A. HT.

NOTE BY VARNHAGEN.—He probably had just read of the Stercoranists in

Strauss’s “Glaubenslehre.” Hence this allusion.

65.

HUMBOLDT TO VARNHAGEN.

THURSDAY, _31st March, 1842_.

On my return from Potsdam with the King I received the “Loa-Tseu,” a

work with a peculiar flavor of ante-Herodotian antiquity. Your note

accompanying the Chinese philosopher impresses me painfully. I find that

you have not yet received the courage arising from a consciousness of

restored physical strength. That the vigor of your intellect never

suffered is shown in each of your letters. I think I have not lost any

of them. About a week ago I wrote you a long one of four pages about

that “Christianly-dogmatising philosopher,” and my reply to the

inquiries of the “Biographer,” who pestered me with his pietistic

curiosity. Did that letter come to hand safely? It contained also much

chit-chat on my brother’s first erudition. You don’t make any mention of

my talkativeness. I trust it will not be a source of trouble to me. We

have succeeded with Buelow. He may be here next Saturday. It may be the

beginning of something good; or the end of it—_le bouquet_—the stage

effect of foot-lights. I met with Tholuk and Bekedorff yesterday at

Potsdam at dinner. No other occasion would have favored me with their

_apparition_. With constant devotion yours,

Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense. From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to Humboldt · 第 59 / 252 题