IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES, JANUARY 28, 1841.

[THE presidential election of 1840 having terminated in the

complete and triumphant success of the whigs, and the overthrow

of the administration of Mr. Van Buren; the party of the latter,

retaining a majority, from former elections, in both houses

of congress, endeavored to use their power for the benefit of

their party, before surrendering their authority to the whigs

on the coming fourth of March. They therefore introduced a new

preëmption bill, by which the interests of the United States in

the sales of public lands were to be sacrificed for the benefit

of that class of settlers called _squatters_. It being proposed

by Mr. Crittenden to amend the bill by providing for the

distribution of the proceeds of the sales of the lands, Mr. Clay

embraced the opportunity to deliver his sentiments on the

subject which had before engaged his deliberations.]

WITH the measure of the distribution of the proceeds of the sales

of the public lands among the states of the union, I have been so

associated for the last eight or ten years, that, although it had not

been my original purpose to say one word in respect to that measure at

the present session of congress, the debate on my colleague’s motion

has taken such a wide range, that my silence might be construed into

indifference, or an abandonment, on my part, of what I conscientiously

believe to be one of the most important and beneficial measures

ever submitted to the consideration of an American congress. I did

not intend to move in the matter at this session, because of the

extraordinary state of parties and of public affairs. The party against

which the people of the United States had recently pronounced decisive

judgment, was still in power, and had majorities in both houses of

congress. It had been always opposed to the distribution bill. The

new administration, to which a majority of the people of the United

States had given its confidence, had not yet the possession of power,

and, prior to the fourth of March next, can do nothing to fulfil

the just expectations of the country. The treasury is exhausted, and

in a wretched condition. I was aware, that its state would be urged

as a plausible plea against present distribution; urged even by a

party, prominent members of which had heretofore protested against

any reliance whatever on the public lands as a source of revenue. Now,

although I do not admit the right of congress to apply the proceeds

of all the public lands, consistently with the terms of the deeds of

cession from Virginia and the other ceding states, to the purposes

of ordinary revenue of government, yet congress being in the habit

of making such an application, I was willing to acquiesce in the

continuation of the habit until, I hope at some early day, a suitable

provision can be made for the exchequer out of some more appropriate

and legitimate source than the public lands.

The distribution proposed by my colleague can be made, and, if no

other senator does, I will propose to make it, to commence on the first

day of January next, leaving the proceeds of the lands of the current

year applicable to the uses of the treasury. This will avoid the

financial objection, as I hoped, prior to that day, that some permanent

and adequate provision will be made to supply government with the

necessary revenue. I shall, therefore, vote for the proposition with

that qualification, since it has been introduced, although I had not

intended to move it myself at this session.

I came to the present session of congress under the hope, that it would

dedicate itself earnestly to the urgent and necessary work of such a

repair of the shattered vessel of state as would put it in a condition

to perform the glorious voyage which it will begin on the fourth of

March next. I supposed, indeed, that all new and doubtful measures

of policy would be avoided; but persuaded myself that a spirit of

manliness, of honor, and of patriotism, would prompt those who yet

linger in power and authority at least to provide the necessary

ways and means to defray the expenses of government in the hands of

their successors, during the present year, if not permanently. But

I confess with pain, that my worst fears are about to be realized. The

administration not only perseveres in the errors which have lost it the

public confidence, but refuses to allow its opponents to minister, in

any way, to the sufferings of the community, or the necessities of the

government. Our constitution is defective, in allowing those to remain

in authority three or four months after the people have pronounced

judgment against them; or rather the convention did not foresee

the possibility of the existence of an administration, which would

deliberately treat with neglect and contempt the manifest sentiments

of their constituents. It did not imagine that an administration could

be so formed, as that, although smarting under a terrible but merited

defeat, it would, in the spirit of the ancient fable, doggedly hold on

to power, refusing to use it, or to permit others to use it, for the

benefit of the people.

We have just had read to us a lecture from the honorable and highly

respectable senator from New Hampshire, (Mr. Pierce,) which ought to

have been exclusively addressed to his own friends. He tells us that we

are wasting our time in party debate, and that a measure is always got

up at the commencement of every session, on which a general political

battle is fought, to the exclusion of all important public business.

There is some truth in the charge; and, if it be wrong, who ought to

be held responsible for it? Clearly, those to whom the administration

of the government has been intrusted, and who have majorities in

both houses of congress. What has been the engrossing subject of this

session? The permanent preëmption bill. Who introduced it, and why

was it introduced? Not my friends, but the senator’s. And it has been

brought up when there is an operating preëmption law in existence,

which has a long time to run. After the debate had been greatly

protracted, and after one administration senator had notified the

officers of the chamber, that they might get their lamps in order, and

another had declared that they were ready to encamp on the ground until

the bill was passed, why has the debate been permitted to continue

weeks longer, without explanation, and to the surprise of every one

on this side of the senate? Why has more than half the session been

consumed with this single and unnecessary subject? I would ask that

senator, who assumes the right to lecture us all, why he concurred in

pressing on the senate this uncalled-for measure? Yes, sir, my worst

fears are about to be realized. Nothing will be done for the country

during this session. I did hope that, if the party in power would not,

in some degree, atone for past misdeeds during the remnant of their

power, they would at least give the new administration a fair trial,

and forbear all denunciation or condemnation of it in advance. But

has this been their equitable course? Before the new president had

entered upon the duties of his office, gentlemen who have themselves

contributed to bring the country to the brink of ruin, (they will

pardon me for saying it, but the truth must be spoken,) these very

gentlemen are decrying beforehand those measures of the coming

administration which are indispensable, and which they must know to

be indispensable, to restore the public happiness and prosperity! The

honorable senator in my eye, (Mr. Wright,) said, in so many words,

that he meant to condemn this measure of distribution _in advance_.

(Mr. Wright shook his head.)

A Biography of Henry Clay, the Senator from Kentucky Containing Also, a Complete Report of All His Speeches; Selections From His Private Correspondence; Eulogies in the Senate and House; and a Poem, by George D. Prentice, Esq. · 第 204 / 250 题