REVOLT OF THE CAKCHIQUELS.
1524-1525.
RETURN OF THE ALLIES TO MEXICO—FOUNDING OF THE CITY OF
SANTIAGO—THE CAKCHIQUELS OPPRESSED BEYOND ENDURANCE—THEY
FLEE FROM THE CITY—DIFFICULTY IN AGAIN REDUCING THEM
TO SUBJECTION—REINFORCEMENTS FROM MEXICO—CAMPAIGN
AGAINST MIXCO—CAPTURE OF THAT STRONGHOLD—FIGHT WITH THE
CHIGNAUTECS—SUPERHUMAN VALOR OF A CAVALRYMAN—CONQUEST OF THE
ZACATEPEC VALLEY—EXPEDITION AGAINST THE MAMES—DEFEAT OF CAN
ILOCAB—ENTRY INTO HUEHUETENANGO—SIEGE OF ZAKULÉU—SURRENDER OF
CAIBIL BALAM.
Pedro de Alvarado with his army arrived at Patinamit from his southern
campaign some days previous to the 28th of July, 1524.[XXVII-1] The
Mexican allies were soon dismissed and returned to their homes, bearing
despatches to Cortés. The general was greatly pleased with the tidings
from his lieutenant, and sent him two hundred more Spanish soldiers, to
aid in the colonization of those parts.
[Sidenote: FOUNDING OF THE CITY OF SANTIAGO.]
Almost immediately after their return to the capital of the Cakchiquels
the Spaniards proceeded to appropriate the territory and make
preparations for its government. A Spanish city was founded at Patinamit
under the name of Ciudad del Señor de Santiago.[XXVII-2]
The ceremonies were conducted with great pomp. According to Remesal, on
the 25th of July, St James' day, the army was drawn up in battle-array
to the sound of fife and drum. The morning was unusually fine, and the
sun flashing its rays upon burnished armor added splendor to the scene.
The cavalry were specially conspicuous for the brilliancy of their
dress and ornaments. After repeated volleys by the arquebusiers mass
was celebrated by Juan Godinez, the chaplain, and all joined devoutly
in the service. With due ceremony the new town was dedicated to their
patron Santiago.
The municipal officers were then appointed by Alvarado. The first
alcaldes were Diego de Rojas and Baltasar de Mendoza. Four regidores
were nominated, whose names were Pedro Puertocarrero, Hernan Carrillo,
Juan Perez Dardon, and Domingo de Zubiarreta,[XXVII-3] while Gonzalo de
Alvarado was elected alguacil mayor.[XXVII-4]
The municipality having thus been formed,[XXVII-5] the Spaniards for the
next three days devoted themselves to festivities and rejoicing. On the
12th of August[XXVII-6] there was an enrolment of colonists, of whom a
list of one hundred has been preserved.[XXVII-7] To the sacred patron
was also built and dedicated a church, of which Juan Godinez was left in
charge, and one Reynosa sacristan with a salary of sixty dollars a year.
The surrounding lands were then distributed in encomiendas. In making
these grants Alvarado must have entertained some misgivings as to their
validity and as to his future position and authority in the conquered
provinces, for in a despatch to Cortés he complains that according
to reports meeting him on his return from the southern campaign the
king had appointed a governor other than himself of the new territory,
and upbraids Cortés for not having duly reported his services to his
Majesty, at the same time begging him to do so.[XXVII-8]
[Sidenote: OUTRAGE UPON OUTRAGE.]
That the Cakchiquel nobles should regard with indignation this arbitrary
disposal of their lands and vassals was but natural. They had already
observed that friend and foe were much the same in the hands of
the voracious Spaniards, whose aggressive and outrageous action now
convinced them that the friendly bearing of their king had gained for
their nation no more, nay less, consideration than that vouchsafed
the conquered Quichés, who had fought manfully for independence. So
it was, in truth, with regard to all the conquerors in America, though
not so expressed in words: those who fought for their rights must die
or suffer enslavement because they offered opposition to the spoilers;
those who did not fight were contemptible things, unworthy a white
man's consideration. Believing in their promises, the Cakchiquels
had received the Spaniards and had accepted their sovereign; but they
were not prepared to go so far as to surrender themselves, their wives
and little ones, their lands and their religion. Death might be the
result of revolt; judging from what they had seen it probably would be;
nevertheless they would revolt and die. How high the high hand of the
taskmasters had been raised we know not; but we know that within a few
short months after Alvarado's return and the founding of his unstable
city[XXVII-9] the Cakchiquels rose to a man against the tyrants. The
crowning grievance also is known. Exaction after exaction had been made.
The temples and palaces of Patinamit had been forced to contribute their
gold and silver ornaments until there was nothing left. Then a large
amount of gold[XXVII-10] was demanded of the king and nobles within a
stated time, which it was out of their power to supply. In their efforts
to obtain the so much desired yellow substance from auriferous streams
they brought in glittering pyrites, mistaking them for gold.[XXVII-11]
Alvarado, furious with rage, summoned the king and his courtiers before
him. "Why," he passionately exclaimed, "have you not brought the gold
and silver that I demanded of you? If I receive not soon all the gold
and all the silver of your towns, you shall have the choice of being
hanged or burned alive!" Then with a brutality that Caligula might have
gloried in he tore with his own hand from the nostrils of Sinacam and
two princes at his side the golden ornaments they wore as badges of
their high rank.[XXVII-12] This indignity cut the unhappy natives to
the heart, and bending their disgraced heads, bitter tears mingled with
the blood which fell at the feet of the Christian. "It is my will,"
added Alvarado, "that the gold and silver be here within five days. Woe
betide you if you bring it not!" and with a coarseness that equalled
his heartlessness he dismissed them from his presence.
[Sidenote: ABANDONMENT OF THE CITY.]
Nobles, priesthood, and people were already of one mind. The priests in
particular, seeing the desecration of their temples and the threatened
suppression of their religion, put forth all their efforts to rouse the
Cakchiquels from the vile thraldom. And while the nobles and people
proceeded as best they were able to collect treasures to meet the
last demand from the neighboring towns, the priesthood succeeded in
completing plans and preparations for revolt. They spread the report
that their deity, offended at the sacrilegious actions of the Spaniards,
had appeared to his ministers, announcing the speedy destruction of the
strangers. A priest of Chamalcan now presented himself before Sinacam
and his court. "I am the lightning!" he cried, with subdued vehemence,
"and I will strike the Castilians. With fire will I destroy them! When
I shall cause the sound of the sacred drum to be heard in the city,
let the king leave it and withdraw to the other side of the river, for
on the seventh day, Ahmak, will I strike the Spaniards!" These bold
and confident words had their effect. In their deep affliction the
Cakchiquels believed their god would help them, else of what value were
gods? and they secretly made all ready for the time the signal should
be given. The Spaniards do not seem to have had any suspicion of the
intentions of the Cakchiquels. On the very evening of the uprising
Alvarado, pacified with the gold that had been brought him, entertained
Sinacam and a large number of princes and nobles at a banquet, a
splendid banquet, whereat the guests feasted on their own of which they
had been despoiled. That night, while the Spaniards were asleep, heavy
after their revelry, the signal drum was sounded. The whole population,
men, women, and children, arose and silently withdrew with their king
and nobles from the city. It is not the only time in the world's history
that a people have abandoned home and fled from persecution, trusting
in religious faith. Now may the god in whom they trust help them, for
all other hope they have left behind! Crossing the ravine they turned
and awaited the expected miracle; all through the remainder of the
night they watched for the lightning and the fire, straining their eyes
afar, to the remotest corners of the heavens, to catch the first faint
gleam of that sacred flame which should bring them deliverance. But
alas! there was no light save that of the morning sun, which came to
dispel all hope. God and priest alike had deceived them; or rather they
themselves were deceived, had not understood aright, or were not worthy
of aid, or their desire would come in some other way—so their teacher
might have said. Now it remained only for them to perish, for they would
return, never![XXVII-13]
Alvarado well knew the meaning of this action when he heard of it. And
as he walked through the city, the empty houses and deserted streets
told him plainly enough that his atrocious system of oppression had
driven to despair a nation that had welcomed him with all kindness and
hospitality. The immediate cause and incentive to revolt, the action of
the priest, being explained to him, he hoped when the Cakchiquels had
discovered how vain was the hope in their god that they would return
to their homes again, and for ten days he remained inactive. But all
attempts at reconciliation were repelled; they would rather die at war
with the Christians than live at peace with them. Ah well! then they
must be slain; and as a religious and patriotic duty Alvarado took the
field against them. It was a long and bloody war that followed. If the
Quichés and Zutugils had confederated with the Cakchiquels, it is safe
to surmise the Spaniards would have been repelled. With a scarcity of
provisions,[XXVII-14] and a reduced number of Mexican auxiliaries,
hemmed in and harassed, it is hardly possible that they could have
fought their way out of the country. But the rejection by Sinacam of the
earlier proposals of the Quichés, and his alliance with the invaders,
still rankled in their breasts, and they now cared little which of
their detested foes ate the other. As it was, the war proved not the
one-sided affair of late so common. The Cakchiquels displayed a skill
and bravery in battle such as the Spaniards had not experienced in
these parts. In front of their lines they dug deep holes in which they
planted pointed stakes, and concealing them with coverings of grass and
light earth, received behind them the charging cavalry. Many a Spaniard
and many a horse found death or frightful wounds, impaled in these
pitfalls.[XXVII-15]
[Sidenote: HATRED OF THE CAKCHIQUELS.]
On the battle-field the natives displayed a desperate courage. With
their deep hatred they would if possible envenom their arrows and darts,
and as they hurled them on the foe they shouted, "Take gold, Tonatiuh,
take gold!" Thus the contest was carried on with great animosity on both
sides, and the Cakchiquels, now more united among themselves, and joined
by many neighboring tribes, long maintained the struggle. Though their
own land suffered from the ravages of the Spaniards, they had their
revenge in devastating the territories of the Quichés and Zutugils; for
these nations had been so weakened in their contests with the Spaniards
that they could no longer meet the Cakchiquels in the field. And,
indeed, under this widely extended process of devastation the Spaniards
began to suffer hunger. Alvarado was obliged to abandon his new city at
Patinamit during the latter part of this year, 1524, and to make his
head-quarters for a time at Xepau,[XXVII-16] round which the country
was less desolate.
The Spaniards were indeed sorely pressed, and many Christians were
killed and wounded. But about the beginning of 1525 he received
reinforcements from Mexico which enabled him to proceed rapidly with
the reduction of the revolted provinces. Returning to Patinamit, he
subjected the several districts one after another to fire and sword,
till the land was one wide scene of desolation.
* * * * *
[Sidenote: CAMPAIGN AGAINST MIXCO.]
It was during, or immediately after, the suppression of this revolt that
the Spaniards accomplished perhaps their greatest achievement during
the whole Guatemalan conquest. This was the storming of the city of
Mixco, deemed impregnable.[XXVII-17] Mixco was one of the most important
strongholds in the Cakchiquel kingdom, being so fortified by nature as
to require little from art. Situated on an eminence surrounded on all
sides by precipices, it was accessible only by a steep path, wide enough
for but a single person, and interrupted here and there by places which
could only with difficulty be climbed.[XXVII-18] On the top of this
eminence was a great plain, capable of supporting a population of eight
or nine thousand.
Learning that the Mixcans had determined to resist Spanish rule,
and were encouraging other tribes to fortify themselves in similar
impregnable positions, Alvarado regarded the reduction of the place
as an absolute necessity. He therefore sent an advance force of two
companies of foot-soldiers and one of cavalry, under the command of
his brother Gonzalo, to invest Mixco until he should be able to assume
command in person. The captains commanding under Gonzalo, Alonso de
Ojeda, Luis de Vivar, and Hernando de Chaves, were men of high courage
and experience; yet they not only accomplished nothing, but suffered
so much from the stones and arrows of the enemy,[XXVII-19] provisions
likewise beginning to fail, that Gonzalo was about to raise the siege
when the lieutenant-general arrived with reinforcements.[XXVII-20]
Although fully recognizing the difficulty and danger of the undertaking
there were two incentives which urged Alvarado forward to its
achievement: he loved what was difficult and dangerous, and he well knew
that there could be no permanent subjugation of the country with this
stronghold in the hands of the enemy. A council of war was held and
the capture of Mixco resolved on. The first attempt was unsuccessful,
as were indeed the second and third, until days and weeks went by
without any seeming progress. Then the Spaniards tried stratagem, and
while feigning an assault by means of scaling-ladders at a place where
the precipice was lower than elsewhere, they suddenly made a rush up
the pathway, which they hoped to find undefended. The Mixcans were
prepared, however, and received the Spaniards with such heavy discharges
of missiles that they were forced to retire in confusion. While the
officers were in consultation shortly after, a strong body of native
warriors was reported near at hand, which proved to be Chignautecs,
allies of the Mixcans.[XXVII-21] Their intentions were evident, and soon
the two armies were engaged in hot contest. Notwithstanding that great
havoc was made by the arquebuses and cross-bows, and still more by the
cavalry, the Chignautecs maintained the fight with such stubbornness
that after the loss of a large number of Tlascaltecs and the wounding
of many Spaniards a retrograde movement was decided on.
[Sidenote: FIGHT WITH THE CHIGNAUTECS.]
Upon an occasion like the present, where the object to be gained, the
taking of a stronghold, partook more of the nature of single combat than
of general battle, here and elsewhere upon a campaign of this kind, it
was not uncommon to see feats of individual prowess cropping out on both
sides. It was the field of glory to the soldier, limited usually to the
field, as the world was the general's field of glory. I will mention one
such exhibition in connection with this fight against the Chignautecs.
In the hazardous retreat one of the cavalrymen, García de Aguilar, is
in the extreme rear, subject to the fiercest assaults of the pursuing
warriors. In truth, his body is interposed between the two contending
armies. Obviously, if the enemy cannot put him out of the way they are
unable to harm the others; every effort is therefore made to maim his
horse, or otherwise to capture him; and he is at length cut off from
his comrades and quickly surrounded by over four hundred of the dusky
foe, each eager to inflict the _coup de grace_. But Aguilar is by no
means vanquished yet. Though presently unseated, he maintains for some
time a desperate struggle, striking with deadly effect upon the enemy.
Then he loses his sword, and nothing remains to him but a dagger. It is
not in this instance the bravery of the man that astonishes so much as
his extraordinary muscular power. The horse, by kicking and plunging,
prevents capture, while Aguilar, circumscribed by threatening death,
exhibits almost superhuman strength. No blow dealt to kill or stun, no
attempt to seize him, can stop the quick stroke of that strong right
arm as it drives the keen steel straight into the assailants' vitals.
With wounds and ever increasing exertion, however, he grows weaker;
but capture signifies immolation. To be gazed at, helpless on a heathen
altar, an offering to odious gods—the thought is horrible—and the fatal
dagger is still, by swift movements, driven to the hilt. And now the
battle cry of Santiago to the rescue! rings in his ears and tells of
succor; he hears a leaden sound, as of crushed bone and flesh, and
the whistle of descending blades, and knows that help is at hand. Six
horsemen have plunged into the unequal contest, and they scatter the
swarthy foe like sheep. They gather round their countryman, support
his exhausted frame, and carry him wounded and faint to a place of
safety. The courage, strength, and skill of this single man, and the
valor displayed in his rescue, so impressed the Chignautecs that they
retired disheartened, regarding their efforts of no avail against such
beings,[XXVII-22] and they returned to their homes.
The siege had now lasted a month. On the third day after the retrograde
movement, which resulted in victory, the Spaniards determined to make
another attempt upon the place, and were on the point of assault when
an ambassador arrived from the Chignautecs tendering their submission,
and bringing the customary presents of gold, green plumes, and costly
mantles. It was, however, stipulated on their part that this act of
allegiance should be kept secret until the fall of Mixco; at the same
time the envoy intimated that their caciques would communicate privately
to Alvarado a secret that would be of service to him. Alvarado received
this message favorably, and sent back the emissary with every mark of
consideration, expressing his willingness to hear what the chiefs had
to say.
The distance from Mixco to Chignauta was nine leagues; and in three
days, during which Alvarado had refrained from active operations, the
principal caciques arrived at his camp. They were attended by a large
retinue and a number of natives bearing presents of great aboriginal
value and a large quantity of provisions. The disclosure made by the
caciques was to the effect that there existed a subterranean passage
from the stronghold, having an outlet in the woods near the river bank.
By this the Mixcans could escape, they said, even if the Spaniards
succeeded in storming the height. The outlet they were willing to
disclose, as they owed no allegiance to the Mixcans, who had incited
them to take up arms against the Spaniards. They moreover suggested that
an ambuscade should be placed near the mouth.[XXVII-23]
[Sidenote: THE FALL OF MIXCO.]
A force of forty men, cross-bowmen and cavalry, commanded by Alonso
Lopez de Loarca, was accordingly despatched to the exit of the
passage,[XXVII-24] and thereupon Alvarado determined once more to
attempt to storm the place. The front man of the storming line bore a
shield, and behind him followed a cross-bowman; then succeeded another
shield-bearer, supported by an arquebusier. This alternate order
afforded protection and at the same time admitted of assault.[XXVII-25]
The file thus formed was led by Bernardino de Arteaga, who had asked
for the dangerous post as a favor, and succeeded in covering his name
with honor. Calling on God and Santiago, they began the ascent of the
narrow ridge, which widened as it joined the cliff. While moving as
rapidly as possible, so that the showering stones and arrows might
have less effect, they nevertheless plied cross-bow and arquebuse with
deadly effect. They had almost reached a wider place in the ridge, where
four men might walk abreast, when the gallant Arteaga was felled with a
heavy stone, breaking his leg, but with indomitable will he struggled
on, supported by his comrade Diego Lopez de Villanueva.[XXVII-26]
Despite the terrible resistance they reached the broader space near
the cliff, which was packed with defenders so eager for a blow at the
assailants that many were crowded off the precipice by those behind. But
the stormers were by this time enabled to fall partially into line and
ply their blades. A hand-to-hand contest followed, and the ground soon
became thickly strewn with the bodies of slain Mixcans, among which were
heaps of lopped-off heads and limbs. More Spaniards and auxiliaries came
rapidly forward to aid in the slaughter as ground could be cleared for
them to stand on. The natives fought with desperation, but height after
height was lost to them, until their victorious foe gained at last the
plain above. There the Spaniards found fresh forces to oppose them. But
the Mixcans were by this time overawed by the extraordinary achievement
of the Spaniards; and as they marked these merciless white foemen, the
first who had ever planted foot within the precincts of their famed
and formidable stronghold, as they saw them moving onward and upward,
invincible as fate, it is no wonder that their hearts sank with despair.
Their opposition was wholly spiritless; they broke and fled at the first
charge. What followed was frightful, surpassing even the terrible scenes
to which these man-killers on both sides were accustomed. To escape the
fierce onslaught of the Spaniards some of the Mixcans plunged headlong
down the cliffs, the dull thud of their bodies, as they struck upon
the rocks, sounding ghostly echoes in the ravine below. Some attempted
escape by the now deserted path by which the assailants had come, but
these were captured by the camp guard. Some fled by the subterranean
caverns, but were pursued and many taken prisoners before they reached
the outlet, while those who had previously withdrawn thither with the
women and children, under the care of several caciques, on emerging at
the outlet were assailed by Loarca, and most of them captured.[XXVII-27]
Thus terminated this remarkable exploit of the conquerors. The city
was burned, the stronghold destroyed, and the population removed to the
site of the present town of the same name, situated in the Valle de las
Vacas.[XXVII-28]
* * * * *
[Sidenote: THE ZACATEPEC WAR.]
It was not long after the fall of Mixco that the conquest of the
Zacatepec Valley was accomplished. The towns of this district
were subject to the king of the Cakchiquels, but many of them,
especially Zacatepec, had thrown off their allegiance and declared
themselves independent, indignant at Sinacam's alliance with the
Spaniards.[XXVII-29] They had, moreover, repeatedly shown their
hostility to those towns which had submitted to Spanish rule, by making
incursions into their lands, and carrying off their women and children
to the sacrifice.[XXVII-30]
After the suppression of the revolt and the re-establishment of Spanish
power in the Patinamit district,[XXVII-31] the caciques of Xinaco and
Zumpango remonstrated with the Zacatepecs, saying that they were now
under the protection of the children of the sun, and should appeal to
them if the depredations on their lands did not cease. The unfortunate
men who carried this message were summarily sacrificed on the altar
stone, all save one, whose life was spared that he might carry back
the reply of the Zacatepecs: "Let the children of the sun bring to
life again the dead envoys. As for ourselves, we will not submit to an
unknown people, but will destroy all the villages of the caciques before
their allies can render assistance." Nor were they slow to carry out
their threat.
A large force invaded the territory of Xinaco and Zumpango, and
began to slay and lay waste. The natives sent to Guatemala to implore
assistance. Alvarado was at this time absent on his second campaign
to Salvador,[XXVII-32] carrying out his former intention to return
and bring the stubborn natives to a recognition of Spaniards' rights.
Nevertheless, one thousand Cakchiquels and ten arquebusiers, under
the command of Antonio de Salazar, a most competent captain, were at
once despatched to the scene of action, while Alvarado was advised of
what had occurred. Hostilities had already begun before these troops
arrived. For three days the Zacatepecs maintained the conflict with
great bravery, though with considerable loss. But now the Spaniards
received a reinforcement of ten arquebusiers, twenty horsemen, and two
hundred Tlascaltecs and Mexicans, commanded by Pedro Gonzalez Nájera.
The contest thereafter was not so evenly balanced, and the Zacatepecs
sustained several defeats. On the fifth day, however, they adopted
the plan of attacking in columns one thousand strong, successively
relieving each other, so that fresh men continually kept up the battle,
each column when relieved retiring to the rear.[XXVII-33] These tactics
enabled them to maintain the fight during the whole of that day, and
they inflicted no little loss on the Spanish forces. Early in the
morning the Spaniards took the field, apparently in disorder and much
reduced in numbers. Encouraged by the success of their new manœuvres,
the Zacatepecs attacked with contemptuous confidence. The Spaniards gave
way and retreated toward a thickly wooded ravine. The Zacatepecs now
felt sure of victory, and in their impetuous pursuit allowed themselves
to be drawn into the defile, where a large body of their enemies were
lying in ambush. Suddenly assailed on both sides, their disorderly ranks
were routed with great slaughter. Numbers were also taken prisoners,
among whom were many caciques. This battle terminated the war. The
whole Zacatepec valley submitted to the authority of the Spaniards;
and in order to insure future obedience a garrison of ten Spaniards
and one hundred and forty Tlascaltecs was stationed at Zacatepec,
under the command of Diego de Alvarado, the caciques being detained as
hostages.[XXVII-34]
* * * * *
[Sidenote: CONQUEST OF THE MAMES.]
About the middle of the year 1525 Sequechul, king of Utatlan,
represented to Alvarado that his father Oxib Quieh had not been so
guilty as he had supposed of the treacherous plot to destroy the
Spaniards the year previous, but that Caibil Balam,[XXVII-35] king
of the Mames,[XXVII-36] was more to blame, as the instigator of the
attempt. At the same time he offered to provide the invading forces
with guides if Alvarado would undertake the conquest of that kingdom
and punish Caibil Balam. Whether Sequechul's object was revenge for his
father's cruel death or favor with Alvarado is of little consequence;
the mention he made of the broad lands and great wealth of the province
fell pleasantly on the lieutenant-general's ear, and he willingly
acceded to the king's proposal.
The expedition was placed under the command of Gonzalo de Alvarado, and
consisted of eighty Spanish infantry, the captains being Antonio de
Salazar and Francisco de Arévalo, together with forty cavalrymen and
two thousand native auxiliaries, drawn from various districts, whose
commanders were Jorge de Acuña, Pedro de Aragon, Bernardino de Oviedo,
and Juan de Verastigui. These forces were, moreover, accompanied by
three hundred pioneers, with axes and picks, while a large number of
Indian carriers bore with them an ample supply of provisions besides the
baggage. Early in July the army marched to Totonicapan, a town on the
confines of the Mame territory, which was made the base of operations.
The usual difficulties of such undertakings here began. It took the
invaders no less than eight days to cross the mountain range between
that place and the Rio Hondo. The season rendered their labors the
greater, for the rain, day after day, poured down in torrents. Up steep
ascents, down dangerous gullies, they toiled, now winding in single
file along the edge of a precipice, now plunging over soft treacherous
ground up to the knee in mud. On reaching the Hondo[XXVII-37] they
bivouacked for two days in the dripping sunless woods on the bank of the
river, which, swollen by the ceaseless rains, for a time defied their
passage. At length they succeeded in crossing, and presently emerged
from the forests upon an open plain, and descried on an eminence the
Mame town of Mazatenango. It was a well fortified place, surrounded by
a barricade of heavy timber, behind which, on a terre-plein of mud and
straw, a great multitude of warriors were drawn up. A wide stretch of
swampy ground, not differing in appearance from the rest of the plain,
debarred approach to this side of the town. As the invading army drew
near, the Mames with hisses and shouts of defiance challenged attack,
in the hope of inducing them to charge into the swamp. Gonzalo de
Alvarado was, however, timely advised of the danger by his guides, and
making a detour he assaulted the barricade on the other side, where
the ground was firm. The assailants were received with a blinding storm
of missiles, which for a long time kept them in check. Their repeated
efforts to burst through the defences were baffled, and the auxiliaries
were becoming discouraged, when Gomez de Loarca with the cavalry plunged
through the palisade. The besiegers, pouring in through the breach,
could now fight after their own fashion; and though the Mames offered a
brave resistance, they were routed with great slaughter, and their town
taken possession of by the conquerors, who placed in it a sufficient
garrison as a protection in their rear.
[Sidenote: PRINCE CAN ILOCAB.]
Continuing their march, they encounter at no great distance from
Mazatenango an army of five thousand warriors from Malacatan, whereupon
Gonzalo takes up a favorable position on the plain.[XXVII-38] The
vanguard of the enemy is composed of slingers and archers, and the
main body of spearmen, commanded by the renowned prince Can Ilocab.
In perfect order, and with deafening sound of drums and conchs, they
approach the Spanish army. As soon as the vanguard has reached a
suitable point Gonzalo charges upon them with the cavalry. The arrows
strike thick as hail on the mailed breasts of the horsemen, drawing fire
therefrom; but the chargers dash through the ranks of the archers, who
with stubborn courage disdain to fly, while to avoid the fatal lance
thrusts they throw themselves under the horses, only to be crushed
and mangled by the iron-shod hoofs. And now the main body of the Mames
come up, and the Spanish cavalry have more difficult work. The charge
against those solid columns bristling with long spears is only partially
successful. The shock is sustained by the Mames with a firmness the
Spaniards are little accustomed to. The discomfited vanguard has time
to rally, and again the swift stone bruises, and arrows hiss and shiver
on helmet and coat of mail. All the forces on both sides are now in
action, and the slaughter of the Mames is dreadful, yet not one inch
will they yield. Rushing to close quarters, within their opponents'
breastwork of sword-points, and gliding along their lances, they so
hamper the Spaniards that they can hardly wield their arms. Bruised and
stunned, embarrassed in their movements, the blows of the Spaniards
fall more feebly, and they already begin to relax their efforts when
Salazar, one of the captains of infantry, seeing the imminent danger,
strives to rouse his men with spirit-stirring words. "Where is your
valor, Castilians?" he cries. "Does that courage sink which won the
blood-stained fields of Mexico and Utatlan? There you achieved renown;
lose it not here, nor suffer yourselves to be carried off to die on
the altars of these idolaters!" The appeal has its effect. With renewed
efforts the infantry mow their way through and through the Mame columns,
causing frightful carnage, but the warriors recede not one foot in
flight. For still waves in air their prince's banner; his plume nods
high above them all, and his voice still cheers them on. As long as he
remains they will fight, knowing no defeat. The Spanish captain is not
blind to this, for under the great Cortés he has learned that in their
leader lies the strength of the warriors, and he recognizes only too
clearly that Can Ilocab's death is their one chance of victory. For some
time the execution of Gonzalo's purpose has been delayed, but at length
by the surging ranks he is thrown near to the magic banner, and then
with desperate charge he urges his steed through the resisting guard
up to the Mame chieftain, and plunges the lance through his body. This
ends the battle, and the Mames, unconquered by sword and lance, on the
fall of their prince flee from the field and are pursued as far as their
town. The chiefs of the place at once send an embassy to sue for peace,
bringing with them a present of gold ornaments, and offering allegiance,
which is accepted. Leaving a garrison in the town, the Spaniards
continue their march in the direction of Huehuetenango.[XXVII-39]
[Sidenote: ZAKULÉU INVESTED.]
This was an important city of the Mames, where Gonzalo de Alvarado
expected warm work, judging from the late formidable resistance. On
arrival, however, he found the place abandoned, and such of the houses
as had not been destroyed stripped of furniture and utensils, without
a handful of provisions. Cavalry troops were sent out in different
directions, and one under the command of Gaspar Aleman fell in with
three hundred Indian archers, who without hesitation attacked the
horsemen, among others wounding Aleman in the face. But they were
soon routed, and in the pursuit three prisoners were taken, one of
whom was a chief named Sahquiab, a captain in Caibil Balam's army.
When brought into the presence of Gonzalo de Alvarado, he informed
him that his sovereign had retired to the almost impregnable city
of Zakuléu,[XXVII-40] where, provided with provisions and stores, he
deemed himself secure. The captive was thereupon sent by Gonzalo to
Caibil Balam with offers of peace and a charitable proposal to teach him
the doctrines of the Christian religion. But Sahquiab did not return,
nor came any answer to Gonzalo. A second embassy, composed of Indians
from Utatlan, was rudely refused audience with a shower of arrows.
This exhausted the patience of Gonzalo and he marched on Zakuléu. As
soon as his approach was observed by the Mames an army six thousand
strong sallied forth to give him battle. The engagement which followed
was maintained by the Mames with the same stubborn valor exhibited
in previous fights, and marked by similar carnage. A reserve of two
thousand, which sallied during the battle from Zakuléu to the support
of their countrymen, made an ineffectual attempt to turn the tide of
victory, only adding to the victims; and routed in all directions the
Mames fled to their stronghold in the mountains.[XXVII-41]
[Sidenote: PREPARING TO STORM ZAKULÉU.]
Owing to the impossibility of storming so impregnable a place as
Zakuléu, Gonzalo closely invested it by stationing troops at the
few points where egress seemed possible. On the third day of the
siege Diego Lopez de Villanueva, while reconnoitring with a body of
cavalry, observed smoke issuing from the woods on the other side of
the river.[XXVII-42] Having crossed with much difficulty, he fell in
with three hundred Indians in charge of a large supply of provisions,
which they intended to introduce into the beleaguered city, and which
Villanueva promptly appropriated.
The inactive warfare soon wore out the patience of the Spaniards, and
Gonzalo began to cut a road suitable for cavalry up the most practicable
part of the steep. Day by day, from morning to night, the sound of the
pick was heard, and the work continued uninterrupted with but little
loss to the besiegers, though the heights were thronged with Mames, who
used every effort to impede its progress. The cross-bow and arquebuse
were far more deadly than the sling and arm-drawn bow, and the Mames
suffered heavily.
In the midst of these operations an army of eight thousand mountaineers
appeared on the plain, presenting a most unusual spectacle—naked, and
hideous with war-paint, unrelieved by plume or ornament of any kind,
only by the glitter of their weapons. The Spanish captain immediately
made preparation for battle. Leaving a sufficient number to protect the
work and guard the camp,[XXVII-43] he advanced against them with the
remainder of his forces, and was soon engaged in a desperate struggle.
Three several times the ranks of the mountaineers were broken, and
as often did they rally and attack with ever increasing fury. Only
the steel and cotton armor of the Spanish forces saved them from
destruction. As it was, lance and sword, bullet and bolt, reaped the
usual harvest, and on the plain, saturated with blood and bespotted with
mangled bodies, the Spaniards at last stood triumphant.[XXVII-44]
Thenceforth the siege continued uninterrupted. The work of cutting the
road dragged slowly on, and by the middle of October both besiegers and
besieged were undergoing intense suffering. Within the city famine was
daily gathering its victims; every eatable substance, to the leather of
their shields, had been consumed, and the survivors were feeding on the
bodies of the dead. Scarcity of provisions, too, was felt in the Spanish
camp. But this was not the worst. The weather was unusually severe;
icy hailstorms and keen frosts caused much suffering to the invaders,
unaccustomed to the cold of that altitude. Fever and ague also attacked
them. From the rain and hail that fell the plain had become a swamp, and
day by day Gonzalo saw the number of his haggard troops' grow smaller.
A more speedy method of reducing the place must be adopted or the
attempt abandoned. Accordingly he sent off his sick to Huehuetenango,
and stopping work on the road, prepared to make the desperate attempt
to storm the place with scaling ladders.[XXVII-45] He had already
constructed a number of these ladders, huge in size and wide enough to
allow three men to ascend abreast, and was on the point of making the
attack when there appeared an envoy from Caibil Balam suing for peace.
This unfortunate ruler had previously attempted to escape by night with
his family and an escort of the principal chiefs; but having fallen in
with a patrolling party, he was wounded in the arm with a cross-bow bolt
and compelled to return. And now he had taken counsel with his chiefs
on the subject of surrender. He had represented to them that all hope
of relief was gone, while his famished subjects were dying around him.
Submission alone could save the few survivors. The chiefs had eagerly
approved his words, and the tender of submission was made. Gonzalo's
satisfaction at this unexpected termination of the siege was indeed
great. A spot midway between the gate of Zakuléu and the quarters of
the cavalry was appointed as the place of meeting for the settlement of
terms, and Gonzalo, accompanied by Loarca, Salazar, Arévalo, and twelve
others, there met the humbled Caibil Balam. The Spaniard's reception
of the native ruler was friendly in the extreme, and with an embrace,
Gonzalo assured him of his love and friendship. Under such kindly
treatment, so little expected, the stoical self-command of the weakened
warrior gave way, and he wept as he returned the victor's greeting.
[Sidenote: THE COUNTRY PACIFIED.]
The Spaniards then took formal possession of the city in the name
of the king of Spain.[XXVII-46] They destroyed the fortification at
the entrance,[XXVII-47] and made more practicable the road across
the ravine. The surrounding country was afterward explored and the
towns subjected to Spanish rule. In Huehuetenango Gonzalo de Alvarado
stationed a strong garrison, with Gonzalo de Solis as captain, and
having taken all the necessary measures for the permanent tranquillity
of his newly conquered territory, he returned to Guatemala City toward
the end of the year.
Henceforth conquest, oppression, and destruction marched hand-in-hand
over the country, and the result was a national and social eclipse of
the fallen races. Their arts and sciences were soon forgotten; their
architectural skill was lost; and from a state of happy development
their life as a nation was blotted out. To what extent the progress
of the world would have been benefited or retarded, had the aboriginal
inhabitants of the American table-lands survived as integral nations, it
is impossible to say; but we may question how much the occupation of the
country by the Spaniards contributed toward general advancement. It is
thought by some that the great Indian nations had reached the limit of
their present line of progress when the Spaniards arrived. In Guatemala
the individual kings had by long lines of succession arrived at that
stage of monarchy when power begets luxury and decay. Without European
interference there might have been a relapse and a dark age; and a later
view, had discovery been delayed to our own time for instance, might
have found Mexico and Central America overrun by savage hordes from the
north and ruined cities scattered over the land. To this fancy I am not
prepared wholly to subscribe.[XXVII-48]
FOOTNOTES
[III-1] The island known to-day as Hayti was named by Columbus
_Insula Hispaniæ_, Island of Spain. On one of his maps it is
called _Insula Hyspaniæ_, and on another _Hyspana_. By the
early navigators and chroniclers the name was turned into
Spanish and spoken and written _La Isla Española_, the Spanish
Isle, or _La Española_. _Hispaniola_, as it is called at a
later period by English authors, is neither Latin nor Spanish;
it may be a syncope of the words _Insula Hyspaniæ_, or more
likely it is a corruption of _La Española_ by foreigners to
whom the Spanish _ñ_ was not familiar. The choice lies between
the mutilation, _Hispaniola_, of English authors, and the
correct but unfamiliar _Española_, and I adopt the latter.
[III-2] Usually two royal officers went out by each departure;
a treasurer to take charge of the gold, and a notary to
watch the treasurer and write down what was seen and done.
The government was exceedingly strict in its regulations of
discoveries by sea, as well as in all matters relative to
commerce and colonization. Notice was given by Ferdinand and
Isabella September 3, 1501, by Charles V. November 17, 1526,
and by Philip II. in 1563, that no one should go to the Indies
except under express license from the king. In 1526 Charles
V. ordered that the captain of any discovering or trading
vessel should not go ashore within the limits mentioned in
his patent without the permission of the royal officers and
priests on board, under penalty of confiscation of half the
goods. The law of 1556 stipulates that ships must be properly
equipped, provisioned for one year, always sail in pairs, and
carry in each two pilots and two priests. In his _ordenanzas
de poblaciones_ of 1563 Philip II. directs that vessels
making discoveries shall carry scissors, combs, knives,
looking-glasses, rifles, axes, fishhooks, colored caps, glass
beads, and the like, as means of introduction and traffic.
_Recopilacion de Leyes de los Reynos de las Indias_, ii.
6-7. In regard to the share of the crown in the gold gathered
our popular writers seem to have found original authorities
somewhat vague. It is clearly enough stated that settlers
are to pay two thirds; the question is whether in relation to
discoverers gold is included in products of which one tenth
was to go to the crown, or whether the exception to a rule
was unintentionally omitted. Mr Irving glides gracefully over
the difficulty with the same degree of indefiniteness that
he finds in the authorities. Mr Prescott states positively,
_History of Ferdinand and Isabella_, ii. 488, that 'the ships
fitted out under the general license were required to reserve
... two thirds of all the gold' for the crown, quoting Muñoz
and Navarrete as vouchers, the words of neither justifying
the statement. Muñoz, _Hist. Nuevo Mundo_, i. 240, says, 'se
concedió á todos generalmente, sin mas gravamen que pagar
la décima de lo que se rescatase,' while Navarrete, _Col.
de Viages_, ii. 167, printing the _real provision_ itself,
states simply 'es nuestra merced que de lo que las dichas
personas hallaren en las dichas islas é tierra-firme hayan
para sí las nueve partes, é la otra diezma parte sea para
Nos.' The misstatement of the talented author of _Ferdinand
and Isabella_ is rendered all the more conspicuous when on the
very next page quoted by him Muñoz settles the whole matter
exactly contrary to Prescott's account. 'todos se permitió
llevar víveres y mercancías, rescatar oro de los naturales
contribuyendo al rey con la décima.' And after thus stating
distinctly that all might trade with the natives for gold
on paying one tenth to the crown, he gives the reason why
miners must pay two thirds to the crown; or if the recipient
of pecuniary aid from the crown, then four fifths; it was
because of the supposed exceeding richness of the mines, the
ease with which gold could be obtained; and, further, the
dependence of the crown on its mines, more than on anything
else for a colonial revenue. Prior to 1504 the regulation of
the royal share was not fixed, some of the traders paying one
tenth gross, some one fifth gross, and some one fourth net.
Bobadilla, in 1500, granted twenty years' licenses to settlers
in Española to work gold mines by paying only one eleventh to
the crown. Summarizing the subsequent laws upon the subject,
we find ordered by Ferdinand and Isabella, February 5, 1504,
reiterated by Philip, 1572, that all dwellers in the Indies
must pay to the crown one fifth of all gold, silver, lead,
tin, quicksilver, iron, or other metal obtained by them;
likewise traders were to pay one fifth of all gold, silver,
or other metals, pearls, precious stones, or amber obtained by
them. September 14, 1519, Charles V. declared that of all gold
received in trade from the natives one fifth must be paid to
him; and March 8, 1530, he said that where a reward has been
promised to a prospector of mines the royal treasury would pay
two thirds of that reward, and the private persons interested
one third. It was ordered September 4, 1536, and reiterated
June 19, 1540, that all persons must pay the king's fifth on
the before-mentioned articles, whether obtained in battle or
by plundering-expeditions, or by trade. Of all gold, silver,
pearls, and precious stones received as ransom of a cacique
or other principal personage the king was to have one third;
the remainder, after deducting the king's fifth, was to be
divided among the members of the expedition. Of the spoils
secured from a cacique slain in battle, or executed, one half
was the crown's, and one half, except the king's fifth, the
property of the conquerors. June 5, 1551, it was ordered,
and reiterated August 24, 1619, that beside the king's share,
there be levied a duty of 1½ per cent. to pay for smelting,
assaying, and stamping. By the _ordenanzas de poblaciones_ of
Philip II., 1563, the adelantado of a discovery by land, and
his successor, and the settlers were to pay the crown but one
tenth on metals and precious stones for the term of ten years.
_Recop. de Indias_, ii. 10, 68, 75-7, 79, and 480-1.
[III-3] The document may be seen to-day in the archives of
the Indies. Beginning: 'EL REY É LA REINA. El asiento que se
tomó por nuestro mandado con vos Rodrigo de Bastidas, vecino
de la cibdad de Sevilla, para ir á descobrir por el mar
Océano, con dos navios, es lo siguiente:'—it goes on to state,
'First, that we give license to you, the said Rodrigo de
Bastidas, that with two vessels of your own, and at your own
cost and risk, you may go by the said Ocean Sea to discover,
and you may discover islands and firm land; in the parts of
the Indies and in any other parts, provided it be not the
islands and firm land already discovered by the Admiral Don
Cristóbal Colon, our admiral of the Ocean Sea, or by Cristóbal
Guerra; nor those which have been or may be discovered by
other person or persons by our order and with our license
before you; nor the islands and firm land which belong to the
most serene prince, the king of Portugal, our very dear and
beloved son; for from them nor from any of them you shall not
take anything, save only such things as for your maintenance,
and for the provision of your ships and crew you may need.
Furthermore, that all the gold, and silver, and copper, and
lead, and tin, and quicksilver, and any other metal whatever;
and _aljofar_, and pearls, and precious stones and jewels,
and slaves and negroes, and mixed breeds, which in these our
kingdoms may be held and reputed as slaves; and monsters and
serpents, and whatever other animals and fishes and birds,
and spices and drugs, and every other thing of whatsoever
name or quality or value it may be; deducting therefrom the
freight expenses, and cost of vessels, which in said voyage
and fleet may be made; of the remainder to us will belong the
fourth part of the whole, and the other three fourths may be
freely for you the said Rodrigo de Bastidas, that you may do
therewith as you choose and may be pleased to do, as a thing
of your own, free and unincumbered. _Item_, that we will
place in each one of the said ships one or two persons, who in
our name or by our order shall be witnesses to all which may
be obtained and trafficked in said vessels of the aforesaid
things; and that they may put the same in writing and keep a
book and account thereof, so that no fraud or mistake happen.'
After stating further under whose direction the ships should
be fitted out, and what should be done on the return of the
expedition, the document is dated at Seville, June 5, 1500,
and the signatures follow: 'YO EL REY. YO LA REINA. Por
mandado del Rey é de la Reina, GASPAR DE GRIZIO.' All this
under penalty of the forfeiture of the property and life of
the captain of the expedition, Rodrigo de Bastidas. _Archivo
de Indias_, printed in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._,
ii. 362-6.
[III-4]
[Illustration: CARAVEL.]
[Illustration: GALLEY.]
[Illustration: GALEAZA.]
[Illustration: GALLEON.]
[Illustration: NAVIO.]
[Illustration: BRIGANTINE.]
It is often remarked with wonder in what small and
apparently insecure vessels the early navigators traversed
perilous seas and explored unknown coasts. That shipwreck
so often attended their ventures is less surprising than
that so many escaped destruction. Two of the three vessels
employed by Columbus were open boats, according to _March y
Labores_, _Historia de la Marina Real Española_, i. 98, of
forty tons each, and the decked _Santa María_, only sixty
tons. The term caravel was originally given to ships navigated
wholly by sails as distinguished from the galley propelled
by oars. It has been applied to a great variety of vessels
of different size and construction. The caravels of the New
World discoverers may be generally described as long, narrow
boats of from twenty to one hundred tons burden, with three
or four masts of about equal height carrying sometimes square
and sometimes lateen sails, the fourth mast set at the heel
of the bowsprit carrying square sails. They were usually
half-decked, and adorned with the lofty forecastle and loftier
poop of the day. The latter constituted over that part of
the vessel a double or treble deck, which was pierced for
cannon. A class of vessels like the _Santa María_, beside a
double stern deck, had a forward deck armed with small pieces
for throwing stones and grape. In the archives of Mallorca
is a picture of a caravel drawn in 1397, and a very fair
representation of those in use a century later may be found
on Juan de la Cosa's map. The large decked ships of from 100
to 1200 tons had two, three, or four masts, and square sails,
with high poop and sometimes high prow. In naval engagements
and in discovery the smaller vessels seemed to be preferred,
being more easily handled. Columbus, at Paria, complained of
his vessel of 100 tons as being too large. In his _ordenanzas
de poblaciones_ of 1563 Philip II. required every discoverer
to take at least two vessels of not over sixty tons each, in
order to enter inlets, cross the bars of rivers, and pass over
shoals. The larger ships, if any were of the expedition, must
remain in a safe port until another safe port was found by
the small craft. Thirty men and no more were to go in every
ship, and the pilots must write down what they encountered
for the benefit of other pilots. _Recop. de Indias_, ii. 5-6.
The _galera_ was a vessel of low bulwarks, navigated by sails
and oars, usually twenty or thirty oars on either side, four
or five oarsmen to a bench. It frequently carried a large
cannon, called _cruxia_, two of medium size, and two small
guns. The _galeaza_ was the largest class of galera, or craft
propelled wholly or in part by oars. It had three masts; it
commonly carried twenty cannon, and the poop accommodated a
small army of fusileers and sharpshooters. A _galeota_ was
a small galera, having only sixteen or twenty oarsmen on a
side, and two masts. The _galeon_ was a large armed merchant
vessel with high bulwarks, three or four decks, with two or
three masts, square-rigged spreading courses and top-sails,
and sometimes top-gallant sails. One fleet of twelve galleons,
from 1000 to 1200 tons burden, was named after the twelve
apostles. Those which plied between Acapulco and Manila were
from 1200 to 2000 tons burden. A _galeoncillo_ was a small
galeon. The _carac_ was a large carrying vessel, the one
intended for Columbus' second voyage being 1250 _toneles_,
or 1500 tons. A _nao_, or _navío_, was a large ship with high
bulwarks and three masts. A _nave_ was a vessel with deck and
sails; the former distinguishing it from the _barca_, and the
absence of oars from a galera. The _bergantin_, or brig, had
low bulwarks; the _bergantin-goleta_ was a hermaphrodite brig,
or brigantine, built for fast sailing. The name brigantine was
applied in America also to an open flat-bottomed boat which
usually carried one sail and from eight to sixteen men, with
a capacity for about 100 persons.
[III-5] The Spanish league varies with time and place. It was
not until 1801 that the diverse measurements of the several
original kingdoms were by royal order made uniform, the legal
league then becoming throughout all Spain 20,000 Spanish feet.
Of these leagues there are twenty to the degree, making each
three geographical miles, being, as specified by the law, the
distance travelled on foot at a steady gait in one hour. The
land league was, by law of Alfonso the Wise, 3000 paces, as
specified by the _Siete Partidas_. The discoverers roughly
estimated a league at from two and a half to three and a
half English miles. A marine or geographical league at that
time was about 7500 varas, or little less than four English
miles, there being nearly 17½ to a degree of latitude. In
different parts of Spanish America the league is different,
being sometimes quite short. In Cuba a league consists of 5078
varas, and in Mexico of 5000 varas. The vara is the Spanish
yard, comprising three Spanish feet of eleven English inches
each. Since the decline of Roman influence, the Spaniards have
had no equivalent for the English mile.
[III-6] See next chapter, note 18.
[III-7] Called by the Venetians _bissas_, and by the Spaniards
_broma_; a terrible pest to tropical navigators before the
days of copper-bottoming. This, and another tropical marine
worm, the _Simnoria terebrans_, brought hither by ships,
play havoc with the wharf-piling of San Francisco and other
west-coast harbors.
[III-8] The early chroniclers make their reckonings of
values under different names at different times. Thus during
the discoveries of Columbus we hear of little else but
_maravedís_; then the _peso de oro_ takes the lead, together
with the _castellano_; all along _marco_ and _ducado_ being
occasionally used. At the beginning of the sixteenth century,
and before and after, Spanish values were reckoned from a
mark of silver, which was the standard. A mark was half a
pound either of gold or silver. The gold mark was divided into
fifty castellanos; the silver mark into eight ounces. In the
reign of Ferdinand and Isabella the mark was divided by law
into 65 _reales de vellon_ of 34 maravedís each, making 2210
maravedís in a mark. To show how changeable were the values
of subsidiary Spanish coins, and how utterly impossible it
is accurately and at all times to determine by their names
the amount of metal they represent, it is only necessary to
state that in the reign of Alfonso XI., 1312-1350, there were
125 maravedís to the mark, while in the reign of Ferdinand
VII., 1808-1833, a mark was divided into 5440 maravedís.
In Spanish America a _real_ is one eighth of a _peso_, and
equal to 2½ reales de vellon. The peso contains one ounce
of silver; it was formerly called _peso de ocho reales de
plata_, whence came the term _pieces of eight_, a vulgarism
at one time in vogue among the merchants and buccaneers in
the West Indies. This coin is designated more particularly
as _peso fuerte_, or _peso duro_, to distinguish it from
_peso sencillo_, equivalent in value to four fifths of the
former. The mutilator of Herrera translates _pesos de oro_
as pieces of eight, in which as in other things he is about
as far as possible wrong. The castellano, the one fiftieth
of the golden mark, in the reign of Ferdinand and Isabella,
was equivalent to 490 maravedís of that day. The _peso de
oro_, according to Oviedo, was exactly equivalent to the
castellano, and either was one third greater than the ducado,
or ducat. The _doblon_, the popular name for the _excelente_,
was first struck by Ferdinand and Isabella as a gold coin
of the weight of two castellanos. The modern doubloon is an
ounce of coined gold, and is worth 16 pesos fuertes. Reduced
to United States currency the peso fuerte, as slightly alloyed
bullion, is in weight nearly enough equivalent to one dollar.
Therefore a mark of silver is equal to eight dollars; a
piece of eight, equal to one peso, which equals one dollar;
a real de vellon, five cents; a Spanish-American real, 12½
cents; a maravedí, 100/276 of a cent; a castellano, or peso
de oro, $2.56; a doubloon, $5.14; a ducat, $1.92; a mark of
gold, $128, assuming the United States alloy. The fact that
a castellano was equivalent to only 490 maravedís shows the
exceedingly high value of silver as compared with gold at
the period in question. The modern ounce, or doubloon, is
valued at about $16. As to the relative purchasing power
of the precious metals at different times during the past
four centuries economists differ. The returns brought by the
first discoverers began the depreciation, which was rapidly
accelerated by the successive conquests, notably of Mexico
and Peru. Any one may estimate; no one can determine with
exactness. Robertson, Prescott, and other writers make but
guess-work of it (see _Hist. America_, and _Conq. Mexico_,
passim) when they attempt to measure the uncertain and widely
diversified denominations of centuries ago by the current coin
of to-day.
[III-9] Las Casas, who was at Santo Domingo when the
shipwrecked mariners arrived, saw Bastidas, and part of his
gold, and the natives of Darien whom he had brought, and who
in place of the Adamic fig-leaf wore a funnel-shaped covering
of gold. There were great riches, it was said; three chests
full of gold and pearls, which on reaching Spain were ordered
to be publicly displayed in all the towns through which the
notary passed on his way to court. This, as an advertisement
of the Indies, was done to kindle the fires of avarice and
discontent in sluggish breasts, that therefrom others might
be induced to go and gather gold and pay the king his fifth.
Afterward Bastidas returned with his wife and children to
Santo Domingo, and became rich in horned cattle, having at one
time 8000 head; and that when a cow in Española was worth 50
pesos de oro. In 1504 he again visited Urabá, in two ships,
and brought thence 600 natives, whom he enslaved in Española.
In 1520 the emperor gave him the pacification of Trinidad
with the title of adelantado; which grant being opposed by
Diego Colon, on the ground that the island was of his father's
discovering, Bastidas waived his claim, and accepted the
governorship of Santa Marta, where he went with 450 men, and
was assassinated by his lieutenant, Villafuerte, who thought
to succeed him, and to silence the governor's interposed
objections to the maltreatment of the natives. Thus if the
humane Bastidas, in accordance with the custom of the day, did
inhumanly enslave his fellow-creatures, he gave his life at
last to save them from other cruelties; which act, standing
as it does luminous and alone in a century of continuous
outrage, entitles him to the honorable distinction of Spain's
best and noblest _conquistador_. As the eloquent Quintana
says: 'Bastidas no se hizo célebre ni como descubridor ni
como conquistador; pero su memoria debe ser grata á todos
los amantes de la justicia y de la humanidad, por haber sido
uno de los pocos que trataron á los indios con equidad y
mansedumbre, considerando aquel pais mas bien como un objeto
de especulaciones mercantiles con iguales, que como campo de
gloria y de conquistas.'
Among the standard authorities mention is made of Bastidas
and his voyage by Las Casas, _Hist. Ind._, iii. 10-12,
who refutes certain of Oviedo's unimportant statements in
_Historia General y Natural de las Indias_, i. 76-7; ii.
334-5; by Herrera, i. 148-9; Gomara, _Hist. Ind._, fol. 67;
and in _Galvano's Discov._, 99-100, and 102-3. But before
these I should place original documents found in _Navarrete_,
_Col. de Viages_, iii. 25-28, 545-6, and 591-3, and in the
_Coleccion_ of Pacheco and Cárdenas, of both of which works
I shall presently speak more fully. In tom. ii. pp. 362-6 of
this latter collection is given the _Asiento que hizo con sus
Majestades Católicas Rodrigo de Bastidas_, before mentioned;
and on pp. 366-467, same volume, is _Informacion de los
servicios del adelantado Rodrigo de Bastidas, conquistador
y pacificador de Santa Marta_. Next in importance to the
chroniclers are, _Historia de la Marina Real Española_, i.
284; _Morelli_, _Fasti Novi Orbis_, 11; _Robertson's Hist.
Am._, i. 159; _Help's Spanish Conquest_, i. 294; _Acosta_,
_Compend. Hist. Nueva Granada_, 21; _Irving's Columbus_, iii.
53-6, and _Quintana_, _Vidas de Españoles Célebres_, 'Vasco
Nuñez de Balboa,' 1. _Robinson's Acct. Discov. in West_,
105; _Lardner's Maritime Discovery_, ii. 32; _Holmes' Annals
of America_, i. 20; _Lerdo de Tejada_, _Apuntes Hist._, 89;
_Harris' Voy._, i. 270; _Major's Prince Henry_, 369, and like
allusions are worthless. In _Kerr's Col. Voy._, ii. 58-63,
is given a translation of Galvano. In Aa's collection the
narrative is substantially the same as in Gottfried's.
[IV-1] His nephew, Fernando, in his _Hist. Almirante_, in
_Barcia_, passim, and those who follow this author closely,
as Napione and De Conti, call him El Prefecto; Herrera, Diego
Mendez, Diego de Porras, Robertson, Navarrete, and others,
employ the title adelantado. Herrera says he was captain of
one of the ships.
[IV-2] Ferdinand Columbus, or as he is more commonly called
Fernando Colon, was an illegitimate son of Christopher
Columbus, by a lady of respectable family. He was born at
Córdova, and in 1494, after his father became famous, was
brought with his elder brother to court, where he was placed
as page to Prince Juan. Upon the death of the heir apparent
young Fernando served Queen Isabella in the same capacity,
thereby securing an excellent education. During this perilous
voyage he was an object no less of comfort than of anxiety
to his father, now infirm and troubled in spirit, and his
conduct throughout merited and received paternal commendation.
'El ha salido y sale de muy buen saber,' writes the fond
father, 'bien que él sea niño en dias, no es assi en el
entendimiento.' _Cartas de Colon_, in _Navarrete_, _Col.
de Viages_, i. 341 and 344. See also _Zúñiga_, _Anales de
Sevilla_. His manhood fulfilled the promise of his youth.
He cultivated literature with considerable success, and
became, as Muñoz, _Hist. Nuevo Mundo_, i. viii., expresses
it, 'doctísimo para su siglo, y de grandes pensamientos
en materias literarias, segun demostraré á su tiempo.' He
travelled extensively in Europe, in the train of Charles V.,
probably visited Africa and Asia, and is said to have made
two voyages to America after his father's death. He formed
a collection of over 20,000 printed books and manuscripts,
which went to the cathedral of Seville. He neither married,
nor left any recognized progeny. He was the author of several
works which have not been preserved, the inscription on
his tomb mentioning one in four divisions relating partly
to the New World and his father's voyages. Antonio de Leon
Pinelo, _Epitome_, 565, 633 and 711, speaks of a work,
_Apuntamientos sobre la Demarcacion del Maluco_, preserved
in manuscript at Simancas. The only printed book of Fernando
Colon is a history of the admiral, his father. The original
title is not known, the manuscript disappearing before its
publication in Spanish. Luis Colon, duke of Veraguas, and
grandson of the admiral, brought the manuscript to Genoa
about 1568, and delivered it to one Fornari, an old man who,
according to Barcia, began to print it in Spanish, Italian,
and Latin. Others assert that it passed into the hands of
Marini, who caused it to be translated into Italian by Alfonso
de Ulloa. _Spotorno_, _Codice Diplomatico_, 1823, lxiii.
Ulloa's translation, badly made from a bad copy—'sans doute
d'après un texte assez fautif,' _Humboldt_, _Exam. Crit._,
i. 13,—was printed in Venice, in 1571, under the title,
_Historie del Fernando Colombo; Nelle quali s'ha particolare,
& vera relatione della vita, & de' fatti dell' Ammiraglio
D. Christoforo Colombo, suo padre_, etc. It was reprinted
in Italian some six or eight times. A French translation was
published in 1680-1, and an English translation has gone the
rounds, appearing in _Churchill's Col. Voy._, ii. 480-604;
_Kerr's Col. Voy._, iii. 1-242; and _Pinkerton's Col. Voy._,
xii. 1-155. It was carelessly retranslated from the Italian
into Spanish by Andrés Gonzalez de Barcia, and printed in
his _Historiadores Primitivos de las Indias Occidentales_, 3
vols., Madrid, 1749, comprising pp. 1-128, tom. i., of that
series, and entitled, _La Historia de D. Fernando Colon, en
la qual se da Particular, y verdadera relacion de la vida, y
hechos de el Almirante D. Christoval Colon, su Padre_, etc.
This is the edition most commonly used, and to this I refer,
although I have before me an Italian copy of the edition of
1709. Fernando Colon had peculiar advantages for writing his
father's history. Himself an actor in the events described,
he was moreover personally acquainted with his father's
friends, and held possession of his father's papers. All
agree that he made good use of his opportunity, and that he
has given a clear statement of events which even in his own
time began to be distorted. If he was silent touching his
father's family, country, and birth, we must remember that
poverty and obscurity were a disgrace in those days, and that
the son Fernando was a Spaniard. Those who should best know
the merits of this author pay him the highest tribute. Of
his work says Muñoz, _Hist. Nuevo Mundo_, i. viii., 'Confieso
deberle mucho;' and the author Navarrete, _Col. de Viages_, i.
lxx., remarks, 'habló siempre con verdad y exactitud, salvo
alguna equivocacion fácil de discernir en buena crítica ...
y por tanto pueden aun estas leves faltas ser efecto de la
incuria ó poca inteligencia de ambos traductores.' Attempts
have been made to deny to Fernando the authorship, but this,
if correct, does not materially affect its value, since it
is allowed to have been written from his documents and under
his supervision. The vicissitudes to which the work has been
subjected and the mutilation it has suffered afford grounds
for caution not to be disregarded by the historian. Still, the
general tenor and details of the narrative, and the literary
bent of the reputed author, present in themselves sufficient
evidence of its authenticity.
With regard to the use of certain proper names encountered
thus far in this history I would say a word. The question
presents difficulties in whatsoever aspect viewed. There
are Spanish names of places and persons which custom has
so anglicized as to give to their use in the original the
appearance of affectation—instance Castilla, for Castile;
Sevilla, Seville; Fernando and Isabel, Ferdinand and Isabella;
Cárlos V., Charles V.; Felipe II., Philip II. On the other
hand, in writing in English of Spanish affairs, the attempt to
continue indefinitely the anglicizing of Spanish names would
be as impossible as absurd. The two chief objects with me have
been to adopt the best forms, and to preserve consistency; I
do not claim eminent success in either attempt. The result,
however, has been the adoption of the following method, if it
may be called a method: The prominent places and persons of
Spain, whose names are invariably given in their anglicized
form in current English literature, I write in the same way;
but those same names, as well as all others, appearing in
the New World, where no prominent English writers have made
them familiar in an English form, I present in the original
as written by the best Spanish scholars. Thus the name of the
great Genoese I give in its common latinized form, Christopher
Columbus, while in the use of those of his less eminent
brothers and sons, who soon became almost or altogether
Spaniards, I adopt the forms employed by Spaniards.
[IV-3] Instance the title-page of the first work published
on the New World, in 1493:—_Epistola Christofori Colom: cui
etas nostra multũ a debet: de Insulis Indie supra Gangem nuper
inuentis. Ad quas perquirendas octauo antea mense auspiciis
et ere inuictissimi Fernandi Hispaniarum Regis missus fuerat:
ad Magnificum dum Raphaelem Sanxis: eiusdem serenissimi Regis
Tesaurariũ missa: quam nobilis ac litteratus vir Aliander
de Cosco ab Hispano ideomate in latinum conuertit: tertio
kal's Maij. M.cccc.xciij. Pontificatus Alexandri Sexti Anno
Primo._ Letter of Christopher Colom, to whom our age is
greatly indebted, respecting the Islands of India beyond the
Ganges, lately discovered. In search of which he was sent
eight months since, under the auspices and at the expense of
the most invincible Ferdinand, king of the Spains. Sent to the
magnificent lord Raphael Sanxis, treasurer of the same most
serene king, and which the noble and learned man, Aliander de
Cosco, translated from the Spanish idiom into Latin. The third
day of the Calends of May, 1493. Pontificate of Alexander VI.,
Year One.
[IV-4] Guanaja is the most easterly of a group called the Bay
Islands. To the west of Guanaja, in the order here named, lie
Barbaretta, Helena, Morat, Ruatan, the largest, and Utila. On
Peter Martyr's map, _India beyond the Ganges_, 1510, Guanaja
is written _guanasa_. On map iv., _Munich Atlas_, supposed
to have been drawn by Salvat Pilestrina in 1515, Guanaja is
called _sam fir.co_, San Francisco; Ruatan, _todo samto_;
and Utila, _I:lhana_. Fernando Colon locates on his map,
1527, _y:llana_, _s:francisco_, and _todos sanctos_, and
between the last two, _sancta ffe._ On the map of Diego de
Ribera, 1529, are _s:franco_, _to stõs_, _la llana_, and
_s∴ fe._ Vaz Dourado, 1571, map x., _Munich Atlas_, calls
Guanaja, _lla ganaxa_; Ruatan, _aguba_; and Utila, _dotila_.
_Mercator's Atlas_, 1574, gives _Guanaxos_; _Ogilby's Map_,
1671, _Guanaja_, _Guajama_, _Roatan_, and _Vtila_; _Laet_,
_Novvs Orbis_, 1633, the same; _Jefferys' Voyages_, 1776,
_Guanaja_ or _Bonaka_, _Guajama_ or _Rattan_, and _Utila_.
Of Guanaja, Diego de Porras in _Navarrete_, _Col. de Viages_,
i. 283, remarks:—'es pequeña, bojará veinte leguas, no tiene
cosa de provecho.' Utila is low and level; hence the name,
La Llana. In his remarks on the two oldest maps of America,
Kohl says of Guanaja:—'Das Columbus sie schon gesehen hat,
ist zu bezweifeln, da er wohl nicht so weit westwärts segelte
oder blickte. Vielleicht sahen sie jedoch Pinzon und Solis
1508. Gewiss ist es, dass sie schon 1516 von einer spanischen
Expedition, die zum Menschenraub von Cuba nach Süden
ausgelaufen war, besucht wurde.' Fernando Colon complains that
Solis and Pinzon, visiting these regions in 1508, re-named
many localities, claiming to be the first discoverers, and
thus causing much confusion in the charts of the times.
And here as well as elsewhere I may speak of a work from
which I have derived no inconsiderable advantage in tracing
the metamorphoses of names from those originally given
to those finally established. Believing that much curious
and valuable historical information might be obtained by
instituting a close comparison of the nomenclature employed
by the earlier makers of charts at their respective dates,
in 1873 I directed Mr Goldschmidt to bring out and arrange
for convenient reference all such relevant maps as my library
contained. Beginning then with the earliest, we entered on
paper prepared for the purpose the names of all the principal
places contained within our territory. And so with the next,
and the next, through the successive periods of discovery,
following the coast on one side from Darien to Texas, and
on the other from Panamá to Alaska, and along the Arctic
seaboard to the Mackenzie River. Inland names were included,
but their number was small as compared with those along the
ocean. Some 200 maps, each original authority for its time
and place, were thus examined, and the names which had been
applied at various times and by various persons to the several
important geographical points along this vast shore line,
and throughout the inland area, were brought together so that
comparisons might be made, and the nomenclatural history of
the several places be quickly and correctly traced. All of the
authorities I cannot mention here, but they will severally be
referred to in their proper places during the course of this
history. The result of this labor at the end of six months, Mr
Goldschmidt working alone after the first fortnight, was three
folio manuscript volumes, entitled _Cartography of the Pacific
Coast of North America, and of the Eastern Coasts of Mexico
and Central America_. The maps more particularly examined in
writing this volume are as follows. Passing the sea charts
of Nicolo and Antonio Zeno, made about 1390, and used by
Frobisher; the ocean and islands between western Europe and
eastern Asia from the globe of Martin Behaim, 1492; the chart
of Juan de la Cosa, 1500, showing the West India Islands, but
omitting the coast of Central America; and the map of Johann
Ruysch, 1508,—we have, in part most important, the following:
Map of _India beyond the Ganges_, drawn by Peter Martyr in
1511, and showing a coast line from Brazil to the middle of
Yucatan. Along this line, in the order here given, from east
to west, are _vraba_, _tariene_, _el mamol_, _beragua_, _c
gra de dios_, _guanasa_, _b de lagartos_. North of Cuba is
a section of the continental shore line lettered _isla de
beimini, parte_. In Ptolemy's Cosmography, 1513, the coast
between Brazil and Florida is given, but without names. The
Atlantic is called _Oceanus Occidentalis_; and South America,
_Terra Incognita_. By Reisch, in _Margaritha Philosophica_,
1515, the map is called _Typvs Vniversalis Terre Ivxta_. Two
only of the islands are given and both called _Isabella_.
South of _Oceanus Occidentalis_ is a large continent called
_Paria sev Prisilia_, Paria or Brazil. There are no names on
the line of Central America, and the only lettering on the
small portion of the northern continent are the mysterious
words _Zoana Mela_, which have given rise to much discussion.
In 1859 was published at Munich, by the Royal Bavarian Academy
of Sciences, from manuscripts in the university library and
army archives, under the auspices of Friedrich Kunstmann, Karl
von Spruner, and Georg M. Thomas, and as supplementary to the
text of Kunstmann's _Die Entdeckung Amerikas_, a collection of
fac-similes of thirteen early maps of America, entitled _Atlas
zur Entdeckungsgeschichte Amerikas_. This work I shall cite
briefly as the _Munich Atlas_. Parts of the Pacific States
are shown on maps numbers iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. x. xii.
and xiii., which will be further mentioned in their several
places. Map iv. was drawn by Salvat de Pilestrina probably in
1515. It shows none of the main-land above Yucatan, which is
a peninsula. The northern coast of Central America is given,
and the southern seaboard only of the Isthmus. No names are
written on the southern coast. The South Sea is called _Mar
Visto pelos castelhanos_, Sea seen by the Spaniards. Map
v. is supposed to be by Visconte de Maiollo, 1519. It shows
the northern coast of the continent only from Cape Camaron
to about 30° south latitude. In a book entitled _Apiano,
Cosmographia_, 1575, a copy of a map supposed to have been
drawn by Peter Apianus in 1520, and the first upon which I
have seen the name 'America.' The northern part is long and
narrow, of a horseshoe shape, and lettered _Baccalearum_.
A large continent is placed north of a strait running round
the northern end of North America. Evidently Master Apianus
was determined no one during his time should out-north him
in map-delineation of a region of which absolutely nothing
was known, either then or for a long time after. On a map
of North America from the globe of Johann Schöner, 1520, the
name 'America' likewise appears, the lettering on the globe
being placed in Brazil, and being in these words:—_America
Vel Brasilia Sive Papagalli Terra_. The northern and southern
continents are separated by a strait at the Isthmus. It is
to be regretted that Master Schöner had not the making of
the world, so that it should agree with his map, and save
canal-cutting. The western line of the northern continent runs
north and south; the western line of the southern continent
north-west and south-east. The extreme northern end of the
northern continent is called _Terra de Cuba_. Along the
western shore are the words _Ultra mondv lustratum_. West of
the northern continent lie the large island of _Zipangri_ and
a multitude of islets. The north Pacific is called _Orientalis
Oceanus_. Cortés' chart of the Gulf of Mexico, 1520, is a
rough draft of oval shape with several names along the coast,
many of which are obsolete. Yucatan is represented as an
island. In 1860 J. G. Kohl published at Weimar a dissertation
on two of the oldest general maps of America, with the origin
of the names on each. The maps were those of Fernando Colon,
1527, and Diego Ribero, 1529, then in the grand-ducal library
at Weimar. The text accompanying these fac-similes is entitled
_Die Beiden Ältesten General-Karten von Amerika_. _Ausgeführt
in den Jahren 1527 und 1529, auf Befehl Kaiser Karl's V._ The
maps being full of names, concerning many of which there has
been much discussion, 185 royal folio pages are devoted to
their explanation. Beside a critical review of nomenclature
is given much information, both geographical and historical.
Colon's map shows the eastern coasts of North and South
America, and the southern shores of the Isthmus and Central
America to about Nicaragua. Ribero's map contains more names
than Colon's, and a section of the Peruvian coast; otherwise
they are not unlike. Continuing the present list we have all
of South America, and part of North America, given in 1527
by Robert Thorne; and the western side of the New World in
1528 by Bordone. Ptolemy, in _Munster_, _Cosmography_, 1530,
gives the two Americas entirely surrounded by water, with
Yucatan an island; in the interior of Mexico _Chamaho_, and
_Temistitan_; and near Zipangu _Archipelagus 7448 insularum_,
counted in all probability specially for this map. Orontius
Fine's globe, 1531, unites the southern continent, which it
calls America, by the isthmus _dariena_ to the northern,
which extends toward the north-west across the ocean and
forms part of Asia, with a continuous coast line to Japan.
The Atlantic is _Alanticum_, and the Pacific _Mar del Sur_.
Yucatan is an island. It is difficult to tell where Mexico
ends and Asia begins. _Temistitan_ is just south of _Catay_,
and Mexican and Asiatic names promiscuously occur. Grynæus,
in 1532, gives America in two parts, divided by a strait at
the Isthmus; the western end of the northern continent is
called _Terra de Cuba_. Map vi., _Munich Atlas_, 1532-40,
shows the Pacific coast from Peru to California, which is
represented as a peninsula. The gulf of California is called
the Red Sea. Yucatan is an island. Baptista Agnese, 1536,
gives North America in the shape of a horseshoe, with Yucatan
an island. Map vii., _Munich Atlas_, is supposed to be by
Baptista Agnese, 1540-50. It shows the whole of the Atlantic
coast, and the Pacific coast from Peru to Mexico. Ramusio,
_Viaggi_, iii. fol. 455-56, 1565, lays down about half the
Pacific coast. Maps ix. x. and xii., _Munich Atlas_, are
supposed to have been drawn by Vaz Dourado in 1571. The first
delineates South America, and a small part of the Isthmus;
the second both shores of Central America, and the Gulf
of Mexico; the third the Pacific coast only from Mexico to
Anian Strait. On map x. is a large lake north of Mexico, in
latitude 40° to 43°, and under it in large letters, _Bimenii
Regio_. Gerard Mercator, _Atlas sive cosmographicæ_, 1569, and
another edition 1574, represents the world on two globes, and
surrounds the two Americas with water, beside capping either
pole with a huge continent. In the north-eastern corner of
Asia, map iv., is _Americæ pars_. There are also _Anian reg_,
_Quiuira reg_, _Tuchano_, a city, and _El freto de Anian_.
On map v. the strait of Magellan separates the southern
continent from another large continent to the south of it,
on which is placed _Terra del fuego_. Luckily this antarctic
polar continent is labeled _Terra Avstralis nondvm cognita_,
lest the author be embarrassed by questions about it. After
well passing the strait of Magellan, _El Mar Pacifico_ is
entered, though as the tropics are reached it becomes _Mar
del Zur_. The northern part of this map v., the two Americas,
is quite interesting, and will be explained elsewhere. This
cartographical monstrosity Michael Lock, _Hakluyt's Divers
Voy._, 1582, endeavored, and with very fair success, to
exceed. Map xiii., _Munich Atlas_, by Thomas Hood, 1592, gives
the Gulf of Mexico, the Islands, and the eastern coast of
North America. In _Drake's World Encompassed_, 1595, another
source of information not remarkable for reliability, Hondius
traces the western coast to Bering Strait. Hondius' map, 1625,
in _Purchas_, _His Pilgrimes_, iv. 857, gives North America to
the mythical strait of Anian. Ioanne de Laet, _Novvs Orbis_,
1633, has at p. 220 a map of _Nveva España_, _Nveva Galicia_,
and _Gvatimala_, and at p. 346 a map of _Tierra Firma_. A
map of the world in the atlas of Jacob Colom, 1663, will
require mention hereafter. _Ogilby's America_, 1671, gives
the northern continent to Anian Strait with _Nova Albion_ in
the northern part, and California as an island; and a map at
p. 222 shows parts of Mexico and Central America. There is
a map of the middle part of America in _Dampier's Voyages_,
i. 44, 1699. Beside these, I shall have occasion to mention
others, such as the maps in the _Buccaniers of America_, 1704;
_Funnell's Voyage_, 1707; the Dutch collection of voyages
by Pieter Van der Aa; the German collection of Gottfried;
_Voyages de François Coreal_, 1722; _Anson's Voyage_, 1756;
_Morden's Geography Rectified_, 1693; Harris, Harleian,
Oxford, Rogers, Shelvocke, Jefferys, and other collections
of voyages. I may also mention incidentally in this volume
maps and charts relating more especially to another part of
the Pacific States and described more fully in a succeeding
volume.
[IV-5] Cacique, lord of vassals, was the name by which the
natives of Cuba designated their chiefs. Learning this, the
conquerors applied the name generally to the rulers of wild
tribes, although in none of the dialects of the continent is
the word found. Peter Martyr says that 'in some places they
call a king Cacicus, in other places they call him Quebi, and
somewhere Tiba.'
[IV-6] 'Porque,' says Herrera, 'auia muchos arboles, cuya
fruta es vnas mançanillas buenas de comer.' Navarrete calls
the place _Punta Castilla y Puerto de Trujillo_, and the coast
_La Costa de Trujillo_. The name Honduras was applied first to
the cape and afterward to a long stretch of shore. Fernando
Colon, _Hist. Almirante_, 103, _Barcia_, i., gives 'Cabo de
Onduras.' In _Oviedo_, lib. iii. cap. ix., is written 'el cabo
de Higueras;' this chronicler also employs the word Honduras;
_Galvano's Discov._, 100, 'the Cape of Higueras, and vnto the
Islands Gamares, and to the Cape of Honduras, that is to say,
the Cape of the Depthes;' _Benzoni_, _Hist. Mondo Nvovo_, 28,
'Prouincia grande, che da' paesani è nominata Iguera, è da'
Spagnuoli Capo di Fonduri;' _Gomara_, _Hist. Ind._, 31, 'cabo
de Higueras.'
[IV-7] Named by Columbus Rio de la Posesion, now known as Rio
Tinto.
[IV-8] For full descriptions of the several peoples inhabiting
this region at the coming of the Europeans, their physique,
character, customs, myths, and languages, I must refer the
reader to my _Native Races of the Pacific States_, 5 vols.,
passim.
[IV-9] This name has never changed. On Peter Martyr's _India
beyond the Ganges_, 1510, it is put down as _c. gr̃a de dios_;
Maiollo, 1519, writes _C de gratia dios_; Fernando Colon,
1527, _C. de gracias, á dios_; Ribero, 1529, _C∴ de grãc a
dios_; Maps vi. and vii., _Munich Atlas_, 1532-50, _C. de
gracia dios_; Vaz Dourado, _C∴ de grasias adios_; Mercator,
_C. de Gracias á Dios_; Dampier, _C. Gratia Dios_, etc.
[IV-10] Rio Escondido, or Bluefields, sometimes spelt
Blewfields, but erroneously. The name originated from the
Dutch pirate Bleeveldt. On map iv., _Munich Atlas_, in this
vicinity are found the words _R∴ del su._
[IV-11] Mercator places half-way between Cape Gracias á Dios
and Laguna de Chiriqui, _Quicuri_, designating a town. Peter
Martyr, dec. iii. cap. iv., says: 'He came to a region which
the inhabitants call Quicuris, in which is the hauen called
Cariari, named Mirobalanus by the Admirall, because the
Mirobalane trees are natiue in the regions thereabout.'
[IV-12] The name of the province also. Diego de Porras calls
it _Cariay_; Herrera and those who follow him write _Cariari_.
On the maps of Colon and Ribero, and also in Mercator's
atlas, the word is _Cariay_. On the map of Vaz Dourado in
this locality is written _masnoro_. 'Einige Geographen haben
geglaubt, dass unsere heutige "Blewfields-Lagune" dieser
Ankerplatz des Columbus sei. Andere haben dafür die Mündung
des grossen Flusses von Nicaragua den Rio San Juan genommen.'
_Kohl_, _Beiden ältesten Karten_, 114-15.
[IV-13] 'En _Cariay_, y en esas tierras de su comarca,
son grandes fechiceros y muy medrosos.' _Carta de
Colon_, _Navarrete_, _Col. de Viages_, i. 307. 'Nos parecian
à nosotros grandes hechiceros, i no sin alguna raçon, pues
quando se acercaban à los Christianos, esparcian, por el
aire cierto polvo à su buelta, i con perfumes, que hechaban
del polvo, hacian, que el humo fuese acía los Christianos.'
_Colon_, _Hist. Almirante_, 107, in _Barcia_, i.
[IV-14] Says Fernando Colon, _Hist. Almirante_, 108, in
_Barcia_, i., of this place:—'arribò al Canal de Zerabora, que
son 6 leguas de largo, i mas de tres de ancho, en el qual, ai
muchas Isletas, i tres, ò quatro Bocas mui à proposito para
entrar.' And Mr Kohl remarks, _Beiden ältesten Karten_, 115,
'Diese Schilderung passt auf kein anderes Gewässer südlich vom
San Juan 'Cariay,' als auf unsere 'Laguna de Chiriqui,' die
auch wohl noch heutiges Tages besonders in ihrer westlichen
Abtheilung 'Baia del Almirante' ... genannt wird.' Ribero
places _ysa de cerebaro_ in the laguna. Vaz Dourado writes
_Carabare_; Maiollo puts here somewhere _la casera bruxada_,
and near by _oro boro_. Mercator makes _Cerebaro_ a town.
Hondius, in _Purchas_, _His Pilgrimes_, places in this
vicinity the town, _Quicari_. _West-Indische Spieghel_, 1624,
gives _Carabaro_, and a little to the north a town, _Quicura_.
[IV-15] Aboriginally the name of a town, province, and
river famous for gold. Later the name became historically
celebrated, being applied by the Spaniards to that whole
region, and given as a title to the descendants of Columbus,
who were called dukes of Veraguas. Peter Martyr, Colon, and
Ribero, all write _beragua_; Vaz Dourado, _baraga_; Ptolemy,
_Beragua_, as a province; Laet and Jefferys, _Veragua_. Porras
calls the province Cobraba.
[IV-16] Off Nombre de Dios on Vaz Dourado's map, is a group
called _I∴ de bastimẽtos_; in the _Novvs Orbis_ of Laet
they are _Yas de Bastimentos_; Jefferys calls them _los
Bastimentos_; Navarrete, _Col. de Viages_, i. 285, gives
_Puerto del Retrete_ in the text, and _Puerto Escribanos_ in
a note.
[IV-17] The locality of this little harbor was soon lost.
Herrera affirms that in his time its situation was uncertain,
some believing Nombre de Dios to be the place mentioned.
Peschel locates it near the town of Colon; Humboldt at Puerto
de Escribanos. Ribero places fifteen leagues west of Nombre de
Dios, _po retre_. Kohl says, _Beiden ältesten Karten_, 116:
'Er findet sich nicht auf N. Vallard (1547), nicht auf Dourado
(1580) und nicht auf den Karten vom Isthmus von Darien in
Herrera.' But it would seem from the description of Fernando
Colon, _Hist. Almirante_, 110, in _Barcia_, i., that the
place should be easily enough found. He says:—'entramos en vn
Puertecillo, que se llamò el _Retrete_, porque no cabian en èl
mas de 5 ò 6 Navios; su entrada era por vna boca de quince, ò
veinte pasos de ancho, i ambos lados eran Rocas, que salian del
Agua, como punta de Diamante, i era tan profundo de Canal,
por enmedio, que acercandose à la orilla, vn poco, se podia
saltar desde el Navio en Tierra.'
[IV-18] Although the authorities are somewhat vague and
conflicting as to the terminal point of the main-land
coastings of Bastidas, there is no doubt that the two
discoveries here united. Oviedo, ii. 334-36, and those copying
his errors, take Bastidas direct from Urabá to Jamaica; but
Las Casas, _Hist. Ind._, iii. 11, states:—'Salieron del golfo
de Urabá, y fueron la costa del Poniente abajo, y llegaron
al puerto que llamaron del Retrete, donde agora está la
ciudad y puerto que nombramos del Nombre de Dios.' Later,
in chapter xxiii. 123, he corrects himself in regard to El
Retrete and Nombre de Dios being the same place:—'Por esto
parece que el puerto del Retrete no es el que agora llamamos
del Nombre de Dios, como arriba dijimos por relacion de
otros, sino más adelante, hácia el Oriente.' Speaking of El
Retrete, Diego de Porras, _Navarrete_, _Col. de Viages_, i.
285, remarks:—'En algunas cartas de navegar de algunos de los
marineros juntaba esta tierra con la que habian descubierto
Hojeda y Bastidas.' Navarrete himself, _Col. de Viages_, iii.
26, says of Bastidas, 'terminó su descubrimiento por los diez
grados de altura en el puerto del Retrete ó de Escribanos y
del nombre de Dios;' and again in a note concerning Nombre
de Dios:—'En este puerto entró posteriormente el Almirante
Colon el dia 26 de Noviembre de 1502 con noticia que ya tenia
de los descubrimientos de Bastidas.' Gomara, _Hist. Ind._,
67, accredits Bastidas with the new discovery of 170 leagues
of coast, 'que ay del cabo de la Vela al golfo de Vraua, y
Farallones del Darien,' resting with Oviedo at that point.
From the evidence Humboldt, _Exam. Crit._, i. 360, infers
that Bastidas continued 'vers l'ouest jusqu'au Puerto de
Retrete.' Loose statements are quite the habit now as of old;
instance that of Lerdo de Tejada, who says, _Apuntes Hist._,
89, referring to Bastidas, 'Y siguió hasta el puerto llamado
despues el _Retiro_, donde se fundó posteriormente el del
_Nombre de Dios_.'
[IV-19] That is to say, Bethlehem. Porras enters it _Y. n.
ebra_; Herrera, _Yebra_; and Fernando Colon, _Kiebra_. On
Ribero's map the name _bele_ is given to a lagoon; Vaz Dourado
writes _belen_; and Jacob Colom, _Belem_.
[IV-20] Although used by most Spanish and English writers
as a proper name, the word _quibian_ is an appellative, and
signifies the chief of a nation, or the ruler of a dynasty, as
the _cacique_ of the Cubans, the _inca_ of the Peruvians, the
_ahau_ of the Quichés, etc. Columbus, writing from Jamaica,
employs the term _el Quibian de Veragua_; and again, _Carta
de Colon_, in _Navarrete_, _Col. de Viages_, i. 302, 'Asenté
pueblo, y dí muchas dádivas al _Quibian_, que así llaman al
Señor de la tierra.' Napione and De Conti write _il Quibio o
cacico di Beragua_. See their _Biog. di Colombo_, 388:—"Il
Prefetto andò colle barche al mare per entrare nel fiume e
portarsi alla popolazione del Quibio, cosi chiamato da quei
popoli il loro Re.'
[IV-21] Rio de la Concepcion.
[IV-22] Irving, _Columbus_, ii. 402, carelessly calls him 'the
chief notary,' confounding him with Diego de Porras, who was
notary of the expedition. The notary was not a fighting man,
but rather must withhold himself from action that he might
write down what was done by others.
[IV-23] 'Y como luego mandó prender al Cacique do se le fizo
mucho daño que le quemaron su poblacion, que era la mejor que
habia en la costa é de mejores casas, de muy buena madera,
todas cubiertas de fojas de palmas, é prendieron á sus fijos,
é aquí traen algunos dellos de que quedó toda aquella tierra
escandalizada, desto no sé dar cuenta sino que lo mandó
facer é aun apregonar escala franca.' _Diego de Porras_, in
_Navarrete_, _Col. de Viages_, i. 286-7.
[IV-24] There are two accounts of this affair; one by Fernando
Colon, and one by Diego Mendez. Both are biased; the former
in favor of Bartolomé, the latter in favor of the writer.
Fernando tells how, when the settlement was taken by surprise,
his uncle seized a lance, and supported by seven men fought
with desperate valor until the main body of the Spaniards came
to his relief, when the enemy was routed. The other states,
_Relacion hecha por Diego Mendez_, in _Navarrete_, _Col. de
Viages_, i. 317, that the admiral had just left the harbor,
accompanied by the larger part of the Spaniards, who had gone
to say farewell. Mendez, newly appointed contador, held the
town of Belen with twenty men. Suddenly four hundred Indians
appeared on the hill above, and sent upon the Spaniards a
shower of darts and arrows. Fortunately the yells were in
advance of the weapons, and thus time was given Mendez to
arm. The fight was desperate, and lasted three hours. Ten
natives who ventured to close with their war clubs were slain
by the sword. Seven of the twenty Christians were killed;
but a miracle at last gave victory to the remainder. During
the next four days, by the ingenuity of Mendez, and under his
direction, the effects of the colony were placed on shipboard,
and in return for his invaluable services he was made captain
of Tristan's ship.
[IV-25] The final burial-place, not only of Columbus, but of
his son Diego, and of his grandson Luis, was the cathedral
of Santo Domingo. For seven years after his death the
remains of Columbus lay in the convent of San Francisco at
Valladolid. Then they were removed to Seville and placed in
the monastery of Las Cuevas; and in 1536 were transferred to
Santo Domingo. When Española was ceded to France in 1795,
the Spanish naval commander asked permission to remove the
remains to Cuba, which was granted; and what were supposed
to be the remains were so removed midst pomp and ceremony in
December-January following. But later investigations, the
result of long-standing suspicions, satisfied many that a
blunder had been committed; and that the bones of Columbus
still rest at Santo Domingo. This has been proved beyond a
doubt by the recent researches of the distinguished French
savant and Americaniste A. Pinart.
[IV-26] I have remarked at some length on Fernando Colon's
life of his father, and on the letters of the admiral, and
other documents in Navarrete, Salvá and Baranda, Pacheco and
Cárdenas, and Mendoza, and elsewhere. The standard historians,
Las Casas, Oviedo, Peter Martyr, Gomara, and Herrera, I
will pass for the present, only remarking that each in his
own way tells the story of the admiral, and all must be
carefully considered in a study of his life and achievements.
Other early or important authorities are _Zorzi_, _Paesi
Nouamente retrouati_, Vicentia, 1507; _Ruchamer_, _Newe
unbekanthe landte_, Nuremberg, 1508; _Stamler_, _Dyalogvs_,
Augsburg, 1508; _Marineo_, _Obra Compuesta de las Cosas
Memorables e Claros Varones de España_, Alcala, 1530;
_Geraldini_, _Itinerarivm ad Regiones svb Æqvinoctiali_,
Rome, 1631; _Grynævs_, _Novvs Orbis Regionvm ac Insularvm
veteribvs incognitarvm_, Basle, 1532; _Maffei_, _Historiarum
indicarum_, Florence, 1588; _Gambaræ_, _De navigatione
Christophori Columbi_, Rome, 1585; _Charlevoix_, _Histoire de
l'Isle-Espagnole_, Paris, 1730; _Cladera_, _Investigaciones
historicas_, Madrid, 1794; _Bossi_, _Vita di Colombo_, Milan,
1818. _Die vierdte Reise so vollenbracht hat Christoffel
Columb_, at page 6 of _Löw_, _Meer oder Seehanen Buch_,
Cologne, 1598, should be read in reference with the maps,
to be appreciated. See also _Ramusio_, _Viaggi_, iii. 16-18
and 98-9; _Benzoni_, _Hist. Mondo Nvovo_, 27-30; _Galvano's
Discov._, 100-1; _Humboldt_, _Exam. Crit._, passim; _Major's
Select Letters of Columbus_, _Hakluyt Soc._, London, 1847;
_Castellanos_, _Elegías de Varones ilustres de Indias_, 42-3;
_Acosta_, _Compend. Hist Nueva Granada_, 1-17; _Repertorio
Americano_, iii. 186-225; _Vetancvrt_, _Teatro Mex._, 3-6 and
101-6; _Lerdo de Tejada_, _Apuntes Hist._, 77-80; _Remesal_,
_Hist. Chyapa_, 162-3; _Gordon's Hist. Am._, i. 247-64;
_Lardner's Hist. Discov._, ii. 16; _Payno_, _Cronología
Mex._, in _Soc. Mex. Geog._; _Robertson's Hist. Am._, i.
59-175; _Corradi_, _Descub. de la Am._, i. 6-312; _Simon_,
_Conq. tierra firme_, 44-50; _Mesa y Leompart_, _Hist. Am._,
i. 1-64; _Torquemada_, i. 20-1, and iii. 283-94; _Vega_,
_Comentarios Reales_, ii. 7; _Acosta_, _Hist. Ind._, passim;
_Villagvtierre_, _Hist. Conq. Itza_, 5-19; _Mendieta_, _Hist.
Ecles._, 13-39; _Cavanilles_, _Hist. España_, v. 27-55
and 104-9; _Nueva España, Breve Resumen_, MS., i. 1-14;
_Maglianos_, _St Francis and Franciscans_, 521-32; _Aa_,
_Naaukeurige Versameling_, ii. and iii. passim; _Holmes'
Annals Am._, i. 1-16; _Puga_, _Cedulario_, 4-5; _Gonzalez
Dávila_, _Teatro Ecles._, i. 255-6; _Burke's Europ. Set._, i.
1-45; _Major's Prince Henry_, 347-67; _Help's Span. Conq._,
passim; _Heylyn's Cosmog._, 1083; _Ogilby's Am._, 55-6; _Ens_,
_West- und Ost-Indischer Lustgart_, 178-84 and 408-9; _Campe_,
_Hist. Descub. Am._, 1-133; _Poussin_, _De la Puissance
Américaine_, passim; _Hist. Mag._, Aug. and Sept. 1864, and
Feb. 1868; _Mariana_, _Hist. España_, vi. 307 etc. and vii.
80; _Muñoz_, _Hist. Nuevo Mundo_, i. 27-312; _Morelli_, _Fasti
Novi Orbis_, 11-12; _Purchas_, _His Pilgrimes_, v. 801-4;
_Pizarro y Orellana_, _Varones Ilvstres del Nvevo Mvndo_,
1-53; _Montanus_, _De Nieuwe en Onbekende Weereld_, 1-43; and
_Laet_, _Nov. Orb._, 345-6. The first work to throw a clear
light on the question of birthplace was the _Della patria di
Cristoforo Colombo_, by Conte Napione di Coconato, Florence,
1808, a dissertation published by the Academy of Sciences,
of Turin. In this and supplementary works the ability and
zeal of the author are manifest. In 1853, at Rome, was issued
a new edition of Napione and de Conti, entitled _Patria e
Biografia Del Grande Ammíraglio D. Cristóforo Colombo ...
rischiarita e comprovata dai celebri scrittori Gio. Francesco
Conte Napione di Coconato e Vincenzo de Conti_, the latter
author of _Storia del Monferrato_, in which appears a wealth
of new information second only to the original narratives
and documents themselves. The _Dissertazioni epistolari
bibliografiche_, Rome, 1809, of Francesco Cancellieri,
which Leclerc calls 'savante et fort curieuse,' should not
be overlooked. John S. C. Abbott throws together a _Life of
Christopher Columbus_, New York, 1875, in popular form, in
which extracts are conspicuous, the author having made quite
free with the writings of his predecessors.
[V-1] Chief judge, or highest judicial officer in the colony,
to take the place of Roldan, who was to be returned to Spain.
Irving, _Columbus_, ii. 331, writes erroneously _alguazil
mayor_, evidently confounding the two offices. For Las Casas,
_Hist. Ind._, iii. 18, says plainly enough:—'Trujo consigo por
Alcalde mayor un caballero de Salamanca y licenciado, llamado
Alonso Maldonado.' An alguacil mayor was a chief constable,
or high sheriff, a very different person from a chief judge.
These terms, and the offices represented by them, will be
fully explained in another place.
[V-2] As this word will often occur in these pages, and as
neither the term nor the institution it symbolizes has any
equivalent in English, I will enter here a full explanation.
_Residencia_ was the examination or account taken of the
official acts of an executive or judicial officer during
the term of his _residence_ within the province of his
jurisdiction, and while in the exercise of the functions of
his office. This was done at the expiration of the term of
office, or at stated periods, or in case of malefeasance at
any time. The person making the examination was appointed by
the king, or in New World affairs by the _Consejo de Indias_,
or by a viceroy, and was called a _juez de residencia_.
Before this judge, within a given time, any one might appear
and make complaint, and offer evidence against the retiring
or suspended official, who might refute and rebut as in an
ordinary tribunal. The residencia of any officer appointed by
the crown must be taken by a judge appointed by the crown; the
residencia of officers appointed in the Indies by viceroys,
audiencias, or president-governors, was taken by a judge
appointed by the same authority. Following are some of the
changes rung upon the subject by royal decrees, the better
to make it fit the government of the Indies. The 10th of
June, 1523, and again the 17th of November, 1526, Charles V.
decreed that appeal might be made from the judge of residencia
to the Council of the Indies, except in private demands not
exceeding 600 pesos de oro, when appeal was to the audiencia.
In 1530 viceroys and president-governors were directed to take
the residencia of _visitadores de Indios_ that wrong-doing
to the natives might not escape punishment; and by a later
law proclamations of residencias must be made in such manner
that the Indians might know thereof. The _Ordenanzas de
Audiencias_ of Philip II. of 1563 and 1567, state that in
some cities of the Indies it was customary to appoint at
certain seasons two regidores, who, with an alcalde, acted
as _fieles ejecutores_. At the beginning of every year the
viceroy, or the president, in a city which was the residence
of an audiencia, had to appoint an _oidor_ to take the
residencia of the fieles ejecutores of the previous year.
The same was to be done if those offices had been sold to
the city, _villa_, or _lugar_; but in such cases it was left
to the discretion of the viceroy or president to cause them
to be taken when necessary, not allowing them to become too
commonplace. Philip II. in 1573, and his successors as late
as 1680, directed that in residencias of governors and their
subordinates, when the fine did not exceed 20,000 maravedís,
execution should issue immediately; in damages granted from
private demands to the amount of 200 ducats, the condemned
was to give bonds to respond. While an official was undergoing
his residencia it was equivalent to his being under arrest, as
he could neither exercise office nor, except in certain cases
specified, leave the place. Thus the law of 1530, reiterated
in 1581, stated that from the time of the proclamation of a
residencia till its conclusion _alguaciles mayores_ and their
_tenientes_ should be suspended from carrying the _varas_,
or from exercising any of the functions of office. In 1583,
in 1620, and in 1680, it was ordered that such judges of
residencia as were appointed in the Indies should be selected
by a viceroy and audiencia, or by a president and audiencia,
acting in accord. Salaries of jueces de residencia were
ordered by Felipe III. in 1618 to be paid by the official
tried if found guilty, if not by the audiencia appointing.
Before this, in 1610, the same sovereign had ordered notaries
employed in residencias taken by _corregidores_ to be paid in
like manner. The next monarch directed that ships' officers
should be subject to residencia in the form of a _visita_;
and in visitas to _galeones_ and _flotas_ none but common
sailors, artillerymen, and soldiers should be exempt. Cárlos
II. in 1667 decreed that the residencia of a viceroy must
be terminated within six months from the publication of the
notice of the judge taking it. Felipe III. in 1619, and Cárlos
II. in 1680, ordered that viceroys and presidents should send
annually to the crown lists of persons suitable for conducting
residencias, so that no one might be chosen to act upon the
official under whose jurisdiction he resided. See _Recop.
de Indias_, ii. 176-89. Of the report of the residencia the
original was sent to the Council of the Indies, and a copy
deposited in the archives of the audiencia. So burdensome
were these trials, so corrupt became the judges, that later,
in America, the residencia seemed rather to defeat than to
promote justice, and in 1799 it was abolished so far as the
subordinate officers were concerned.
[V-3] Originally written _fijodalgo_, son of something.
Later applied to gentlemen, country gentlemen perhaps more
particularly. Oviedo, ii. 466, calls Diego de Nicuesa 'hombre
de limpia sangre de hijosdalgo,' a man of pure gentle blood.
Concerning the origin of the word _hidalgo_, Juan de la Puente
states that during the Moorish wars, whenever a large town was
captured the king kept it; the villages he gave to captains
who had distinguished themselves, and who were called at first
_ricos homes_, and afterward _grandes_. To minor meritorious
persons something less was given, a portion of the spoils or
a grant of land, but always something; hence their descendants
were called _fijosdalgos_, _hijosdalgos_, or _hidalgos_, sons
of something. In the _Dic. Univ._ authorities are quoted
showing that the word _hidalgo_ originated with the Roman
colonists of Spain, called _Itálicos_, who were exempt from
imposts. Hence those enjoying similar benefits were called
_Itálicos_, which word in lapse of time became _hidalgo_.
[V-4] 'Por justas causas, y consideraciones conviene, que
en todas las capitulaciones que se hicieron para nuevos
descubrimientos, se excuse esta palabra conquista, y en
su lugar se use de las de pacificacion y poblacion, pues
habiéndose de hacer con toda paz y caridad, es nuestra
voluntad, que aun este nombre interpretado contra nuestra
intencion, no ocasione, ni dé color á lo capitulado, para que
se pueda hacer fuerza ni agravio á los Indios.' _Recop. de
Indias_, ii. 2.
[V-5] The best proof of the policy of Spain in regard to
the natives of the New World is found in her laws upon the
subject. Writers may possibly color their assertions, but
by following the royal decrees through successive reigns
we have what cannot be controverted. The subject of the
treatment of the Indians occupies no inconsiderable space in
the _Recopilacion de Leyes de las Indias_. At the beginning
of tit. x. lib. vi. is placed a clause of Isabella's will,
solemnly enjoining her successors to see that the Indians were
always equitably and kindly treated; and this was the text
for future legislation. And now let us glance at the laws; I
cannot give them all; but I can assure the reader they are of
one tenor. First of all the natives were to be protected by
the ecclesiastical and civil authorities. They might marry
freely, but always in accordance with Christian usage; must
not be taken to Spain; must be civilized, Christianized,
taught to speak Spanish, and to love labor, if possible; they
might sow seed, breed stock, keep their ancient market-days,
buy and sell at pleasure, and even dispose of their lands,
only the Spaniards were not allowed to sell them arms or
alcoholic liquors. The Inquisition could not touch them,
for in religious matters they were subject to the bishop's
jurisdiction, and in cases of witchcraft to the civil power.
They might have their municipal organizations in imitation of
the Spanish town government, with their alcaldes, fiscales,
and regidores, elected from among themselves to serve for one
year, elections to be held in the presence of the priest. It
was made the duty of priests, prelates, all officers of the
government, and in fact every Spanish subject, to watch over
and protect the Indians. Governors and judges were charged
under the severest penalties to see justice done them. Two
officers were created at an early day for this purpose, those
of _protector_ and _defensor_, the former having general
oversight of the natives and their interests, and the latter
appearing in their behalf in court. After a time, when it was
thought the aborigines could stand alone, the offices were
abolished. But the action was premature, and in 1589 Philip
II. ordered them revived. These officers were appointed by
the viceroys and president-governors. Indians might appear
in courts of law and have counsel assigned them free of any
cost; and even in suits between the natives themselves there
was to be no expense, the fiscal appearing on one side, and
the protector on the other. Philip also gave notice in 1593
that Spaniards who maltreated Indians were to be punished
with greater rigor than for badly treating a Spaniard. This
was a remarkable law; it is a pity the Puritans and their
descendants lacked such a one. Indians might be hired, but
they must be paid promptly. They might work in the mines, or
carry burdens if they chose, but it must be done voluntarily.
Enforced personal service, or any approach to it, was
jealously and repeatedly prohibited. Indians under eighteen
must not be employed to carry burdens. Let those who sneer
at Philip and Spain remember that two centuries after this
England could calmly look on and see her own little children,
six years of age, working with their mothers in coal-pits.
There were many ways the Spaniards had of evading the just and
humane laws of their monarchs—instance the trick of employers
of getting miners or other laborers in debt to them, and
keeping them so, and if they attempted to run away interpose
the law for their restraint. It was equivalent to slavery.
A native might even sell his labor for an indefinite time,
until Felipe III. in 1618 decreed that no Indian could bind
himself to work for more than one year. The law endeavored
to throw all severe labor upon the negro, who was supposed
to be better able to endure it. The black man was likewise
placed far below the red in the social scale. It was criminal
for a negro or mixed-breed to have an Indian work for him,
although voluntarily and for pay; nor might an African even
go to the house of an American. The law endeavored to guard
the Indian in his privacy, as well as in his rights. It
studied to make the lot of the aboriginal as peaceful and
comfortable under Christian civilization as under heathen
barbarism. More it could not do; it could not do this much;
after the pacifying raid through the primeval garden, all
Europe could not restore it. But Spain's monarchs did their
best to mitigate the sufferings caused by Spain's unruly
sons. The cacique might hold his place among his people,
and follow ancient usage in regard to his succession, but he
must not enslave them, or inflict upon them the ancient cruel
customs, such as giving Indian girls in lieu of tribute, or
burying servants with their dead masters. And these petty
rulers must stay at home and attend to their affairs; Indians
could not leave one pueblo to take up their residence in
another, and caciques could not go to Spain without special
license from the king. The natives were ordered to live in
communities, and have a fixed residence, and their lands were
not in consequence to be taken from them. They must not ride
on horseback, for that would make them too nearly equal to
the cavalier in battle; they must not hold dances without
permission, for then they might plot conspiracies, or give
themselves up to serve heathen gods as of old; they must not
work in gold or silver, an illiberal restriction which lost to
the world the finest of America's arts. Spaniards could not
place a cattle rancho within 1½ leagues of a native pueblo;
or swine, sheep, or goats within half a league; the Indians
might lawfully kill cattle trespassing on their lands. In a
pueblo of Indians neither Spaniard, nor mulatto, nor negro
should live. No traveller might spend the night at the house
of a native if an inn was at hand. No Spanish or mestizo
merchant might remain in an Indian pueblo more than three
days, nor another white man more than two days. Beside the
property of individuals each Indian pueblo had some common
property, and a strong-box in which the community money and
title-deeds were kept. Caciques must not call themselves lords
of pueblos, as that detracted from royal preëminence; they
must be called caciques simply. The cacique must not attempt
feudal fashions; he must not oppress his people, or take
more than the stipulated tribute; and he who worked for the
cacique must be paid by the cacique. In criminal matters the
jurisdiction of caciques over their people could not extend to
death or mutilation. On the other hand a cacique could not be
tried by the ordinary Spanish justice of the peace, but only
by the judge of a district. The last four laws were made by
Charles V. in 1538. And beside these were many other edicts
promulgated by the Spanish monarchs during two and a half
centuries, notable for their wisdom, energy, and humanity. By
the continued outrages and excesses of their subjects in the
New World the temper of the crown was often severely tried.
Thus was found written by Felipe IV. with his own hand, on a
decree of the council ordering the immediate suppression of
all those infamous evils practised in spite of laws against
them, a sentiment which was fully reiterated by his son Cárlos
II. in 1680:—'I will that you give satisfaction to me and to
the world concerning the manner of treating those my vassals,'
so reads the writing; 'and if this be not done, so that as in
response to this letter I may see exemplary punishment meted
offenders, I shall hold myself disobeyed; and be assured that
if you do not remedy it, I will. The least omissions I shall
consider grave crimes against God and against me; the evil
conduct tending as it does to the total ruin and destruction
of those realms whose natives I hold in estimation; and I will
that they be treated as is merited by vassals who serve the
monarchy so well, and have so contributed to its grandeur and
enlightenment.' See further, _Tapia_, _Hist. Civ. Española_,
passim; _Cogolludo_, _Hist. Yucathan_, 71-3; _Ramirez_, _Vida
Motolinia_, in _Icazbalceta_, _Col. Doc._, i. lxvi.; _Las
Casas_, _Carta_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._,
vii. 290-338.
[V-6] Twenty-five pounds. The Spanish pound is a little more
than the English pound. There are four arrobas in a quintal.