INTRODUCTION

The customary antithesis between "American" literature and "English"

literature is unfortunate and misleading in that it seems to exclude

American authors from the noble roll of those who have contributed to

the literature of our mother-tongue. Of course, when we consider it

carefully we cannot fail to see that the literature of a language is one

and indivisible and that the nativity or the domicile of those who make

it matters nothing. Just as Alexandrian literature is Greek, so American

literature is English; and as Theocritus demands inclusion in any

account of Greek literature, so Thoreau cannot be omitted from any

history of English literature as a whole. The works of Anthony Hamilton

and Rousseau, Mme. de Staël and M. Maeterlinck are not more indisputably

a part of the literature of the French language than the works of

Franklin and Emerson, of Hawthorne and Poe are part of the literature of

the English language. Theocritus may never have set foot on the soil of

Greece, and Thoreau never adventured himself on the Atlantic to visit

the island-home of his ancestors; yet the former expressed himself in

Greek and the latter in English,--and how can either be neglected in any

comprehensive survey of the literature of his own tongue?

None the less is it undeniable that there is in Franklin and Emerson, in

Walt Whitman and Mark Twain, whatever their mastery of the idiom they

inherited in common with Steele and Carlyle, with Browning and Lamb, an

indefinable and intangible flavor which distinguishes the first group

from the second. The men who have set down the feelings and the

thoughts, the words and the deeds of the inhabitants of the United

States have not quite the same outlook on life that we find in the men

who have made a similar record in the British Isles. The social

atmosphere is not the same on the opposite shores of the Western ocean;

and the social organization is different in many particulars. For all

that American literature is,--in the apt phrase of Mr. Howells,--"a

condition of English literature," nevertheless it is also distinctively

American. American writers are as loyal to the finer traditions of

English literature as British writers are; they take an equal pride that

they are also heirs of Chaucer and Dryden and subjects of King

Shakspere; yet they cannot help having the note of their own

nationality.

Green, when he came to the Fourth of July, 1776, declared that

thereafter the history of the English-speaking people flowed in two

currents; and it is equally obvious that the stream of English

literature has now two channels. The younger and the smaller is

American--and what can we call the older and the ampler except British?

A century ago there were published collections entitled the _British

Poets_, the _British Novelists_, and the _British Essayists_; and the

adjective was probably then chosen to indicate that these gatherings

included the work of Scotch and Irish writers. Whatever the reason, the

choice was happy; and the same adjective would serve to indicate now

that the selections excluded the work of American writers. The British

branch of English literature is the richer and the more various; yet the

American branch has its own richness and its own variety, even if these

qualities have revealed themselves only in the past hundred years.

It may be noted also that although American literature has not been

adorned by so great a galaxy of brilliant names as illumined British

literature in the nineteenth century, it has had the good fortune to

possess more authors of cosmopolitan fame than can be found in the

German literature of the past hundred years, in the Italian, or in the

Spanish. A forgotten American essayist once asserted that "foreign

nations are a contemporaneous posterity," and even if this smart saying

is not to be taken too literally, it has its significance. There is

therefore food for thought in the fact that at least half a dozen, not

to say half a score, of American authors have won wide popularity

outside the limits of their own language,--a statement which could not

be made of as many German or Italian or Spanish authors of the

nineteenth century. From the death of Goethe to the arrival of the

playwrights of the present generation, perhaps Heine is the sole German

writer either of prose or of verse who has established his reputation

broadly among the readers of other tongues than his own. And not more

than one or two Spanish or Italian authors have been received even by

their fellow Latins, as warmly as the French and the Germans have

welcomed Cooper and Poe, Emerson and Mark Twain.

It is to present typical and characteristic examples of the American

contribution to English literature in the essay-form that this volume

has been prepared. Perhaps the term "essay-form" is not happily chosen

since the charm of the essay lies in the fact that it is not formal,

that it may be whimsical in its point of departure, and capricious in

its ramblings after it has got itself under way. Even the Essay is

itself a chameleon, changing color while we study it. There is little in

common between Locke's austere _Essay on the Human Understanding_ and

Lamb's fantastic and frolicsome essay on _Roast Pig_. He would be bold

indeed who should take compass and chain to measure off the precise

territory of the Essay and to mark with scientific exactness the

boundaries which separate it from the Address on the one side and from

the Letter on the other.

"Some (there are) that turn over all books and are equally searching in

all papers," said Ben Jonson; "that write out of what they presently

find or meet, without choice.... Such are all the Essayists, ever their

master Montaigne." Bacon and Emerson followed in the footsteps of

Montaigne, and present us with the results of their browsings among

books and of their own dispersed meditations. In their hands the essay

lacks cohesion and unity; it is essentially discursive. Montaigne never

stuck to his text, when he had one; and the paragraphs of any of

Emerson's essays might be shuffled without increasing their fortuitous

discontinuity.

After Montaigne and Bacon came Steele and Addison, in whose hands the

essay broadened its scope and took on a new aspect. The eighteenth

century essay is so various that it may be accepted as the forerunner of

the nineteenth century magazine, with its character-sketches and its

brief tales, its literary and dramatic criticism, its obituary

commemorations and its serial stories--for what but a serial story is

the succession of papers devoted to the sayings and doings of Sir Roger?

It was a new departure, although the writers of the _Tatler_ and of the

_Spectator_ had profited by the _Conversations_ of Walton and by the

_Characters_ of La Bruyère, by the epistles of Horace and by the

comedies of Molière. (Has it ever been pointed out that the method of

Steele and Addison in depicting Sir Roger is curiously akin to the

method of Molière in presenting M. Jourdain?)

The delightful form of poetry which we call by a French name, _vers de

société,_ (although it has flourished more abundantly in English

literature than in French) and which Mr. Austin Dobson, one of its

supreme masters, prefers to call by Cowper's term, "familiar verse," may

be accepted as the metrical equivalent of the prose essay as this was

developed and expanded by the English writers of the eighteenth century.

And as the familiar verse of our language is ampler and richer than that

of any other tongue, so also is the familiar essay. Indeed, the essay is

one of the most characteristic expressions of the quality of our race.

In its ease and its lightness and its variety, it is almost unthinkable

in German; and even in French it is far less frequent than in English

and far less assiduously cultivated.

As Emerson trod in the footsteps of Bacon so Washington Irving walked in

the trail blazed by Steele and Addison and Goldsmith; and Franklin

earlier, although his essays are in fact only letters, had revealed his

possession of the special quality the essay demands,--the playful wisdom

of a man of the world who is also a man of letters. Indeed, Dr. Franklin

was far better fitted to shine as an essayist than his more ponderous

contemporary, Dr. Johnson; certainly Franklin would never have "made

little fishes talk like whales." And in the nineteenth century the

American branch of English literature has had a group of essayists less

numerous than that which adorned the British branch, but not less

interesting or less important to their own people.

Among these American essayists we may find all sorts and conditions of

writers,--poets adventuring themselves in prose, novelists eschewing

story-telling, statesmen turning for a moment to matters of less weight,

men of science and men of affairs chatting about themselves and airing

their opinions at large. In their hands, as in the hands of their

British contemporaries, the essay remains infinitely various, refusing

to conform to any single type, and insisting on being itself and on

expressing its author. We find in the best of these American essayists

the familiar style and the everyday vocabulary, the apparent simplicity

and the seeming absence of effort, the horror of pedantry and the scorn

of affectation, which are the abiding characteristics of the true essay.

We find also the flavor of good talk, of the sprightly conversation that

may sparkle in front of a wood fire and that often vanishes with the

curling blue smoke.

It is the bounden duty of every maker of an anthology to set forth the

principles that have guided him in the choice of the examples he is

proffering to the public. The present editor has excluded purely

literary criticism, as not quite falling within the boundaries of the

essay, properly so-called. Then he has avoided all set orations,

although he has not hesitated to include more than one paper originally

prepared to be read aloud by its writer, because these examples seemed

to him to fall within the boundaries of the essay. (Nearly all of

Emerson's essays, it may be noted, had been lectures in an early stage

of their existence.) Furthermore he has omitted all fiction, strictly to

be so termed, although he would gladly have welcomed an apologue like

Mark Twain's "Traveling with a Reformer," which is essentially an essay

despite its use of dialogue. He has included also Franklin's "Dialogue

with the Gout," which is instinct with the true spirit of the essay; and

he has accepted as essays Franklin's "Ephemera" and "The Whistle,"

although they were both of them letters to the same lady. As the essay

flowers out of leisure and out of culture, and as there has been in the

United States no long background of easy tranquillity, there is in the

American branch of English literature a relative deficiency in certain

of the lighter forms of the essay more abundantly represented in the

British branch; and therefore the less frequent examples of these

lighter forms have here been companioned by graver discussions, never

grave enough, however, to be described as disquisitions. Finally, every

selection is presented entire, except that Dana's paper on Kean's acting

has been shorn of a needless preparatory note.

The Oxford Book of American Essays · 第 24 / 125 题