Syphilis appears to account for a very considerable proportion of

the more serious cases of heart disease which we meet with in older

subjects--excluding of course chronic valvular disease originating

remotely in endocarditis. But I ought to repeat here what I have

already mentioned, that syphilis as a cause of cardio-vascular

lesions is very often associated with other morbific influences,

particularly strain and alcohol. Of its position as the principal

cause of grave disease of the valves as distinguished from the walls

of the heart, originating in middle life, there can be no question.

No fewer than nine out of 28 cases, of which I have private notes,

were the subjects of double aortic disease; practically all the

others had a loud ringing second sound over the aorta, significant

of degeneration; pain of anginal type in half the cases was the

prominent complaint; and two-thirds of the subjects had sclerosis

of the radial artery. When we consider that syphilis does also

affect the myocardium primarily; that fibroid disease, chronic

aneurysm and fatty degeneration of the heart are all traceable to

specific disease of the coronaries in many instances; and, finally,

that many of the subjects of syphilitic cardio-vascular disease

have perished before 40, the magnitude of this cause can be fully

realised. I believe that the profession in general have not yet

woke up, if I may say so, to the gravity of this subject. How

seldom we inquire for a history of specific disease in patients

coming to us with cardiac disease in middle life! To no one, as

far as my reading goes, are we so much indebted for the truth on

this subject as to my friend and colleague Dr. Mott. Thirteen

years ago he published a paper on 21 cases of sudden death from

cardio-vascular disease, and in nine of these there was a history of

either actual or probable syphilis. What was of greater interest,

however, at that early date, he drew attention to the association

of syphilitic cardio-vascular lesions with Bright's disease in the

broad acceptation of the term. Dr. Mott's work in the interval on

syphilitic lesions of the arterial system of the brain has been so

brilliant, and is so generally known, that it requires nothing more

than this appreciative mention by me, and it saves me the trouble of

an excursion into the subjects of cerebral hæmorrhage and thrombosis

in connection with these lectures.

NERVOUS STRAIN.

I confess that it is difficult to say much that is of real

diagnostic value on the clinical aspect of cardio-vascular disorders

and disease from nervous strain. As I remarked in discussing this

subject from the etiological point of view, several factors come

into play besides nervous excitement followed by exhaustion and

their effects on the heart, great vessels and cerebral arteries;

and the cases, therefore, are found to present a puzzling variety

of features. Certain clinical characters are, however, common to

the majority. Arterial tension is high; the radial artery is thick,

sometimes markedly so; the heart enlarges; and in about one-half of

the cases a systolic murmur is to be heard either in the aortic or

in the mitral area, significant of chronic endocardial lesions--all

readily intelligible results of cerebral strain in the light of

our knowledge of the innervation of the cardio-vascular system. I

have already pointed out that in some of these patients polyuria

and temporary albuminuria occur along with the high tension and

the increased action of the heart; but the heart may fail later

on. The direct cardiac symptoms of which they complain are of the

ordinary character, palpitation with accelerated cardiac frequency

and pain (not angina) being the most common at first, feelings of

indescribable discomfort and suffocation in the more advanced stage.

A great deal that I might have had to say on the very interesting

subjects of pseudo-angina, and the climacteric and pre-climacteric

disturbances of the circulation in women, I am reluctantly compelled

to omit from want of time.

* * * * *

After having reviewed, as I have attempted to do, the principal

clinical characters of the disorders and diseases of middle and

advanced life under their several causes, it may appear for a

moment strange that the most important of all the clinical types of

cardio-vascular degeneration has been mentioned only incidentally.

This is chronic Bright's disease, which, from its complex

pathological relations, its widespread effects on the heart and

circulation and the organs that they supply, and the far greater

gravity of these than those of any of the other causes which we have

studied (unless it be syphilis), is a subject of endless interest to

us all. Fortunately for me my immediate predecessor in this chair on

the medical side, our distinguished Fellow, Dr. Samuel West, took

for his subject the "Clinical Aspects of Granular Kidney," and thus

relieved me of a task which he was so much better able to discharge

than I. Emphysema must also be passed over with the single remark

that it is a very common accompaniment both of vascular and cardiac

degenerations.

I trust you do not conclude that the description which I have just

given you of the clinical characters of these various disorders and

diseases of the heart is in any sense complete. It only relates to

the most prominent symptoms and signs as they present themselves to

us in what might be called the every-day life of the patient, at a

period in the history of his case precedent to failure. In all of

them there may occur occasional attacks of acute embarrassment of

the heart and lungs from one or more of a variety of causes, such

as indigestion, excitement or over-exertion. Sooner or later, also,

there occurs either cardiac dropsy--insidiously developed after

increasing local distress, growing dyspnœa and "bad nights"; or

Bright's disease; or cerebral thrombosis or hæmorrhage, or acute

myocardial failure with angina: or the patient dies from failure of

the heart in the course of some acute disease such as bronchitis or

pneumonia. Neither have I considered it necessary in this lecture to

dwell on some of the rarer phenomena occasionally met with, such as

tachycardia and bradycardia. I may have occasion to refer to them

next time in connection with prognosis.

LECTURE III.

MR. VICE-PRESIDENT AND GENTLEMEN,--In this, the concluding lecture

of the series, I will attempt to deal with the applications of

the facts and considerations which I submitted to you on the two

previous occasions when I had the honour to address you. I trust

that what I then laid before you proved to be of some interest.

Let us see now whether it is practically useful. However much the

etiology and pathology of the diseases and disorders of the heart

and arteries in middle and advanced life may deserve study as

matters of natural history, we should be disappointed if they could

not be turned to account in prognosis and treatment. These are the

subjects I propose to discuss this evening.

Now, prognosis and treatment, to be rational and useful, have to be

based on as full and as correct a diagnosis as knowledge permits.

The present disposition is to fall short of this; to rest content

with an incomplete diagnosis. We say that the patient's "heart

is dilated," that he has "arterial degeneration," that there is

"fatty degeneration." But you will remember that we have found that

cardiac dilatation may be present in every kind of cardio-vascular

degeneration; that the arteries are naturally enlarged and thickened

after middle life, and that we refused to call these changes morbid.

Clearly, therefore, a purely anatomical diagnosis of this sort

is insufficient. If you are asked what the prognosis is of fatty

degeneration of the heart, you answer that you must first be told

whether syphilitic or gouty disease of the coronary arteries, or

strain, or alcoholism, or phosphorus-poisoning or anæmia is the

cause of it. When you are planning the treatment of dilatation of

the heart you first determine whether the dilatation is a result

of the stretching of a sound heart by overfilling during muscular

effort, or of the insufficient emptying of failing chambers with

degenerated and feeble walls. Obviously what we ought to determine

in these instances and in every instance is the origin of the

disease. The ultimate diagnosis to be reached for practical purposes

is the etiological diagnosis.

Is this possible? Does our knowledge of the nature, characters and

course of these cardio-vascular affections enable us to say, after

investigating a case, what the kind of the pathological change is

that constitutes the disease, or in what respect the physiological

mechanisms are disordered? Can the cause of these degenerations of

the heart and arteries be determined in each instance? How is the

practitioner to proceed to do so? What method might be followed with

advantage in making a complete diagnosis of heart disease in older

subjects?

A man of 60 consults us about his heart. He says that it has caused

him a good deal of concern lately. More specifically he describes

a sense of oppression behind the sternum as often as he exerts

himself, and palpitation with consciousness of irregular cardiac

action when he goes to bed. We inquire for other familiar cardiac

symptoms, such as pain, angina, fluttering, faintness, giddiness,

and a sense of impending death. We find that one or more are present

occasionally, and that they have increased in number and degree

during the last few months or years. Perhaps cough, nocturnal

orthopnœa and dropsy may be beginning to give trouble. The next

part of the inquiry relates to the patient's previous history

from childhood upwards. Which of the acute diseases has he had?

Acute rheumatism, chorea, scarlet fever, typhoid, diphtheria and

influenza must be mentioned individually, and in women the nature

of any puerperal disease from which they may have suffered. Gout,

irregular gout, gravel, eczema, sick headache, asthma must be

inquired after with the same minuteness, and so must syphilis. We

next hear an account of any accident which the patient may have met

with, such as a blow, or a fall from a horse or a carriage. This

brings us naturally to question him about his occupation and modes

of relaxation and amusements--whether active or sedentary, regular

or irregular, their characters otherwise, and their direct effects,

including strain. More difficult to elicit is a correct account of

the patient's habits--in respect of food, stimulants and tobacco,

and his manner of life generally. As I said in my first lecture,

this is an inquiry which the family practitioner has an opportunity

to carry out much more successfully than the hospital physician

or consultant. The family practitioner has known for years of his

cardiac patient's work and worries; it may be of his large eating,

of his secret drinking, of the history of syphilis in earlier years.

It is always well also to inquire after a family history of gout,

rheumatism and heart disease. A list of questions like this sounds

far more formidable than it is in reality. A few minutes suffice to

arrive at the truth. We already have a pretty fair notion what we

have to deal with, whether strain, gout, syphilis, tobacco, an old

rheumatic lesion, or a combination of two or more of these.

We next proceed to physical examination, beginning with the pulse

and arteries, and passing on to the heart and associated structures.

The characters of the præcordial impulse--particularly the seat

of the apex-beat and the strength of the impulse--are closely (I

might almost say laboriously) investigated. We must never yield to

the temptation to disregard weakness or absence of the impulse.

Like many other negative signs it is apt to be overlooked. Then the

præcordial dulness is mapped out by means of light percussion.

Finally, auscultation reveals to us the presence or absence of

murmurs and the characters of the sounds--in the standing and

recumbent postures, and, if necessary, after a little exertion. The

relative loudness of the first and second sounds over the different

parts of the præcordia is particularly worthy of note.

Now let us suppose that we have found a mitral systolic murmur. We

ask ourselves whether it is structural or whether it is functional,

that is, due to relaxation and dilatation of the ventricular walls.

If structural, with which (if any) of the diseases elicited in the

man's previous history would it correspond? Most probably with

gout or glycosuria. Thus we attempt to connect the lesion with

its cause, and the cause with its effects, and have reached the

ultimate diagnosis. So with other valvular murmurs: for example,

an aortic diastolic murmur proves to be related to syphilis. If

there be no murmur audible, we naturally think of dilatation with

failure, or of enlargement from strain, from Bright's disease, from

arterial sclerosis, from emphysema, from an insufficient or impure

blood-supply in the coronary arteries, from disordered innervation,

or from some rarer cause, such as adherent pericardium; and then,

with these associations in our minds, we review once more the

patient's history, and generally succeed in our diagnosis.

Here let me recount the significance of the principal signs and

symptoms which I detailed to you in my last lecture, considered in

the reverse order on this occasion, some of which are of real value

in differentiating the causes of cardio-vascular degeneration. To

begin with negative facts: a mitral pre-systolic murmur is never

significant of a degenerative lesion. Secondly, when we meet with

an aortic diastolic murmur, whether alone or along with an aortic

systolic murmur, we may safely conclude that we have to deal with

something more than atheroma produced by regular or irregular gout

and associated metabolic disturbance, cardio-vascular disease of

nervous origin and alcoholic or tobacco heart, even if there be

evidence of the presence of one or more of these in the case.

Aortic incompetence developed in later life is the result of

syphilis, or of acute or chronic valvular strain; but, of course,

many instances of this lesion met with after the age of 40 can

be traced to juvenile endocarditis of rheumatic or other origin.

Always a serious lesion, aortic incompetence due to syphilis, or to

syphilis and strain, is particularly grave, as being so frequently

associated with coronary disease and consequent myocardial

degeneration--fatty or fibroid, acute softening, and sudden fatal

failure. A fully-developed basic systolic murmur, audible over the

aortic area and manubrium and along the course of the carotid,

is a very common sign of atheroma of the aortic arch and valves

and great vessels in association with regular or irregular gout,

diabetes, corpulence and allied disorders of nutrition. It is also

one of the physical signs of syphilitic and traumatic affections of

the aorta and aortic valves and of remote endocarditis. Further,

these lesions are so often accompanied by similar degenerations in

the coronary arteries and consequent myocardial degeneration, that

the basic systolic murmur ought at least to raise the suspicion

of this in the observer's mind. An ill-developed basic systolic

murmur is not uncommon in alcoholism, chronic Bright's disease and

nervous strain, but it is difficult to dissociate from anæmia. A

fully-developed systolic murmur audible in the mitral area, I mean

independently of ventriculo-auricular leakage in cardiac failure,

is usually traceable to early endocarditis of rheumatic or other

origin, rarely to injury, including ordinary juvenile strain of the

valves or walls, or to Graves's disease. But in some instances it

is unquestionably due to valvular atheroma and attendant sclerosis,

caused by gout or other disturbances of metabolism, including the

effects of free living; and in these instances the observer must

not overlook the possible association of coronary disease and fatty

degeneration. If a systolic mitral murmur prove to be somewhat

indefinite and affected by posture, cubitus and effort, to vary

under observation from day to day, and to disappear under treatment,

it is of no more value to us in differential diagnosis than that

it signifies relaxation and weakness, or disorderly action, of the

left ventricle, consequent on any one of the recognised causes of

failure or disturbance of the heart, including the different cardiac

poisons, overwork, anæmia, acute disease, poverty and the like, and

this whether in a heart previously sound or previously enlarged or

previously the seat of valvular disease. An accentuated ringing

second sound in the aortic area, or more extensively, is of great

value in the diagnosis of arterial tension and of aortic atheroma or

of both, but it is associated with far too many different causes to

be of much use in differential diagnosis. It should suggest a most

careful search for Bright's disease. Slight reduplication of the

first sound is common over the heart strained in youth and the heart

degenerated by alcoholism and metabolic disorders, but everyone

knows that it is not unusual in a variety of other conditions,

healthy and morbid. On the other hand, the _bruit de galop_, or

cantering rhythm of cardiac sounds--definite doubling of the first

sound followed by loud, accentuated, ringing second sound--is

practically pathognomonic of Bright's disease, and is one of the

most valuable, because one of the most ominous, of physical signs in

connection with the cardio-vascular system. A normally-sized heart

with irregularity, increased frequency, and a variable systolic

murmur in the mitral area, is characteristic of tobacco poisoning. A

heart enlarged on both sides, and acting irregularly without murmur,

is (apart from cardiac failure) suggestive of strain in early life.

Cardiac symptoms taken individually are of less diagnostic value

than signs. No symptom is pathognomonic. Palpitation is a nearly

universal phenomenon of cardiac disease and disorder. Faintness and

actual faints are not uncommon in cases of early cardiac strain,

gouty heart, and nervous disturbances. Angina we meet with, you

will remember, in regular and irregular gout, tobacco heart, strain

(especially strain after 40), and in syphilis and alcoholism,

whilst pseudo-angina is extremely common in nervous women: thus

angina is of less diagnostic value than might have been expected.

A high-tension pulse I have found most often in Bright's disease,

in juvenile strain, and in cardio-vascular affections of nervous

origin; a low tension pulse in connection with alcoholic and tobacco

poisoning, and with senile strain.

When we review these facts, I think we are entitled to conclude that

the physical signs and symptoms carefully determined by clinical

investigation may be confidently employed, along with the patient's

previous personal history, and the history of his present illness,

to differentiate from each other the causes of cardio-vascular

degeneration in individual cases. And, further, that they inform

us of the seat of at least some of the lesions, valvular, parietal

and vascular. A little trouble, patience and attentive observation

are all that are required to reach a complete or working diagnosis.

Now we may approach the great practical subjects of prognosis and

treatment with some confidence.

PROGNOSIS.

Beginning with the simplest kind of cardio-vascular disorder, let us

see what the prognosis is in tobacco heart. You will have gathered

from what I had to say on this subject in my last lecture, and

indeed you know as men of observation and experience, that it is

comparatively favourable. All the cases I have had an opportunity to

watch did well, provided the cause of their distress was avoided and

the heart and vessels were otherwise healthy. Further, improvement

begins early, and it may be rapid and recovery complete; but you

will remember that one patient, whose case I detailed to you,

continued to have alarming angina for six months after giving up

tobacco. Recurrence attends resumption of the habit, but some of

its votaries contrive to continue to smoke just short of inducing

serious discomfort. Unless a successful effort at reform be made,

cardiac trouble may continue indefinitely. But even then I cannot

say that I have seen serious damage done by tobacco alone in

sound hearts, nor arterial sclerosis, as has been stated by some

authorities.

An entirely different and most unfavourable estimate is to be formed

of the prospect of life in the alcoholic heart. Naturally, a certain

proportion of cases recover if the disease be of recent development,

the condition uncomplicated, and treatment faithfully carried

out. Unfortunately, as a rule, we have to deal with alcoholism in

which all these conditions of success are wanting. The habit is

established, other organs besides the heart are involved, other

diseases than alcoholism are present, and the patient has neither

the inclination nor the power to follow our advice. Cirrhosis,

neuritis, dementia complicate the cardiac degeneration, or, more

correctly, it complicates one or all of these. Chronic Bright's

disease is made to account for a number of deaths in the mortality

returns that strictly belong to alcoholism. Occasionally the end

comes suddenly from fatty degeneration, or in the course of some

acute disease; otherwise, as we have seen, by slow cardiac failure

and dropsy.

Prognosis in gouty heart, including the heart of the man with

goutiness, glycosuria and other irregular forms of the disease, is

a subject of considerable practical difficulty. In my last lecture

I read to you a short account of the case of a friend of my own

who had had occasional attacks of gouty angina for 40 years. And

certainly a large proportion of the old ladies of 60 or 70, whom

you all have had as patients for years on end with weak heart

and systolic murmur in the aortic area, owe their disablement

to gout, if my observations are correct. The lesion proper of

the aorta and aortic valves in these cases is atheroma, but the

damage is accompanied with repair in the form of sclerosis, which,

by increasing the loudness of the bruit, adds unreasonably to

our anxiety about the case. Equally certain it is that patients

belonging to this class improve under treatment. Still, the

condition of arrest cannot go on indefinitely. In addition to

extrinsic dangers, particularly those of Bright's disease, cerebral

thrombosis and hæmorrhage, and bronchitis, failure of the heart

is liable to supervene and prove fatal from the gravest of all

intrinsic causes, namely, coronary degeneration. As this increases,

the myocardium is steadily more and more impoverished; its

contractile vigour declines, and residual dilatation of the chambers

sets in with mechanical congestion of the viscera. Complaints of

"the heart" increase, the breathing becomes oppressed, the face

assumes more and more the characteristic "cardiac" appearance, and

dropsy creeps up the lower limbs. Even then the prognosis is not

hopeless, for undoubtedly a certain proportion of cases of dropsy in

old persons with degenerated heart and vessels are still amenable to

rational treatment. But the case has occasionally a more dramatic

termination. As I was able to illustrate after my second lecture by

a specimen from the Museum of Charing Cross Hospital, a branch of

one of the coronary arteries that has been narrowed by atheroma for

an indefinite length of time, with consequent cardiac weakness and

discomfort, may any moment become thrombosed rapidly, apparently

in consequence of some passing depression or other unfavourable

influence, just as in thrombosis of degenerated cerebral vessels.

Fatal angina is the result. This is a point of great practical

importance--that sudden death will occur in old gouty subjects not

from the lesion of which a basic or an apical systolic murmur is the

evidence and which causes us concern, but from associated coronary

atheroma, which we probably never suspect; indeed, that it may occur

in those subjects with no murmur whatsoever to attract our attention

and excite our fears.

Still more unfavourable must be the forecast in syphilitic lesions

of the heart and vessels. Of 18 of my cases in which the result was

known, only one-half improved under treatment, and 20 per cent. of

them died within a few years (some indeed within a few weeks) of the

discovery of their disease. Cardiac failure accounts for most of the

deaths, whether developed gradually with dropsy, which proves to be

intractable; or progressing rapidly with great cardiac distress,

including angina; or occurring suddenly, as it often does. Aneurysm

makes its appearance in other instances, of which the patient dies,

or he is carried off by general paralysis or Bright's disease.

The Lettsomian Lectures on Diseases and Disorders of the Heart and Arteries in Middle and Advanced Life [1900-1901] · 第 3 / 5 段