1 = e^{-r_{max}} + b.e^{-r_{max}(a)} - b.e^{r_{max}(n+1)} Eq. 2

where a is potential age of females first producing young, b is

potential annual birth rate of female young, and n is potential age of

females producing their final young. After life-history data were

substituted into Eq. 2, r_{max} was determined by trial and error

substitution (Hennemann, 1983).

Because r_{max} represents the genetically fixed, physiologically

determined maximum possible rate of increase, data on earliest

possible age of female reproduction, highest possible birth rate of

female young, and longest possible female reproductive life span were

used for a, b, and n, respectively. Calculated values, therefore,

represent physiologically possible, not ecologically possible,

intrinsic rates of increase (Hennemann, 1983, 1984; Hayssen, 1984;

McNab, 1984b). Values of n were derived from longevity records for

captive animals, and as these were all large values of similar

duration (14-16 years), they had very little effect on r_{max}. All

species considered have one litter per year, and because their sex

ratios at birth are about 50:50, variation in b was due to differences

in litter size. Therefore, age of first reproduction and litter size

had the greatest effect on r_{max}. Intrinsic rate of increase scales

to body mass (Fenchel, 1974), and we removed this effect by comparing

each calculated r_{max} with the value expected (r_{maxe}) on the

basis of body mass (Hennemann, 1983).

Metabolic Adaptation to Climate and Distribution of the Raccoon Procyon Lotor and Other Procyonidae · 第 18 / 127 题