THE NOVELIST'S VADE MECUM.

(_Compiled by a Publisher with strong views on the Subject._)

_Question._ Which do you prefer--a novel in three volumes, or in one

single tome?

_Answer._ That is a matter that entirely depends upon terms.

_Q._ Then you are indifferent as to length?

_A._ In everything save the figures of a cheque.

_Q._ But is not Art your first consideration?

_A._ Certainly, when it leads to a substantial balance at my bankers.

_Q._ Then you write for your living?

_A._ Certainly, or I shouldn't live at all.

_Q._ Which do you prefer--a story produced in parts, or a story

published as a whole?

_A._ Again a question of terms. Still, if remuneration is equal,

sketches of character are easier than construction of plot.

_Q._ When is the latter necessary?

_A._ When the novel is written for a serial, and is published with the

standing announcement (frequently repeated), "to be continued in our

next."

_Q._ Is it difficult to sketch character?

_A._ Not if you do not mind irritating your friends and driving your

foes into lunacy.

_Q._ How do you irritate your friends?

_A._ By reproducing in an amusing manner their peculiarities.

_Q._ And how do you madden your foes?

_A._ By passing them over in a dead silence, and sternly refusing to

recognise their existence.

_Q._ How should you treat your contemporaries?

_A._ If you appreciate your work at its proper (that is to say, your

_own_) value, you will not admire contemporaries.

_Q._ And what will you say of authors of the past?

_A._ That it is fortunate that they did live in the past, as they

certainly do not exist in the present, and will certainly not revive in

the future.

_Q._ How should you criticise a contemporary's novel?

_A._ If you are sure of his influencing a criticism of your own work

favourably, praise his romance sky high. If he is, from a reviewer's

point of view, a negligable quantity, why, treat him on that basis.

_Q._ Then what is your motto?

_A._ "Nothing for nothing."

_Q._ Do you consider a novelist's life the best possible form of

existence?

_A._ I should say yes if I did not know of a form of existence to be

even better.

_Q._ And what is that?

_A._ Inheriting a fortune, putting your hands in your pockets, and for

the rest of your life doing nothing.

* * * * *

[Illustration: PREHISTORIC PEEPS.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 107, December 1, 1894 · 第 17 / 28 题