with copper plates and

fragments, copper hatchets, and pearl beads, shown in the list below, laid

in rectangular form about seven feet in length and five feet in width, and

so close as to frequently overlap.

[Illustration: Fig. 247. STENCIL ORNAMENT OF THIN COPPER. Hopewell Mound,

Ross County, Ohio. 1/4 natural size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 248. FISH ORNAMENT OF THIN COPPER. Hopewell Mound,

Ross County, Ohio. 1/6 natural size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 249. LOZENGE-SHAPED STENCIL OF THIN COPPER. Hopewell

Mound, Ross County, Ohio. 1/4 natural size.]

There were also found sixty-six copper hatchets, ranging from 1-1/2 to

22-1/2 inches in length; twenty-three copper plates and fragments; one

copper eagle; eleven semicircles, bars, etc.; two spool-shaped objects;

four comb-shaped effigies; one wheel with peculiar circles and bars of

copper; three long plates of copper; pearl and shell beads and teeth; a

lot of extra fine pearls; a lot of wood, beads, and an unknown metal; a

lot of bones; a human jaw, very large; a fragmentary fish resembling a

sucker (fig. 248); one stool of copper with two legs; broken copper

plates; one broken shell; bear and panther tusks; mica plates; forty

fragmentary and entire copper stencils of squares, circles, diamonds,

hearts, etc.; copper objects, saw-shaped; twenty ceremonial objects,

rusted or oxidized copper; two diamond-shaped stencils, copper (fig. 249);

four peculiar spool-shaped copper ornaments, perforated, showing repoussé

work (fig. 250).

I made sketches of two or three of the bone carvings, for the purpose of

showing the art of the people who constructed this monument, so that by

comparison with that of other known peoples some knowledge may be

obtained, or theory advanced, concerning the race or tribe to which they

belonged and the epoch in which they lived. Fig. 251 shows an exquisite

bone carving of a paroquet which belongs much farther south and not found

in that locality in modern times. The design shown in fig. 252 suggests a

Mississippi Kite, but the zoologists of the Museum, while unable to

determine with exactitude its intended representation, chiefly from the

mutilated condition of the fragment, report it more likely to be the

head of the "leather-back" turtle. Fig. 253 probably represents an otter

with a fish in his mouth.

[Illustration: PLATE 13. HUMAN SKULL WITH COPPER-COVERED HORNS. Hopewell

Mound, Ross County, Ohio. Moorehead, "Primitive Man in Ohio,"

frontispiece.]

[Illustration: PLATE 14. PREHISTORIC ALTAR. Hopewell Mound, Ross County,

Ohio. Found near the copper Swastika shown in fig. 244. Moorehead,

"Primitive Man in Ohio," Fig. XXXVII. Cat. No. 148662, U. S. N. M.]

In trench No. 3, 15 skeletons (numbered 264 to 278, inclusive), were found

on the base line, all extended. Objects of coal, bone, shell, or stone,

had been placed with nearly all of them. Nos. 265 and 266 were laid on

blocks of burnt earth 3 inches higher than the base of the mound. One of

the skeletons in this mound (No. 248) is shown in pl. 13. It was a most

remarkable specimen, and forms the frontispiece of Prof. W. K. Moorehead's

volume "Primitive Man in Ohio," where it is described (p. 195) as follows:

At his head were imitation elk horns, neatly made of wood and covered

with sheet copper rolled into cylindrical forms over the prongs. The

antlers were 22 inches high and 19 inches across from prong to prong.

They fitted into a crown of copper bent to fit the head from occipital

to upper jaw. Copper plates were upon the breast and stomach, also on

the back. The copper preserved the bones and a few of the sinews. It

also preserved traces of cloth similar to coffee sacking in texture,

interwoven among the threads of which were 900 beautiful pearl beads,

bear teeth split and cut, and hundreds of other beads, both pearl and

shell. Copper spool-shaped objects and other implements covered the

remains. A pipe of granite and a spearhead of agate were near the

right shoulder. The pipe was of very fine workmanship and highly

polished.

[Illustration: Fig. 250. SPOOL-SHAPED OBJECT OF COPPER. Repoussé and

intaglio decoration. Hopewell Mound, Ross County, Ohio. Natural size.]

While digging out skeletons 280 to 284, Professor Moorehead says they

touched the edge of an altar (pl. 14). It was on the base line and 15 feet

north of the copper find before described. On the 5th of January, 1892,

the altar was uncovered, and the earth, charcoal, and objects within it

put into five soap boxes and transported to headquarters, where the

material was assorted in my presence and with my aid. The mass on the

altar had been charred throughout. It contained, in part, mica ornaments,

beads, spool-shaped objects, whale, bear, and panther teeth, flint knives,

carved effigies of bone and stone, some of which were broken, while others

were whole. There were stone tablets, slate ornaments, copper balls,

fragments of cloth, rings of chlorite, quartz crystals perforated and

grooved, and a few pieces of flint and obsidian, with several thousand

pearls drilled for suspension. These objects were heaped in the cavity of

the altar without any regularity. All were affected by heat, the copper

being fused in many cases. The teeth and tusks were charred, split, and

calcined. There were no ashes. All the fuel was charcoal, and from the

appearance of the débris, especially the wood, earth, and bone, one might

suppose that after the fire had started it had not been allowed to burn to

ashes as if in the open air, but had been covered with earth, and so had

smoldered out as in a charcoal pit.

[Illustration: Fig. 251. FRAGMENT OF ENGRAVED BONE REPRESENTING A

PAROQUET. Hopewell Mound, Ross County, Ohio. Natural size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 252. FRAGMENT OF ENGRAVED BONE PROBABLY REPRESENTING A

MISSISSIPPI KITE OR LEATHER-BACK TURTLE. Hopewell Mound, Ross County,

Ohio. Natural size.]

Evidence was found of an extended commerce with distant localities, so

that if the Swastika existed in America it might be expected here. The

principal objects were as follows: A number of large seashells (_Fulgur_)

native to the southern Atlantic Coast 600 miles distant, many of them

carved; several thousand pieces of mica from the mountains of Virginia or

North Carolina, 200 or more miles distant; a thousand large blades of

beautifully chipped objects in obsidian, which could not have been found

nearer than the Rocky Mountains, 1,000 or 1,200 miles distant; four

hundred pieces of wrought copper, believed to be from the Lake Superior

region, 150 miles distant; fifty-three skeletons, the copper headdress

(pl. 13) made in semblance of elk horns, 16 inches high, and other

wonderful things. Those not described have no relation to the Swastika.

[Illustration: Fig. 253. FRAGMENT OF ENGRAVED BONE PROBABLY REPRESENTING

AN OTTER WITH A FISH IN ITS MOUTH. Natural size.]

These objects were all prehistoric. None of them bore the slightest

evidence of contact with white civilization. The commoner objects would

compare favorably with those found in other mounds by the same and other

investigators. Much of it may be undetermined. It is strange to find so

many objects brought such long distances, and we may not be able to

explain the problem presented; but there is no authority for injecting any

modern or European influence into it. By what people were these made? In

what epoch? For what purpose? What did they represent? How did this

ancient, curious, and widespread sign, a recognized symbol of religion of

the Orient, find its way to the bottom of one of the mounds of antiquity

in the Scioto Valley? These are questions easy to ask but difficult to

answer. They form some of the riddles of the science of prehistoric

anthropology.

[Illustration: Fig. 254. WATER JUG WITH FIGURE OF SWASTIKA. Decoration,

red on yellow ground. Poinsett County, Ark. Cat. No. 91230, U. S. N. M.]

_Mounds in Arkansas._--A water jug in the collection of the U. S. National

Museum (fig. 254) was obtained in 1883 by P. W. Norris, of the Bureau of

Ethnology, from a mound in Poinsett County, Ark. It is of yellow ground,

natural color of clay, and decorated with light red paint. The paint is

represented in the cut by the darkened surfaces. The four quarters of the

jug are decorated alike, one side of which is shown in the cut. The center

of the design is the Swastika with the arm crossing at right angles, the

ends turned to the right, the effect being produced by an enlargement on

the right side of each arm until they all join the circle. A similar water

jug with a Swastika mark of the same type as the foregoing decorates Major

Powell's desk in the Bureau of Ethnology.

Marquis Nadaillac[255] describes and figures a grooved ax from Pemberton,

N. J., on which some persons have recognized a Swastika, but which the

Marquis doubts, while Dr. Abbott[256] denounces the inscription as a

fraud.

The Swastika, the Earliest Known Symbol, and Its Migration With Observations on the Migration of Certain Industries in Prehistoric Times · 第 89 / 203 题