M. Eugene Burnouf[3] defines the mark Swastika as follows:

A monogrammatic sign of four branches, of which the ends are curved at

right angles, the name signifying, literally, the sign of benediction

or good augury.

The foregoing explanations relate only to the present accepted name

"Swastika." The _sign_ Swastika must have existed long before the _name_

was given to it. It must have been in existence long before the Buddhist

religion or the Sanskrit language.

In Great Britain the common name given to the Swastika, from Anglo-Saxon

times by those who apparently had no knowledge whence it came, or that it

came from any other than their own country, was Fylfot, said to have been

derived from the Anglo-Saxon _fower fot_, meaning four-footed, or

many-footed.[4]

George Waring, in his work entitled "Ceramic Art in Remote Ages" (p. 10),

says:

The word [Fylfot] is Scandinavian and is compounded of Old Norse

_fiël_, equivalent to the Anglo-Saxon _fela_, German _viel_, many, and

_fotr_, foot, the many-footed figure. * * * It is desirable to have

some settled name by which to describe it; we will take the simplest

and most descriptive, the "Fylfot."

He thus transgresses one of the oldest and soundest rules of scientific

nomenclature, and ignores the fact that the name Swastika has been

employed for this sign in the Sanskrit language (the etymology of the word

naturally gave it the name Svastika, _sv_--good or well, _asti_--to be or

being, or it is) and that two thousand and more years of use in Asia and

Europe had sanctioned and sanctified that as its name. The use of Fylfot

is confined to comparatively few persons in Great Britain and, possibly,

Scandinavia. Outside of these countries it is scarcely known, used, or

understood.

The Swastika was occasionally called in the French language, in earlier

times, _Croix gammée_ or _Gammadion_, from its resemblance to a

combination of four of the Greek letters of that name, and it is so named

by Count Goblet d'Alviella in his late work, "La Migration des Symboles."

It was also called _Croix cramponnée_, _Croix pattée_, _Croix à crochet_.

But the consensus even of French etymologists favors the name Swastika.

Some foreign authors have called it Thor's hammer, or Thor's hammer-mark,

but the correctness of this has been disputed.[5] Waring, in his elaborate

work, "Ceramic Art in Remote Ages,"[6] says:

The [Z] used to be vulgarly called in Scandinavia the hammer of Thor,

and Thor's hammer-mark, or the hammer-mark, but this name properly

belongs to the mark [Y].

Ludwig Müller gives it as his opinion that the Swastika has no connection

with the Thor hammer. The best Scandinavian authors report the "Thor

hammer" to be the same as the Greek tau (fig. 5), the same form as the

Roman and English capital T. The Scandinavian name is Miölner or Mjolner,

the crusher or mallet.

The Greek, Latin, and Tau crosses are represented in Egyptian

hieroglyphics by a hammer or mallet, giving the idea of crushing,

pounding, or striking, and so an instrument of justice, an avenger of

wrong,[7] hence standing for Horus and other gods.[8] Similar symbolic

meanings have been given to these crosses in ancient classic countries of

the Orient.[9]

The Swastika, the Earliest Known Symbol, and Its Migration With Observations on the Migration of Certain Industries in Prehistoric Times · 第 27 / 203 题