And having thus, _Eleutherius_, Evinc'd that 'tis possible that such

Substances as those that Chymists are wont to call their _Tria Prima_,

may be Generated, anew: I must next Endeavour to make it Probable,

that the Operation of the Fire does Actually (sometimes) not only

divide Compounded Bodies into smal Parts, but Compound those Parts

after a new Manner; whence Consequently, for ought we Know, there may

Emerge as well Saline and Sulphureous Substances, as Bodies of other

Textures. And perhaps it will assist us in our Enquiry after the

Effects of the Operations of the Fire upon other Bodies, to Consider a

little, what it does to those Mixtures which being Productions of the

Art of Man, We best know the Composition of. You may then be pleas'd

to take Notice that though Sope is made up by the Sope-Boylers of Oyle

or Grease, and Salt, and Water Diligently Incorporated together, yet

if You expose the Mass they Constitute to a Graduall Fire in a Retort,

You shall then indeed make a Separation, but not of the same

Substances that were United into Sope, but of others of a Distant and

yet not an Elementary Nature, and especially of an Oyle very sharp and

Faetid, and of a very Differing Quality from that which was Employ'd to

make the Sope: fo [Errata: so] if you Mingle in a due Proportion, _Sal

Armoniack_ with Quick-Lime, and Distill them by Degrees of Fire, You

shall not Divide the _Sal Armoniack_ from the Quick-Lime, though the

one be a Volatile, and the other a Fix'd Substance, but that which

will ascend will be a Spirit much more Fugitive, Penetrant, and

stinking, then _Sal Armoniack_; and there will remain with the

Quick-Lime all or very near all the Sea Salt that concurr'd to make up

the _Sal Armoniack_; concerning which Sea Salt I shall, to satisfie

You how well it was United to the Lime, informe You, that I have by

making the Fire at length very Vehement, caus'd both the Ingredients

to melt in the Retort it self into one Mass and such Masses are apt to

Relent in the Moist Air. If it be here Objected, that these Instances

are taken from factitious Concretes which are more Compounded then

those which Nature produces; I shall reply, that besides that I have

Mention'd them as much to Illustrate what I propos'd, as to prove it,

it will be Difficult to Evince that Nature her self does not make

Decompound Bodies, I mean mingle together such mixt Bodies as are

already Compounded of Elementary, or rather of more simple ones. For

Vitriol (for Instance) though I have sometimes taken it out of

Minerall Earths, where Nature had without any assistance of Art

prepar'd it to my Hand, is really, though Chymists are pleas'd to

reckon it among Salts, a De-compounded Body Consisting (as I shall

have occasion to declare anon) of a Terrestriall Substance, of a

Metal, and also of at least one Saline Body, of a peculiar and not

Elementary Nature. And we see also in Animals, that their blood may

be compos'd of Divers very Differing Mixt Bodies, since we find it

observ'd that divers Sea-Fowle tast rank of the Fish on which they

ordinarily feed; and _Hipocrates_ himself Observes, that a Child may

be purg'd by the Milke of the Nurse, if she have taken _Elaterium_;

which argues that the purging Corpuscles of the Medicament Concurr to

make up the Milke of the Nurse; and that white Liquor is generally by

Physitians suppos'd to be but blanch'd and alter'd Blood. And I

remember I have observ'd, not farr from the _Alps_, that at a certain

time of the Year the Butter of that Country was very Offensive to

strangers, by reason of the rank tast of a certain Herb, whereon the

Cows were then wont plentifully to feed. But (proceeds _Carneades_) to

give you Instances of another kind, to shew that things may be

obtain'd by the Fire from a Mixt Body that were not Pre-existent in

it, let Me Remind You, that from many Vegetables there may without any

Addition be Obtain'd Glass, a Body, which I presume You will not say

was Pre-existent in it, but produc'd by the Fire. To which I shall

add but this one Example more, namely that by a certain Artificial way

of handling Quicksilver, You may without Addition separate from it at

least a 5th. or 4th. part of a clear Liquor, which with an Ordinary

Peripatetick would pass for Water, and which a Vulgar Chymist would

not scruple to call Phlegme, and which, for ought I have yet seen or

heard, is not reducible into Mercury again, and Consequently is more

then a Disguise of it. Now besides that divers Chymists will not allow

Mercury to have any or at least any Considerable Quantity of either of

the Ignoble Ingredients, Earth and Water; Besides this, I say, the

great Ponderousness of Quicksilver makes it very unlikely that it can

have so much Water in it as may be thus obtain'd from it, since

Mercury weighs 12 or 14 times as much as water of the same Bulk. Nay

for a further Confirmation of this Argument, I will add this Strange

Relation, that two Friends of mine, the one a Physitian, and the other

a Mathematician, and both of them Persons of unsuspected Credit, have

Solemnly assured me, that after many Tryals they made, to reduce

Mercury into Water, in Order to a Philosophicall Work, upon Gold

(which yet, by the way, I know prov'd Unsuccesfull) they did once by

divers Cohobations reduce a pound of Quicksilver into almost a pound

of Water, and this without the Addition of any other Substance, but

only by pressing the Mercury by a Skillfully Manag'd Fire in purposely

contriv'd Vessels. But of these Experiments our Friend (sayes

_Carneades_, pointing at the Register of this Dialogue) will perhaps

give You a more Particular Account then it is necessary for me to do:

Since what I have now said may sufficiently evince, that the Fire may

sometimes as well alter Bodies as divide them, and by it we may obtain

from a Mixt Body what was not Pre-existent in it. And how are we sure

that in no other Body what we call Phlegme is barely separated, not

Produc'd by the Action of the Fire: Since so many other Mixt Bodies

are of a much less Constant, and more alterable Nature, then Mercury,

by many Tricks it is wont to put upon Chymists, and by the Experiments

I told You of, about an hour since, Appears to be. But because I

shall ere long have Occasion to resume into Consideration the Power of

the Fire to produce new Concretes, I shall no longer insist on this

Argument at present; only I must mind You, that if You will not

dis-believe _Helmonts_ Relations, You must confess that the _Tria

Prima_ are neither ingenerable nor incorruptible Substances; since by

his _Alkahest_ some of them may be produc'd of Bodies that were before

of another Denomination; and by the same powerfull _Menstruum_ all of

them may be reduc'd into insipid Water.

Here _Carneades_ was about to pass on to his Third Consideration, when

_Eleutherius_ being desirous to hear what he could say to clear his

second General Consideration from being repugnant to what he seem'd to

think the true Theory of Mistion, prevented him by telling him, I

somewhat wonder, _Carneades_, that You, who are in so many Points

unsatisfied with the Peripatetick Opinion touching the Elements and

Mixt Bodies, should also seem averse to that Notion touching the

manner of Mistion, wherein the Chymists (though perhaps without

knowing that they do so) agree with most of the Antient Philosophers

that preceded _Aristotle_, and that for Reasons so considerable, that

divers Modern Naturalists and Physitians, in other things unfavourable

enough to the Spagyrists, do in this case side with them against the

common Opinion of the Schools. If you should ask me (continues

_Eleutherius_) what Reasons I mean? I should partly by the Writings of

_Sennertus_ and other learned Men, and partly by my own Thoughts, be

supply'd with more, then 'twere at present proper for me to Insist

largely on. And therefore I shall mention only, and that briefly,

three or four. Of these, I shall take the First from the state of the

Controversie itself, and the genuine Notion of Mistion, which though

much intricated by the Schoolmen, I take in short to be this,

_Aristotle_, at least as many of his Interpreters expound him, and as

indeed he Teaches in some places, where he professedly Dissents from

the Antients, declares Mistion to be such a mutual Penetration, and

perfect Union of the mingl'd Elements, that there is no Portion of the

mixt Body, how Minute soever, which does not contain All, and Every

of the Four Elements, or in which, if you please, all the Elements are

not. And I remember, that he reprehends the Mistion taught by the

Ancients, as too sleight or gross, for this Reason, that Bodies mixt

according to their _Hypothesis_, though they appear so to humane Eyes,

would not appear such to the acute Eyes of a _Lynx_, whose perfecter

Sight would discerne the Elements, if they were no otherwise mingled,

than as his Predecessors would have it, to be but Blended, not United;

whereas the Antients, though they did not all Agree about what kind of

Bodies were Mixt, yet they did almost unanimously hold, that in a

compounded Bodie, though the _Miscibilia_, whether Elements,

Principles, or whatever they pleas'd to call them, were associated in

such small Parts, and with so much Exactness, that there was no

sensible Part of the Mass but seem'd to be of the same Nature with the

rest, and with the whole; Yet as to the Atomes, or other Insensible

Parcels of Matter, whereof each of the _Miscibilia_ consisted, they

retain'd each of them its own Nature, being but by Apposition or

_Juxta_-Position united with the rest into one Bodie. So that

although by virtue of this composition the mixt Body did perhaps

obtain Divers new Qualities, yet still the Ingredients that Compounded

it, retaining their own Nature, were by the Destruction of the

_Compositum_ separable from each other, the minute Parts disingag'd

from those of a differing Nature, and associated with those of their

own sort returning to be again, Fire, Earth, or Water, as they were

before they chanc'd to be Ingredients of that _Compositum_. This may

be explain'd (Continues _Eleutherius_,) by a piece of Cloath made of

white and black threds interwoven, wherein though the whole piece

appear neither white nor black, but of a resulting Colour, that is

gray, yet each of the white and black threds that compose it, remains

what it was before, as would appear if the threds were pull'd asunder,

and sorted each Colour by it self. This (pursues _Eleutherius_) being,

as I understand it, the State of the Controversie, and the

_Aristotelians_ after their Master Commonly Defining, that Mistion is

_Miscibilium alteratorum Unio_, that seems to comport much better

with the Opinion of the Chymists, then with that of their Adversaries,

since according to that as the newly mention'd Example declares, there

is but a _Juxta_-position of separable Corpuscles, retaining each its

own Nature, whereas according to the _Aristotelians_, when what they

are pleas'd to call a mixt Body results from the Concourse of the

Elements, the _Miscibilia_ cannot so properly be said to be Alter'd,

as Destroy'd, since there is no Part in the mixt Body, how small

soever, that can be call'd either Fir [Transcriber's Note: Fire], or

Air, or Water, or Earth.

Nor indeed can I well understand, how Bodies can be mingl'd other

wayes then as I have declar'd, or at least how they can be mingl'd, as

our Peripateticks would have it. For whereas _Aristotle_ tells us,

that if a Drop of Wine be put into ten thousand Measures of Water, the

Wine being Overpower'd by so Vast a Quantity of Water will be turn'd

into it, he speaks to my Apprehension, very improbably; For though One

should add to that Quantity of Water as many Drops of Wine as would a

Thousand times exceed it all, yet by his Rule the whole Liquor should

not be a _Crama_, a Mixture of Wine and Water, wherein the Wine would

be Predominant, but Water only; Since the Wine being added but by a

Drop at a time would still Fall into nothing but Water, and

Consequently would be turn'd into it. And if this would hold in Metals

too, 'twere a rare secret for Goldsmiths, and Refiners; For by melting

a Mass of Gold, or Silver, and by but casting into it Lead or

Antimony, Grain after Grain, they might at pleasure, within a

reasonable Compass of time, turn what Quantity they desire, of the

Ignoble into the Noble Metalls. And indeed since a Pint of wine, and a

pint of water, amount to about a Quart of Liquor, it seems manifest to

sense, that these Bodies doe not Totally Penetrate one another, as one

would have it; but that each retains its own Dimensions; and

Consequently, that they are by being Mingl'd only divided into minute

Bodies, that do but touch one another with their Surfaces, as do the

Grains, of Wheat, Rye, Barley, &c. in a heap of severall sorts of

Corn: And unless we say, that as when one measure of wheat, for

Instance, is Blended with a hundred measures of Barley, there happens

only a _Juxta_-position and Superficial Contact betwixt the Grains of

wheat, and as many or thereabouts of the Grains of Barley. So when a

Drop of wine is mingl'd with a great deal of water, there is but an

Apposition of so many Vinous Corpuscles to a Correspondent Number of

Aqueous ones; Unless I say this be said, I see not how that Absurdity

will be avoyded, whereunto the Stoical Notion of mistion (namely by

[Greek: synchysis] [Errata: [Greek: Synchysis]], or Confusion) was

Liable, according to which the least Body may be co-extended with the

greatest: Since in a mixt Body wherein before the Elements were

Mingl'd there was, for Instance, but one pound of water to ten

thousand of Earth, yet according to them there must not be the least

part of that Compound, that Consisted not as well of Earth, as water.

But I insist, Perhaps, too long (sayes _Eleutherius_) upon the proofs

afforded me by the Nature of Mistion: Wherefore I will but name Two or

Three other Arguments; whereof the first shall be, that according to

_Aristotle_ himself, the motion of a mixt Body followes the Nature of

the Predominant Element, as those wherein the Earth prevails, tend

towards the Centre of heavy Bodies. And since many things make it

Evident, that in divers Mixt Bodies the Elementary Qualities are as

well Active, though not altogether so much so as in the Elements

themselves, it seems not reasonable to deny the actual Existence of

the Elements in those Bodies wherein they Operate.

To which I shall add this Convincing Argument, that Experience

manifests, and _Aristotle_ Confesses it, that the _Miscibilia_ may be

again separated from a mixt Body, as is Obvious in the Chymical

Resolutions of Plants and Animalls, which could not be unless they did

actually retain their formes in it: For since, according to

_Aristotle_, and I think according to truth, there is but one common

Mass of all things, which he has been pleas'd to call _Materia Prima_;

And since tis not therefore the Matter but the Forme that Constitutes

and Discriminates Things, to say that the Elements remain not in a

Mixt Body, according to their Formes, but according to their Matter,

is not to say that they remain there at all; Since although those

Portions of Matter were Earth and water, &c. before they concurr'd,

yet the resulting Body being once Constituted, may as well be said to

be simple as any of the Elements, the Matter being confessedly of the

same Nature in all Bodies, and the Elementary Formes being according

to this _Hypothesis_ perish'd and abolish'd.

And lastly, and if we will Consult Chymical Experiments, we shall find

the Advantages of the Chymical Doctrine above the Peripatetick Title

little less then Palpable. For in that Operation that Refiners call

Quartation, which they employ to purifie Gold, although three parts of

Silver be so exquisitely mingl'd by Fusion with a fourth Part of Gold

(whence the Operation is Denominated) that the resulting Mass acquires

severall new Qualities, by virtue of the Composition, and that there

is scarce any sensible part of it that is not Compos'd of both the

metalls; Yet if You cast this mixture into _Aqua Fortis_, the Silver

will be dissolv'd in the _Menstruum_, and the Gold like a dark or

black Powder will fall to the Bottom of it, and either Body may be

again reduc'd into such a Metal as it was before, which shews: that it

retain'd its Nature, notwithstanding its being mixt _per Minima_ with

the other: We likewise see, that though one part of pure Silver be

mingled with eight or ten Parts, or more, of Lead, yet the Fire will

upon the Cuppel easily and perfectly separate them again. And that

which I would have you peculiarly Consider on this Occasion is, that

not only in Chymicall Anatomies there is a Separation made of the

Elementary Ingredients, but that some Mixt Bodies afford a very much

greater Quantity of this or that Element or Principle than of another;

as we see, that Turpentine and Amber yield much more Oyl and Sulphur

than they do Water, whereas Wine, which is confess'd to be a perfectly

mixt Bodie, yields but a little Inflamable Spirit, or Sulphur, and not

much more Earth; but affords a vast proportion of Phlegm or water:

which could not be, if as the Peripateticks suppose, every, even of

the minutest Particles, were of the same nature with the whole, and

consequently did contain both Earth and Water, and Aire, and Fire;

Wherefore as to what _Aristotle_ principally, and almost only Objects,

that unless his Opinion be admitted, there would be no true and

perfect Mistion, but onely Aggregates or Heaps of contiguous

Corpuscles, which, though the Eye of Man cannot discerne, yet the Eye

of a _Lynx_ might perceive not to be of the same Nature with one

another and with their _Totum_, as the Nature of Mistion requires, if

he do not beg the Question, and make Mistion to consist in what other

Naturalists deny to be requisite to it, yet He at least objects That

as a great Inconvenience which I cannot take for such, till he have

brought as Considerable Arguments as I have propos'd to prove the

contrary, to evince that Nature makes other Mistions than such as I

have allowed, wherein the _Miscibilia_ are reduc'd into minute Parts,

and United as farr as sense can discerne: which if You will not grant

to be sufficient for a true Mistion, he must have the same Quarrel

with Nature her self, as with his Adversaries.

Wherefore (Continues _Eleutherius_) I cannot but somewhat marvail that

_Carneades_ should oppose the Doctrine of the Chymist in a Particular,

wherein they do as well agree with his old Mistress, Nature, as

dissent from his old Adversary, _Aristotle_.

I must not (replies _Carneades_) engage my self at present to examine

thorowly the Controversies concerning Mistion: And if there were no

third thing, but that I were reduc'd to embrace absolutely and

unreservedly either the Opinion of _Aristotle_, or that of the

Philosophers that went before him, I should look upon the latter,

which the Chymists have adopted, as the more defensible Opinion: But

because differing in the Opinions about the Elements from both

Parties, I think I can take a middle Course, and Discourse to you of

Mistion after a way that does neither perfectly agree, nor perfectly

disagree with either, as I will not peremptorily define, whether there

be not Cases wherein some _Phaenomena_ of Mistion seem to favour the

Opinion that the Chymists Patrons borrow'd of the Antients, I shall

only endeavour to shew You that there are some cases which may keep

the Doubt, which makes up my second General Consideration from being

unreasonable.

I shall then freely acknowledge to You (sayes _Carneades_) that I am

not over well satisfi'd with the Doctrine that is ascribed to

_Aristotle_, concerning Mistion, especially since it teaches that the

four Elements may again be separated from the mixt Body; whereas if

they continu'd not in it, it would not be so much a Separation as a

Production. And I think the Ancient Philosophers that Preceded

_Aristotle_, and Chymists who have since receiv'd the same Opinion, do

speak of this matter more intelligibly, if not more probably, then the

Peripateticks: but though they speak Congruously enough, to their

believing, that there are a certain Number of Primogeneal Bodies, by

whose Concourse all those we call Mixts are Generated, and which in

the Destruction of mixt Bodies do barely part company, and recede from

one another, just such as they were when they came together; yet I,

who meet with very few Opinions that I can entirely Acquiesce in,

must confess to You that I am inclin'd to differ not only from the

_Aristotelians_, but from the old Philosophers and the Chymists, about

the Nature of Mistion: And if You will give me leave, I shall Briefly

propose to you my present Notion of it, provided you will look upon

it, not so much as an Assertion as an _Hypothesis_; in talking of

which I do not now pretend to propose and debate the whole Doctrine of

Mistion, but to shew that 'tis not Improbable, that sometimes mingl'd

substances may be so strictly united, that it doth not by the usuall

Operations of the Fire, by which Chymists are wont to suppose

themselves to have made the _Analyses_ of mixt Bodies, sufficiently

appear, that in such Bodies the _Miscibilia_ that concurr'd to make

them up do each of them retain its own peculiar Nature: and by the

_Spagyrists_ Fires may be more easily extricated and Recover'd, than

Alter'd, either by a Change of Texture in the Parts of the same

Ingredient, or by an Association with some parts of another Ingredient

more strict than was that of the parts of this or that _Miscibile_

among themselves. At these words _Eleu._ having press'd him to do

what he propos'd, and promis'd to do what he desir'd;

I consider then (resumes _Carneades_) that, not to mention those

improper Kinds of mistion, wherein _Homogeneous_ Bodies are Joyn'd, as

when Water is mingl'd with water, or two Vessels full of the same kind

of Wine with one another, the mistion I am now to Discourse of seems,

Generally speaking, to be but an Union _per Minima_ of any two or more

Bodies of differing Denominations; as when Ashes and Sand are

Colliquated into Glass or Antimony, and Iron into _Regulus Martis_, or

Wine and Water are mingl'd, and Sugar is dissolv'd in the Mixture. Now

in this general notion of Mistion it does not appear clearly

comprehended, that the _Miscibilia_ or Ingredients do in their small

Parts so retain their Nature and remain distinct in the Compound, that

they may thence by the Fire be again taken asunder: For though I deny

not that in some Mistions of certain permanent Bodies this Recovery of

the same Ingredients may be made, yet I am not convinc'd that it will

hold in all or even in most, or that it is necessarily deducible from

Chymicall Experiments, and the true Notion of Mistion. To explain

this a little, I assume, that Bodies may be mingl'd, and that very

durably, that are not Elementary or resolv'd [Errata: nor have been

resolved] into Elements or Principles that they may be mingl'd; as is

evident in the _Regulus_ of Colliquated Antimony, and Iron newly

mention'd; and in Gold Coyne, which lasts so many ages; wherein

generally the Gold is alloy'd by the mixture of a quantity, greater or

lesser, (in our Mints they use about a 12th. part) of either silver,

or Copper, or both. Next, I consider, that there being but one

Universal matter of things, as 'tis known that the _Aristotelians_

themselves acknowledge, who call it _Materia Prima_ (about which

nevertheless I like not all their Opinions,) the Portions of this

matter seem to differ from One Another, but in certain Qualities or

Accidents, fewer or more; upon whose Account the Corporeal Substance

they belong to receives its Denomination, and is referr'd to this or

that particular sort of Bodies; so that if it come to lose, or be

depriv'd of those Qualities, though it ceases not to be a body, yet it

ceases from being that kind of Body as a Plant, or Animal; or Red,

Green, Sweet, Sowre, or the like. I consider that it very often

happens that the small parts of Bodies cohere together but by

immediate Contact and Rest; and that however, there are few Bodies

whose minute Parts stick so close together, to what cause soever their

Combination be ascrib'd, but that it is possible to meet with some

other Body, whose small Parts may get between them, and so dis-joyn

them; or may be fitted to cohere more strongly with some of them, then

those some do with the rest; or at least may be combin'd so closely

with them, as that neither the Fire, nor the other usual Instruments

of Chymical Anatomies will separate them. These things being promis'd,

I will not peremptorily deny, but that there may be some Clusters of

Particles, wherein the Particles are so minute, and the Coherence so

strict, or both, that when Bodies of Differing Denominations, and

consisting of such durable Clusters, happen to be mingl'd, though the

Compound Body made up of them may be very Differing from either of

the Ingredients, yet each of the little Masses or Clusters may so

retain its own Nature, as to be again separable, such as it was

before. As when Gold and Silver being melted together in a Due

Proportion (for in every Proportion, the Refiners will tell You that

the Experiment will not succeed) _Aqua Fortis_ will dissolve the

Silver, and leave the Gold untoucht; by which means, as you lately

noted, both the Metalls may be recover'd from the mixed Mass. But

(Continues _Carneades_) there are other Clusters wherein the Particles

stick not so close together, but that they may meet with Corpuscles of

another Denomination, which are dispos'd to be more closely United

with some of them, then they were among themselves. And in such case,

two thus combining Corpuscles losing that Shape, or Size, or Motion,

or other Accident, upon whose Account they were endow'd with such a

Determinate Quality or Nature, each of them really ceases to be a

Corpuscle of the same Denomination it was before; and from the

Coalition of these there may emerge a new Body, as really one, as

either of the Corpuscles was before they were mingl'd, or, if you

please, Confounded: Since this Concretion is really endow'd with its

own Distinct qualities, and can no more by the Fire, or any other

known way of _Analysis_, be divided again into the Corpuscles that at

first concurr'd to make it, than either of them could by the same

means be subdivided into other Particles. But (sayes _Eleutherius_) to

make this more intelligible by particular examples; If you dissolve

Copper in _Aqua Fortis_, or Spirit of Nitre, (for I remember not which

I us'd, nor do I think it much Material) You may by Crystalizing the

Solution Obtain a goodly Vitriol; which though by Virtue of the

Composition it have manifestly diverse Qualities, not to be met with

in either of the Ingredients, yet it seems that the Nitrous Spirits,

or at least many of them, may in this Compounded Mass retain their

former Nature; for having for tryal sake Distill'd this Vitrioll

Spirit, there came over store of Red Fumes, which by that Colour, by

their peculiar stinke, and by their Sourness, manifested themselves to

be, Nitrous Spirits; and that the remaining Calx continu'd Copper, I

suppose you'l easily beleeve. But if you dissolve _Minium_, which is

but Lead Powder'd by the Fire, in good Spirit of Vinager, and

Crystalize the Solution, you shall not only have a Saccharine Salt

exceedingly differing from both its Ingredients; but the Union of some

Parts of the _Menstruum_ with some of those of the Metal is so strict,

that the Spirit of Vinager seems to be, as such, destroy'd, since the

Saline Corpuscles have quite lost that acidity, upon whose Account the

Liquor was call'd Spirit of Vinager; nor can any such Acid Parts as

were put to the _Minium_ be Separated by any known way from the

_Saccharum Saturni_ resulting from them both; for not only there is no

Sowrness at all, but an admirable Sweetness to be tasted in the

Concretion; and not only I found not that Spirit of Wine, which

otherwise will immediately hiss when mingl'd with strong Spirit of

Vinager, would hiss being pour'd upon _Saccharum Saturni_, wherein yet

the Acid Salt of Vinager, did it Survive, may seem to be concentrated;

but upon the Distillation of _Saccharum Saturni_ by its Self I found

indeed a Liquor very Penetrant, but not at all Acid, and differing as

well in smell and other Qualities, as in tast, from the Spirit of

Vinager; which likewise seem'd to have left some of its Parts very

firmly united to the _Caput Mortuum_, which though of a Leaden Nature

was in smell, Colour, &c. differing from _Minium_; which brings into

my mind, that though two Powders, the one Blew, and the other Yellow,

may appear a Green mixture, without either of them losing its own

Colour, as a good Microscope has sometimes inform'd me; yet having

mingl'd _Minium_ and _Sal Armoniack_ in a requisite Proportion, and

expos'd them in a Glass Vessel to the Fire, the whole Mass became

White, and the Red Corpuscles were destroy'd; for though the Calcin'd

Lead was separable from the Salt, yet you'l easily beleeve it did not

part from it in the Forme of a Red Powder, such as was the _Minium_,

when it was put to the _Sal Armoniack_. I leave it also to be

consider'd, whether in Blood, and divers other Bodies, it be probable,

that each of the Corpuscles that concurr to make a Compound Body doth,

though some of them in some Cases may, retain its own Nature in it,

so that Chymsts [Transcriber's Note: Chymists] may Extricate each sort

of them from all the others, wherewith it concurr'd to make a Body of

one Denomination.

The Sceptical Chymist or Chymico-Physical Doubts & Paradoxes, Touching the Spagyrist's Principles Commonly call'd Hypostatical; As they are wont to be Propos'd and Defended by the Generality of Alchymists. Whereunto is præmis'd Part of another Discourse relating to the same Subject. · 第 7 / 20 段