CHAPTER XIX.

One of the most important sections of the book of Numbers now lies open

before us, presenting for our consideration the deeply interesting and

instructive ordinance of “The Red Heifer.” A thoughtful student of

Scripture would naturally feel disposed to inquire why it is that we get

this type in Numbers and not in Leviticus. In the first seven chapters

of the latter book we have a very elaborate statement of the doctrine of

sacrifice, and yet we have no allusion whatever to the red heifer. Why is

this? What are we to learn from the fact that this beautiful ordinance

is presented in the book of Numbers and no where else. We believe it

furnishes another striking illustration of the distinctive character of

our book. The red heifer is pre-eminently a wilderness-type. It was God’s

provision for defilements by the way, and it prefigures the death of

Christ as a purification for sin, to meet our need in passing through a

defiling world home to our eternal rest above. It is a most instructive

figure, and unfolds most precious and needed truth. May the Holy Ghost,

who has penned the record, be graciously pleased to expound and apply it

to our souls.

“And the Lord spake unto Moses and unto Aaron, saying, ‘This is the

ordinance of the law which the Lord hath commanded, saying, Speak unto

the children of Israel that they bring thee a red heifer without spot,

wherein is no blemish, and upon which never came yoke.’” (Ver. 1, 2.)

When, with the eye of faith, we gaze upon the Lord Jesus, we not only see

Him to be the spotless One in His own holy Person, but also One who never

bore the yoke of sin. The Holy Ghost is ever the jealous Guardian of the

Person of Christ, and He delights to present Him to the soul in all His

excellency and preciousness. Hence it is that every type and every shadow

designed to set Him forth exhibits the same careful guardianship. Thus,

in the red heifer we are taught that not only was our blessed Saviour

as to His human nature intrinsically and inherently pure and spotless,

but that as to His birth and relationships He stood perfectly clear from

every mark and trace of sin. No yoke of sin ever came upon His sacred

neck. When He speaks of “My yoke” (Matt. xi. 29.), it was the yoke of

implicit subjection to the Father’s will in all things. This was the only

yoke He ever wore; and this yoke was never off for one moment during the

entire of His spotless and perfect career—from the manger, where He lay a

helpless babe, to the cross, where He expired as a victim.

But He wore no yoke of sin. Let this be distinctly understood. He went

to the cross to expiate our sins, to lay the ground-work of our perfect

purification from all sin; but He did this as One who had never, at any

time during His blessed life, worn the yoke of sin. He was “without sin,”

and as such, was perfectly fitted to do the great and glorious work of

expiation. To think of Him as bearing the yoke of sin in His life, would

be to think of Him as unfit to atone for it in His death. “_Wherein_

is no blemish, and _whereon_ never came yoke.” It is quite as needful

to remember and weigh the force of the word “whereon” as of the word

“wherein.” Both expressions are designed by the Holy Ghost to set forth

the perfection of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, who was not only

internally spotless, but also externally free from every trace of sin.

Neither in His Person nor yet in His relationships was He in any wise

obnoxious to the claims of sin or death. He—adored forever be His blessed

name!—entered into all the reality of our circumstances and condition;

but _in_ Him was no sin, and _on_ Him no yoke of sin.

“Touched with a sympathy within,

He knows our feeble frame;

He knows what sore temptations mean,

For He has felt the same.

“But spotless, undefiled, and pure,

The great Redeemer stood,

While Satan’s fiery darts He bore,

And did resist to blood.”

“And ye shall give her unto Eleazar the priest, that he may bring her

forth without the camp, and one shall slay her before his face.” (Ver. 3.)

The thoughtful reader of Scripture will not pass over any expression,

how trivial soever it may seem to be. Such an one will ever bear in mind

that the book which lies open before him is from God, and therefore

perfect—perfect as a whole—perfect in all its parts. Every little word

is pregnant with meaning; each little point, feature, and circumstance

contains some spiritual teaching for the soul. No doubt, infidels and

rationalists altogether fail in seizing this weighty fact, and, as a

consequence, when they approach the divine volume, they make the saddest

havoc. They see flaws where the spiritual student sees only gems; they

see incongruities and contradictions where the devout, self-distrusting,

Spirit-taught disciple beholds divine harmonies and moral glories.

This is only what we might expect, and it is well to remember it

nowadays. “God is His own interpreter” in Scripture as well as in

providence; and if we wait on Him, He will assuredly make it plain. But

as in providence “blind unbelief is sure to err, and scan His ways in

vain,” so in Scripture it is sure to err, and scan His lines in vain.

And the devout poet might have gone farther; for, most surely, unbelief

will not only scan God’s ways and God’s Word in vain, but turn both the

one and the other into an occasion of making a blasphemous attack upon

God Himself—upon His nature, and upon His character, as well as upon the

revelation which He has been pleased to give us. The infidel would rudely

smash the lamp of inspiration, quench its heavenly light, and involve us

all in that deep gloom and moral darkness which inwrap his misguided

mind.

We have been led into the foregoing train of thought while meditating

upon the third verse of our chapter. We are exceedingly desirous to

cultivate the habit of profound and careful study of holy Scripture.

It is of immense importance. To say or to think that there is so much

as a single clause, or a single expression, from cover to cover of the

inspired volume, unworthy of our prayerful meditation, is to imply that

God the Holy Ghost has thought it worth His while to write what we do not

think it worth our while to study. “All Scripture is given by inspiration

of God.” (2 Tim. iii. 16.) This commands our reverence. “Whatsoever

things were written aforetime were written for our learning.” (Rom. xv.

4.) This awakens our personal interest. The former of these quotations

proves that Scripture comes _from God_; the latter proves that it comes

_to us_. That and this, taken together, bind us to God by the divine link

of holy Scripture—a link which the devil, in this our day, is doing his

very utmost to snap; and that, too, by means of agents of acknowledged

moral worth and intellectual power. The devil does not select an ignorant

or immoral man to make his grand and special attacks upon the Bible, for

he knows full well that the former could not speak, and the latter would

not get a hearing; but he craftily takes up some amiable, benevolent,

and popular person—some one of blameless morals—a laborious student, a

profound scholar, a deep and original thinker. Thus he throws dust in

the eyes of the simple, the unlearned, and the unwary.

Christian reader, we pray you to remember this. If we can deepen in

your soul the sense of the unspeakable value of your Bible, if we can

warn you off from the dangerous rocks and quicksands of rationalism and

infidelity, if we are made the means of stablishing and strengthening

you in the assurance that when you are hanging over the sacred page of

Scripture you are drinking at a fountain every drop of which has flowed

into it from the very bosom of God Himself,—if we can reach all or any of

these results, we shall not regret the digression from our chapter, to

which we now return.

“And ye shall give her unto Eleazar the priest, that he may bring her

forth without the camp, and one shall slay her before his face.” We have,

in the priest and the victim, a joint type of the Person of Christ. He

was at once the Victim and the Priest. But He did not enter upon His

priestly functions until His work as a victim was accomplished. This

will explain the expression in the last clause of the third verse—“_one

shall slay her before his face_.” The death of Christ was accomplished

on earth, and could not, therefore, be represented as the act of

priesthood. Heaven, not earth, is the sphere of His priestly service. The

apostle, in the epistle to the Hebrews, expressly declares, as the sum

of a most elaborate and amazing piece of argument, that “we have such a

High-Priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty

in the heavens; a Minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle,

which the Lord pitched, and not man. For every high-priest is ordained

to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this

Man have somewhat also to offer. _For if He were on earth, He should not

be a priest_, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according

to the law.” (Heb. viii. 1-4.) “But Christ being come a High-Priest of

good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made

with hands, that is to say, not of this building; neither by the blood of

goats and calves, but by His own blood He entered in once into the holy

place, having obtained eternal redemption.” “For Christ is not entered

into the holy places made with hands, the figures of the true, but _into

heaven itself_, now to appear in the presence of God for us.” (Chap. ix.

11, 12, 24.) “But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins,

forever _sat down on the right hand of God_.” (Chap. x. 12.)

From all these passages, taken in connection with Numbers xix. 3, we

learn two things, namely, that the death of Christ is not presented

as the proper, ordinary act of priesthood; and further, that heaven,

not earth, is the sphere of His priestly ministry. There is nothing

new in these statements—others have advanced them repeatedly, but it

is important to notice every thing tending to illustrate the divine

perfection and precision of holy Scripture. It is deeply interesting to

find a truth which shines brightly in the pages of the New Testament

wrapped up in some ordinance or ceremony of Old-Testament times. Such

discoveries are ever welcome to the intelligent reader of the Word. The

truth, no doubt, is the same wherever it is found; but when it bursts

upon us, with meridian brightness, in the New-Testament scriptures,

and is divinely shadowed forth in the Old, we not only have the truth

established, but the unity of the volume illustrated and enforced.

But we must not pass over unnoticed the place where the death of the

victim was accomplished. “That he may bring her forth without the camp.”

As has already been remarked, the priest and the victim are identified,

and form a joint type of Christ; but it is added, “one shall slay her

before his face,” simply because the death of Christ could not be

represented as the act of priesthood. What marvelous accuracy! And yet it

is not marvelous, for what else should we look for in a book every line

of which is from God Himself? Had it been said, He shall slay her, then

Numbers xix. would be at variance with the epistle to the Hebrews. But

no; the harmonies of the volume shine forth among its brightest glories.

May we have grace to discern and appreciate them.

Jesus, then, suffered without the gate.—“Wherefore Jesus also, that He

might sanctify the people with His own blood, suffered without the gate.”

(Heb. xiii. 12.) He took the outside place, and His voice falls on the

ear from thence. Do we listen to it? do we understand it? Should we

not consider more seriously the place where Jesus died? Are we to rest

satisfied with reaping the benefits of Christ’s death, without seeking

fellowship with Him in His rejection? God forbid! “Let us _go forth_,

therefore, unto Him without the camp, bearing His reproach.”[18] There

is immense power in these words. They should rouse our whole moral being

to seek more complete identification with a rejected Saviour. Shall we

see Him die outside, while we reap the benefits of His death and remain

within? Shall we seek a home and a place and a name and a portion in

that world from which our Lord and Master is an outcast? Shall we aim

at getting on in a world which could not tolerate that blessed One to

whom we owe our present and everlasting felicity? Shall we aspire after

honor, position, and wealth where our Master found only a manger, a

cross, a borrowed grave? May the language of our _hearts_ be, “Far be the

_thought_!” and may the language of our _lives_ be, “Far be the _thing_!”

May we, by the grace of God, yield a more hearty response to the Spirit’s

call to “_go forth_.”

Christian reader, let us never forget that when we look at the death of

Christ, we see two things, namely, the death of a victim and the death of

a martyr—a victim for sin, a martyr for righteousness—a victim under the

hand of God, a martyr under the hand of man. He suffered for sin that

we might never suffer. Blessed be His name for evermore! But then, His

martyr-sufferings—His sufferings for righteousness under the hand of man,

these we may know; “for unto you _it is given_, in the behalf of Christ,

not only to believe on Him, but also to _suffer_ for His sake.” (Phil. i.

29.) It is a positive _gift_ to be allowed to suffer with Christ. Do we

so esteem it?

In contemplating the death of Christ, as typified by the ordinance of the

red heifer, we see not only the complete putting away of sin, but also

the judgment of this present evil world. “He gave Himself for our sins

that He might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the

will of God and our Father.” (Gal. i. 4.) Here the two things are put

together by God; and, most surely, they should never be separated by us.

We have the judgment of sin, root and branch, and the judgment of this

world. The former should give perfect repose to the exercised conscience,

while the latter should deliver the heart from the insnaring influence of

the world, in all its multiplied forms. That purges the conscience from

all sense of guilt; this snaps the link which binds the heart and the

world together.

Now, it is most needful for the reader to understand and enter

experimentally into the connection existing between these two things.

It is quite possible to miss this grand link, even while holding and

contending for a vast amount of evangelical truth; and it may be

confidently affirmed that where this link is missing, there must be a

very serious defect in the Christian character. We frequently meet with

earnest souls who have been brought under the convicting and awakening

power of the Holy Spirit, but who have not yet known, for the ease of

their troubled consciences, the full value of the atoning death of

Christ, as putting away forever all their sins, and bringing them nigh

to God, without a stain upon the soul or a sting in the conscience. If

this be the present actual condition of the reader, he would need to

consider the first clause of the verse just quoted—“He gave Himself for

our sins.” This is a most blessed statement for a troubled soul. It

settles the whole question of sin. If it be true that Christ gave Himself

for my sins, what remains for me but to rejoice in the precious fact that

my sins are all gone? The One who took my place, who stood charged with

my sins, who suffered in my room and stead, is now at the right hand of

God, crowned with glory and honor. This is enough. My sins are all gone

forever. If they were not, _He_ could not be where he now is. The crown

of glory which wreathes His blessed brow is the proof that my sins are

perfectly atoned for, and therefore perfect peace is my portion—a peace

as perfect as the work of Christ can make it.

But then let us never forget that the very same work that has forever

put away our sins has delivered us from this present evil world. The

two things go together. Christ has not only delivered me from the

consequences of my sins, but also from the present power of sin, and

from the claims and influences of that thing which Scripture calls “the

world.” All this, however, will come more fully out as we proceed with

our chapter.

“And Eleazar the priest shall take of her blood with his finger,

and sprinkle of her blood directly before the tabernacle of the

congregation seven times.” Here we have the solid ground-work of all

real purification. We know that in the type before us it is only, as the

inspired apostle tells us, a question of “sanctifying to the purifying

of the flesh.” (Heb. ix. 13.) But we have to look beyond the type to

the Antitype—beyond the shadow to the substance. In the sevenfold

sprinkling of the blood of the red heifer before the tabernacle of the

congregation, we have a figure of the perfect presentation of the blood

of Christ to God, as the only ground of the meeting-place between God

and the conscience. The number “seven,” as has frequently been observed,

is expressive of perfection; and in the figure before us, we see the

perfection attaching to the death of Christ as an atonement for sin,

presented to and accepted by God. All rests upon this divine ground. The

blood has been shed and presented to a holy God as a perfect atonement

for sin. This, when simply received by faith, must relieve the conscience

from all sense of guilt, and all fear of condemnation. There is nothing

before God save the perfection of the atoning work of Christ. Sin has

been judged, and our sins put away; they have been completely obliterated

by the precious blood of Christ. To believe this, is to enter into

perfect repose of conscience.

And here let the reader carefully note that there is no further allusion

to the sprinkling of blood throughout the entire of this singularly

interesting chapter. This is precisely in keeping with the doctrine of

Hebrews ix, x. It is but another illustration of the divine harmony

of the volume. The sacrifice of Christ, being divinely perfect, needs

not to be repeated. Its efficacy is divine and eternal. “But Christ

being come a High-Priest of good things to come, by a greater and more

perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this

building; neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by His own

blood, He entered in once into the holy place, having obtained _eternal_

redemption. For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and _the ashes of

a heifer_ sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the

flesh; how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal

Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from

dead works to serve the living God?” (Heb. ix. 11-14.) Observe the force

of these two words, “_once_” and “_eternal_.” See how they set forth the

completeness and divine efficacy of the sacrifice of Christ. The blood

was shed once and forever. To think of a repetition of that great work

would be to deny its everlasting and all-sufficient value, and reduce it

to the level of the blood of bulls and goats.

But further—“It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things

in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things

themselves with better sacrifices than these. For Christ is not entered

into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true;

but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us: nor

yet _that He should offer Himself often_, as the high-priest entereth

into the holy place every year with blood of others; for then _must He

often have suffered_ since the foundation of the world; but now _once_ in

the end of the world hath. He appeared _to put away sin_ by the sacrifice

of Himself.” Sin, therefore, has been put away. It cannot be put away

and at the same time be on the believer’s conscience. This is plain. It

must either be admitted that the believer’s sins are blotted out, and his

conscience perfectly purged, or that Christ must die over again. But this

latter is not only needless, but wholly out of the question; for, as the

apostle goes on to say, “as it is appointed unto men _once_ to die, but

after this the judgment; so Christ was once offered to bear the sins of

many; and unto them that look for Him shall He appear the second time,

without sin, unto salvation.”

There is something most marvelous in the patient elaborateness with which

the Holy Ghost argues out this entire subject. He expounds, illustrates,

and enforces the great doctrine of the completeness of the sacrifice in

such a way as to carry conviction to the soul, and relieve the conscience

of its heavy burden. Such is the exceeding grace of God, that He has not

only accomplished the work of eternal redemption for us, but, in the most

patient and painstaking manner, has argued and reasoned, and proved the

whole point in question, so as not to leave one hair’s breadth of ground

on which to base an objection. Let us hearken to His further powerful

reasonings, and may the Spirit apply them in power to the heart of the

anxious reader.

“For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very

image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered

year by year continually make the comers thereunto _perfect_. For then

would they not have _ceased to be offered_? because that the worshipers

_once purged_ should have had _no more conscience of sins_. But in those

sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year. For it

is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away

sins.” But that which the blood of bulls could never do, the blood of

Jesus has forever done. This makes all the difference. All the blood that

ever flowed around Israel’s altars—the millions of sacrifices offered

according to the requirements of the Mosaic ritual—could not blot out

one stain from the conscience, or justify a sin-hating God in receiving

a sinner to Himself. “It is not possible that the blood of bulls and of

goats should take away sins.” “Wherefore when He cometh into the world

He saith, ‘Sacrifice and offering Thou wouldest not, but a body hast

Thou prepared Me: in burnt-offerings and sacrifices for sin Thou hast

had no pleasure. Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it

is written of Me,) to do Thy will, O God.’ ... By the which will we are

sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ _once_.” Mark

the contrast. God had no pleasure in the endless round of sacrifices

under the law,—they did not please Him. They left wholly unaccomplished

that which He had in His loving heart to do for His people, namely, to

rid them completely of sin’s heavy load, and bring them unto Himself,

in perfect peace of conscience and liberty of heart. This, Jesus, by

the one offering of His blessed body, did. He did the will of God; and,

blessed forever be His name, He has not to do His work over again. We may

refuse to believe that the work is done, refuse to commit our souls to

its efficacy—to enter into the rest which it is calculated to impart—to

enjoy the holy liberty of spirit which it is fitted to yield; but there

stands the work in its own imperishable virtue; and there, too, stand

the Spirit’s arguments respecting that work, in their own unanswerable

force and clearness; and neither Satan’s dark suggestions nor our own

unbelieving reasonings can ever touch either the one or the other. They

may, and, alas! they do, most sadly interfere with our soul’s enjoyment

of the truth; but the truth itself remains ever the same.

“And every priest _standeth daily_ ministering and _offering oftentimes

the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins_: but this Man, after

He had offered _one sacrifice_ for sins, _forever sat down_ on the right

hand of God; from henceforth expecting till His enemies be made His

footstool. For _by one offering_ He hath perfected forever them that

are sanctified.” It is due to the blood of Christ that it should impart

eternal perfection; and, we may surely add, it is due to it likewise that

our souls should taste that perfection. No one need ever imagine that

he is doing honor to the work of Christ, or to the Spirit’s testimony

respecting that work, when he refuses to accept that perfect remission of

sins which is proclaimed to him through the blood of the cross. It is no

sign of true piety, or of pure religion, to deny what the grace of God

has done for us in Christ, and what the record of the Eternal Spirit has

presented to our souls on the page of inspiration.

Christian reader, anxious inquirer, does it not seem strange that when

the Word of God presents to our view Christ seated at the right hand of

God, in virtue of accomplished redemption, we should be virtually in no

wise better off than those who had merely a human priest standing daily

ministering, and offering the same round of sacrifices? We have a divine

Priest, who has sat down forever. They had a merely human priest, who

could never, in his official capacity, sit down at all; and yet are we,

in the state of the mind, in the apprehension of the soul, in the actual

condition of the conscience, in no respect better off than they? Can it

be possible that, with a perfect work to rest upon, our souls should

never know perfect rest? The Holy Ghost, as we have seen in these various

quotations taken from the epistle to the Hebrews, has left nothing unsaid

to satisfy our souls as to the question of the complete putting away

of sin by the precious blood of Christ. Why, then, should you not this

moment enjoy full, settled peace of conscience? Has the blood of Jesus

done nothing more for you than the blood of a bullock did for a Jewish

worshiper?

It may be, however, that the reader is ready to say, in reply to all that

we have been seeking to urge upon him, “I do not, in the least, doubt

the efficacy of the blood of Jesus. I believe it cleanseth from all sin.

I believe, most thoroughly, that all who simply put their trust in that

blood are perfectly safe, and will be eternally happy. My difficulty does

not lie here at all. What troubles me is not the efficacy of the blood,

in which I fully believe, but _my own personal interest in that blood_,

of which I have no satisfactory evidence. This is the secret of all my

trouble. The doctrine of the blood is as clear as a sunbeam, but the

question of _my_ interest therein is involved in hopeless obscurity.”

Now, if this be at all the embodiment of the reader’s feelings on this

momentous subject, it only proves the necessity of his deeply pondering

the fourth verse of the nineteenth of Numbers. There he will see that

the true basis of all purification is found in this, that the blood of

atonement has been presented to God, and accepted by Him. This is a

most precious truth, but one little understood. It is of all importance

that the really anxious soul should have a clear view of the subject of

atonement. It is so natural to us all to be occupied with our thoughts

and feelings about the blood of Christ, rather than with the blood

itself, and with God’s thoughts respecting it. If the blood has been

perfectly presented to God, if He has accepted it, if He has glorified

Himself in the putting away of sin, then what remains for the divinely

exercised conscience but to find perfect repose in that which has met all

the claims of God, harmonized His attributes, and laid the foundations of

that marvelous platform whereon a sin-hating God and a poor sin-destroyed

sinner can meet? Why introduce the question of my interest in the blood

of Christ, as though that work were not complete without aught of mine,

call it what you will,—my interest, my feelings, my experience, my

appreciation, my appropriation, my any thing? Why not rest in Christ

alone? This would be really having an interest in Him. But the very

moment the heart gets occupied with the question of its own interest, the

moment the eye is withdrawn from that divine object which the Word of God

and the Holy Ghost present, then spiritual darkness and perplexity must

ensue, and the soul, instead of rejoicing in the perfection of the work

of Christ, is tormented by looking at its own poor, imperfect feelings.

“Th’ atoning work is done,

The Victim’s blood is shed,

And Jesus now is gone

_His_ people’s cause to plead.

He stands in heav’n their great High-Priest,

And bears their names upon His breast.”

Here, blessed be God, we have the stable ground-work of “purification

for sin,” and of perfect peace for the conscience. “The atoning work is

done.” All is finished. The great Antitype of the red heifer has been

slain. He gave Himself up to death, under the wrath and judgment of a

righteous God, that all who simply put their trust in Him might know,

in the deep secret of their own souls, divine purification and perfect

peace. We are purified, as to the conscience, not by our thoughts about

the blood, but by the blood itself. We must insist upon this. God Himself

has made out our title for us, and that title is found in the blood

_alone_. Oh, that most precious blood of Jesus, that speaks profound

peace to every troubled soul that will simply lean upon its eternal

efficacy! Why, we may ask, is it that the blessed doctrine of the blood

is so little understood and appreciated? Why will people persist in

looking to aught else, or in mingling aught else with it? May the Holy

Ghost lead the anxious reader, as he reads these lines, to stay his heart

and conscience upon the atoning sacrifice of the Lamb of God.

Having thus endeavored to present to the reader the precious truth

unfolded to us in the _death_ of the red heifer, we shall now ask him

to meditate for a few moments upon the _burning_ of the heifer. We have

looked at the _blood_, let us now gaze upon the _ashes_. In the former,

we have the sacrificial death of Christ as the only purification for

sin; in the latter, we have the remembrance of that death applied to the

heart by the Spirit, through the Word, in order to remove any defilement

contracted in our walk from day to day. This gives great completeness

and beauty to this most interesting type. God has not only made provision

for past sins, but also for present defilement, so that we may be ever

before Him in all the value and credit of the perfect work of Christ. He

would have us treading the courts of His sanctuary, the holy precincts

of His presence, “clean every whit.” And not only does He Himself see

us thus, but, blessed forever be His name, He would have us thus in

our own inward self-consciousness. He would give us, by His Spirit,

through the Word, the deep inward sense of cleanness in His sight, so

that the current of our communion with Him may flow on without a ripple

and without a curve. “If we walk in the light, as He is in the light,

we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His

Son cleanseth us from all sin.” (1 John i.) But if we fail to walk in

the light—if we forget, and, in our forgetfulness, touch the unclean

thing, how is our communion to be restored? Only by the removal of the

defilement. And how is this to be effected? By the application to our

hearts and consciences of the precious truth of the death of Christ. The

Holy Ghost produces self-judgment, and brings to our remembrance the

precious truth that Christ suffered death for that defilement which we

so lightly and indifferently contract. It is not a fresh sprinkling of

the blood of Christ—a thing unknown in Scripture,—but the remembrance of

His death brought home, in fresh power, to the contrite heart, by the

ministry of the Holy Ghost.

“And one shall burn the heifer in his sight.... And the priest shall take

cedar-wood and hyssop and scarlet, and cast it into the midst of the

burning of the heifer.... And a man that is clean shall gather up the

ashes of the heifer, and lay them up without the camp in a clean place,

and it shall be kept for the congregation of the children of Israel for a

water of separation: it is a purification for sin.”

It is the purpose of God that His children should be purified from all

iniquity, and that they should walk in separation from this present evil

world, where all is death and defilement. This separation is effected

by the action of the Word on the heart, by the power of the Holy Ghost.

“Grace to you and peace from God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ,

who gave Himself for our sins, that He might deliver us from this present

evil world, according to the will of God and our Father.” (Gal. i. 4.)

And again, “Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing

of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; who gave Himself for us,

that He might _redeem_ us from all iniquity, and _purify_ unto Himself a

peculiar people, zealous of good works.” (Titus ii. 13, 14.)

It is remarkable how constantly the Spirit of God presents, in intimate

connection, the full relief of the conscience from all sense of guilt,

and the deliverance of the heart from the moral influence of this present

evil world. Now, it should be our care, beloved Christian reader, to

maintain the integrity of this connection. Of course, it is only by

the gracious energy of the Holy Ghost that we can do so; but we ought

to seek earnestly to understand and practically carry out the blessed

link of connection between the death of Christ as an atonement for sin

and as the moral power of separation from this world. Many of the people

of God never get beyond the former, if they even get that length. Many

seem to be quite satisfied with the knowledge of the forgiveness of sins

through the atoning work of Christ, while, at the same time, they fail to

realize deadness to the world in virtue of the death of Christ and their

identification with Him therein.

Now, when we stand and gaze upon the burning of the red heifer in

Numbers xix.—when we examine that mystic heap of ashes, what do we

find? It may be said, in reply, We find our sins there. True, thanks

be to God and to the Son of His love, we do indeed find our sins, our

iniquities, our trespasses, our deep crimson guilt, all reduced to ashes;

but is there nothing more? can we not, by a careful analysis, discover

more? Unquestionably. We find nature there, in every stage of its

existence—from the highest to the lowest point in its history. Moreover,

we find all the glory of this world there. The cedar and the hyssop

represent nature in its widest extremes; and in giving its extremes,

they take in all that lies between. “Solomon spake of trees, from the

cedar-tree that is in Lebanon even unto the hyssop that springeth out of

the wall.”

“Scarlet” is viewed, by those who have carefully examined Scripture on

the point, as the type or expression of human splendor, worldly grandeur,

the glory of this world, the glory of man. Hence, therefore, we see in

the burning of the heifer, the end of all worldly greatness, human glory,

and the complete setting aside of the flesh with all its belongings.

This renders the burning of the heifer deeply significant. It shadows

forth a truth too little known, and when known, too readily forgotten—a

truth embodied in these memorable words of the apostle, “God forbid that

I should glory save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, whereby the

world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.”

We are all far too prone to accept the cross as the ground of escape from

all the consequences of our sins, and of full acceptance with God, and,

at the same time, refuse it as the ground of our complete separation from

the world. True it is, thanks and praise be to our God, the solid ground

of our deliverance from guilt and consequent condemnation; but it is

more than this. It has severed us forever from all that pertains to this

world, through which we are passing. Are my sins put away? Yes, blessed

be the God of all grace. According to what? According to the perfection

of Christ’s atoning sacrifice as estimated by God Himself. Well, then,

such precisely is the measure of our deliverance from this present evil

world—from its fashions, its maxims, its habits, its principles. The

believer has absolutely nothing in common with this world, in so far

as he enters into the spirit and power of the cross of the Lord Jesus

Christ. That cross has dislodged him from every thing here below, and

made him a pilgrim and a stranger in this world. The truly devoted heart

sees the dark shadow of the cross looming over all the glitter and glare,

the pomp and fashion of this world. Paul saw this, and the sight of it

caused him to esteem the world, in its very highest aspect, in its most

attractive forms, in its brightest glories, as dross.

Such was the estimate formed of this world by one who had been brought up

at the feet of Gamaliel. “The world is crucified unto me,” said he, “and

I unto the world.” Such was Paul, and such should every Christian be—a

stranger on earth, a citizen of heaven, and this not merely in sentiment

and theory, but in downright fact and reality; for as surely as our

deliverance from hell is more than a mere sentiment or theory, so surely

is our separation from this present evil age. The one is as positive and

as real as the other.

But here let us ask, Why is not this great practical truth more pressed

home upon the hearts of evangelical Christians at the present moment? why

are we so slow to urge upon one another the separating power of the cross

of Christ? If my heart loves Jesus, I shall not seek a place, a portion,

or a name where He only found a malefactor’s cross. This, dear reader,

is the simple way to look at the matter. Do you really love Christ? has

your heart been touched and attracted by His wondrous love to you? If so,

remember that He was cast out by this world. Yes, Jesus was and still is

an outcast from this world. There is no change. The world is the world

still; and be it remembered that one of Satan’s special devices is to

lead people to accept salvation from Christ, while at the same time they

refuse to be identified with Him in His rejection—to avail themselves of

the atoning work of the cross, while abiding comfortably in the world

that is stained with the guilt of nailing Christ thereto. In other words,

he leads people to think and to say that the offense of the cross has

ceased; that the world of the nineteenth century is totally different

from the world of the first; that if the Lord Jesus were on earth now,

He would meet with very different treatment from that which He received

then; that it is not now a pagan world, but a Christian one, and this

makes a material and a fundamental difference; that now it is quite right

for a Christian to accept of citizenship in this world—to have a name, a

place, and a portion here, seeing it is not the same world at all as that

which nailed the Son of God to Calvary’s cursed tree.

Now, we feel it incumbent on us to press upon all who read these lines

that this is, in very deed, a lie of the arch-enemy of souls. The world

is not changed. It may have changed its dress, but it has not changed

its nature, its spirit, its principles. It hates Jesus as cordially as

when the cry went forth, “Away with Him! Crucify Him!” There is really no

change. If only we try the world by the same grand test, we shall find

it to be the same evil, God-hating, Christ-rejecting world as ever. And

what is that test? Christ crucified. May this solemn truth be engraved

on our hearts. May we realize and manifest its formative power. May it

detach us more completely from all that belongs to the world. May we be

enabled to understand more fully the truth presented in the ashes of the

red heifer. Then shall our separation from the world, and our dedication

to Christ, be more intense and real. The Lord, in His exceeding goodness,

grant that thus it may be, with all His people, in this day of hollow,

worldly, half-and-half profession.

Let us now consider for a moment how the ashes were to be applied.

“He that toucheth the dead body of any man shall be unclean seven days.

He shall purify himself with it on the third day, and on the seventh day

he shall be clean; but if he purify not himself the third day, then the

seventh day he shall not be clean. Whosoever toucheth the dead body of

any man that is dead, and purifieth not himself, defileth the tabernacle

of the Lord; and that soul shall be cut off from Israel; because the

water of separation was not sprinkled upon him, he shall be unclean; his

uncleanness is yet upon him.”

It is a solemn thing to have to do with God—to walk with Him, from day

to day, in the midst of a defiled and defiling scene. He cannot tolerate

any uncleanness upon those with whom He deigns to walk, and in whom He

dwells. He can pardon and blot out: He can heal, cleanse, and restore;

but He cannot sanction unjudged evil, or suffer it upon His people.

It would be a denial of His very name and nature where He to do so.

This, while deeply solemn, is truly blessed. It is our joy to have to

do with One whose presence demands and secures holiness. We are passing

through a world in which we are surrounded with defiling influences.

True, defilement is not now contracted by touching “a dead body, or a

bone of a man, or a grave.” These things were, as we know, types of

things moral and spiritual, with which we are in danger of coming in

contact every day and every hour. We doubt not but those who have much

to do with the things of this world are most painfully sensible of the

immense difficulty of escaping with unsoiled hands. Hence the need of

holy diligence in all our habits and associations, lest we contract

defilement, and interrupt our communion with God. He must have us in a

condition worthy of Himself. “Be ye holy, for I am holy.”

But the anxious reader, whose whole soul breathes after holiness, may

eagerly inquire, What, then, are we to do, if it be true that we are thus

surrounded, on all hands, with defiling influences, and if we are so

prone to contract that defilement? Furthermore, if it is impossible to

have fellowship with God with unclean hands and a condemning conscience,

what are we to do? First of all, then, we should say, be watchful; wait

much and earnestly on God. He is faithful and gracious—a prayer-hearing

and a prayer-answering God—a liberal and an unupbraiding Giver. “He

giveth _more_ grace.” This is positively a blank check, which faith

can fill up to any amount. Is it the real purpose of your soul to get

on—to advance in the divine life—to grow in personal holiness? Then

beware how you continue, for a single hour, in contact with what soils

your hands and wounds your conscience, grieves the Holy Ghost and mars

your communion. Be decided: be whole-hearted. Give up at once the

unclean thing, whatever it be,—habit, or association, or any thing else.

Cost what it may, give it up; entail what loss it may, abandon it. No

worldly gain, no earthly advantage, could compensate for the loss of a

pure conscience, an uncondemning heart, and the light of your Father’s

countenance. Are you not convinced of this? If so, seek grace to carry

out your conviction.

But it may be further asked, What is to be done when defilement is

actually contracted? How is the defilement to be removed? Hear the reply

in the figurative language of Number xix.—“And for an unclean person,

they shall take of the _ashes_ of the burnt heifer of purification for

sin, and running water shall be put thereto in a vessel: and a clean

person shall take hyssop, and dip it in the water, and sprinkle it upon

the tent, and upon all the vessels, and upon the persons that were there,

and upon him that touched a bone, or one slain, or one dead, or a grave:

and the clean person shall sprinkle upon the unclean on the third day and

on the seventh day; and on the seventh day he shall purify himself, and

wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and shall be clean at even.”

The reader will remark that in the twelfth and eighteenth verses there

is a double action set forth. There is the action of the third day and

the action of the seventh day. Both were essentially necessary to remove

the ceremonial defilement caused by contact with the varied forms of

death above specified. Now, what did this double action typify? what is

it that, in our spiritual history, answers thereto? We believe it to

be this: When we, through lack of watchfulness and spiritual energy,

touch the unclean thing and get defiled, we may be ignorant of it, but

God knows all about it. He cares for us, and is looking after us; not,

blessed be His name, as an angry judge, or stern censor, but as a loving

Father, who will never impute any thing to us, because it was all, long

ago, imputed to the One who died in our stead. But though He will never

impute it to us, He will make us feel it deeply and keenly. He will be

a faithful reprover of the unclean thing; and He can reprove all the

more powerfully simply because He will never reckon it against us. The

Holy Spirit brings our sin to remembrance, and this causes unutterable

anguish of heart. This anguish may continue for some time; it may be

moments, days, months, or years. We once met with a young Christian who

was rendered miserable for three years by having gone with some worldly

friends on an excursion. This convicting operation of the Holy Ghost we

believe to be shadowed forth by the action of the third day. He first

brings our sin to remembrance; and then He graciously brings to our

remembrance, and applies to our souls, through the written Word, the

value of the death of Christ as that which has already met the defilement

which we so easily contract. This answers to the action of the seventh

day—removes the defilement and restores our communion.

And be it carefully remembered that we can never get rid of defilement

in any other way. We may seek to forget, to slur over, to heal the wound

slightly, to make little of the matter, to let time obliterate it from

the tablet of memory. It will never do; nay, it is most dangerous work.

There are few things more disastrous than trifling with conscience or

the claims of holiness. And it is as foolish as it is dangerous; for God

has, in His grace, made full provision for the removal of the uncleanness

which His holiness detects and condemns. But the uncleanness must be

removed, else communion is impossible. “If I wash thee not, thou hast

no part _with_ Me.” The suspension of a believers’s communion is what

answers to the cutting off of a member from the congregation of Israel.

The Christian can never be cut off from Christ; but his communion can be

interrupted by a single sinful thought, and that sinful thought must be

judged and confessed, and the soil of it removed, ere the communion can

be restored. It is well to remember this. It is a serious thing to trifle

with sin. We may rest assured we cannot possibly have fellowship with

God and walk in defilement. To think so, is to blaspheme the very name,

the very nature, the very throne and majesty of God. No, dear reader; we

must keep a clean conscience, and maintain the holiness of God, else we

shall very soon make shipwreck of faith, and break down altogether. May

the Lord keep us walking softly and tenderly, watchfully and prayerfully,

until we have laid aside our bodies of sin and death, and entered upon

that bright and blessed world above, where sin, death, and defilement are

unknown.

In studying the ordinances and ceremonies of the Levitical economy,

nothing is more striking than the jealous care with which the God of

Israel watched over His people, in order that they might be preserved

from every defiling influence. By day and by night, awake and asleep, at

home and abroad, in the bosom of the family and in the solitary walk, His

eyes were upon them. He looked after their food, their raiment, their

domestic habits and arrangements. He carefully instructed them as to

what they might and what they might not eat, what they might and what

they might not wear. He even set forth distinctly His mind as to the

very touching and handling of things. In short, He surrounded them with

barriers amply sufficient, had they only attended to them, to resist the

whole tide of defilement to which they were exposed on every side.

In all this, we read, in unmistakable characters, the holiness of God;

but we read also, as distinctly, the grace of God. If divine holiness

could not suffer defilement upon the people, divine grace made ample

provision for the removal thereof. This provision is set forth in our

chapter under two forms, namely, the blood of atonement and the water

of separation. Precious provision! a provision illustrating at once the

holiness and the grace of God. Did we not know the ample provisions of

divine grace, the lofty claims of divine holiness would be perfectly

overwhelming; but being assured of the former, we can heartily rejoice

in the latter. Could we desire to see the standard of divine holiness

lowered a single hair’s breadth? Far be the thought! How could we? or

why should we? seeing that divine grace has fully provided what divine

holiness demands. An Israelite of old might shudder as he hearkened to

such words as these: “He that toucheth the dead body of any man shall be

unclean seven days;” and again, “Whosoever toucheth the dead body of any

man that is dead, and purifieth not himself, defileth the tabernacle of

the Lord; and that soul shall be cut off from Israel.” Such words might

indeed terrify his heart. He might feel led to exclaim, What am I to do?

How can I ever get on? It seems perfectly impossible for me to escape

defilement. But then, what of the ashes of the burnt heifer? what of the

water of separation?—what could these mean? They set forth the memorial

of the sacrificial death of Christ applied to the heart by the power of

the Spirit of God. “He shall purify himself with it the third day, and

on the seventh day he shall be clean; but if he purify not himself the

third day, then the seventh day he shall not be clean.” If we contract

defilement, even though it be through negligence, that defilement must

be removed ere our communion can be restored. But we cannot get rid of

the soil by any effort of our own; it can only be by the use of God’s

gracious provision, even the water of purification. An Israelite could no

more remove, by his own efforts, the defilement caused by the touch of a

dead body, than he could have broken Pharaoh’s yoke, or delivered himself

from the lash of Pharaoh’s taskmasters.

And let the reader observe that it was not a question of offering a fresh

sacrifice, nor yet of a fresh application of the blood. It is of special

importance that this should be distinctly seen and understood. The death

of Christ cannot be repeated. “Christ being raised from the dead dieth

no more; death hath no more dominion over Him. For in that He died,

He died unto sin once; but in that He liveth, He liveth unto God.” We

stand, by the grace of God, in the full credit and value of the death of

Christ; but, inasmuch as we are surrounded on all sides by temptations

and snares, and as we have within us such capabilities and tendencies,

and further, seeing we have a powerful adversary who is ever on the watch

to insnare us, and lead us off the path of truth and purity, we could

not get on for a single moment were it not for the gracious way in which

our God has provided for all our exigencies in the precious death and

all-prevailing advocacy of our Lord Jesus Christ. It is not merely that

the blood of Jesus Christ has washed away all our sins, and reconciled us

to a holy God, but “we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the

righteous.” “He ever liveth to make intercession for us,” and “He is able

to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by Him.” He is ever in

the presence of God for us. He represents us there, and maintains us in

the divine integrity of the place and relationship in which His atoning

death has set us. Our ease can never, by any possibility, fall through

in the hands of such an advocate. He must cease to live ere the very

feeblest of His saints can perish. We are identified with Him and He with

us.

Now, then, Christian reader, what should be the practical effect of all

this grace upon our hearts and lives? When we think of the death and

of the burning—of the blood and of the ashes—of the atoning sacrifice,

and the interceding Priest and Advocate, what influence should it exert

upon our souls? how should it act upon our consciences? Should it lead

us to think little of sin? should it cause us to walk carelessly and

indifferently? should it have the effect of making us light and frivolous

in our ways? Alas! for the heart that can think so. We may rest assured

of this, that the man who can draw a plea from the rich provisions of

divine grace for lightness of conduct or levity of spirit, knows very

little, if indeed he knows any thing at all, of the true nature or

proper influence of grace and its provisions. Could we imagine for a

moment that the ashes of the heifer or the water of separation would have

had the effect of making an Israelite careless as to his walk? Assuredly

not. On the contrary, the very fact of such careful provision being made,

by the goodness of God, against defilement, would make him feel what a

serious thing it was to contract it. Such, at least, would be the proper

effect of the provisions of divine grace. The heap of ashes, laid up in a

clean place, gave forth a double testimony; it testified of the goodness

of God, and it testified of the hatefulness of sin. It declared that God

could not suffer uncleanness upon His people; but it declared also that

He had provided the means of removing it. It is utterly impossible that

the blessed doctrine of the sprinkled blood, of the ashes, and of the

water of separation can be understood and enjoyed without its producing a

holy horror of sin in all its defiling forms. And we may further assert

that no one who has ever felt the anguish of a defiled conscience could

lightly contract defilement. A pure conscience is far too precious a

treasure to be lightly parted with, and a defiled conscience is far too

heavy a burden to be lightly taken up. But, blessed be the God of all

grace, He has met all our need, in His own perfect way, and He has met

it, too, not to make us careless, but to make us watchful. “My little

children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not.” But then He

adds, “If any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ

the righteous. And He is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours

only, but for the whole world.” (1 John.)

But we must draw this section to a close, and shall merely add a word on

the closing verses of our chapter. “And it shall be a perpetual statute

unto them, that he that sprinkleth the water of separation shall wash his

clothes, and he that toucheth the water of separation shall be unclean

until even. And whatsoever the unclean person toucheth shall be unclean,

and the soul that toucheth it shall be unclean until even.” (Chap.

xix. 21, 22.) In verse 18 we are taught that it needed a clean person

to sprinkle the unclean, and in verse 21 we are taught that the act of

sprinkling another defiled one’s self.

Putting both these together, we learn, as another has said, “that any

one who has to do with the sin of another, though it be in the way of

duty, to cleanse it, is defiled; not as the guilty person, it is true,

but we cannot touch sin without being defiled.” And we learn also that

in order to lead another into the enjoyment of the cleansing virtue of

Christ’s work, I must be in the enjoyment of that cleansing work myself.

It is well to remember this. Those who applied the water of separation

to others had to use that water for themselves. May our souls enter

into this. May we ever abide in the sense of the perfect cleanness into

which the death of Christ introduces us, and in which His priestly work

maintains us; and, oh, let us never forget that _contact with evil

defiles_! It was so under the Mosaic economy, and it is so now.

Notes on the book of Numbers · 第 13 / 22 章