It is a well known fact that wild animals and birds are stupefied at

the appearance of artificial light. Birds are often attracted by it,

while animals, dazed by the strangeness of the sight and the glare,

seem to lose at times all power of motion. Whether it is because of

curiosity or on account of the judgment becoming paralyzed through

excessive fear, artificial light of great intensity seems to deprive

a wild animal of his usual cunning and alertness. Wildfowl, such as

ducks and geese, are notably affected in the same way. “Firelighting,”

which it is well known, involves the destruction of so many thousands

of game birds every year, fairly illustrates and proves the foregoing

statement. Insects seem strangely attracted by artificial lights and

frequently pay for their temerity with their lives. What impression

artificial light makes upon wild animals it is hard to state. Sportsmen

know how easily a deer can be taken at a disadvantage by “jacking,”

but this does not account for one entering the lighted circle of a

camp-fire. Instances of wild animals being approached when stupefied by

the presence of artificial light are plentiful, but I have never known

before of any animal actually invading a camp and standing in front of

the fire.

When we had exhausted comment upon the unusual incident, which was the

absorbing theme for conversation for the balance of the evening, a good

night’s sleep came as relaxation from the exercise of the day.

The morning broke bright and clear and quite cold. Breakfast was

soon bolted down. An abomination which Aleck called a pancake was

the principal article of our repast. This dish compensated by its

size and quantity for what it lacked in other respects. Even Jake,

whose digestion might excite the envy of an ostrich, hesitated before

tackling a second one. Aleck, seeing his uncertain look, asked him

whether he would have another pancake.

“Only a small piece about the size of your foot,” Jake replied.

Having saddled the horses the guide took a course which led along a

rocky defile for a considerable distance. While looking up at the red

sandstone cliffs, which overhung us, and admiring the contrast their

rugged outlines furnished against the clear blue of the sky, I saw a

large bald-headed eagle perched upon a commanding eminence. His figure

was sharply defined in the clear atmosphere, and although I knew he

was quite a distance off, I was somewhat surprised when the guide

computed the range at 300 yards at least. I reined up my horse and

threw the lines over his head. As Jake saw me alight to take aim, a

sort of weary expression came over his face. He was evidently thinking

of the coyotes. After carefully sighting the bird and gauging the range

according to the estimate I had received, I fired. For several seconds

the wings fluttered, as the eagle strove to balance himself on his

perch, and then he collapsed in a lifeless mass, a few feet below.

[Illustration: A GLIMPSE OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCENERY.]

Having watched the lifeless shape a few seconds, I reloaded the rifle

without betraying any signs of emotion or uttering a word. Although

my eyes were turned in a different direction, I felt conscious of a

penetrating gaze which seemed to go through me like an X-ray and read

my inmost thought. Turning to mount my horse, I met the wide-open eyes

of Jake staring at me in astonishment. Neither of us said a word for

some time, but Jake was thinking, wondering whether it was an accident

or a fair exhibition of my skill. The only data he had to work on in

drawing his conclusions was the previous bad marksmanship in shooting

at the coyotes, and the telling recent shot at the eagle, which I

seemed to regard as a matter of course, but I acted the same way when I

missed the coyotes.

Jake displayed the same resourcefulness that a curious woman will

sometimes exercise upon receiving a letter: first she looks at the

post-mark, then at the handwriting of the address and, after exhausting

all the pros and cons to determine what the contents of the letter

are, finally strikes upon a happy idea--she opens the letter and reads

it. After Jake had thoroughly turned the incident over in his mind

he finally remarked, in a tone pitched between an exclamation and an

interrogation point: “I guess you were surprised when you fetched

that bird down?” My presence of mind did not leave me; I gave Jake

good advice about marksmanship and shooting in general. He thanked

me and said he hoped I would give him some points about guiding and

outfitting, as he was trying to learn the business.

Game being rather scarce in this section we concluded to move camp

and try our luck in the Jackson’s Hole country. For a short time I

made headquarters near a ranch on Jackson’s Lake. This body of water

is situated quite close to the Grand Tetons, which tower thousands of

feet above its surface. The crest of these great formations, like a

mighty arm stretching a curtain over the western sky, receives the rays

of the morning sun long before they reach the narrow valley below. It

is interesting and beautiful to see the golden light slowly creeping

down the slopes of these great mountains, until at last the sun, having

climbed well into the sky, suddenly pours its golden flood of light in

one immense deluge into the lake. The transition is startling.

The trout in the lake grow to a very large size and are very gamy.

There are a few hot springs in this locality which, however, do not

affect the temperature of the water, which is very cold the year

round. The lake derives its main supply from the melting snows of the

surrounding mountains.

I concluded to enjoy a morning’s sport fishing, and for that purpose

secured a boat from the ranchman who threw in his services as well. We

poled up the outlet, which was a very clear and swift stream. The trout

swarmed under the boat at times in great numbers and many of them of

considerable size. Flocks of wild ducks and geese, winging their way to

their feeding grounds, broke the stillness of the early morning, for

it was before daybreak that we started, when the stars were beginning

to pale in the sky. The trout made their presence quite noticeable,

frequently disturbing the surface of the water, and sometimes a big

one would stir up an awful commotion. I soon had a seven-pound trout

securely hooked, which I landed as soon as I was able to do so, because

I wanted a change of diet.

Although I had been in camp for a couple of weeks I had been unable to

get a shot at an elk, and had only seen one making its way through the

thick timber. The snow had not fallen as yet, and the ground was very

dry, which made hunting difficult. It was a welcome sight one morning

to look out of my tent and see the ground covered with snow, and it is,

moreover, surprising to notice what a difference it makes in hunting. I

had not traveled more than two miles from camp on foot when I heard a

long, loud whistle--a most pleasing sound. I directed my steps in the

direction whence it came, and was rewarded by catching a glimpse of

half a dozen elk disappearing through an opening in the timber. They

were not going fast, and I do not believe they saw me.

I followed them as quickly and carefully as I could until I came to

the edge of a steep descent, and saw the bunch in the valley below.

In the herd there was a fine bull who seemed proud of his authority,

and occasionally whistled and bugled his challenge to any possible

rival disposed to dispute his lordship over the cows he had assembled

around him, which by this time had considerably increased in numbers.

The distance seemed too great to hazard a shot, and I thought I would

circle around on the higher elevations to secure a closer range and

better position. Although unfrightened, the elk began to move off with

a gentle ambling gait which seems slow, but if one tries to keep up

with it in a rough mountainous country he will find his energy pretty

well taxed. I soon lost sight of the game and stopped partly because I

was almost exhausted and also to locate the herd, if it were possible

to hear it.

At first I thought I heard the hoof beats on the ground, but presently

recognized that it was the action of my heart, which was beating so

forcibly that I could distinctly hear it. The high elevation and the

vigorous exercise often produce that effect upon one who is not used

to the climate. Other sportsmen have had a similar experience. After

pursuing my course some distance along the side of a steep hill my

attention was suddenly arrested by the sound of breaking branches in

the spruce nearby. I had not long to wait before a spike-horned elk

stepped out in front of me not more than twenty-five or thirty yards

off. The large brown eyes were looking straight at me with a mildness

and apparent absence of fear, which removed all thought of slaughter

from my mind, although at that time I had never killed an elk.

The poor quality of the head as a trophy determined my action. After

gazing a few seconds I turned my steps in the direction I thought the

herd had taken its course. A long, shrill whistle, ending in a squeal,

blended with a bray like a donkey, soon informed me of the whereabouts

of the bull I was seeking. Climbing over the crest of the hill I

finally caught sight of the old bull in the valley with a bunch of cow

elk collected around him, which had increased by this time to about

twenty-five or thirty. The bull frequently threw his head up, giving

vent to his peculiar call, which was answered now and then by several

other bulls on the surrounding hills, none of which seemed willing to

venture near him. I watched this spectacle for some time, endeavoring

to get near enough to obtain a good shot.

Being alone and unaccustomed to the country I was unable to gauge

the distance correctly. When finally I stopped at the nearest point

I could reach to secure a fair shot (I was using on that occasion a

.45-90 Winchester, not one of the modern high-power guns with a flat

trajectory), I fired at the bull without effect and saw the whole

bunch of cow elk come together in a solid mass and ascend the slope of

the neighboring mountain. The cow elk acted as though panic-stricken,

all striving to get as near the center of the bunch as possible while

ascending the slope and interfering considerably with the movements

of one another in so doing. The bull remained behind until the cows

had gained a considerable start, and then followed them up the

mountain. When I examined the distance from the spot where I stood

when I fired at the bull to the point where he was located, I found it

over 400 yards. Being unaccustomed to gauging distance at that time,

I underestimated the range. The atmosphere is so clear that objects

obtain a much clearer definition and seem at times nearer than they

really are. A mistake in underestimating distance made a greater

difference with the old .45-90 than it would with modern high power

rifles. I returned to camp burning with a desire to secure a good

trophy.

The next day I went out with Jake. We separated, agreeing to meet at

a certain place, which, through some misunderstanding, we failed to

accomplish. I soon ran upon the tracks of a big bull elk, which led

directly up the steep side of a mountain. This I climbed for about six

hundred feet with some trouble, when I noticed that the tracks had

begun to turn and tended downward. I continued to follow them until

they brought me again to the foot of the mountain, within about thirty

feet of the point where I first started to trace them up. I finally ran

across my guide again, and it was not long before his keen eyes picked

out an elk at a distance of about two hundred and fifty yards, just

visible among some spruce trees. It was a cow elk, and I was indisposed

to shoot it, but being reminded of the condition of the larder I

concluded to try my luck. The crack of the rifle was followed by the

disappearance of the animal in the timber, and I thought I had missed,

but was reassured to the contrary, and when I reached the spot where

the elk had stood I saw a few traces of blood, which shortly led to a

brown form lying among the green spruce trees--the elk was stone dead.

Standing over Jake, who was engaged in dressing the elk, I asked him

if he thought I ought to smash the rifle over a rock. Looking up from

his dirty work, besmeared with perspiration and gore, he replied with a

grin, “Not when she throws lead like that.”

My time was drawing to a close, and although I had abundant

opportunities to kill animals with inferior heads, that kind of sport

did not satisfy me, and I left them to die a natural death, unless some

tooth hunter has cut their existence short.

The final day passed without result, and I had to leave for a later

period a more successful hunt for trophies.

The last night around the camp-fire Jake made entertaining by relating

to me some of his personal experiences. The following story was told me

as absolutely true: The guide had struck the trail of a mountain lion,

which he followed with his pack of dogs to a tree where the trail

ended. Naturally he expected to find the lion in the tree. Much to his

surprise there was no lion in the tree, and no tracks of a lion leading

away from the tree. The only tracks discernible were the tracks of an

elk. Finally a bloodhound in the pack started off on the elk tracks.

This seemed very strange, because the dogs had been thoroughly broken

from following anything except lions and bobcats. The guide tried to

call the dog back, but he continued to follow the elk tracks, and the

rest of the pack joined in the pursuit. Following the tracks about a

quarter of a mile, there appeared in the snow signs of a struggle, and

then an impression upon the ground of a large animal which the elk had

evidently unseated. The lion’s tracks were distinctly visible from this

point for a considerable distance, until he took refuge in a pinyon

tree.

It was plain that the mountain lion had jumped upon the back of a

passing elk and had stolen a free ride, which he enjoyed until his

saddle horse dismounted him. “That shows what a wonderfully intelligent

animal a dog is,” said Jake; “just to think that they should have

reasoned it out that the lion had ridden off on the elk, when I was

puzzled myself to find out what had become of him.”

[Illustration: PACK HORSES ROUNDED UP FOR THE RETURN.]

“Do you suppose,” chimed in Aleck, “that the dogs showed intelligence

because they knew more than you did?”

BLOODLESS SPORT

There has developed in recent years a sentiment which has declared

itself strongly in opposition to taking animal life for the sake

of sport. The camera has been recommended as a substitute for the

death-dealing firearm. A great many people have discussed this subject

without possessing a clear idea of what constitutes real sport.

To obtain a better understanding of the subject we may classify those

who hunt for the purpose of destroying wild life under three divisions:

sportsmen, market hunters and butchers. The last expression I have

employed in a peculiar sense as indicating a very objectionable class

in itself. By a process of elimination one may arrive at the true

conception of a sportsman after first grasping the meaning of the term

market hunter and butcher, and then disabusing the mind of both of

those conceptions. The term butcher is applicable to whomever engages

in the wanton and wasteful destruction of animal life with no idea of

utilizing the remains. To the mind of such persons a sportsman’s goal

is a slaughter pen. The game butcher recognizes no rules, but prides

himself on the amount of havoc he can produce in a flock of birds

or a herd of wild animals, and speaks with glee of the quantity of

game he has destroyed. The market hunter, as the name implies, is out

for business. The rules of sport do not interest him; it is merely a

question of dollars and cents; he kills when it pays to kill, and tries

to make certain every shot, regarding any advantage he can take as

perfectly legitimate. The worst qualities of the butcher and the market

hunter combine in the person who hunts elk for the purpose of securing

the teeth, allowing the antlers and carcass to remain unused. The sins

of these two classes are indiscriminately laid on the shoulders of the

sportsman by people who have a misty idea about real sport.

The desire to kill is instinctive, and, refined under civilizing

influences, produces the sportsman. The mere love of killing for the

sake of doing so soon palled on people who had any conception of sport.

The true theory of sport, whether in playing games or in hunting,

necessarily involves the idea of a contest or trial of skill wherein

there is a certain element of chance. The rapid destruction of game,

consequent upon the easy mastery of nature by man, led in quite early

times to the establishment of game preserves and the enactment of laws

for the preservation of game. The killing of game developed into a

pastime, and rules regulating its enjoyment readily grew out of this

method of recreation. In other words it came to be regarded as a sport

or game wherein the hunted had rights or privileges which had to be

respected the same as those of a contestant in any other game; the

huntsman must exercise his ingenuity and sometimes his daring and

endurance against the cunning and desperation of the wild beast. It is

obvious from the foregoing explanation that no sportsman countenances

killing, except for a purpose, and prefers to give the game a chance to

exercise its cleverness and adroitness in making good its escape; if

it fails, it has been outwitted. The observance of game laws for the

preservation of game find no stronger advocates anywhere than among

sportsmen, and it is to their interest to prevent the extermination of

wild life, because if that should take place their pastime would be

gone.

There are a number of enlightened people, however, who distinctly

disapprove of a sportsman’s favorite amusement and regard hunting and

killing game for recreation as altogether wrong. An examination into

this state of feeling with a view of ascertaining whether it is based

upon a clearly defined reason, or is merely a capricious sentiment,

may be instructive. All animal life in one way or another exists or is

sacrificed for the benefit of humanity. No one can reasonably combat

this assertion. By the very instinct of his being, man assumes to have

an unquestioned right to subject the lower order of created life to

his use. This assertion of his authority dates from the beginning when

the fiat was delivered--“Let him have dominion over the fish of the

sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that

moveth upon the face of the earth!” In what way shall this authority

be exercised? Human necessity or convenience alone has determined that

question without the brute creation being considered. The beast that

is reduced to servitude, and compelled to work the balance of his

existence, finds no advocate for his emancipation; no protest is made

against the wholesale slaughter of cattle to supply the meat market.

But when the sportsman goes forth to exercise his skill, allowing the

hunted prey a chance for its life and freedom, the sentimentalist,

who is generally someone who never took pleasure in that form of

amusement, throws up his hands and exclaims, “How brutal!” It is easy

to discriminate against a practice in which one does not participate.

Self-denial, when you deny yourself nothing, is an easy and convenient

morality. The brute creation is sacrificed for man’s enjoyment, and it

is useless to offer capricious objections to a form of sacrifice which

pleases another and which does not happen to appeal to one’s own idea

of pleasure.

There is a great deal of inconsistency displayed by many who deprecate

hunting with a rifle or shotgun, as the case may be. Cruelty to

animals seems to include birds and quadrupeds, but not fish. I have

heard people who are fond of angling expatiate upon the wickedness of

destroying animal life; yet they saw no harm in catching fish with a

light rod and play their quarry for a long time.

The huntsman endeavors to kill his game as soon as possible; he does

not prolong its agony for his amusement. No protests are made against

fishing as a sport so far as I have observed. The reason for this is

not hard to discover. The fish is a cold-blooded creature to whom the

heart does not seem to go out in sympathy to any extent; the slimy

scales do not invite the contact of the fingers like the warm fur of

a deer or the soft down of a duck; there is nothing in its “yellow

orbs” to excite sentimental regard; it is not an object one would pet

or fondle like a spotted fawn; wanting in qualities which appeal to

the fancy, no plea is set up in its behalf. In further evidence of the

inconsistency in question I have heard ladies almost melt with emotion

while deprecating the destruction of animal life by the sportsman, who

yet seem little affected by the recital of the lingering death agony of

the poor creatures caught in traps to furnish the furs which minister

to female vanity.

The universal custom of sacrificing animal life in some form or another

makes it impossible for one to condemn the sportsman’s method of

destroying it without the charge of inconsistency. Once concede that

the right to take the life of dumb creatures exists, and the individual

must decide in what way that right shall be exercised, with the

limitations which civilization places upon the exercise of all natural

rights.

WESTERN CAMP LIFE

We read of the big game which once frequented the Western part of the

United States in such large numbers; yet in traveling over that section

in a Pullman it is surprising that we seldom see any evidence of it.

Leaving the line of the railway and settlement, the monotony of the

sterile plain covered with sagebrush is unrelieved by signs of animal

life, except horses and cattle and occasionally herds of sheep. The old

life has passed and the new has hardly developed sufficiently to supply

its place.

Here and there may be found spots which excite the ardor of sportsmen,

but they are generally inaccessible except through the agency of a

competent guide. The great herds of buffalo which once swept over

the plains in such vast numbers as to endanger the life of the

pioneer, have disappeared entirely; the elk have almost vanished and

their annual migrations have ceased to be a terror to the ranchman,

who fenced in his hay to protect it from the famished herds. Even the

smaller game has greatly diminished.

[Illustration: MOUNTAIN CLIMBING.

When the ascent is steep and slippery, one is aided by holding on to a

horse’s tail.]

There are yet some localities where primeval conditions still continue

to a great extent; of these the most noted is the country south of the

Yellowstone National Park. To the providential care of the National

Government, in laying out this great preserve, is due the preservation

of the principal sport which now remains. Large bands of elk frequent

this preserve during the greater part of the year, until the heavy

snows drive them down from the higher elevations to obtain pasturage.

Other game besides elk may be hunted in the country adjacent to the

park, such as sheep, antelope and blacktail deer, besides smaller

animals. With a pack of well trained dogs it is also possible to hunt

with success cougars, bobcats, lynx and sometimes bear. Elk and deer

do not, as a rule, frequent the same locality to any extent. If one

desires to hunt sheep and goats a still different plan of operation

must be adopted, while antelope inhabit a country where neither elk,

deer, sheep, nor goats are likely to be found, except by merest

accident.

Inter-Ocean Hunting Tales · 第 4 / 6 段