1/C_{t} = 1/C_{mw} + 1/C_{a} + 1/C_{d} Eq. 7

Minimum thermal conductance C_{mw} for raccoons in winter was

0.0172 mL O_{2}.g^{-1}.h^{-1}. deg.C^{-1} (Table 3). Based on Thorkelson

and Maxwell's (1974) model we let 1/C_{mw} = 0.65(1/C_{t}) =

1/0.0172 mL O_{2}.g^{-1}.h^{-1}. deg.C^{-1}, and 1/C_{a} + 1/C_{d} =

0.35(1/C_{t}). Substituting these values into Eq. 7 and solving

for C_{t} yields 0.0112 mL O_{2}.g^{-1}.h^{-1}. deg.C^{-1}, a value

that is 35% lower than that of the animal alone. Substituting

this value and the value for basal metabolism of winter raccoons

(0.47 mL O_{2}.g^{-1}.h^{-1}; Table 7) into Eq. 4 and solving for

(T_{b} - T_{a}) yields a new temperature differential of 42 deg.C.

Therefore, by using tree dens, raccoons in north central Virginia,

with T_{b} = 37 deg.C (Figure 7), could effectively reduce their T_{lc}

from 11 deg.C to -5 deg.C and markedly reduce their metabolic cost of

thermoregulation.

_Metabolic Advantage of the Den_

Given prevailing winter temperatures in north central Virginia (see

"Materials and Methods"), adult raccoons in that area should be able

to sustain endothermy most of the time they are in their dens by simply

maintaining [.H]_{b}. Depending on the mass of their stored fat, they

could remain in their dens for several weeks without eating (Mugaas and

Seidensticker, ms). The thermal advantage of a den could be further

enhanced during colder temperatures if two or more raccoons occupied it

at the same time and huddled together, and/or if these animals could

reduce C_{mw} even more by lowering T_{b} and cooling their extremities.

Although we do not have any data to verify the second mechanism, there

are many accounts in natural history literature that document raccoons

occupying dens together (Lotze and Anderson, 1979). This habit could be

particularly important for the young of the year and may be one reason

why they often continue to den with their mothers during winter (Lotze

and Anderson, 1979; Seidensticker et al., 1988). Raccoons that live in

colder climates, such as Minnesota, undoubtedly obtain the same

advantage from a den as Virginia animals, but because of their greater

body mass, longer fur, and potentially lower C_{mw}, T_{lc} of a

Minnesota raccoon in a den could be even lower than what we calculated

for Virginia raccoons. Therefore, when they are in their dens, raccoons

living in very cold climates also may be able to maintain homeothermy

with a basal level of metabolism.

Metabolic Adaptation to Climate and Distribution of the Raccoon Procyon Lotor and Other Procyonidae · 第 34 / 127 题