A. HT.

On the 18th December, 1841, Varnhagen writes in his diary: “I heard

to-day the quite incredulous, mysteriously-whispered story, that the

King would go to England for the baptism of the Prince of Wales; that it

had been agreed upon quite secretly, and that this flattering

communication had contributed a great deal to make Bunsen’s appointment

as Ambassador agreeable to the Court of St. James. The latter part of

the story makes me suspect the truth of the whole. This is by no means

the real diplomatic state of things. Should, however, the journey have

been decided upon, or even only be under discussion, there can be no

doubt that Bunsen had a hand in it; and then important events would

result therefrom, and very dangerous events, too, in my opinion. A near

alliance with England would in itself be hazardous; but to enter into

close connexion with the Anglican Church and the Tories, sure ruin! And

all Prussia, all Germany, all Europe would take it for granted that such

a connexion was really established, even if it were not; and the

supposition alone would damage us in a thousand ways; the king would

lose more in the loyal attachment of his subjects than he can now

afford. I hope the whole story will turn out a fable. Humboldt says the

spirit of discontent, which he calls the howling mania, has largely

increased here. When he left, a few were howling; but now they all howl.

His sharp and witty remarks are really refreshing in our spiritless

society.”

Before his departure for England Humboldt called on Varnhagen to take

leave. On this occasion the following entry was made in the diary, on

the 14th of January, 1842: “Humboldt called to take leave,—he starts

to-morrow night. He came from Count Maltzan’s of whose life but little

hope is left to-day. ‘His death will bring Canitz here—not Buelow’, said

Humboldt dolefully. I comforted him with the suggestion, that Canitz too

might be dropped, ‘And whose turn would it then be?’ ‘Bunsen’s.’ ‘That

would be too frightful! But as it is, he accompanies the King on his

return. That is already decided upon.’ Humboldt dislikes Canitz and

cannot understand how I am not more afraid of him—of this

arch-aristocratic, utterly bigoted—(and consequently preposterous, nay,

stupid)—fanatically anti-French Canitz, with his malicious and vulgar

sneers. ‘But then you are a Tory yourself!’ he added. ‘As to that,’ I

replied, ‘that is still somewhat doubtful—but as for Canitz, he is

honest, strict, and straightforward; he will do much, and as for the

rest, business and circumstances will control him.’”

After Humboldt’s return, Varnhagen writes on the 24th of February, in

his diary: “Humboldt gave me some very interesting descriptions of

England. At court the greatest magnificence; the mode of living,

however, plain and easy; conversation unrestrained; the tone very

pleasant and cheerful, even between gentlemen and ladies of adverse

parties. Peel pleases him as little as ever; looks like a Dutchman; is

more vain than ambitious, and narrow in his views. Lord Aberdeen is

invincibly taciturn, without being able to convince people that his

taciturnity covers anything worth saying. Bunsen has shown the greatest

want of tact; every one is against him, except the King, who likes him

better than ever.” The whole visit of the King was an intrigue of

Bunsen, and was so understood even by Englishmen.

“Our affairs here are the subject of much conjecture. As minister of

foreign affairs the pious Arnim will, for the present, be recalled from

Brussels; at some later day Canitz will be appointed,—or Bunsen, say I.

Count Alvensleben is to go to Vienna; Radowitz first to Carlsruhe, until

the embassy to the German Diet become vacant. Perhaps there is hardly

courage enough as yet to take Bunsen and remove Buelow. Every month,

however, every week must improve the courage, and then both these

appointments will be done. There is no hope that Maltzan can recover;

the better days have again been followed by the worse, and light gives

way to renewed darkness. Sad state of things.”

62.

HUMBOLDT TO VARNHAGEN.

BERLIN, MONDAY, _28th February, 1842_.

Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense. From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to Humboldt · 第 54 / 252 题