CHAPTER XX.

“Then came the children of Israel, even the whole congregation, into the

desert of Zin, in the first month: and the people abode in Kadesh; and

Miriam died there, and was buried there.” (Ver. 1.)

The chapter which now opens before us furnishes a very remarkable record

of wilderness life and experience. In it we see Moses, the servant of

God, passing through some of the most trying scenes of his eventful

life. First of all, Miriam dies. The one whose voice was heard, amid the

brilliant scenes of Exodus xv, chanting a hymn of victory passes away,

and her ashes are deposited in the wilderness of Kadesh. The timbrel is

laid aside. The voice of song is hushed in the silence of death. She can

no longer lead in the dance. She had sung sweetly in her day; she had

very blessedly seized the key-note of that magnificent song of praise

sung on the resurrection side of the Red Sea. Her chorus embodied the

great central truth of redemption.—“Sing ye to the Lord, for He hath

triumphed gloriously: the horse and his rider hath He thrown into the

sea.” This was truly a lofty strain; it was the suited utterance for the

joyous occasion.

But now the prophetess passes off the scene, and the voice of melody

is exchanged for the voice of murmuring. Wilderness life is becoming

irksome. The trials of the desert put nature to the test; they bring out

what is in the heart. Forty years’ toil and travail make a great change

in people. It is very rare indeed to find a case in which the verdure and

freshness of spiritual life are kept up, much less augmented, throughout

all the stages of Christian life and warfare. It ought not to be such a

rarity; it ought to be the very reverse, inasmuch as it is in the actual

details, the stern realities of our path through this world, that we

prove what God is. He, blessed be His name, takes occasion from the very

trials of the way to make Himself known to us in all the sweetness and

tenderness of love that knows no change. His loving-kindness and tender

mercy never fail. Nothing can exhaust those springs which are in the

living God. He will be what He is spite of all our naughtiness: God will

be God, let man prove himself ever so faithless and faulty.

This is our comfort, our joy, and the source of our strength. We have

to do with the living God. What a reality! Come what may, He will prove

Himself equal to every emergency—amply sufficient “for exigence of

every hour.” His patient grace can bear with our manifold infirmities,

failures, and shortcomings, and His strength is made perfect in our utter

weakness. His faithfulness never fails; His mercy is from everlasting

to everlasting. Friends fail or pass away; links of fond friendship are

snapped in this cold, heartless world; fellow-laborers part company;

Miriams and Aarons die; but God remaineth. Here lies the deep secret of

all true and solid blessedness. If we have the hand and heart of the

living God with us, we need not fear. If we can say, “The Lord is my

Shepherd,” we can assuredly add, “We shall not want.”

Still there are the scenes of sorrow and trial in the desert, and we have

to go through them. Thus it was with Israel in the chapter before us.

They were called to meet the keen blasts of the wilderness, and they met

them with accents of impatience and discontent. “And there was no water

for the congregation: and they gathered themselves together against Moses

and against Aaron. And the people chode with Moses, and spake, saying,

‘Would God that we had died when our brethren died before the Lord! And

why have ye brought up the congregation of the Lord into this wilderness,

that we and our cattle should die there? And wherefore have ye made us to

come up out of Egypt, to bring us unto this evil place? It is no place of

seed, or of figs, or of vines, or of pomegranates; neither is there any

water to drink.’” (Ver. 2-5.)

This was a deeply trying moment to the spirit of Moses. We can form no

conception of what it must have been to encounter six hundred thousand

murmurers, and to be obliged to listen to their bitter invectives, and to

hear himself charged with all the misfortunes which their own unbelief

had conjured up before them. All this was no ordinary trial of patience;

and most assuredly _we_ need not marvel if that dear and honored servant

found the occasion too much for him. “And Moses and Aaron went from

the presence of the assembly unto the door of the tabernacle of the

congregation, and they fell upon their faces: and the glory of the Lord

appeared unto them.” (Ver. 6.)

It is deeply touching to find Moses, again and again, on his face before

God. It was a sweet relief to make his escape from a tumultuous host

and betake himself to the only One whose resources were adequate to

meet such an occasion. “They fell upon their faces; and the glory of

the Lord appeared unto them.” They do not appear, on this occasion, to

have attempted any reply to the people; “they went from the presence

of the assembly” and cast themselves upon the living God. They could

not possibly have done better. Who but the God of all grace could meet

the ten thousand necessities of wilderness life? Well had Moses said,

at the very beginning, “If Thy presence go not with us, carry us not

up hence.” Assuredly, he was right and wise in so expressing himself.

The divine presence was the _only_ answer to the demand of such a

congregation; but that presence _was_ an all-sufficient answer. God’s

treasury is absolutely inexhaustible. He can never fail a trusting heart.

Let us remember this. God delights to be used; He never grows weary of

ministering to the need of His people. If this were ever kept in the

remembrance of the thoughts of our hearts, we should hear less of the

accents of impatience and discontent, and more of the sweet language of

thankfulness and praise; but, as we have had frequent occasion to remark,

desert life tests every one. It proves what is in us, and, thanks be to

God, it brings out what is in _Him_ for us.

“And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, ‘Take _the_ rod, and gather thou

the assembly together, thou and Aaron thy brother, and speak ye unto

the rock before their eyes; and it shall give forth his water, and thou

shalt bring forth to them water out of the rock: so thou shalt give the

congregation and their beasts drink.’ And Moses took _the_ rod from

before the Lord as He commanded him. And Moses and Aaron gathered the

congregation together before the rock, and he said unto them, ‘Hear, now,

ye rebels; must we fetch you water out of this rock?’ And Moses lifted up

his hand, and with _his_ rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came

out abundantly; and the congregation drank, and their beasts also.” (Ver.

7-11.)

Two objects in the foregoing quotation demand the reader’s attention,

namely, “The rock” and “the rod.” They both present Christ most blessedly

to the soul, but in two distinct aspects. In 1 Corinthians x. 4, we read,

“They drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was

Christ.” This is plain and positive. It leaves no room whatever for the

exercise of imagination. “That Rock was Christ”—Christ smitten for us.

Then as regards “the rod,” we must remember that it was not the rod of

Moses—the rod of authority—the rod of power. This would not suit the

occasion before us. It had done its work; it had smitten the rock once,

and that was enough. This we learn from Exodus xvii, where we read, “The

Lord said unto Moses, ‘Go on before the people, and take with thee of the

elders of Israel; and _thy_ rod, _wherewith thou smotest the river_ (see

Exodus vii. 20.), take in thy hand and go. Behold, I will stand before

thee there upon the rock in Horeb; and thou shalt smite the rock, and

there shall come water out of it, that the people may drink.’ And Moses

did so in the sight of the elders of Israel.”

Here we have a type of Christ smitten for us, by the hand of God, in

judgment. The reader will note the expression, “Thy rod wherewith thou

smotest the river.” Why the river? why should this particular stroke

of the rod be referred to? Exodus vii. 20 furnishes the reply.—“And he

[Moses] lifted up the rod, and smote the waters that were in the river,

in the sight of Pharaoh, and in the sight of his servants; and all the

waters that were in the river were _turned to blood_.” It was the rod

which turned the water into blood that was to smite “that Rock which was

Christ,” in order that streams of life and refreshment might flow for us.

Now, this smiting could only take place once; it is never to be repeated.

“Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath

no more dominion over Him. For in that He died, He died unto sin _once_;

but in that He liveth, He liveth unto God.” (Rom. vi. 9, 10.) “But now

_once_ in the end of the world hath He appeared to put away sin by the

sacrifice of Himself; ... so Christ was _once_ offered to bear the sins

of many.” (Heb. ix. 26, 28.) “For Christ also hath _once_ suffered for

sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God.” (1 Pet.

iii. 18.)

There can be no repetition of the death of Christ, and hence Moses was

wrong in smiting the rock twice with _his_ rod—wrong in smiting it at

all. He was commanded to take “_the rod_”—Aaron’s rod—the priestly rod,

and speak to the rock. The atoning work is done, and now our great

High-Priest has passed into the heavens, there to appear in the presence

of God for us, and the streams of spiritual refreshment flow to us on

the ground of accomplished redemption and in connection with Christ’s

priestly ministry, of which Aaron’s budding rod is the exquisite figure.

Hence, then, it was a grave mistake for Moses to smite the rock a second

time—a mistake to use his rod in the matter at all. To have smitten

with Aaron’s rod would, as we can easily understand, have spoiled its

lovely blossom. A word would have sufficed in connection with the rod of

priesthood—the rod of grace. Moses failed to see this—failed to glorify

God. He spoke unadvisedly with his lips, and as a consequence, he was

prohibited going over Jordan. His rod could not take the people over—for

what could mere authority do with a murmuring host—and he was not

suffered to go over himself, because he failed to sanctify Jehovah in

the eyes of the congregation.

But Jehovah took care of His own glory. He sanctified Himself before the

people, and notwithstanding their rebellious murmurings, and Moses’ sad

mistake and failure, the congregation of the Lord received a gushing

stream from the smitten rock.

Nor was this all. It was not merely that grace triumphed in furnishing

Israel’s murmuring hosts with drink, but even in reference to Moses

himself it shines out most brilliantly, as we may see in Deuteronomy

xxxiv. It was grace that brought Moses to the top of Pisgah and showed

him the land of Canaan from thence. It was grace that led Jehovah to

provide a grave for His servant and bury him therein. It was better to

see the land of Canaan in company with God than to enter it in company

with Israel. And yet we must not forget that Moses was prevented entering

the land because of the unadvised speaking. God in government kept

Moses out of Canaan: God in grace brought Moses up to Pisgah. These two

facts in the history of Moses illustrate very forcibly the distinction

between grace and government—a subject of the deepest interest, and of

great practical value. Grace pardons and blesses, but government takes

its course. Let us ever remember this. “Whatsoever a man soweth, that

shall he also reap.” This principle runs through all the ways of God in

government, and nothing can be more solemn; nevertheless, “grace reigns

through righteousness, unto eternal life, by Jesus Christ our Lord.” All

praise to Him who is at once the fountain and the channel of this grace!

From verses 14-20 of our chapter, we have the correspondence between

Moses and the king of Edom. It is instructive and interesting to notice

the style of each, and to compare it with the history given in Genesis

xxxii, xxxiii. Esau had a serious grudge against Jacob; and albeit,

through the direct interposition of God, he was not suffered to touch

a hair of his brother’s head, still, on the other hand, Israel must

not meddle with Esau’s possessions. Jacob had supplanted Esau, and

Israel must not molest Edom. “Command thou the people, saying, Ye are

to pass through the coast of your brethren the children of Esau, which

dwell in Seir; and they shall be afraid of you: take ye good heed unto

yourselves therefore. Meddle not with them; for I will not give you of

their land—no, not so much as a foot-breadth, because I have given Mount

Seir unto Esau for a possession. Ye shall buy meat of them for money,

that ye may eat; and ye shall also buy water of them for money, that ye

may drink.” (Deut. ii. 4-6.) Thus we see that the same God who would not

suffer Esau to touch Jacob, in Genesis xxxiii, now will not suffer Israel

to touch Edom, in Numbers xx.

The closing paragraph of Numbers xx. is deeply touching. We shall not

quote it, but the reader should refer to it, and compare it carefully

with the scene in Exodus iv. 1-17. Moses had deemed Aaron’s companionship

indispensable; but he afterwards found him to be a sore thorn in his

side, and here he is compelled to strip him of his robes and see him

gathered to his fathers. All this is very admonitory, in whatever way we

view it, whether as regards Moses or Aaron. We have already referred to

this instructive piece of history, and therefore we shall not dwell upon

it here; but may the good Lord engrave its solemn lesson deeply upon the

tablets of our hearts.

Notes on the book of Numbers · 第 14 / 22 章