Chapter XXIII. God’s Condescension

1. An attribute of great importance for the theological conception of God,

one upon which both Biblical and rabbinical literature laid especial

stress, is His condescension and humility. The Psalmist says(409): “Thy

condescension hath made me great,” which is interpreted in the Midrash

that the Deity stoops to man in order to lift him up to Himself. A

familiar saying of R. Johanan is(410): “Wherever Scripture speaks of the

greatness of God, there mention is made also of His condescension. So when

the prophet begins, ‘Thus saith the High and Lofty One that inhabiteth

eternity, whose name is Holy: I dwell in the high and holy place,’ he adds

the words, ‘With him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit.’(411)

Or when the Deuteronomist says: ‘For the Lord your God, the great God, the

mighty and the awful,’ he concludes, ‘He doth execute justice for the

fatherless and widow, and loveth the stranger.’(412) And again the

Psalmist: ‘Extol Him that rideth upon the skies, whose name is the Lord, a

Father of the fatherless and a Judge of the widows.’ ”(413) “Do you deem

it unworthy of God that He should care for the smallest and most

insignificant person or thing in the world’s household?” asks Mendelssohn

in his _Morgenstunden_. “It certainly does not detract from the dignity of

a king to be seen fondling his child as a loving father,” and he quotes

the verse of the Psalm, “Who is like unto the Lord our God, that is

enthroned on high, that looketh down low upon heaven and upon the

earth.”(414)

2. This truth has a religious depth which no philosophy can set forth.

Only the God of Revelation is near to man in his frailty and need, ready

to hear his sighs, answer his supplication, count his tears, and relieve

his wants when his own power fails. The philosopher must reject as futile

every attempt to bring the incomprehensible essence of the Deity within

the compass of the human understanding. The religious consciousness,

however, demands that we accentuate precisely those attributes of God

which bring Him nearest to us. If reason alone would have the decisive

voice in this problem, every manifestation of God to man and every

reaching out of the soul to Him in prayer would be idle fancy and

self-deceit. It is true that the Biblical conception was simple and

child-like enough, representing God as descending from the heavens to the

earth. Still Judaism does not accept the cold and distant attitude of the

philosopher; it teaches that God as a spiritual power does condescend to

man, in order that man may realize his kinship with the Most High and rise

ever nearer to his Creator. The earth whereon man dwells and the human

heart with its longing for heaven, are not bereft of God. Wherever man

seeks Him, there He is.

3. Rabbinical Judaism is very far from the attitude assigned to it by

Christian theologians,(415) of reducing the Deity to an empty

transcendental abstraction and loosening the bond which ties the soul to

its Maker. On the contrary, it maintains these very relations with a

firmness which betokens its soundness and its profound psychological

truth. In this spirit a Talmudic master interprets the Deuteronomic verse:

“For what great nation is there that hath God so nigh unto them, as the

Lord our God is whensoever we call upon Him?”(416) saying that “each will

realize the nearness of God according to his own intellectual and

emotional disposition, and thus enter into communion with Him.” According

to another Haggadist the verse of the Psalm, “The voice of the Lord

resoundeth with power,”(417) teaches how God reveals Himself, not with His

own overwhelming might, but according to each man’s individual power and

capacity. The rabbis even make bold to assert that whenever Israel

suffers, God suffers with him; as it is written, “I will be with him in

trouble.”(418)

4. As a matter of fact, all the names which we apply to God in speech or

in prayer, even the most sublime and holy ones, are derived from our own

sensory experience and cannot be taken literally. They are used only as

vehicles to bring home to us the idea that God’s nearness is our highest

good. Even the material world, which is perceptible to our senses, must

undergo a certain inner transformation before it can be termed science or

philosophy, and becomes the possession of the mind. It requires still

further exertions of the imagination to bring within our grasp the world

of the spirit, and above all the loftiest of all conceptions, the very

being of God. Yet it is just this Being of all Beings who draws us

irresistibly toward Himself, whose nearness we perceive in the very depths

of our intellectual and emotional life. Our “soul thirsteth after God, the

living God,” and behold, He is nigh, He takes possession of us, and we

call Him _our_ God.

5. The Haggadists expressed this intimate relation of God to man, and

specifically to Israel, by bold and often naïve metaphors. They ascribe to

God special moments for wrath and for prayer, a secret chamber where he

weeps over the distress of Israel, a prayer-mantle (tallith) and

phylacteries which He wears like any of the leaders of the community, and

even lustrations which He practices exactly like mortals.(419) But such

fanciful and extravagant conceptions were never taken seriously by the

rabbis, and only partisan and prejudiced writers, entirely lacking in a

sense of humor, could point to such passages to prove that a theology of

the Synagogue carried out a “Judaization of God.”(420)

C. God In Relation To The World

Jewish Theology, Systematically and Historically Considered · 第 20 / 34 章