PROF. STEPHEN P. DUGGAN

The Peace Conference came to naught and hostilities were resumed on

February 14, 1913, because of the impossibility of agreement between

the allies and Turks on three important points: the status of

Adrianople, the disposal of the Aegean islands, and the payment of an

indemnity by Turkey. Bulgaria and Turkey both maintained that

Adrianople was essential to their national safety. Moreover, its

possession by Bulgaria was absolutely necessary were she to secure the

hegemony in the Balkans at which she aimed. On the other hand, to the

Turks, Adrianople is a sacred city around which cluster the most

glorious memories of their race. Thus they would yield it only as a

last necessity. The ambassadorial conference, anxious to bring to an

end a war which was threatening to embroil Austria-Hungary and Russia

and desirous also to make the settlement permanent, had already on

January 17th in its collective note to the Porte unavailingly

recommended to the Porte the cession of Adrianople to the Balkan

States.

The question of the Aegean islands presented similar difficulties. They

are inhabited almost exclusively by Greeks who demand to be united to

the mother country; but Turkey insisted that the possession of some of

them (_e.g._, Imbros, Tenedos, and Lemnos) was necessary to her for the

protection of the Dardanelles, since they command the entrance to the

straits, while others (_e.g._, Chios and Mitylene) are part of Asiatic

Turkey. The Greeks asserted that to leave any of them to Turkey would

cause constant unrest in Greece, and subsequent uprising against

Turkey, thus merely repeating the history of Crete. Moreover, the

Greeks maintained that they must have the disputed islands because they

are the only large and profitable ones; but they expressed a

willingness to neutralize them so that the integrity of the Dardanelles

would not be endangered. The difficulty was complicated by the

retention of a number of the islands by Italy until Turkey should

fulfil all the provisions of the Treaty of Lausanne arising from the

Tripolitan war. The Greeks asserted that their fleet would have taken

all the islands except for the Italian occupation. Moreover, they are

suspicious of Italian intentions, especially with regard to Rhodes. The

ambassadorial conference in its collective note to the Porte had

advised the Porte "to leave to the Powers the task of deciding upon the

fate of the islands of the Aegean Sea and the Powers would arrange a

settlement of the question which will exclude all menace to the

security of Turkey."

The third question in dispute concerned a money indemnity. The war had

been a fearful drain upon the resources of the allies. They were

determined not to share any of the Ottoman debt and to compel Turkey,

if possible, to bear the financial burden of the war. But to yield to

this demand would absolutely destroy Turkish credit. This would result

in the financial ruin of many of the subjects of the great Powers.

Hence this demand of the allies met with scant favor in the

ambassadorial conference.

The war dragged on during the entire month of February without changing

the relative positions of the belligerents. In the mean time, the

relations between Austria-Hungary and Russia were daily becoming more

strained. This was due to the determination of Austria-Hungary to

prevent Servia from securing a seaboard upon the Adriatic. In the

slogan of the allies, "the Balkan peninsula for the Balkan peoples,"

Austria-Hungary found a principle which could be utilized against their

demands. She took the stand that the Albanians are a Balkan people

entirely distinct from Slavs and Greeks and particularly unfriendly to

the Slavs. It would be as suicidal to place any of the Albanians under

the Slavs as to put back any of the Slavs under the Turks. Albania must

be an autonomous State; that it may live in peace, it must possess its

seaboard intact. In this position Austria-Hungary was seconded by

Italy, which has interests in Albania as important as those of

Austria-Hungary. Neither State can afford to allow the other to possess

the eastern shore of the Adriatic; and both are determined that it

shall not fall into the possession of another possibly stronger power.

As early as December 20, 1912, the ambassadors had recommended to their

governments, and the latter had accepted, the principle of Albanian

autonomy, together with a provision guaranteeing to Servia commercial

access to the Adriatic. This had aroused the intense indignation of the

Serbs, whose armies, contrary to the express prohibitions of

Austria-Hungary, had already occupied Durazzo on the Adriatic and

overrun northern Albania. The Serbs denied the right of any State to

forbid them to occupy the territory of the enemy whom they had

conquered, and Servia sent a detachment of her best troops and some of

her largest siege guns to help the Montenegrins take Scutari. Moreover,

numerous reports of outrages committed upon Albanians by the

"Liberators" in their attempts to convert both Moslem and Catholic

Albanians to the orthodox faith reached central Europe and caused great

danger in Vienna. Count Berchtold's statement to the Delegations that

Austria-Hungary would insist upon territory enough to enable

independent Albania to be a stable State with Scutari as the capital,

aroused in turn much excitement in Russia. Scutari was the chief goal

of Montenegrin ambition. To possess it had been the hope of King

Nicholas and his people during his long reign of half a century. To

forbid him to possess it would be to deprive him of the fruits of the

really heroic sacrifices his people had made during this war. Hence the

excitement in all Slavdom. On February 7th Francis Joseph sent Prince

Hohenlohe to St. Petersburg with an autograph letter to the Czar which

had the good effect of reducing the tension between the two countries.

The ambassadorial conference at London then directed its attention

exclusively to settling the status of Albania. After more than a month

of acrimonious discussion a settlement was reached on March 26th in

which the principle of nationality which had been invoked to justify

the creation of an independent Albania was quietly ignored. The

conference agreed upon the northern and northeastern boundaries of

Albania. In order to carry her point that Scutari must be Albanian,

Austria-Hungary agreed that the almost exclusively Albanian towns of

Ipek, Djakova, Prizrend, and Dibra should go to the Serbs. On April 1st

King Nicholas was notified that the powers had unanimously agreed to

blockade his coast if he did not raise the siege of Scutari. His answer

was that the proposed action of the powers was a breach of neutrality

and that Montenegro would not alter her attitude until she had signed a

treaty of peace. At once the warships of all the powers save Russia

(which had none in the Mediterranean) engaged in the blockade. On April

15th, owing to the pressure of the powers and to the strained relations

that had arisen between Servia and Bulgaria, the Servian troops were

recalled from Scutari. Nevertheless the Montenegrins persisted alone

and Scutari fell April 22, 1913. Two days later the Austro-Hungarian

government demanded that vigorous action be undertaken by the powers to

put independent Albania in possession of Scutari according to the

agreement of March 26th. At once the greatest excitement prevailed

throughout Russia. Street demonstrations against the Austro-Hungarian

policy were held in many of the large cities. In Austria-Hungary

military preparations became active on a large scale, and on May 1st

the Dual Monarchy gave notice that it would undertake individual action

should Montenegro not agree to the ultimatum. Italy, which is

determined never to permit the Dual Monarchy individual action in

Albania, announced that she would support her ally. As the result of

all the pressure brought to bear upon him, on May 5th, King Nicholas

yielded and placed Scutari in the hands of the powers, just in time, as

Sir Edward Grey informed the English House of Commons, to prevent an

outbreak of hostilities between Austria-Hungary and Russia.

While the chancelleries of the great powers were thus straining every

nerve to agree upon the status of Albania and thereby to prevent a

conflict between the two powers most vitally interested, the war

between the allies and Turkey was prosecuted during March with greater

vigor and with more definite results. On March 5th, Janina surrendered

to the Greeks and on March 26th Adrianople fell. The powers had already

offered to mediate between the belligerents, and their good offices had

been accepted by both sides. The allies at first insisted upon the

Rodosto-Malatra line as the western boundary of Turkey, but were

informed that the powers would not consent to giving Bulgaria a

foothold on the Dardanelles.

After much outcry and violent denunciation by the allies, an armistice

was signed at Bulair on April 19th by representatives of all the

belligerents except Montenegro, which was thereby only incited to more

heroic efforts to capture Scutari. Nevertheless the allies had profited

so much by delay in their relations with the powers since the very

outbreak of the war that they now hoped to secure advantages by a

similar policy, and it was not until May 21st that their

representatives reassembled at London. Even then there appeared to be

no sincere desire to come to terms, and on May 27th Sir Edward Grey

informed the delegates that they would soon lose the confidence of

Europe, and that for all that was being accomplished they might as well

not be in London. The delegates were very indignant at this strong

language, but it had the desired effect, for on May 30, 1913, the

Treaty of London was signed by the representatives of all the

belligerents. Its principal provisions were those already suggested by

the powers, _viz_.:

(1) The boundary between Turkey and the allies to be a line drawn from

Midia to Enos, to be delimited by an international commission:

(2) The boundaries of Albania to be determined by the powers.

(3) Turkey to cede Crete to Greece.

(4) The powers to decide the status of the Aegean islands.

(5) The settlement of all the financial questions arising out of the

war to be left to an international commission to meet at Paris.

It was time for a settlement, since the problem was no longer to secure

peace between Turkey and the allies, but rather to maintain peace among

the allies. The solution of the great problem of the war, the division

of the spoils, could no longer be deferred. From the moment that

Adrianople had fallen, the troops of Bulgaria, Servia, and Greece

maneuvered for position, each state determined to secure possession of

as much territory as possible, in the hope that at the final settlement

it might retain what it had seized.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 21 The Recent Days (1910-1914) · 第 115 / 142 题