Designed for protection against raids by our air-experts.]

_Tuesday, March 21st._--Returning from Westminster this afternoon I

stumbled in Whitehall upon a Member whom I had not seen in his place

this Session. "Going down to the House?" I asked. "What, is it sitting?"

he replied; and then it appeared that he was just home on short leave

after working hard "somewhere on the Continent," and had no present

interest in political controversy. As I reflected on a speech I had just

listened to, it occurred to me that the attitude of some of the

stay-at-home Members towards the War is much the same as that of my hon.

friend towards the House. "What, is it still going on?"

If the Germans were in occupation of the Black Country, if Oxford were

being daily shelled, as Rheims is, and if with a favouring breeze London

could hear the dull rumble of the bombardment, as Paris can, I wonder if

Members would still be encumbering the Order-paper with the sort of

trivialities that now find place there.

An exception may be made in favour of Mr. JOE KING. He has discovered a

little late in the day that a war is going on in Europe, and that it

affects a little country called Belgium, whose neutrality was guaranteed

by the Powers. He was anxious to know whether Belgium had formally

renounced her neutrality, and was no doubt greatly surprised to learn

from Sir EDWARD GREY that, owing to one of the guaranteeing Powers

having invaded her, Belgium had become a belligerent.

I do not know whether Mr. PRINGLE was in the House when this

announcement was made. But if so it evidently created no impression on

his mind. In the debate on the Army Estimates he followed Captain TRYON,

who had delivered an urgent appeal to the Government from the text, "A

strong Army and a shorter War." Mr. PRINGLE'S ideal is just the reverse.

In his view the Army is too big already, and is taking too great a toll

from our industrial and commercial population. The great men who won the

Napoleonic War--after twenty-three years--had not a big army; and the

consequence was that, while it was going on, British trade expanded by

leaps and bounds. To-day, owing to our disastrous military policy the

demands upon our tonnage were so heavy that people had to go short of

sugar and tobacco. Let us conserve our resources and be ready to dictate

terms when Germany has been financially ruined. When Mr. PRINGLE at last

sat down after three-quarters of an hour of this sort of thing I longed

for ten minutes of Mr. BALFOUR at his best. But he was not present, and

Mr. LONG was so much occupied in defending the Government against the

charge of having broken faith with the married men that Mr. PRINGLE

never got the trouncing he deserved.

_Wednesday, March 22nd._--One of the most cherished beliefs of the House

of Commons is that upon the Second Reading of the Consolidated Fund Bill

anything under the sun may be discussed. Colonel YATE was justly

surprised, therefore, when the SPEAKER ruled that he was out of order in

criticising the Indian Government for its conduct of the Mesopotamian

Expedition, and advised him to reserve his remarks for the Indian Budget

discussion--equivalent in these times to the Greek Kalends.

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN was surprised too, but, regardless of the ruling,

proceeded to make a carefully-prepared reply to the speech which the

Hon. and gallant Member had not been allowed to deliver. He frankly

admitted that there had been a lamentable breakdown of the hospital

arrangements, but steps had been taken to improve them, and a telegram

from General LAKE showed that the treatment of the men wounded in the

recent engagement was satisfactory.

Mr. PEMBERTON-BILLING essayed another and a longer flight to-day, but

had a good deal of engine trouble. His Parliamentary friends ought to

have warned him that the House does not care to listen to a man reading

extracts from his own leading articles, however prophetic they may have

been; that the constant reiteration of a phrase such as "I would like to

suggest, Mr. SPEAKER," soon becomes tiresome, and that to call somebody

else "the De Rougemont of the air" is to invite the _tu quoque_. Members

became more and more impatient as the orator became more and more

dogmatic; and when he rhetorically demanded the name of "one man to whom

we could turn to solve the problem" they derisively chorused, "BILLING!"

Mr. TENNANT, recognising the feeling of the House, did not spend much

time in refuting Mr. BILLING's wild assertions, but devoted most of his

speech to replying to Mr. JOYNSON-HICKS, who had pleaded that the

East-Coast towns should be more promptly warned of approaching

air-raids. He had personally investigated the arrangements and was

positively "staggered" at "the wonderful network that had been set up,"

and he invited Mr. JOYNSON-HICKS to come with him privately and share

his amazement. Mr. ELLIS GRIFFITH was not convinced. He thought that

there were still too many strands of red tape in the network, and

reiterated the hope that the DERBY Committee would soon develop into a

Ministry of the Air.

_Thursday, March 23rd._--A distressing report in the papers this

morning, that the _Galloper_ had been blown up by the Germans, made the

friends of Sir FREDERICK SMITH anxious. Had he, on one of his periodical

visits to the trenches to see Friend WINSTON, stumbled across an enemy

mine? Happily the report was grossly exaggerated. The _Galloper_ was

only a light-ship, and had not been destroyed by the enemy but merely

withdrawn by the Trinity House; and on the Treasury Bench this afternoon

there was the ATTORNEY-GENERAL very much alive.

Mr. TREVELYAN had a motion on the paper condemning the administration of

the Defence of the Realm Act, and in support of it produced a sheaf of

cases, in which he said the Government had abused its powers. Among

other acts of vile oppression they had ravished from her home, on

September 1st, while her father was away shooting partridges, and had

subsequently interned without trial, a young lady against whom no charge

had been formulated. It sounded very dreadful, and someone called out,

"Is this a Russian case?"

Then arose Sir F. E. SMITH, and with a few forensic gestures demolished

the house of cards that Mr. TREVELYAN had so laboriously erected. Most

of his cases were out of court because they had already been in court,

the decisions he impugned being those of the magistrates. As for the

daughter of the partridge-slayer she was an associate of a notorious

German spy, and had come back from Switzerland with a message for one of

his agents. As her case had been fully considered by the late HOME

SECRETARY he suggested that Mr. TREVELYAN should talk to him about it.

This was the most pungent speech of the afternoon. The most amusing was

that of Mr. GINNELL, who kept the House in fits of laughter for ten

minutes while in his most rasping tones he jerked out epigrams against

"this thing calling itself a Government." The Coalition was described as

"two poisons blended, which could not make a wholesome drink." Never

before has he had such a success. I only hope it will not turn his head

and encourage him to attempt conscious humour.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Veteran_ (_instructing "Bantam" in his duties as

sentry_). "You look over there--there's the Germans. Don't you worry

about them--_they_ won't 'urt you. But you watch those blinking rats.

_They'll_ get you by the back of the leg and pull you off the bloomin'

fire-step in no time!"]

* * * * *

"The World at War at ---- Theatre Only."

_Advt. in Evening Paper._

We are relieved to find that the area of conflict has been so much

restricted.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 150, March 29, 1916 · 第 25 / 36 题