_Discovery and Settlement_.--Bartholomew Diaz, the Portuguese navigator,
discovered the Cape of Good Hope in 1488, and Vasco da Gama in 1497
sailed along the whole coast of South Africa on his way to India. The
Portuguese, attracted by the riches of the East, made no permanent
settlement at the Cape. But the Dutch, who, on the decline of the
Portuguese power, established themselves in the East, early saw the
importance of the place as a station where their vessels might take in
water and provisions. They did not, however, establish any post at the
Cape until 1652, when a small garrison under Jan van Riebeek were sent
there by the Dutch East India Company. Riebeek landed at Table Bay and
founded Cape Town. In 1671 the first purchase of land from the
Hottentots beyond the limits of the fort built by Riebeek marked the
beginning of the Colony proper. The earliest colonists were for the most
part people of low station or indifferent character, but as the result
of the investigations of a commissioner sent out in 1685 a better class
of immigrants was introduced. About 1686 the European population was
increased by a number of the French refugees who left their country on
the revocation of the edict of Nantes. The influence of this small body
of immigrants on the character of the Dutch settlers was marked. The
Huguenots, however, owing to the policy of the Company, which in 1701
directed that Dutch only should be taught in the schools, ceased by the
middle of the 18th century to be a distinct body, and the knowledge of
French disappeared. Advancing north and east from their base at Cape
Town the colonists gradually acquired--partly by so-called contracts,
partly by force--all the land of the Hottentots, large numbers of whom
they slew. Besides those who died in warfare, whole tribes of Hottentots
were destroyed by epidemics of smallpox in 1713 and in 1755. Straggling
remnants still maintained their independence, but the mass of the
Hottentots took service with the colonists as herdsmen, while others
became hangers-on about the company's posts and grazing-farms or roamed
about the country. In 1787 the Dutch government passed a law subjecting
these wanderers to certain restrictions. The effect of this law was to
place the Hottentots in more immediate dependence upon the farmers, or
to compel them to migrate northward beyond the colonial border. Those
who chose the latter alternative had to encounter the hostility of their
old foes, the Bushmen, who were widely spread over the plains from the
Nieuwveld and Sneeuwberg mountains to the Orange river. The colonists
also, pressing forward to those territories, came in contact with these
Ishmaelites--the farmers' cattle and sheep, guarded only by a Hottentot
herdsman, offering the strongest temptation to the Bushman. Reprisals
followed; and the position became so desperate that the extermination of
the Bushmen appeared to the government the only safe alternative.
"Commandoes" or war-bands were sent out against them, and they were
hunted down like wild beasts. Within a period of six years, it is said,
upwards of 3000 were either killed or captured. Out of the organization
of these commandoes, with their field-commandants and field-cornets, has
grown the common system of local government in the Dutch-settled
districts of South Africa.
It was not to the hostility of the natives, nor to the hard struggle
with nature necessary to make agriculture profitable on Karroo or veld,
that the slow progress made by the colonists was due, so much as to the
narrow and tyrannical policy adopted by the East India Company, which
closed the colony against free immigration, kept the whole of the trade
in its own hands, combined the administrative, legislative and judicial
powers in one body, prescribed to the farmers the nature of the crops
they were to grow, demanded from them a large part of their produce, and
harassed them with other exactions tending to discourage industry and
enterprise. (See further SOUTH AFRICA, where the methods and results of
Dutch colonial government are considered in their broader aspects.) To
this mischievous policy is ascribed that dislike to orderly government,
and that desire to escape from its control, which characterized for many
generations the "boer" or farmer class of Dutch settlers--qualities
utterly at variance with the character of the Dutch in their native
country. It was largely to escape oppression that the farmers trekked
farther and farther from the seat of government. The company, to control
the emigrants, established a magistracy at Swellendam in 1745 and
another at Graaff Reinet in 1786. The Gamtoos river had been declared,
c. 1740, the eastern frontier of the colony, but it was soon passed. In
1780, however, the Dutch, to avoid collision with the warlike Kaffir
tribes advancing south and west from east central Africa, agreed with
them to make the Great Fish river the common boundary. In 1795 the
heavily taxed burghers of the frontier districts, who were afforded no
protection against the Kaffirs, expelled the officials of the East India
Company, and set up independent governments at Swellendam and Graaff
Reinet. In the same year, Holland having fallen under the revolutionary
government of France, a British force under General Sir James Craig was
sent to Cape Town to secure the colony for the prince of Orange--a
refugee in England--against the French. The governor of Cape Town at
first refused to obey the instructions from the prince, but on the
British proceeding to take forcible possession he capitulated.[3] His
action was hastened by the fact that the Hottentots, deserting their
former masters, flocked to the British standard. The burghers of Graaff
Reinet did not surrender until a force had been sent against them, while
in 1799 and again in 1801 they rose in revolt. In February 1803, as a
result of the peace of Amiens, the colony was handed over to the
Batavian Republic, which introduced many needful reforms, as had the
British during their eight years' rule. (One of the first acts of
General Craig had been to abolish torture in the administration of
justice.) War having again broken out, a British force was once more
sent to the Cape. After an engagement (Jan. 1806) on the shores of Table
Bay the Dutch garrison of Cape Castle surrendered to the British under
Sir David Baird, and in 1814 the colony was ceded outright by Holland to
the British crown. At that time the colony extended to the line of
mountains guarding the vast central plateau, then called Bushmansland,
and had an area of about 120,000 sq. m. and a population of some 60,000,
of whom 27,000 were whites, 17,000 free Hottentots and the rest slaves.
These slaves were mostly imported negroes and Malays. Their introduction
was the chief cause leading the white settlers to despise manual labour.
_The First and Second Kaffir Wars_.--At the time of the cession to Great
Britain the first of several wars with the Kaffirs had been fought. (The
numerous minor conflicts which since 1789 had taken place between the
colonists and the Kaffirs--the latter sometimes aided by Hottentot
allies--are not reckoned in the usual enumeration of the Kaffir wars.)
The Kaffirs, who had crossed the colonial frontier, had been expelled
from the district between the Sunday and Great Fish rivers known as the
Zuurveld, which became a sort of neutral ground. For some time previous
to 1811 the Kaffirs, however, had taken possession of the neutral ground
and committed depredations on the colonists. In order to expel them from
the Zuurveld, Colonel John Graham took the field with a mixed force in
December 1811, and in the end the Kaffirs were driven beyond the Fish
river. On the site of Colonel Graham's headquarters arose the town which
bears his name. In 1817 further trouble arose with the Kaffirs, the
immediate cause of quarrel being an attempt by the colonial authorities
to enforce the restitution of some stolen cattle. Routed in 1818 the
Kaffirs rallied, and in the early part of 1819 poured into the colony in
vast hordes. Led by a prophet-chief named Makana, they attacked Graham's
Town on the 22nd of April, then held by a handful of white troops. Help
arrived in time and the enemy were beaten back. It was then arranged
that the land between the Fish and Keiskamma rivers should be neutral
territory.
_The British Settlers of 1820_.--The war of 1817-19 led to the first
introduction of English settlers on a considerable scale, an event
fraught with far-reaching consequences. The then governor, Lord Charles
Somerset, whose treaty arrangements with the Kaffir chiefs had proved
unfortunate, desired to erect a barrier against the Kaffirs by settling
white colonists in the border district. In 1820, on the advice of Lord
Charles, parliament voted L50,000 to promote emigration to the Cape, and
4000 British were sent out. These people formed what was known as the
Albany settlement, founding Port Elizabeth and making Graham's Town
their headquarters. Intended primarily as a measure to secure the safety
of the frontier, and regarded by the British government chiefly as a
better means of affording a livelihood to a few thousands of the surplus
population, this emigration scheme accomplished a far greater work than
its authors contemplated. The new settlers, drawn from every part of the
British Isles and from almost every grade of society, retained, and
their descendants retain, strong sympathy with their native land. In
course of time they formed a valuable counterpoise to the Dutch
colonists, and they now constitute the most progressive element in the
colony. The advent of these immigrants was also the means of introducing
the English language at the Cape. In 1825, for the first time,
ordinances were issued in English, and in 1827 its use was extended to
the conduct of judicial proceedings. Dutch was not, however, ousted, the
colonists becoming to a large extent bilingual.
_Dislike of British Rule_.--Although the colony was fairly prosperous,
many of the Dutch farmers were as dissatisfied with British rule as they
had been with that of the Dutch East India Company, though their ground
of complaint was not the same. In 1792 Moravian missions had been
established for the benefit of the Hottentots,[4] and in 1799 the London
Missionary Society began work among both Hottentots and Kaffirs. The
championship of Hottentot grievances by the missionaries caused much
dissatisfaction among the majority of the colonists, whose views, it may
be noted, temporarily prevailed, for in 1812 an ordinance was issued
which empowered magistrates to bind Hottentot children as apprentices
under conditions differing little from that of slavery. Meantime,
however, the movement for the abolition of slavery was gaining strength
in England, and the missionaries at length appealed from the colonists
to the mother country. An incident which occurred in 1815-1816 did much
to make permanent the hostility of the frontiersmen to the British. A
farmer named Bezuidenhout refused to obey a summons issued on the
complaint of a Hottentot, and firing on the party sent to arrest him,
was himself killed by the return fire. This caused a miniature
rebellion, and on its suppression five ringleaders were publicly hanged
at the spot--Slachters Nek--where they had sworn to expel "the English
tyrants." The feeling caused by the hanging of these men was deepened by
the circumstances of the execution--for the scaffold on which the rebels
were simultaneously swung, broke down from their united weight and the
men were afterwards hanged one by one. An ordinance passed in 1827,
abolishing the old Dutch courts of _landroost_ and _heemraden_ (resident
magistrates being substituted) and decreeing that henceforth all legal
proceedings should be conducted in English; the granting in 1828, as a
result of the representations of the missionaries, of equal rights with
whites to the Hottentots and other free coloured people; the imposition
(1830) of heavy penalties for harsh treatment of slaves, and finally the
emancipation of the slaves in 1834,[5]--all these things increased the
dislike of the farmers to the government. Moreover, the inadequate
compensation awarded to slave-owners, and the suspicions engendered by
the method of payment, caused much resentment, and in 1835 the trekking
of farmers into unknown country in order to escape from an unloved
government, which had characterized the 18th century, recommenced.
Emigration beyond the colonial border had in fact been continuous for
150 years, but it now took on larger proportions.
_The Third Kaffir War_.--On the eastern border further trouble arose
with the Kaffirs, towards whom the policy of the Cape government was
marked by much vacillation. On the 11th of December 1834 a chief of high
rank was killed while resisting a commando party. This set the whole of
the Kaffir tribes in a blaze. A force of 10,000 fighting men, led by
Macomo, a brother of the chief who was killed, swept across the
frontier, pillaged and burned the homesteads and murdered all who dared
to resist. Among the worst sufferers were a colony of freed Hottentots
who, in 1829, had been settled in the Kat river valley by the British
authorities. The fighting power of the colony was scanty, but the
governor, Sir Benjamin D'Urban (q.v.), acted with promptitude, and all
available forces were mustered under Colonel (afterwards Sir Harry)
Smith, who reached Graham's Town on the 6th of January 1835, six days
after news of the rising reached Cape Town. The enemy's territory was
invaded, and after nine months' fighting the Kaffirs were completely
subdued, and a new treaty of peace concluded (on the 17th of September).
By this treaty all the country as far as the river Kei was acknowledged
to be British, and its inhabitants declared British subjects. A site for
the seat of government was selected and named King Wiliam's Town.
_The Great Trek_.--The action of Sir Benjamin D'Urban was not approved
by the home government, and on the instruction of Lord Glenelg,
secretary for the colonies, who declared that "the great evil of the
Cape Colony consists in its magnitude," the colonial boundary was moved
back to the Great Fish river, and eventually (in 1837) Sir Benjamin was
dismissed from office. "The Kaffirs," in the opinion of Lord Glenelg,
"had an ample justification for war; they had to resent, and endeavoured
justly, though impotently, to avenge a series of encroachments"
(despatch of the 26th of December 1835). This attitude towards the
Kaffirs was one of the many reasons given by the Trek Boers for leaving
Cape Colony. The Great Trek, as it is called, lasted from 1836 to 1840,
the trekkers, who numbered about 7000, founding communities with a
republican form of government beyond the Orange and Vaal rivers, and in
Natal, where they had been preceded, however, by British emigrants. From
this time Cape Colony ceased to be the only civilized community in South
Africa, though for long it maintained its predominance. Up to 1856 Natal
was, in fact, a dependency of the Cape (see SOUTH AFRICA). Considerable
trouble was caused by the emigrant Boers on either side of the Orange
river, where the new comers, the Basutos and other Kaffir tribes,
Bushmen and Griquas contended for mastery. The Cape government
endeavoured to protect the rights of the natives. On the advice of the
missionaries, who exercised great influence with all the non-Dutch
races, a number of native states were recognized and subsidized by the
Cape government, with the object--not realized--of obtaining peace on
this northern frontier. The first of these "Treaty States" recognized
was that of the Griquas of Griqualand West. Others were recognized in
1843 and 1844--in the last-named year a treaty was made with the Pondoes
on the eastern border. During this period the condition of affairs on
the eastern frontier was deplorable, the government being unable or
unwilling to afford protection to the farmers from the depredations of
the Kaffirs. Elsewhere, however, the colony was making progress. The
change from slave to free labour proved to be advantageous to the
farmers in the western provinces; an efficient educational system, which
owed its initiation to Sir John Herschel, the astronomer (who lived in
Cape Colony from 1834 to 1838), was adopted; Road Boards were
established and did much good work; to the staple industries--the
growing of wheat, the rearing of cattle and the making of wine--was
added sheep-raising; and by 1846 wool became the most valuable export
from the country. The creation, in 1835, of a legislative council, on
which unofficial members had seats, was the first step in giving the
colonists a share in the government.
_The War of the Axe_.--Another war with the Kaffirs broke out in 1846
and was known as the War of the Axe, from the murder of a Hottentot, to
whom an old Kaffir thief was manacled, while being conveyed to Graham's
Town for trial for stealing an axe. The escort was attacked by a party
of Kaffirs and the Hottentot killed. The surrender of the murderer was
refused, and war was declared in March 1846. The Gaikas were the chief
tribe engaged in the war, assisted during the course of it by the
Tambukies. After some reverses the Kaffirs were signally defeated on the
7th of June by General Somerset on the Gwangu, a few miles from Fort
Peddie. Still the war went on, till at length Sandili, the chief of the
Gaikas, surrendered, followed gradually by the other chiefs; and by the
beginning of 1848 the Kaffirs were again subdued, after twenty-one
months' fighting.
_Extension of British Sovereignty_.--In the last month of the war
(December 1847) Sir Harry Smith reached Cape Town as governor of the
colony, and with his arrival the Glenelg policy was reversed. By
proclamation, on the 17th of December, he extended the frontier of the
colony northward to the Orange river and eastward to the Keiskamma
river, and on the 23rd, at a meeting of the Kaffir chiefs, announced the
annexation of the country between the Keiskamma and the Kei rivers to
the British crown, thus reabsorbing the territory abandoned by order of
Lord Glenelg. It was not, however, incorporated with the Cape, but made
a crown dependency under the name of British Kaffraria. For a time the
Kaffirs accepted quietly the new order of things. The governor had other
serious matters to contend with, including the assertion of British
authority over the Boers beyond the Orange river, and the establishment
of amicable relations with the Transvaal Boers. In the colony itself a
crisis arose out of the proposal to make it a convict station.
_The Convict Agitation and Granting of a Constitution_.--In 1848 a
circular was sent by the 3rd Earl Grey, then colonial secretary, to the
governor of the Cape (and to other colonial governors), asking him to
ascertain the feelings of the colonists regarding the reception of a
certain class of convicts, the intention being to send to South Africa
Irish peasants who had been driven into crime by the famine of 1845.
Owing to some misunderstanding, a vessel, the "Neptune," was despatched
to the Cape before the opinion of the colonists had been received,
having on board 289 convicts, among whom were John Mitchell, the Irish
rebel, and his colleagues. When the news reached the Cape that this
vessel was on her way, the people of the colony became violently
excited; and they established an anti-convict association, by which they
bound themselves to cease from all intercourse of every kind with
persons in any way connected "with the landing, supplying or employing
convicts." On the 19th of September 1849 the "Neptune" arrived in
Simon's Bay. Sir Harry Smith, confronted by a violent public agitation,
agreed not to land the convicts, but to keep them on board ship in
Simon's Bay till he received orders to send them elsewhere. When the
home government became aware of the state of affairs orders were sent
directing the "Neptune" to proceed to Tasmania, and it did so after
having been in Simon's Bay for five months. The agitation did not,
however, pass away without other important results, since it led to
another movement, the object of which was to obtain a free
representative government for the colony. This concession, which had
been previously promised by Lord Grey, was granted by the British
government, and, in 1854, a constitution was established of almost
unprecedented liberality.
_The Kaffir War of 1850-1853_.--The anti-convict agitation had scarcely
ceased when the colony was once again involved in war. The Kaffirs
bitterly resented their loss of independence, and ever since the last
war had been secretly preparing to renew the struggle. Sir Harry Smith,
informed of the threatening attitude of the natives, proceeded to the
frontier, and summoned Sandili and the other chiefs to an interview.
Sandili refused obedience; upon which, at an assembly of other chiefs
(October 1850), the governor declared him deposed from his chiefship,
and appointed an Englishman, Mr Brownlee, a magistrate, to be temporary
chief of the Gaika tribe. The governor appears to have believed that the
measures he took would prevent a war and that Sandili could be arrested
without armed resistance. On the 24th of December Col. Geo. Mackinnon,
being sent with a small force with the object of securing the chief, was
attacked in a narrow defile by a large body of Kaffirs, and compelled to
retreat with some loss. This was the signal for a general rising of the
Gaika tribe. The settlers in the military villages, which had been
established along the frontier, assembled in fancied security to
celebrate Christmas Day, were surprised, many of them murdered, and
their houses given to the flames. Other disasters followed in quick
succession. A small patrol of military was cut off to a man. The greater
part of the Kaffir police deserted, many of them carrying off their arms
and accoutrements. Emboldened by success, the enemy in immense force
surrounded and attacked Fort Cox, where the governor was stationed with
an inconsiderable force. More than one unsuccessful attempt was made to
relieve Sir Harry; but his dauntless spirit was equal to the occasion.
At the head of 150 mounted riflemen, accompanied by Colonel Mackinnon,
he dashed out of the fort, and, through a heavy fire of the enemy, rode
to King William's Town--a distance of 12 m. Meantime, a new enemy
appeared. Some 900 of the Kat river Hottentots, who had in former wars
been firm allies of the British, threw in their lot with their
hereditary enemies--the Kaffirs. They were not without excuses. They
complained that while doing burgher duty in former wars--the Cape
Mounted Rifles consisted largely of Hottentot levies--they had not
received the same treatment as others serving in defence of the colony,
that they got no compensation for the losses they had sustained, and
that they were in various ways made to feel they were a wronged and
injured race. A secret combination was formed with the Kaffirs to take
up arms to sweep the Europeans away and establish a Hottentot republic.
Within a fortnight of the attack on Colonel Mackinnon the Kat river
Hottentots were also in arms. Their revolt was followed by that of the
Hottentots at other missionary stations; and part of the Hottentots of
the Cape Mounted Rifles followed their example, including the very men
who had escorted the governor from Fort Cox. But numbers of Hottentots
remained loyal and the Fingo Kaffirs likewise sided with the British.
After the confusion caused by the sudden outbreak had subsided, and
preparations had been made, Sir Harry Smith and his gallant force turned
the tide of war against the Kaffirs. The Amatola mountains were stormed;
and the paramount chief Kreli, who all along covertly assisted the
Gaikas, was severely punished. In April 1852 Sir Harry Smith was
recalled by Earl Grey, who accused him--unjustly, in the opinion of the
duke of Wellington--of a want of energy and judgment in conducting the
war, and he was succeeded by Lieutenant-General Cathcart. Kreli was
again attacked and reduced to submission. The Amatolas were finally
cleared of the Kaffirs, and small forts erected among them to prevent
their reoccupation. The British commanders were hampered throughout by
the insufficiency of their forces, and it was not till March 1853 that
this most sanguinary of Kaffir wars was brought to a conclusion, after a
loss of many hundred British soldiers. Shortly afterwards, British
Kaffraria was made a crown colony. The Hottentot settlement at Kat river
remained, but the Hottentot power within the colony was now finally
crushed.
_The Great Amaxosa Delusion._--From 1853 the Kaffir tribes on the east
gave little trouble to the colony. This was due, in large measure, to an
extraordinary delusion which arose among the Amaxosa in 1856, and led in
1857 to the death of some 50,000 persons. This incident is one of the
most remarkable instances of misplaced faith recorded in history. The
Amaxosa had not accepted their defeat in 1853 as decisive and were
preparing to renew the struggle with the white men. At this juncture,
May 1856, a girl named Nongkwase told her father that on going to draw
water from a stream she had met strangers of commanding aspect. The
father, Mhlakza, went to see the men, who told him that they were
spirits of the dead, who had come, if their behests were obeyed, to aid
the Kaffirs with their invincible power to drive the white man from the
land. Mhlakza repeated the message to his chief, Sarili, one of the most
powerful Kaffir rulers. Sarili ordered the commands of the spirits to be
obeyed. These orders were, at first, that the Amaxosa were to destroy
their fat cattle. The girl Nongkwase, standing in the river where the
spirits had first appeared, heard unearthly noises, interpreted by her
father as orders to kill more and more cattle. At length the spirits
commanded that not an animal of all their herds was to be left alive,
and every grain of corn was to be destroyed. If that were done, on a
given date myriads of cattle more beautiful than those destroyed would
issue from the earth, while great fields of corn, ripe and ready for
harvest, would instantly appear. The dead would rise, trouble and
sickness vanish, and youth and beauty come to all alike. Unbelievers and
the hated white man would on that day utterly perish. The people heard
and obeyed. Sarili is believed by many persons to have been the
instigator of the prophecies. Certainly some of the principal chiefs
regarded all that was done simply as the preparation for a last struggle
with the whites, their plan being to throw the whole Amaxosa nation
fully armed and in a famishing condition upon the colony. There were
those who neither believed the predictions nor looked for success in
war, but destroyed their last particle of food in unquestioning
obedience to their chief's command. Either in faith that reached the
sublime, or in obedience equally great, vast numbers of the people
acted. Great kraals were also prepared for the promised cattle, and huge
skin sacks to hold the milk that was soon to be more plentiful than
water. At length the day dawned which, according to the prophecies, was
to usher in the terrestrial paradise. The sun rose and sank, bat the
expected miracle did not come to pass. The chiefs who had planned to
hurl the famished warrior host upon the colony had committed an
incredible blunder in neglecting to call the nation together under
pretext of witnessing the resurrection. This error they realized too
late, and endeavoured by fixing the resurrection for another day to
gather the clans, but blank despair had taken the place of hope and
faith, and it was only as starving suppliants that the Amaxosa sought
the British. The colonists did what they could to save life, but
thousands perished miserably. In their extremity many of the Kaffirs
turned cannibals, and one instance of parents eating their own child is
authenticated. Among the survivors was the girl Nongkwase; her father
perished. A vivid narrative of the whole incident will be found in G.M.
Theal's _History and Geography of South Africa_ (3rd ed., London, 1878),
from which this account is condensed. The country depopulated as the
result of this delusion was afterwards peopled by European settlers,
among whom were members of the German legion which had served with the
British army in the Crimea, and some 2000 industrious North German
emigrants, who proved a valuable acquisition to the colony.
_Sir George Grey's Governorship._--In 1854 Sir George Grey became
governor of the Cape, and the colony owed much to his wise
administration. The policy, imposed by the home government, of
abandoning responsibility beyond the Orange river, was, he perceived, a
mistaken one, and the scheme he prepared in 1858 for a confederation of
all South Africa (q.v.) was rejected by Great Britain. By his energetic
action, however, in support of the missionaries Moffat and Livingstone,
Sir George kept open for the British the road through Bechuanaland to
the far interior. To Sir George was also due the first attempt,
missionary effort apart, to educate the Kaffirs and to establish British
authority firmly among them, a result which the self-destruction of the
Amaxosa rendered easy. Beyond the Kei the natives were left to their own
devices. Sir George Grey left the Cape in 1861. During his governorship
the resources of the colony had been increased by the opening up of the
copper mines in Little Namaqualand, the mohair wool industry had been
established and Natal made a separate colony. The opening, in November
1863, of the railway from Cape Town to Wellington, begun in 1859, and
the construction in 1860 of the great breakwater in Table Bay, long
needed on that perilous coast, marked the beginning in the colony of
public works on a large scale. They were the more or less direct result
of the granting to the colony of a large share in its own government. In
1865 the province of British Kaffraria was incorporated with the colony,
under the title of the Electoral Divisions of King William's Town and
East London. The transfer was marked by the removal of the prohibition
of the sale of alcoholic liquors to the natives, and the free trade in
intoxicants which followed had most deplorable results among the Kaffir
tribes. A severe drought, affecting almost the entire colony for several
years, caused great depression of trade, and many farmers suffered
severely. It was at this period (1869) that ostrich-farming was
successfully established as a separate industry.
Whether by or against the wish of the home government, the limits of
British authority continued to extend. The Basutos, who dwelt in the
upper valleys of the Orange river, had subsisted under a
semi-protectorate of the British government from 1843 to 1854; but
having been left to their own resources on the abandonment of the Orange
sovereignty, they fell into a long exhaustive warfare with the Boers of
the Free State. On the urgent petition of their chief Moshesh, they were
proclaimed British subjects in 1868, and their territory became part of
the colony in 1871 (see BASUTOLAND). In the same year the south-eastern
part of Bechuanaland was annexed to Great Britain under the title of
Griqualand West. This annexation was a consequence of the discovery
there of rich diamond mines, an event which was destined to have
far-reaching results. (F. R. C.)
_Development of Modern Conditions._--The year 1870 marks the dawn of a
new era in South Africa. From that date the development of modern South
Africa may be said to have fairly started, and in spite of political
complications, arising from time to time, the progress of Cape Colony
down to the outbreak of the Transvaal War of 1899 was steadily forward.
The discovery of diamonds on the Orange river in 1867, followed
immediately afterwards by the discovery of diamonds on the Vaal river,
led to the rapid occupation and development of a tract of country which
had hitherto been but sparsely inhabited. In 1870 Dutoitspan and
Bultfontein diamond mines were discovered, and in 1871 the still richer
mines of Kimberley and De Beers. These four great deposits of mineral
wealth are still richly productive, and constitute the greatest
industrial asset which the colony possesses. At the time of the
beginning of the diamond industry, not only the territory of Cape Colony
and the Boer Republics, but all South Africa, was in a very depressed
condition. Ostrich-farming was in its infancy, and agriculture but
little developed. The Boers, except in the immediate vicinity of Cape
Town, were a primitive people. Their wants were few, they lacked
enterprise, and the trade of the colony was restricted. Even the British
colonists at that time were far from rich. The diamond industry
therefore offered considerable attractions, especially to colonists of
British origin. It was also the means at length of demonstrating the
fact that South Africa, barren and poor on the surface, was rich below
the surface. It takes ten acres of Karroo to feed a sheep, but it was
now seen that a few square yards of diamondiferous blue ground would
feed a dozen families. By the end of 1871 a large population had already
gathered at the diamond fields, and immigration continued steadily,
bringing new-comers to the rich fields. Among the first to seek a
fortune at the diamond fields was Cecil Rhodes.
In 1858 the scheme of Sir George Grey for the federation of the various
colonies and states of South Africa had been rejected, as has been
stated, by the home authorities. In 1874 the 4th earl of Carnarvon,
secretary of state for the colonies, who had been successful in aiding
to bring about the federation of Canada, turned his attention to a
similar scheme for the confederation of South Africa. The representative
government in Cape Colony had been replaced in 1872 by responsible, i.e.
self-government, and the new parliament at Cape Town resented the manner
in which Lord Carnarvon propounded his suggestions. A resolution was
passed (June 11, 1875) stating that any scheme in favour of
confederation must in its opinion originate within South Africa itself.
James Anthony Froude, the distinguished historian, was sent out by Lord
Carnarvon to further his policy in South Africa. As a diplomatist and a
representative of the British government, the general opinion in South
Africa was that Froude was not a success, and he entirely failed to
induce the colonists to adopt Lord Carnarvon's views. In 1876,
Fingoland, the Idutywa reserve, and Noman's-land, tracts of country on
the Kaffir frontier, were annexed by Great Britain, on the understanding
that the Cape government should provide for their government. Lord
Carnarvon, still bent on confederation, now appointed Sir Bartle Frere
governor of Cape Colony and high commissioner of South Africa.
Frere had no sooner taken office as high commissioner than he found
himself confronted with serious native troubles in Zululand and on the
Kaffir frontier of Cape Colony. In 1877 there occurred an outbreak on
the part of the Galekas and the Gaikas. A considerable force of imperial
and colonial troops was employed to put down this rising, and the war
was subsequently known as the Ninth Kaffir war. It was in this war that
the famous Kaffir chief, Sandili, lost his life. At its conclusion the
Transkei, the territory of the Galeka tribe, under Kreli, was annexed by
the British. In the meantime Lord Carnarvon had resigned his position in
the British cabinet, and the scheme for confederation which he had been
pushing forward was abandoned. As a matter of fact, at that time Cape
Colony was too fully occupied with native troubles to take into
consideration very seriously so great a question as confederation. A
wave of feeling spread amongst the different Kaffir tribes on the
colonial frontier, and after the Gaika-Galeka War there followed in 1879
a rising in Basutoland under Moirosi, whose cattle-raiding had for some
time past caused considerable trouble. His stronghold was taken after
very severe fighting by a colonial force, but, their defeat
notwithstanding, the Basutos remained in a restless and aggressive
condition for several years. In 1880 the colonial authorities
endeavoured to extend to Basutoland the Peace Preservation Act of 1878,
under which a general disarmament of the Basutos was attempted. Further
fighting followed on this proclamation, which was by no means
successful, and although peace was declared in the country in December
1882, the colonial authorities were very glad in 1884 to be relieved of
the administration of a country which had already cost them L3,000,000.
The imperial government then took over Basutoland as a crown colony, on
the understanding that Cape Colony should contribute for administrative
purposes L18,000 annually. In 1880, Sir Bartle Frere, who by his
energetic and statesmanlike attitude on the relations with the native
states, as well as on all other questions, had won the esteem and regard
of loyal South African colonists, was recalled by the 1st earl of
Kimberley, the liberal secretary of state for the colonies, and was
succeeded by Sir Hercules Robinson. Griqualand West, which included the
diamond fields, was now incorporated as a portion of Cape Colony.
_Origin of the Afrikander Bond._--The Boer War of 1881, with its
disastrous termination, naturally reacted throughout South Africa; and
as one of the most important results, in the year 1882 the first
Afrikander Bond congress was held at Graaff Reinet. The organization of
the Bond developed into one embracing the Transvaal, the Orange Free
State and Cape Colony. Each country had a provincial committee with
district committees, and branches were distributed throughout the whole
of South Africa. At a later date the Bond in the Cape Colony dissociated
itself from its Republican branches. The general lines of policy which
this organization endeavoured to promote may best be gathered from _De
Patriot_, a paper published in the colony, and an avowed supporter of
the organization. The following extracts from articles published in 1882
will illustrate, better than anything else, the ambition entertained by
some of the promoters of this remarkable organization.
"The Afrikander Bond has for its object the establishment of a South
African nationality by spreading a true love for what is really our
fatherland. No better time could be found for establishing the Bond
than the present, when the consciousness of nationality has been
thoroughly aroused by the Transvaal war." ... "The British government
keep on talking about a confederation under the British flag, but that
will never be brought about. They can be quite certain of that. There
is just one obstacle in the way of confederation, and that is the
British flag. Let them remove that, and in less than a year the
confederation would be established under the Free Afrikander flag."
"After a time the English will realize that the advice given them by
Froude was the best--they must just have Simon's Bay as a naval and
military station on the way to India, and give over all the rest of
South Africa to the Afrikanders." ... "Our principal weapon in the
social war must be the destruction of English trade by our
establishing trading companies for ourselves." ... "It is the duty of
each true Afrikander not to spend anything with the English that he
can avoid."
_De Patriot_ afterwards became imperialist, but _Ons Land_, another Bond
organ, continued in much the same strain.
In addition to having its press organs, the Bond from time to time
published official utterances less frank in their tone than the
statements of its press. Some of the Articles of the Bond's original
manifesto are entirely praiseworthy, e.g. those referring to the
administration of justice, the honour of the people, &c.; such clauses as
these, however, were meaningless in view of the enlightened government
which obtained in Cape Colony, and for the true "inwardness" of this
document it is necessary to note Article 3, which distinctly speaks of
the promotion of South Africa's independence (_Zelfstandigheid_). If the
Bond aroused disloyalty and mistaken aspirations in one section of the
Cape inhabitants, it is equally certain that it caused a great wave of
loyal and patriotic enthusiasm to pass through another and more
enlightened section. A pamphlet written in 1885 for an association called
the Empire League by Mr Charles Leonard, who afterwards consistently
championed the cause of civil equality and impartial justice in South
Africa, maintained as follows:--
"(1) That the establishment of the English government here was
beneficial to all classes; and (2) that the withdrawal of that
government would be disastrous to every one having vested interests in
the colony.... England never can, never will, give up this colony, and
we colonists will never give up England.... Let us, the inhabitants of
the Cape Colony, be swift to recognize that we are one people, cast
together under a glorious flag of liberty, with heads clear enough to
appreciate the freedom we enjoy, and hearts resolute to maintain our
true privileges; let us desist from reproaching and insulting one
another, and, rejoicing that we have this goodly land as a common
heritage, remember that by united action only can we realize its grand
possibilities. We belong both of us to a home-loving stock, and the
peace and prosperity of every home in the land is at stake. On our
action now depends the question whether our children shall curse or
bless us; whether we shall live in their memory as promoters of civil
strife, with all its miserable consequences, or as joint architects of
a happy, prosperous and united state. Each of us looks back to a noble
past. United, we may ensure to our descendants a not unworthy future.
Disunited, we can hope for nothing but stagnation, misery and ruin. Is
this a light thing?"
It is probable that many Englishmen reading Mr Leonard's manifesto at
the time regarded it as unduly alarming, but subsequent events proved
the soundness of the views it expressed. The fact is that, from 1881
onwards, two great rival ideas came into being, each strongly opposed to
the other. One was that of Imperialism--full civil rights for every
civilized man, whatever his race might be, under the supremacy and
protection of Great Britain. The other was nominally republican, but in
fact exclusively oligarchical and Dutch. The policy of the extremists of
this last party was summed up in the appeal which President Kruger made
to the Free State in February 1881, when he bade them "Come and help us.
God is with us. It is his will to unite us as a people"--"to make a
united South Africa free from British authority." The two actual
founders of the Bond party were Mr Borckenhagen, a German who was
residing in Bloemfontein, and Mr Reitz, afterwards state secretary of
the Transvaal. Two interviews have been recorded which show the true
aims of these two promoters of the Bond at the outset. One occurred
between Mr Borckenhagen and Cecil Rhodes, the other between Mr Reitz and
Mr T. Schreiner, whose brother became, at a later date, prime minister
of Cape Colony. In the first interview Mr Borckenhagen remarked to
Rhodes: "We want a united Africa," and Rhodes replied: "So do I." Mr
Borckenhagen then continued: "There is nothing in the way; we will take
you as our leader. There is only one small thing: we must, of caurse, be
independent of the rest of the world." Rhodes replied: "You take me
either for a rogue or a fool. I should be a rogue to forfeit all my
history and my traditions; and I should be a fool, because I should be
hated by my own countrymen and mistrusted by yours." But as Rhodes truly
said at Cape Town in 1898, "The only chance of a true union is the
overshadowing protection of a supreme power, and any German, Frenchman,
or Russian would tell you that the best and most liberal power is that
over which Her Majesty reigns." The other interview took place at the
beginning of the Bond's existence. Being approached by Mr Reitz, Mr T.
Schreiner objected that the Bond aimed ultimately at the overthrow of
British rule and the expulsion of the British flag from South Africa. To
this Mr Reitz replied: "Well, what if it is so?" Mr Schreiner
expostulated in the following terms: "You do not suppose that that flag
is going to disappear without a tremendous struggle and hard fighting?"
"Well, I suppose not, but even so, what of that?" rejoined Mr Reitz. In
the face of this testimony with reference to two of the most prominent
of the Bond's promoters, it is impossible to deny that from its
beginning the great underlying idea of the Bond was an independent South
Africa.
_Mr Hofmeyr's Policy_.--In 1882 an act was passed in the Cape
legislative assembly, empowering members to speak in the Dutch language
on the floor of the House, if they so desired. The intention of this act
was a liberal one, but the moment of its introduction was inopportune,
and its effect was to give an additional stimulus to the policy of the
Bond. It was probably also the means of bringing into the House a number
of Dutchmen, by no means well educated, who would not have been returned
had they been obliged to speak English. By this act an increase of
influence was given to the Dutch leaders. The head of the Afrikander
Bond at this time in Cape Colony, and the leader of Dutch opinion, was
Mr J.H. Hofmeyr, a man of undoubted ability and astuteness. Although he
was recognized leader of the Dutch party in Cape Colony, he consistently
refused to take office, preferring to direct the policy and the action
of others from an independent position. Mr Hofmeyr sat in the house of
assembly as member for Stellenbosch, a strong Dutch constituency. His
influence over the Dutch members was supreme, and in addition to
directing the policy of the Bond within the Cape Colony, he supported
and defended the aggressive expansion policy of President Kruger and the
Transvaal Boers. In 1883, during a debate on the Basutoland
Dis-annexation Bill, Rhodes openly charged Mr Hofmeyr in the House with
a desire to see a "United States of South Africa under its own flag." In
1884 Mr Hofmeyr led the Bond in strongly supporting the Transvaal Boers
who had invaded Bechuanaland (q.v.), proclaiming that if the
Bechuanaland freebooters were not permitted to retain the territories
they had seized, in total disregard of the terms of the conventions of
1881 and 1884, there would be rebellion among the Dutch of Cape Colony.
Fortunately, however, for the peace of Cape Colony at that time, Sir
Charles Warren, sent by the imperial government to maintain British
rights, removed the invading Boers from Stellaland and Goshen--two
so-called republics set up by the Boer freebooters--in March 1885 and no
rebellion occurred. Nevertheless the Bond party was so strong in the
House that they compelled the ministry under Sir Thomas Scanlen to
resign in 1884. The logical and constitutional course for Mr Hofmeyr to
have followed in these circumstances would have been to accept office
and himself form a government. This he refused to do. He preferred to
put in a nominee of his own who should be entirely dependent on him. Mr
Upington, a clever Irish barrister, was the man he selected, and under
him was formed in 1884 what will always be known in Cape history as the
"Warming-pan" ministry. This action was denounced by many British
colonists, who were sufficiently loyal, not only to Great Britain, but
also to that constitution which had been conferred by Great Britain upon
Cape Colony, to desire to see the man who really wielded political power
also acting as the responsible head of the party. It was Mr Hofmeyr's
refusal to accept this responsibility, as well as the nature of his Bond
policy, which won for him the political sobriquet of the "Mole." Open
and responsible exercise of a power conferred under the constitution of
the country, Englishmen and English colonists would have accepted and
even welcomed. But that subterranean method of Dutch policy which found
its strongest expression in Pretoria, and which operated from Pretoria
to Cape Town, could not but be resented by loyal colonists. From 1881
down to 1898, Mr Hofmeyr practically determined how Dutch members should
vote, and also what policy the Bond should adopt at every juncture in
its history. In 1895 he resigned his seat in parliament--an action which
made his political dictatorship still more remarkable. This influence on
Cape politics was a demoralizing one. Other well-known politicians at
the Cape subsequently found it convenient to adapt their views a good
deal too readily to those held by the Bond. In justice to Mr Hofmeyr,
however, it is only fair to say that after the Warren expedition in
1885, which was at least evidence that Great Britain did not intend to
renounce her supremacy in South Africa altogether, he adopted a less
hostile or anti-British attitude. The views and attitude of Mr Hofmeyr
between 1881 and 1884--when even loyal British colonists, looking to the
events which followed Majuba, had almost come to believe that Great
Britain had little desire to maintain her supremacy--can scarcely be
wondered at.
_Rhodes and Dutch Sentiment._--Recognizing the difficulties of the
position, Cecil Rhodes from the outset of his political career showed
his desire to conciliate Dutch sentiment by considerate treatment and
regard for Dutch prejudices. Rhodes was first returned as member of the
House of Assembly for Barkly West in 1880, and in spite of all
vicissitudes this constituency remained loyal to him. He supported the
bill permitting Dutch to be used in the House of Assembly in 1882, and
early in 1884 he first took office, as treasurer-general, under Sir
Thomas Scanlen. Rhodes had only held this position for six weeks when
Sir Thomas Scanlen resigned, and in August of the same year he was sent
by Sir Hercules Robinson to British Bechuanaland as deputy-commissioner
in succession to the Rev. John Mackenzie, the London Missionary
Society's representative at Kuruman, who in the previous May had
proclaimed the queen's authority over the district. Rhodes's efforts to
conciliate the Boers failed--hence the necessity for the Warren mission.
In 1885 the territories of Cape Colony were farther extended, and
Tembuland, Bomvanaland and Galekaland were formally added to the colony.
In 1886 Sir Gordon Sprigg succeeded Sir Thomas Upington as prime
minister.
_South Affican Customs Union._--The period from 1878 to 1885 in Cape
Colony had been one of considerable unrest. In this short time, in
addition to the chronic troubles with the Basutos--which led the Cape to
hand them over to the imperial authorities--there occurred a series of
native disturbances which were followed by the Boer War of 1881, and the
Bechuanaland disturbances of 1884. In spite, however, of these
drawbacks, the development of the country proceeded. The diamond
industry was flourishing. In 1887 a conference was held in London for
"promoting a closer union between the various parts of the British
empire by means of an imperial tariff of customs." At this conference it
is worthy of note that Mr Hofmeyr propounded a sort of "Zollverein"
scheme, in which imperial customs were to be levied independently of the
duties payable on all goods entering the empire from abroad. In making
the proposition he stated that his objects were "to promote the union of
the empire, and at the same time to obtain revenue for the purposes of
general defence." The scheme was not at the time found practicable. But
its authorship, as well as the sentiments accompanying it, created a
favourable view of Mr Hofmeyr's attitude. In the year 1888, in spite of
the failure of statesmen and high commissioners to bring about political
confederation, the members of the Cape parliament set about the
establishment of a South African Customs Union. A Customs Union Bill was
passed, and this in itself constituted a considerable development of the
idea of federation. Shortly after the passing of the bill the Orange
Free State entered the union. An endeavour was also made then, and for
many years afterwards, to get the Transvaal to join. But President
Kruger, consistently pursuing his own policy, hoped through the Delagoa
Bay railway to make the South African Republic entirely independent of
Cape Colony. The endeavour to bring about a customs union which would
embrace the Transvaal was also little to the taste of President Kruger's
Hollander advisers, interested as they were in the schemes of the
Netherlands Railway Company, who owned the railways of the Transvaal.
_Diamonds and Railways._--Another event of considerable commercial
importance to the Cape Colony, and indeed to South Africa, was the
amalgamation of the diamond-mining companies, chiefly brought about by
Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Beit and "Barney" Barnato, in 1889. One of the
principal and most beneficent results of the discovery and development
of the diamond mines was the great impetus which it gave to railway
extension. Lines were opened up to Worcester and Beaufort West, to
Graham's Town, Graaff Reinet and Queenstown. Kimberley was reached in
1885. In 1890 the line was extended northwards on the western frontier
of the Transvaal as far as Vryburg in Bechuanaland. In 1889 the Free
State entered into an arrangement with the Cape Colony whereby the main
trunk railway was extended to Bloemfontein, the Free State receiving
half the profits. Subsequently the Free State bought at cost price the
portion of the railway in its own territory. In 1891 the Free State
railway was still farther extended to Viljoen's Drift on the Vaal river,
and in 1892 it reached Pretoria and Johannesburg.
_Rhodes as Prime Minister: Native Policy_.--In 1889 Sir Henry Loch was
appointed high commissioner and governor of Cape Colony in succession to
Sir Hercules Robinson. In 1890 Sir Gordon Sprigg, the premier of the
colony, resigned, and a Rhodes government was formed. Prior to the
formation of this ministry (see table at end of article), and while Sir
Gordon Sprigg was still in office, Mr Hofmeyr approached Rhodes and
offered to put him in office as a Bond nominee. This offer was declined.
When, however, Rhodes was invited to take office after the downfall of
the Sprigg ministry, he asked the Bond leaders to meet him and discuss
the situation. His policy of customs and railway unions between the
various states, added to the personal esteem in which he was at this
time held by many of the Dutchmen, enabled him to undertake and to carry
on successfully the business of government.
The colonies of British Bechuanaland and Basutoland were now taken into
the customs union existing between the Orange Free State and Cape
Colony. Pondoland, another native territory, was added to the colony in
1894, and the year was marked by the Glen Grey Act, a departure in
native policy for which Rhodes was chiefly responsible. It dealt with
the natives residing in certain native reserves, and in addition to
providing for their interests and holdings, and in other ways protecting
the privileges accorded to them, the principle of the duty of some
degree of labour devolving upon every able-bodied native enjoying these
privileges was asserted, and a small labour tax was levied.[6] This is
in many respects the most statesmanlike act dealing with natives on the
statute-book; and in the session of 1895 Rhodes was able to report to
the Cape parliament that the act then applied to 160,000 natives. In
1905 the labour clauses of this act, which had fallen into desuetude,
were repealed. The clauses had, however, achieved success, in that they
had caused many thousands of natives to fulfil the conditions requisite
to claim exemption.
In other respects Rhodes's native policy was marked by combined
consideration and firmness. Ever since the granting of self-government
the natives had enjoyed the franchise. An act passed in 1892, at the
instance of Rhodes, imposed an educational test on applicants for
registration, and made other provisions, all tending to restrict the
acquisition of the franchise by "tribal" natives, the possible danger
arising from a large native vote being already obvious (see section
_Constitution_).
Rhodes opposed the native liquor traffic, and at the risk of offending
some of his supporters among the brandy-farmers of the western
provinces, he suppressed it entirely on the diamond mines, and
restricted it as far as he was able in the native reserves and
territories. Nevertheless the continuance of this traffic on colonial
farms, as well as to some extent in the native territories and reserves,
is a black spot in the annals of the Cape Colony. The Hottentots have
been terribly demoralized, and even partially destroyed by it in the
western province.
Another and little-known instance of Rhodes's keen insight in dealing
with native affairs--an action which had lasting results on the history
of the colony--may be given. After the native territories east of the
Kei had been added to Cape Colony, a case of claim to inheritance came
up for trial, and in accordance with the law of the colony, the court
held that the eldest son of a native was his heir. This decision created
the strongest resentment among the people of the territory, as it was in
distinct contradiction to native tribal law, which recognized the great
son, or son of the chief wife, as heir. The government were threatened
with a native disturbance, when Rhodes telegraphed his assurance that
compensation should be granted, and that such a decision should never be
given again. This assurance was accepted and tranquillity restored. At
the close of the next session (that of 1894), after this incident had
occurred, Rhodes laid on the table a bill drafted by himself, the
shortest the House had ever seen. It provided that all civil cases were
to be tried by magistrates, an appeal to lie only to the chief
magistrate of the territory with an assessor. Criminal cases were to be
tried before the judges of supreme court on circuit. The bill was
passed, and the effect of it was, inasmuch as the magistrates
administered according to native law, that native marriage customs and
laws (including polygamy) were legalized in these territories. Rhodes
had retrieved his promise, and no one who has studied and lived amongst
the Bantu will question that the action taken was both beneficent and
wise.
During 1895 Sir Hercules Robinson was reappointed governor and high
commissioner of South Africa in succession to Sir Henry Loch, and in the
same year Mr Chamberlain became secretary of state for the colonies.
_Movement for Commercial Federation_.--With the development of railways,
and the extension of trade between Cape Colony and the Transvaal, there
had grown up a closer relationship on political questions. Whilst
premier of Cape Colony, by means of the customs union and in every other
way, Rhodes endeavoured to bring about a friendly measure of at least
commercial federation among the states and colonies of South Africa. He
hoped to establish both a commercial and a railway union, and a speech
which he made in 1894 at Cape Town admirably describes this policy:--
"With full affection for the flag which I have been born under, and
the flag I represent, I can understand the sentiment and feeling of a
republican who has created his independence, and values that before
all; but I can say fairly that I believe in the future that I can
assimilate the system, which I have been connected with, with the Cape
Colony, and it is not an impossible idea that the neighbouring
republics, retaining their independence, should share with us as to
certain general principles. If I might put it to you, I would say the
principles of tariffs, the principle of railway connexion, the
principle of appeal in law, the principle of coinage, and in fact all
those principles which exist at the present moment in the United
States, irrespective of the local assemblies which exist in each
separate state in that country."
To this policy President Kruger and the Transvaal government offered
every possible opposition. Their action in what is known as the Vaal
River Drift question will best illustrate the line of action which the
Transvaal government believed it expedient to adopt. A difficulty arose
at the termination of the agreement in 1894 between the Cape government
railway and the Netherlands railway. The Cape government, for the
purposes of carrying the railway from the Vaal river to Johannesburg,
had advanced the sum of L600,000 to the Netherlands railway and the
Transvaal government conjointly; at the same time it was stipulated that
the Cape government should have the right to fix the traffic rate until
the end of 1894, or until such time as the Delagoa Bay-Pretoria line was
completed. These rates were fixed by the Cape government at 2d. per ton
per mile, but at the beginning of 1895 the rate for the 52 m. of railway
from the Vaal river to Johannesburg was raised by the Netherlands
railway to no less a sum than 8d. per ton per mile. It is quite evident
from the action which President Kruger subsequently took in the matter
that this charge was put on with his approval, and with the object of
compelling traffic to be brought to the Transvaal by the Delagoa route,
instead of as heretofore by the colonial railway. In order to compete
against this very high rate, the merchants of Johannesburg began
removing their goods from the Vaal river by waggon. Thereupon President
Kruger arbitrarily closed the drifts (fords) on the Vaal river, and thus
prevented through waggon traffic, causing an enormous block of waggons
on the banks of the Vaal. A protest was then made by the Cape government
against the action of the Transvaal, on the ground that it was a breach
of the London Convention. President Kruger took no notice of this
remonstrance, and an appeal was made to the imperial government;
whereupon the latter entered into an agreement with the Cape government,
to the effect that if the Cape would bear half the cost of any
expedition which should be necessary, assist with troops, and give full
use of the Cape railway for military purposes if required, a protest
should be sent to President Kruger on the subject. These terms were
accepted by Rhodes and his colleagues, of whom Mr W.P. Schreiner was
one, and a protest was then sent by Mr Chamberlain stating that the
government would regard the closing of the drifts as a breach of the
London Convention, and as an unfriendly action calling for the gravest
remonstrance. President Kruger at once reopened the drifts, and
undertook that he would issue no further proclamation on the subject
except after consultation with the imperial government.
On the 29th of December 1895 Dr Jameson (q.v.) made his famous raid into
the Transvaal, and Rhodes's complicity in this movement compelled him to
resign the premiership of Cape Colony in January 1896, the vacant post
being taken by Sir Gordon Sprigg. As Rhodes's complicity in the raid
became known, there naturally arose a strong feeling of resentment and
astonishment among his colleagues in the Cape ministry, who had been
kept in complete ignorance of his connexion with any such scheme. Mr
Hofmeyr and the Bond were loud in their denunciation of him, nor can it
be denied that the circumstances of the raid greatly embittered against
England the Dutch element in Cape Colony, and influenced their
subsequent attitude towards the Transvaal Boers.
In 1897 a native rising occurred under Galeshwe, a Bantu chief, in
Griqualand West. Galeshwe was arrested and the rebellion repressed. On
cross-examination Galeshwe stated that Bosnian, a magistrate of the
Transvaal, had supplied ammunition to him, and urged him to rebel
against the government of Cape Colony. There is every reason to suppose
that this charge was true, and it is consistent with the intrigues which
the Boers from time to time practised among the natives.
In 1897 Sir Alfred Milner was appointed high commissioner of South
Africa and governor of Cape Colony, in succession to Sir Hercules
Robinson, who had been created a peer under the title of Baron Rosmead
in August 1896.
_Mr Schreiner's Policy_.--In 1898 commercial federation in South Africa
advanced another stage, Natal entering the customs union. A fresh
convention was drafted at this time, and under it "a uniform tariff on
all imported goods consumed within such union, and an equitable
distribution of the duties collected on such goods amongst the parties
to such union, and free trade between the colonies and state in respect
of all South African products," was arranged. In the same year, too, the
Cape parliamentary election occurred, and the result was the return to
power of a Bond ministry under Mr W.P. Schreiner. From this time, until
June 1900, Mr Schreiner remained in office as head of the Cape
government. During the negotiations (see TRANSVAAL) which preceded the
war in 1899, feeling at the Cape ran very high, and Mr Schreiner's
attitude was very freely discussed. As head of a party, dependent for
its position in power on the Bond's support, his position was
undoubtedly a trying one. At the same time, as prime minister of a
British colony, it was strongly felt by loyal colonists that he should
at least have refrained from openly interfering between the Transvaal
and the imperial government during the course of most difficult
negotiations. His public expressions of opinion were hostile in tone to
the policy pursued by Mr Chamberlain and Sir Alfred Milner. The effect
of them, it was believed, might conceivably be to encourage President
Kruger in persisting in his rejection of the British terms. Mr
Schreiner, it is true, used directly what influence he possessed to
induce President Kruger to adopt a reasonable course. But however
excellent his intentions, his publicly expressed disapproval of the
Chamberlain-Milner policy probably did more harm than his private
influence with Mr Kruger could possibly do good. On the 11th of June
1899, shortly after the Bloemfontein conference, from which Sir Alfred
Milner had just returned, Mr Schreiner asked the high commissioner to
inform Mr Chamberlain that he and his colleagues agreed in regarding
President Kruger's Bloemfontein proposals as "practical, reasonable and
a considerable step in the right direction." Early in June, however, the
Cape Dutch politicians began to realize that President Kruger's attitude
was not so reasonable as they had endeavoured to persuade themselves,
and Mr Hofmeyr, accompanied by Mr Herholdt, the Cape minister of
agriculture, visited Pretoria. On arrival, they found that the Transvaal
Volksraad, in a spirit of defiance and even levity, had just passed a
resolution offering four new seats in the Volksraad to the mining
districts, and fifteen to exclusively burgher districts. Mr Hofmeyr, on
meeting the executive, freely expressed indignation at these
proceedings. Unfortunately, Mr Hofmeyr's influence was more than
counterbalanced by an emissary from the Free State, Mr Abraham Fischer,
who, while purporting to be a peacemaker, practically encouraged the
Boer executive to take extreme measures. Mr Hofmeyr's established
reputation as an astute diplomatist, and as the trusted leader for years
of the Cape Dutch party, made him as powerful a delegate as it was
possible to find. If any emissary could accomplish anything in the way
of persuading Mr Kruger, it was assuredly Mr Hofmeyr. Much was looked
for from his mission by moderate men of all parties, and by none more
so, it is fair to believe, than by Mr Schreiner. But Mr Hofmeyr's
mission, like every other mission to Mr Kruger to induce him to take a
reasonable and equitable course, proved entirely fruitless. He returned
to Cape Town disappointed, but probably not altogether surprised at the
failure of his mission. Meanwhile a new proposal was drafted by the Boer
executive, which, before it was received in its entirety, or at least
before it was clearly understood, elicited from Mr Schreiner a letter on
the 7th of July to the _South African News_, in which, referring to his
government, he said:--
"While anxious and continually active with good hope in the cause of
securing reasonable modifications of the existing representative
system of the South African Republic, this government is convinced
that no ground whatever exists for active interference in the internal
affairs of that republic."
This letter was precipitate and unfortunate. On the 11th of July, after
seeing Mr Hofmeyr on his return, Mr Schreiner made a personal appeal to
President Kruger to approach the imperial government in a friendly
spirit. At this time an incident occurred which raised the feeling
against Mr Schreiner to a very high pitch. On the 7th of July 500 rifles
and 1,000,000 rounds of ammunition were landed at Port Elizabeth,
consigned to the Free State government, and forwarded to Bloemfontein.
Mr Schreiner's attention was called to this consignment at the time, but
he refused to stop it, alleging as his reason that, inasmuch as Great
Britain was at peace with the Free State, he had no right to interdict
the passage of arms through the Cape Colony. The British colonist is as
capable of a grim jest as the Transvaal Boer, and this action of Mr
Schreiner's won for him the nickname "Ammunition Bill." At a later date
he was accused of delay in forwarding artillery and rifles for the
defence of Kimberley, Mafeking and other towns of the colony. The reason
he gave for delay was that he did not anticipate war; and that he did
not wish to excite unwarrantable suspicions in the minds of the Free
State. His conduct in both instances was perhaps technically correct,
but it was much resented by loyal colonists.
On the 28th of July Mr Chamberlain sent a conciliatory despatch to
President Kruger, suggesting a meeting of delegates to consider and
report on his last franchise proposals, which were complex to a degree.
Mr Schreiner, on the 3rd of August, telegraphed to Mr Fischer begging
the Transvaal to welcome Mr Chamberlain's proposal. At a later date, on
receiving an inquiry from the Free State as to the movements of British
troops, Mr Schreiner curtly refused any information, and referred the
Free State to the high commissioner. On the 28th of August Sir Gordon
Sprigg in the House of Assembly moved the adjournment of the debate, to
discuss the removal of arms to the Free State. Mr Schreiner, in reply,
used expressions which called down upon him the severest censure and
indignation, both in the colony and in Great Britain. He stated that,
should the storm burst, he would keep the colony aloof with regard both
to its forces and its people. In the course of the speech he also read a
telegram from President Steyn, in which the president repudiated all
contemplated aggressive action on the part of the Free State as absurd.
The speech created a great sensation in the British press. It was
probably forgotten at the time (though Lord Kimberley afterwards
publicly stated it) that one of the chief reasons why the Gladstone
government had granted the retrocession of the Transvaal after Majuba,
was the fear that the Cape Colonial Dutch would join their kinsmen if
the war continued. What was a danger in 1881, Mr Schreiner knew to be a
still greater danger in 1899. At the same time it is quite obvious, from
a review of Mr Schreiner's conduct through the latter half of 1899, that
he took an entirely mistaken view of the Transvaal situation. He
evinced, as premier of the Cape Colony, the same inability to understand
the Uitlanders' grievances, the same futile belief in the eventual
fairness of President Kruger, as he had shown when giving evidence
before the British South Africa Select Committee into the causes of the
Jameson Raid. Actual experience taught him that President Kruger was
beyond an appeal to reason, and that the protestations of President
Steyn were insincere. War had no sooner commenced with the ultimatum of
the Transvaal Republic on the 9th of October 1899, than Mr Schreiner
found himself called upon to deal with the conduct of Cape rebels. The
rebels joined the invading forces of President Steyn, whose false
assurances Mr Schreiner had offered to an indignant House of Assembly
only a few weeks before. The war on the part of the Republics was
evidently not to be merely one of self-defence. It was one of aggression
and aggrandisement. Mr Schreiner ultimately addressed, as prime
minister, a sharp remonstrance to President Steyn for allowing his
burghers to invade the colony. He also co-operated with Sir Alfred
Milner, and used his influence to restrain the Bond.
_The War of 1899-1902._[7]--The first shot actually fired in the war
was at Kraipan, a small railway station within the colony, 40 m. south
of Mafeking, a train being derailed, and ammunition intended for Colonel
Baden-Powell seized. The effect of this was entirely to cut off
Mafeking, the northernmost town in Cape Colony, and it remained in a
state of siege for over seven months. On the 16th of October Kimberley
was also isolated. Proclamations by the Transvaal and Free State
annexing portions of Cape Colony were actually issued on the 18th of
October, and included British Bechuanaland and Griqualand West, with the
diamond fields. On the 28th of October Mr Schreiner signed a
proclamation issued by Sir Alfred Milner as high commissioner, declaring
the Boer annexations of territory within Cape Colony to be null and
void.
Then came the British reverses at Magersfontein (on the 11th of
December) and Stormberg (on the 10th of December). The effect of these
engagements at the very outset of the war, occurring as they did within
Cape Colony, was to offer every inducement to a number of the frontier
colonial Boers to join their kinsmen of the republics. The Boers were
prolific, and their families large. Many younger sons from the colony,
with nothing to lose, left their homes with horse and rifle to join the
republican forces.
Meanwhile the loyal Cape colonists were chafing at the tardy manner in
which they were enrolled by the imperial authorities. It was not until
after the arrival of Lord Roberts and Lord Kitchener at Cape Town on the
10th of January 1900 that these invaluable, and many of them
experienced, men were freely invited to come forward. So strongly did
Lord Roberts feel on the subject, that he at once made Colonel Brabant,
a well-known and respected colonial veteran and member of the House of
Assembly, a brigadier-general, and started recruiting loyal colonists in
earnest. On the 15th of February Kimberley was relieved by General
French, and the Boer general, Cronje, evacuated Magersfontein, and
retreated towards Bloemfontein. Cecil Rhodes was shut up in Kimberley
during the whole of the siege, and his presence there undoubtedly
offered an additional incentive to the Boers to endeavour to capture the
town, but his unique position and influence with the De Beers workmen
enabled him to render yeoman service, and infused enthusiasm and courage
into the inhabitants. The manufacture of a big gun, which was able to
compete with the Boer "Long Tom," at the De Beers workshops, under
Rhodes's orders, and by the ingenuity of an American, Mr. Labram, who
was killed a few days after its completion, forms one of the most
striking incidents of the period.
With the relief of Mafeking on the 17th of May, the Cape rebellion
ended, and the colony was, at least for a time, delivered of the
presence of hostile forces.
On the 20th of March Mr (afterwards Sir James) Rose-Innes, a prominent
member of the House of Assembly, who for several years had held aloof
from either party, and who also had defended Mr Schreiner's action with
regard to the passage of arms to the Free State, addressed his
constituents at Claremont in support of the annexation of both
republics; and in the course of an eloquent speech he stated that in
Canada, in spite of rebellions, loyalty had been secured from the French
Canadians by free institutions. In South Africa they might hope that a
similar policy would attain a similar result with the Boers. In June, Mr
Schreiner, whose recent support of Sir Alfred Milner had incensed many
of his Bond followers, resigned in consequence of the refusal of some of
his colleagues to support the disfranchisement bill which he was
prepared, in accordance with the views of the home government, to
introduce for the punishment of Cape rebels. The bill certainly did not
err on the side of severity, but disfranchisement for their supporters
in large numbers was more distasteful to the Bond extremists than any
stringency towards individuals. Sir Gordon Sprigg, who after a political
crisis of considerable delicacy, succeeded Mr Schreiner and for the
fourth time became prime minister, was able to pass the Bill with the
co-operation of Mr Schreiner and his section. Towards the end of the
year 1900 the war entered on a new phase, and took the form of guerilla
skirmishes with scattered forces of marauding Boers. In December some of
these bands entered the Cape Colony and endeavoured to induce colonial
Boers to join them. In this endeavour they met at first with little or
no success; but as the year 1901 progressed and the Boers still managed
to keep the various districts in a ferment, it was deemed necessary by
the authorities to proclaim martial law over the whole colony, and this
was done on the 9th of October 1901.
On the 4th of January 1901 Sir Alfred Milner was gazetted governor of
the Transvaal and Orange River Colony, being shortly afterwards created
a peer as Lord Milner, and Sir Walter Hely-Hutchinson, governor of
Natal, was appointed his successor as governor of the Cape Colony. The
office of high commissioner in South Africa was now separated from the
governorship of the Cape and associated with that of the Transvaal--an
indication of the changed conditions in South Africa. The division of
the colonists into those who favoured the Boer states and those firmly
attached to the British connexion was reflected, to the detriment of the
public weal, in the parties in the Cape parliament. Proposals were made
to suspend the constitution, but this drastic course was not adopted.
The Progressive party, the name taken by those who sought a permanent
settlement under the British flag, lost their leader, and South Africa
its foremost statesman by the death, in May 1902, of Cecil Rhodes, a few
weeks before the end of the war.
_After the War_.--The acknowledgment of defeat by the Boers in the
field, and the surrender of some 10,000 rebels, did not weaken the
endeavours of the Dutch to obtain political supremacy in the colony.
Moreover, in the autumn of 1902 Sir Gordon Sprigg, the prime minister,
nominally the leader of the Progressives, sought to maintain his
position by securing the support of the Bond party in parliament. In the
early part of 1903 Mr Chamberlain included Cape Town in his visit to
South Africa, and had conferences with the political leaders of all
parties. Reconciliation between the Bond and British elements in the
colony was, however, still impossible, and the two parties concentrated
their efforts in a struggle for victory at the coming election. Mr
Hofmeyr, who had chosen to spend the greater part of the war period in
Europe, returned to the Cape to reorganize the Bond. On the other side
Dr Jameson came forward as the leader of the Progressives. Parliament
was dissolved in September 1903. It had passed, since the war, two
measures of importance--one (1902) restricting alien immigration, the
other (1903) ratifying the first customs convention between all the
South African colonies. This convention was notable for its grant of
preferential treatment (in general, a rebate of 25% on the customs
already levied) to imports from the United Kingdom.
The election turned on the issue of British or Bond supremacy. It was
fought on a register purged of the rebel voters, many of whom, besides
being disfranchised, were in prison. The issue was doubtful, and each
side sought to secure the support of the native voters, who in several
constituencies held the balance of power. The Bondsmen were more lavish
than their opponents in their promises to the natives and even invited a
Kaffir journalist (who declined) to stand for a seat in the Assembly. In
view of the agitation then proceeding for the introduction of Chinese
coolies to work the mines on the Rand, the Progressives declared their
intention, if returned, to exclude them from the colony, and this
declaration gained them some native votes. The polling (in January and
February 1904) resulted in a Progressive majority of five in a house of
95 members. The rejected candidates included prominent Bond supporters
like Mr Merriman and Mr Sauer, and also Sir Gordon Sprigg and Mr A.
Douglass, another member of the cabinet. Mr W.P. Schreiner, the
ex-premier, who stood as an Independent, was also rejected.
_The Jameson Ministry_.--On the 18th of February Sir Gordon Sprigg
resigned and was succeeded by Dr L.S. Jameson, who formed a ministry
wholly British in character. The first task of the new government was to
introduce (on the 4th of March) an Additional Representation Bill, to
rectify--in part--the disparity in electoral power of the rural and
urban districts. Twelve new seats in the House of Assembly were divided
among the larger towns, and three members were added to the legislative
council. The town voter being mainly British, the bill met with the
bitter opposition of the Bond members, who declared that its object was
the extinction of their parliamentary power. In fact, the bill was
called for by the glaring anomalies in the distribution of seats by
which a minority of voters in the country districts returned a majority
of members, and it left the towns still inadequately represented. The
bill was supported by two or three Dutch members, who were the object of
violent attack by the Bondsmen. It became law, and the elections for the
additional seats were held in July, after the close of the session. They
resulted in strengthening the Progressive majority both in the House of
Assembly and in the legislative council--where the Progressives
previously had a majority of one only.
At the outset of its career the Jameson ministry had to face a serious
financial situation. During the war the supplying of the army in the
field had caused an artificial inflation of trade, and the Sprigg
ministry had pursued a policy of extravagant expenditure not warranted
by the finances of the colony. The slow recovery of the gold-mining and
other industries in the Transvaal after the war was reflected in a great
decline in trade in Cape Colony during the last half of 1903, the
distress being aggravated by severe drought. When Dr Jameson assumed
office he found an empty treasury, and considerable temporary loans had
to be raised. Throughout 1904, moreover, revenue continued to
shrink--compared with 1903 receipts dropped from L11,701,000 to
L9,913,000. The government, besides cutting down official salaries and
exercising strict economy, contracted (July 1904) a loan for L3,000,000.
It also passed a bill imposing a graduated tax (6d. to 1s. in the L) on
all incomes over L1000. A substantial excise duty was placed on spirits
and beer, measures of relief for the brandy-farmers being taken at the
same time. The result was that while there was a deficit on the budget
of 1904-1905 of L731,000, the budget of 1905-1906 showed a surplus of
L5161. This small surplus was obtained notwithstanding a further
shrinkage in revenue.
Dr Jameson's programme was largely one of material development. In the
words of the speech opening the 1905 session of parliament, "without a
considerable development of our agricultural and pastoral resources our
position as a self-sustaining colony cannot be assured." This reliance
on its own resources was the more necessary for the Cape because of the
keen rivalry of Natal and Delagoa Bay for the carrying trade of the
Transvaal. The opening up of backward districts by railways was
vigorously pursued, and in other ways great efforts were made to assist
agriculture. These efforts to help the country districts met with
cordial recognition from the Dutch farmers, and the release, in May
1904, of all rebel prisoners was another step towards reconciliation. On
the exclusion of Chinese from the colony the Bond party were also in
agreement with the ministry. An education act passed in 1905 established
school boards on a popular franchise and provided for the gradual
introduction of compulsory education. The cultivation of friendly
relations with the neighbouring colonies was also one of the leading
objects of Dr Jameson's policy. The Bond, on its side, sought to draw
closer to Het Volk, the Boer organization in the Transvaal, and similar
bodies, and at its 1906 congress, held in March that year at Ceres, a
resolution with that aim was passed, the design being to unify, in
accordance with the original conception of the Bond, Dutch sentiment and
action throughout South Africa.
Native affairs proved a source of considerable anxiety. In January 1905
an inter-colonial native affairs commission reported on the native
question as it affected South Africa as a whole, proposals being made
for an alteration of the laws in Cape Colony respecting the franchise
exercised by natives. In the opinion of the commission the possession of
the franchise by the Cape natives under existing conditions was sure to
create in time an intolerable situation, and was an unwise and dangerous
thing. (The registration of 1905 showed that there were over 23,000
coloured voters in the colony.) The commission proposed separate voting
by natives only for a fixed number of members of the legislature--the
plan adopted in New Zealand with the Maori voters. The privileged
position of the Cape native was seen to be an obstacle to the federation
of South Africa. The discussion which followed, based partly on the
reports that the ministry contemplated disfranchising the natives, led,
however, to no immediate results.
Another disturbing factor in connexion with native affairs was the
revolt of the Hottentots and Hereros in German South-West Africa (q.v.).
In 1904 and the following years large numbers of refugees, including
some of the most important chiefs, fled into British territory, and
charges were made in Germany that sufficient control over these refugees
was not exercised by the Cape government. This trouble, however, came to
an end in September 1907. In that month Morenga, a chief who had been
interned by the colonial authorities, but had escaped and recommenced
hostilities against the Germans, was once more on the British side of
the frontier and, refusing to surrender, was pursued by the Cape Mounted
Police and killed after a smart action. The revolt in the German
protectorate had been, nearly a year before the death of Morenga, the
indirect occasion of a "Boer raid" into Cape Colony. In November 1906 a
small party of Transvaal Boers, who had been employed by the Germans
against the Hottentots, entered the colony under the leadership of a man
named Ferreira, and began raiding farms and forcibly enrolling recruits.
Within a week the filibusters were all captured. Ferreira and four
companions were tried for murder and convicted, February 1907, the death
sentences being commuted to terms of penal servitude.
As the result of an inter-colonial conference held in Pietermaritzburg
in the early months of 1906, a new customs convention of a strongly
protective character came into force on the 1st of June of that year. At
the same time the rebate on goods from Great Britain and reciprocating
colonies was increased. The session of parliament which sanctioned this
change was notable for the attention devoted to irrigation and railway
schemes. But one important measure of a political character was passed
in 1906, namely an amnesty act. Under its provisions over 7000
ex-rebels, who would otherwise have had no vote at the ensuing general
election, were readmitted to the franchise in 1907.
While the efforts made to develop the agricultural and mineral resources
of the country proved successful, the towns continued to suffer from the
inflation--over-buying, over-building and over-speculation--which marked
the war period. As a consequence, imports further declined during
1906-1907, and receipts being largely dependent on customs the result
was a considerably diminished revenue. The accounts for the year ending
30th of June 1907 showed a deficit of L640,455. The decline in revenue,
L4,000,000 in four years, while not a true reflection of the economic
condition of the country--yearly becoming more self-supporting by the
increase in home produce--caused general disquietude and injuriously
affected the position of the ministry. In the session of 1907 the
Opposition in the legislative council brought on a crisis by refusing to
grant supplies voted by the lower chamber. Dr Jameson contested the
constitutional right of the council so to act, and on his advice the
governor dissolved parliament in September. Before its dissolution
parliament passed an act imposing a profit tax of 10% on diamond- and
copper-mining companies earning over L50,000 per annum, and another act
establishing an agricultural credit bank.
_Mr Merriman, Premier_.--The elections for the legislative council were
held in January 1908 and resulted in a Bond victory. Its supporters, who
called themselves the South African party, the Progressives being
renamed Unionists, obtained 17 seats out of a total of 26. Dr Jameson
thereupon resigned (31st of January), and a ministry was formed with Mr
J.X. Merriman as premier and treasurer, and Mr J.W. Sauer as minister of
public works. Neither of these politicians was a member of the Bond, and
both had held office under Cecil Rhodes and W.P. Schreiner. They had,
however, been the leading parliamentary exponents of Bond policy for a
considerable time. The elections for the legislative assembly followed
in April and, partly in consequence of the reinfranchisement of the
ex-rebels, resulted in a decisive majority for the Merriman ministry.
There were returned 69 members of the South African party, 33 Unionists
and 5 Independents, among them the ex-premiers Sir Gordon Sprigg and Mr
Schreiner. The change of ministry was not accompanied by any relief in
the financial situation. While the country districts remained fairly
prosperous (agricultural and pastoral products increasing), the transit
trade and the urban industries continued to decline. The depression was
accentuated by the financial crisis in America, which affected adversely
the wool trade, and in a more marked degree the diamond trade, leading
to the partial stoppage of the Kimberley mines. (The "slump" in the
diamond trade is shown by a comparison of the value of diamonds exported
from the Cape in the years 1907 and 1908; in 1907 they were valued at
L8,973,148, in 1908 at L4,796,655.) This seriously diminished the
revenue returns, and the public accounts for the year 1907-1908 showed a
deficit of L996,000, and a prospective deficit for the ensuing year of
an almost equal amount. To balance the budget, Mr Merriman proposed
drastic remedies, including the suspension of the sinking fund, the
reduction of salaries of all civil servants, and taxes on incomes of L50
per annum. Partly in consequence of the serious economic situation the
renewed movement for the closer union of the various South African
colonies, formally initiated by Dr Jameson in 1907, received the support
of the Cape parliament. During 1907-1908 a national convention decided
upon unification, and in 1910 the Union of South Africa was established
(see SOUTH AFRICA: _History_).
_Leading Personalities_.--The public life of Cape Colony has produced
many men of singular ability and accomplishments. The careers of Cecil
Rhodes, of Jan Hendrik Hofmeyr, and of Dr L.S. Jameson have been
sufficiently indicated (see also their separate biographies). Sir Gordon
Sprigg, four times premier, was associated with the Cape parliament from
1873 to 1904, and was once more elected to that assembly in 1908. In and
out of office his zeal was unflagging, and if he lacked those qualities
which inspire enthusiasm and are requisite in a great leader, he was at
least a model of industry. Among other prominent politicians were Sir
James Rose-Innes, Mr J.X. Merriman and Mr W.P. Schreiner. The two last
named both held the premiership; their attitude and views have been
indicated in the historical sketch. Sir James Rose-Innes, a lawyer whose
intellectual gifts and patriotism have never been impugned, was not a
"party man," and this made him, on more than one occasion, a somewhat
difficult political ally. On the native question he held a consistently
strong attitude, defending their rights, and uncompromisingly opposing
the native liquor traffic. In 1901 he went to the Transvaal as chief
justice of that colony. Sir Thomas Fuller, a Cape Town representative,
though he remained outside office, gave staunch support to every
enlightened liberal and progressive measure which was brought forward. A
man of exceptional culture and eloquence, he made his influence felt,
not only in politics, but in journalism and the best social life of the
Cape peninsula. From 1902 to 1908 he held the office of agent-general of
the colony in London.
In literature, the colony has produced at least two authors whose works
have taken their place among those of the best English writers of their
day. The _History of South Africa_, by Mr G. McCall Theal, will remain a
classic work of reference. The careful industry and the lucidity which
characterize Mr Theal's work stamp him as a historian of whom South
Africa may well be proud. In fiction, Olive Schreiner (Mrs
Cronwright-Schreiner) produced, while still in her teens, the _Story of
an African Farm_, a work which gave great promise of original literary
genius. Unfortunately, she, in common with the rest of South Africa, was
subsequently swept into the seething vortex of contemporary politics and
controversy. In music and painting there have been artists of talent in
the Cape Colony, but the country is still too young, and the conditions
of life too disturbed, to allow such a development as has already
occurred in Australia.