CHAPTER VIII

THE EAST AND THE WEST

"Behold how far the East is from the West!"

"A forest of houses, between which ebbs and flows a stream

of human faces, with all their varied passions--an awful

rush of love, hunger, and hate--for such is

London."--_Heine._

"To Newton and to Newton's Dog Diamond," says Carlyle, "what a

different pair of Universes; while the painting on the optical retina

of both was, most likely, the same." "A distinct Universe," adds

Thackeray in the same spirit, "walks about under your Hat, and under

mine." This latter reflection occurs to me often as I walk about

London, and note all its many "sorts and conditions" of men. There is

here, especially, everything in the "point of view." From the West to

the East is a wide difference; yet, between the two, how many minor

differences?

London, indeed, is hardly like a single city; it is rather like many

cities rolled into one. Here, more than anywhere else, you realize

that "it takes all sorts to make a world"; for the inhabitants vary

quite as widely as do those of foreign countries. It was Disraeli who

said, with much cynical truth:

"The courts of two cities do not so differ from one another

as the court and the city in their peculiar ways of life and

conversation. In short, the inhabitants of St. James's,

notwithstanding they live under the same laws, and speak the

same language, are a distinct people from those of

Cheapside."

[Illustration: _A Railway Bookstall._]

Between the people of the East, and those of the West, it is not

merely a question of distance; for, as a matter of fact, the two types

are often closely interwoven. Thus, there is an "East in the West,"

where, not infrequently, slums and mean streets lie in near

juxtaposition to squares of lordly pleasure-houses, and where recently

erected "model dwellings" for workmen flourish in the very hearts of

the Grosvenor and Cadogan Estates; and there is a "West in the East,"

as testified by the pleasant wide streets of comfortable roomy houses

that abound in the near suburbs of East and South London. Yet, it may

be broadly stated that every part of London has manners peculiar to

itself, as unvarying, in their way, as were the laws of the Medes and

Persians; with, also, one principal dividing-line,--that intangible

line separating the East End from the West End. Here are a few of the

differences between the two:

The West End has all the money and all the leisure; the East End

monopolizes most of the labour, and nearly all of the dirt. The West

End numbers a few thousands of floating population; the East End, a

million or so of pretty constant inhabitants. Yet, by some strange

association of ideas, it is to this small "West End" that we allude

when we speak of "all London," and to which the daily papers refer

when in August and September they assure us that "there is absolutely

no one left in town." The manners and customs of each are dissimilar;

both indulge in slang of a kind; but, while the East End usually cuts

off the initial letter of its words, the West-End drops the final one.

The West End is shocked by the East, but then, the East End is just as

much shocked, for its part, by the West. If the "lady" is full of

righteous scorn for the "factory hand" who spends her hard-won

earnings on a feathered hat and a plush cape, the slum-dweller is, on

the other hand, quite equally scandalized at the "lady's" brazen

boldness in wearing a _decollete_ dress: "To think of 'er 'avin' the

fice ter go hout with them nyked showlders, 'ow 'orrid!" the factory

girl will say, from out the street-door crowd at an evening "crush."

Even a veiled Turkish lady, from the secluded harem, could hardly show

more genuine feeling at the unpleasant spectacle. No, our ways are not

as their ways. Their conventionalities are quite as strict, even

stricter, than ours. Possibly to them, even our speech sounds just as

faulty as theirs to us; probably they think us very ill-bred because

we do not constantly reiterate the words "Mrs. Smith," or "Mrs.

Jones," when addressing the said ladies; or cry immediately, "Granted,

Miss, or Sir," in reply to "I beg your pardon!" At any rate, we must,

to them, seem chilly and unresponsive. Then, the books we read, if

they understood them, would often greatly shock the slum-dwellers; the

pictures we hang in our parlours would horrify them. Servants do not

come from the slums or even from the lowest class; yet I have myself,

out of regard for their feelings, had to "sky" the most beautiful

_chefs-d'oeuvre_ of Titian, and turn the photograph of a masterpiece

by Praxiteles with its face ignominiously to the wall. And it's "'ow

you can go to that there National Gallery, 'm, and look at them

pictures of folkses without a rag on 'em, well, it beats me, it do

indeed!" After all, and once more, the difference is all in "the point

of view!"

[Illustration: _The City Train._]

But, if the East and the West have their wide and radical differences,

between the two there are, as I said, many recurring types. And the

constant Londoner, were he suddenly to be brought, blindfolded, to

some hitherto unknown spot in the city or near suburbs, would soon

know his whereabouts by the look of the people he encountered. Thus,

you may know Bloomsbury by its Jews, as well as by a population

remarkable for general frowsiness, a look of "ingrained" dirt, and an

indescribable air of having seen better days; Chelsea, by a certain

art-serged female, and long-haired male community with an

artistic,--and, yes,--perhaps a well-pleased and self-satisfied air;

the "City," by its black-coated business men; Whitechapel, by its

coster girls with fringes; Somers Town and Lisson Grove, by their

odoriferous cats and cabbages; Mayfair, by its sleek carriage-horses,

and also by the very superior maids and butlers you meet in its silent

streets. Or, perhaps, by the straw that occasionally fills the quiet

square corners, sounding the sad note of Death. I have seen a slum

child dying of cancer in a crowded garret,--baked by the August

sun,--covered with flies,--in a noisy alley; but only rich people's

nerves require soothing at the last!

Miss Amy Levy has written a haunting little poem on this subject:

"Straw in the street, where I pass to-day,

Dulls the sound of the wheels and feet.

'Tis for a failing life they lay

Straw in the street.

"Here, where the pulses of London beat,

Someone strives with the Presence Grey--

Ah, is it victory or defeat?

"The hurrying people go their way,

Pause and jostle and pass and greet;

For life, for death, are they treading, say,

Straw in the street?"

"London," says a French writer, "resembles, in its size and luxury,

Ancient Rome." But, if Ancient Rome, he adds, weighed heavily upon

its toiling slaves, "how heavily does not our modern Rome weigh,

also, upon the labouring class!" The hanging gardens of Park Lane

are in as great, and greater contrast to the Somers Town, Drury

Lane, and Deptford slums, as were ever the Palaces of the Palatine

to the slaves' quarters. London is the best city in the world to be

rich in, the worst to be very poor in; as it is the best city for

happiness, the worst for misery. It is the Temple of Midas, where

everything,--from a coffin to a hired guest,--from the _entree_ to

an "exclusive" mansion to a peer's status,--can be bought with

money. Here, more than anywhere else, money is imperatively needed.

Even the poor hawkers who live in unspeakable slums, lined with cats

and cabbages, in Lisson Grove, might, if they lived in the country,

at least have clean cottages, gardens, and pure air. With the same

income on which you are poor in town, you will be well-to-do, nay,

rich in the country. House-rent,--indirect taxation,--the vicinity

of tempting shops,--and amusements take the surplus. The attractions

of town must indeed be great to the poor; for, if their wages be

higher, their life is infinitely lower. But it is the same in all

classes. It is often said that the rich, who own so many large and

luxurious country estates, houses, and gardens, are ill-advised to

come up to town and spend hot Mays and Junes in baking Belgravia or

Mayfair; but, after all, they only share the tastes of the majority.

Man is a gregarious animal, and loves his kind. Similarly, if you

were to make a "house-to-house visitation" in some wretched Lisson

Grove or East End slum, and inquire diligently of every inhabitant,

whether they would prefer to "go back and live in the lovely

country," their answer, I am convinced, would be firmly in the

negative. East and West are alike in this.

But the key-note of the East End of London, apart from its big

thoroughfares, is not so much squalor or poverty, as desperate,

commonplace monotony, such as is described by Mrs. Humphry Ward in

_Sir George Tressady_, "long lines of low houses,--two storeys always,

or two storeys and a basement,--all of the same yellowish brick, all

begrimed by the same smoke, every door-knocker of the same pattern,

every window-blind hung in the same way, and the same corner 'public'

on either side, flaming in the hazy distance." The East End is very

conservative, and in its better houses there is a conservatism even in

the blinds, which are, almost invariably, of cheap red rep or cloth,

alternated by dirty "lace." With the poorest tenants, of course,

blinds are at a discount; and grimy paper fills the frequent holes in

the panes.

Yet, it is a mistake to suppose, as is more or less the popular

theory, that the average East Ender's life is all unmitigated gloom.

Take, for instance, the life of the honest, hard-working artisan and

his family. He may live in "mean streets"; but use is everything; and

they are not "mean" to him. Possibly, from his point of view, the

two-pair back, the frowsy street, are "a sight more homely and cosy"

than rich people's area gates and chilly grandeur. If the West End

takes its pleasure by driving in the Park, the East, on the other

hand, finds its relaxation on the tops of 'buses and trams, in walking

about the flaring, gas-jetted street, in looking into shop windows, or

in driving about in all the pride of a private, special coster's cart.

If the rich do not know how the poor live, the poor, on the other

hand, have but a hazy idea of how the rich live. If you asked the

average slum-dweller how the rich spend their day, they would most

likely say, "in drinking champagne and driving in motor cars." Thus

the classes mutually do each other injustice. If the poor, for a

while, could live the life of the rich, they would vote it terribly

slow; Calverley was not so far out when he suggested slyly that

"Unless they've souls that grovel,

Folks _prefer_ in fact a hovel to your dreary marble halls."

The poor of the East End have their special plays, their theatres,

their "halls," their cheap popular amusements. And they have other

minor compensations. They "eat hearty" when they do eat; they do not

fall ill from dyspepsia or have to go to Carlsbad; or if they do

suffer from M. Taine's favourite complaint, "the spleen" (which is

unusual in a working man), they remedy it by a little harmless

correction of their wives. Or if a poor woman's child is ill, she does

not suffer for want of medical advice; she bundles it up quickly in a

shawl, and runs with it to the nearest hospital, where, if the

authorities are somewhat curt, she at any rate gets plenty of sympathy

from all the other mothers in the big hospital waiting-room. Even that

large, shabby crowd that, on visiting-days, await the opening of the

hospital doors, so unutterably pathetic to the looker-on, is not,

perhaps, without its alleviations. It is a mercy that we do not all

like the same thing; and that, while the rich are exclusive, the poor

will enjoy society of almost any kind: "We shall 'ave to leave our

lodgin's, 'm, over them nice mews," a poor woman said to me lately, in

a mournful tone. "The landlord, he's takin' the place down; an' I

shall miss the 'orses' feet at night, somethin' shockin'; _they was

sech comp'ny like_." Here, surely, is a case where one man's poison

may be another man's meat!

As for the children of the working classes, they, unless their parents

are lazy or given to drink, really have, often, a far better time of

it, so far as their own actual enjoyment is concerned, than the more

repressed children of the rich. The pavement is their property, the

streets are their world; the beautiful, dazzling, magical,

ever-changing streets, with their myriad attractions, their boundless

possibilities. Then, the children of the poor are not brought up as

useless luxuries, but, from tender years, are required to contribute

their share of help to the household; and what the average child loves

above all things is to feel itself of use. Dirt and grime are of no

account whatever to the child; and old clothes are always far more

comfortable than new to play about in. The "shades of the prison

house" may close in, later, about the children of the poor, when they

must go to service, to the factory, to the shop; but, in their early

years, their life has its attractions.

Of course, however, with the families of the drunkard, the shiftless,

the lazy, the case becomes altogether different. Drifting hopelessly

from one slum to another, these soon help to swell the sad ranks of

the "submerged tenth": poor creatures whose misery shivers in fireless

garrets and damp cellars, whose empty stomachs call in vain for food;

and whose only outlook is the workhouse, the "big villa" as they call

it; an institution, however, that they will only enter from dire

necessity, regarding it, as a rule, with wholesome dislike and

disfavour.

There are many churches and chapels all over London, yet the very poor

rarely attend any of them. Indeed, very few London working men's wives

attend any religious service, unless, that is, they happen to boast of

a new hat or bonnet.... They will, however, receive the "visitor" or

"tract-lady" with a sort of chilly grandeur; and, though their

acquaintance with Holy Writ is generally slight, through all life's

troubles their favourite text is ever this: "It is easier for a camel

to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the

Kingdom of Heaven." Thus, they are always, so to speak, comforting

themselves for the enforced payment of the insurance of hard work and

poor fare in this life by the assurance of paid-up capital with

interest, in the next! Poor, hard-worked mothers of the slums! who

would grudge you that harmless and unfailing consolation?

[Illustration: _Bank Holiday._]

Nor is the "country,"--except in strictly limited quantities,--such an

unfailing consolation to the children of the poor, as some would have

us imagine. (That it is such a priceless advantage to their health is,

no doubt, partly owing to the fact that it is generally associated

with good and wholesome food.) The children like the "real country"

for a day or two;--afterwards, they are too often conscious of slight

boredom. At first, they delight in the fact that "it's so green all

rarnd,--right to the sky,--with no roads, and no walls,--and no

trespsin boards,--and no pleecemen;" but these joys have their

limitations,--and, after a fortnight's holiday,--even poor slum

children are generally glad to get back home. Even in tender

youth,--the country is a cult that requires some learning. "The

country is dreadful slow,"--a little girl of the great city once

remarked with painful frankness,--"no swings, no rahnd-abarts, no

penny-ice men, no orgins, no shops, no nothink;--jest a great bare

field only." Here, again, is the difference of "the point of view!"

Go into that glittering Armida-Palace, the busy Whitechapel Road, and

watch the scene at nightfall. The weather may be cold or mirk; the

weather matters little; the skies may be glum and starless, but a

galaxy of light, from innumerable gas jets and shop fronts, floods the

busy street. Here is, certainly, no lack of life and amusement; the

crowd laughs, jostles, and chatters, as if no such thing as care or

struggle existed. It is a motley crowd. Handsome dark-eyed Jewesses

with floppy hair and long gold earrings; coster girls "on the spree,"

dressed in their gaudy best; staid couples doing their weekly

marketing; here and there a happy family round a stall, eating

"winkles" composedly with the help of pins, or demolishing saucerfuls

of the savoury cockle; vendors of penny toys; all these, combined with

the voluble "patter" of the lively shop-boys, make a veritable

pandemonium. Shops are full; barrows of all kinds drive a brisk trade;

velvet-cushioned trams ply up and down the big highway, which extends,

apparently almost into infinity, up the long Mile End Road.

(Tram-lines, in London, seem more or less confined to the uninspiring

North and East and their suburbs.) Ugly and uninvigorating enough by

day, the streets, by night, invest themselves with mysterious glamour

and brightness. Like some murky theatre when the deceiving footlights

are lit, this, too, is a "stage illusion," and it is a wise one. For

all the East End does its shopping by gaslight; now only it begins to

enjoy its day. Seen in such kaleidoscopic glare of light, even the

Whitechapel Road has its attractions. Yet through it all one sometimes

sees sad sights. Many public-houses dot these thoroughfares, shining

like meteors through the nocturnal mists; and here and there, truth

to tell, a bevy of red-faced women may be seen through the

plate-glass, whose unhappy infants are stationed in shabby

perambulators outside; their eyes, by dint of vain straining towards

their natural guardians, painfully acquiring that squint that would

seem to be the birthright of so many of the London poor.

In strange contrast with the din and bustle of Aldgate and its network

of wide streets, are the collegiate buildings of Toynbee Hall, in

Commercial Street, close by. This is a curious little oasis in the

wilderness, a most unexpected by-way in busy, glaring Whitechapel. To

Canon and Mrs. Barnett, who have devoted their lives towards making

Toynbee Hall what it is, is due the chief honour for the successful

working of this Institution, primarily intended to bring "sweetness

and light" into the darkened, unlovely lives of the London poor. The

name of Arnold Toynbee, the young and enthusiastic Oxford man and

reformer, has been immortalised in this place, the first of the

University Settlements in London. Toynbee died young, of overwork and

overpressure; in a sense a martyr to his cause; yet the work of this

latter-day apostle has already had large results, and his creed has

had many followers. To him, dying in his youthful zeal, Tennyson's

lines seem specially appropriate:

"So many worlds, so much to do,

So little done, such things to be,

How know I what had need of thee,

For thou wert strong as thou wert true?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

"O hollow wraith of dying fame,

Fade wholly, while the soul exults,

And self-infolds the large results

Of force that would have forged a name."

In some ways, Toynbee Hall, and its successive, and kindred

institutions, seem like late revivals of the monastic system of the

middle ages. Toynbee Hall is a hall in the academic sense,--and

shelters successive batches of some twenty residents,--young

university men of strong convictions,--who come here both to learn and

to teach;--to teach their less fortunate brothers,--to learn how the

poor live. At its hospitable door the sick and suffering apply for

help and succour; here charity,--charity, too, of the kind that

"blesseth him that gives and him that takes,"--is freely

given,--without narrow restrictions of sectarianism or dogma--and it

does more than this.

For,--unlike the monastic system,--Toynbee Hall is specially devised to

help the individual soul of the poor worker in busy London to rise above

its often base and mean surroundings. The late Matthew Arnold, in his

well-remembered lecture at Toynbee Hall,--taught the possibility of

"following the gleam" even in the "gloom" of the East-End,--and of

helping Nature, by the aid of books and of art, from sinking under

"long-lived pressure of obscure distress." Books and art are great

tonics. The ancient monasteries dissuaded,--if anything,--knowledge, and

aspiration generally, in the "masses": Toynbee Hall encourages and

promotes it; it is thus a physician to the mind even more than to the

body. It raises the aims, improves the tastes, and widens the horizons

of its disciples; it satisfies the cravings of the poor for better

things; but it must first inculcate such cravings. Within its walls the

poor and struggling artisan may enjoy concerts, lectures, pictures;--may

learn, too, from the best teachers,--and profit by many of the

advantages of university life. There are not only lecture-rooms, but

reception-rooms,--dining-rooms,--a library;--the latter a much-valued

institution in the neighbourhood. Many pleasant social gatherings are

held here;--not only of working men,--but also of factory

girls,--shop-hands,--pupil-teachers,--who come here,--these latter,--to

cast off the "codes" and dry bones of learning, and acquire a little of

its warmer, fuller humanity.

Toynbee Hall is not the only place in East London where such works

are carried on. Oxford House, Bethnal Green,--and Mansfield House,

Canning Town,--are, among others,--institutions more or less of the

kind; and the Passmore Edwards Institute, in Tavistock Place, has

similar aims. But to Toynbee Hall is due the introduction of yearly

loan Exhibitions of good pictures for the East End,--originated by

Canon Barnett, and still successfully carried on by his unwearying

exertions.

The charms of poetic contrast are always great in London. While

standing in a dingy byway of some city church--St. Olave's, Hart

Street, or St. Jude's, Whitechapel,--does not the deep music of the

organ,--resounding from inside the building,--fill the listener with a

strange feeling almost akin to tears? Not even outside a country

church is one so affected. Here it seems to bring the calm of Eternity

into the fitful fever of the moment. The picturesqueness, alone, of

religion, is so great, that, to the determined agnostic London would

surely lose half its charm. And who could work among the London poor

without, at least, something of the feeling so beautifully expressed

in Matthew Arnold's well-known lines?

"'Twas August, and the fierce sun overhead

Smote on the squalid streets of Bethnal Green,

And the pale weaver, through his windows seen

In Spitalfields, look'd thrice dispirited.

"I met a preacher there I knew, and said:

'Ill and o'erwork'd, how fare you in this scene?'--

'Bravely!' said he; 'for I of late have been

Much cheer'd with thoughts of Christ, _the living bread_.'

"O human soul! as long as thou canst so

Set up a mark of everlasting light,

Above the howling senses' ebb and flow,

To cheer thee, and to right thee if thou roam--

Not with lost toil thou labourest through the night!

Thou mak'st the heaven thou hop'st indeed thy home."

Toynbee Hall, of course, is of modern design; but there are still many

good old-time houses in the East-end,--now deserted and left stranded

by the tide of fashion. Of these is Essex House, in the Mile-End-Road,

(opposite Burdett-Road), now no longer residential, but used by Mr.

Ashbee as the convenient location for his well-known "Guild and School

of Handicraft." Built partly by a pupil of Sir Christopher Wren, with

panelled rooms, oak staircase, and large garden, its solid dignity is

well suited to its new and living purpose. Mr. Ashbee,--the founder

and moving spirit of the Guild--was himself a worker at Toynbee Hall,

where, indeed, in a small "Ruskin class" held in 1886-7, the school

had its beginning. So one thing grows out of another, and a sturdy

plant sends out its offshoots.

Thus Toynbee Hall, and kindred institutions, show the West-end in the

East; now let us turn to the East-end in the West. This is not so

difficult to find; "the poor," indeed, "we have always with us," and

in some of London's most fashionable streets the saddest sights of all

may be seen. Slums of a sort are to be found near most of the

fashionable West-end squares; and, even within the precincts of

aristocratic Mayfair, the expensive fish-shop in Bond-Street,--where,

during long summer days, enormous blocks of ice, tempting to the eye,

glitter like some Rajah's diamond,--entertains a motley crew of poor

folk on Saturday nights, when it makes a practice of giving away its

remaining stock. Bond Street is, in a manner, the "Aldgate High

Street" of the fashionable world: here, at four o'clock or so in the

afternoon, are to be seen the "gilded youth,"--the dandies of the

day;--here the smart world flock for afternoon tea; and here fine

ladies walk even unattended, and satisfy, as eagerly as their

Whitechapel sisters, their feminine cravings for shop-windows. Who was

it who first said that no real woman could ever pass a hat-shop? The

truth of this remark may here be attested. The very smartest of

motor-cars,--of horses,--of "turn-outs" generally,--may be seen

blocking the narrow Piccadilly entrance of this thoroughfare from

which deviates as many mysterious byways as from Cheapside itself.

Very much sought after are all these tiny streets; indeed, the tide of

fashion has been ever faithful to this special part of the metropolis.

Did not Swift once write to "Stella," of the neighbouring Bury Street;

"I have a first floor, a dining-room and bedroom, at eight shillings a

week,--and plaguey dear!"? But,--even considering the vast difference

in money value since Swift's day,--we have to pay a good deal more

than that now for similar accommodation in this quarter.

But, yet further West, between Bond Street and Hyde Park, are

Grosvenor and Berkeley Squares, the very focus of fashion, in whose

neighbourhood rents rise proportionately. Here, too, are many

unexpected and charming byways. Behind the vestry in Mount Street, for

instance, in the passage that leads into the church in Farm Street,

you might think yourself thousands of miles away from Mayfair. This

church in Farm Street,--the Roman Catholic Church of the Immaculate

Conception,--is famous as a Jesuit centre; here it was that Henry

Manning, afterwards Cardinal, was "received" on Passion Sunday, 1851.

Other byways there are, too, of a less attractive kind; the byways

where dwell the "poor relations," so to speak, of the Aristocracy and

the "Smart Set"; the impoverished ladies whose sense of propriety

would lead them to dwell even in a wheelbarrow, could that wheelbarrow

only be drawn up on the fashionable side of the street! They are

"backmewsy" little streets of saddening aspect, such as Dickens's

typical "Mews Street, Grosvenor Square," that contained the residence

of Mr. Tite Barnacle, with "squeezed houses," each with "a ramshackle

bowed front, little dingy windows, and a little dark area like a damp

waistcoat pocket" ... the house a sort of bottle filled with a strong

distillation of mews, so that when the footman opened the door, he

"seemed to take the stopper out." Dickens's picture is still a

portrait that many will recognise:

"Mews Street, Grosvenor Square, was not absolutely Grosvenor

Square itself, but it was very near it. It was a hideous

little street of dead wall, stables, and dunghills, with

lofts over coach-houses inhabited by coachmen's families,

who had a passion for drying clothes, and decorating their

window-sills with miniature turnpike-gates. The principal

chimney-sweep of that fashionable quarter lived at the blind

end of Mews Street; and the same corner contained an

establishment much frequented about early morning and

twilight, for the purchase of wine-bottles and

kitchen-stuff. Punch's shows used to lean against the dead

wall in Mews Street, while their proprietors were dining

elsewhere; and the dogs of the neighbourhood made

appointments to meet in the same locality. Yet there were

two or three small airless houses at the entrance end of

Mews Street, which went at enormous rents on account of

their being abject hangers-on to a fashionable situation;

and whenever one of these fearful little coops was to be let

(which seldom happened, for they were in great request), the

house agent advertised it as a gentlemanly residence in the

most aristocratic part of town, inhabited solely by the

elite of the _beau monde_."

But to the millionaire's dwelling, located at that period in Harley

Street, Cavendish-Square, the novelist is hardly more polite:

"Like unexceptionable society" (he says), "the opposing rows

of houses in Harley Street were very grim with one another.

Indeed, the mansions and their inhabitants were so much

alike in that respect, that the people were often to be

found drawn up on opposite sides of dinner-tables, in the

shade of their own loftiness, staring at the other side of

the way with the dullness of the houses. Everybody knows how

like the street the two dinner-rows of people who take their

stand by the street will be. The expressionless uniform

twenty houses, all to be knocked and rung at in the same

form, all approachable by the same dull steps, all fended

off by the same pattern of railing, all with the same

impracticable fire-escapes, the same inconvenient fixtures

in their heads, and everything without exception to be taken

at a high valuation--who has not dined with these? The house

so drearily out of repair, the occasional bow-window, the

stuccoed house, the newly-fronted house, the corner house

with nothing but angular rooms, the house with the blinds

always down, the house with the hatchment always up, the

house where the collector has called for one quarter of an

Idea, and found nobody at home--who has not dined with

these?"

Dickens, on the whole, is kinder to his thieves' kitchens and debtors'

prisons, even to Fagin and his crew; for he allows them, at any rate,

to boast occasionally of an "Idea." But the "Smart Set," with the

plutocrats and the Merdles, has moved westward since the days of the

Early-Victorian novelists; and "Harley Street, Cavendish Square," is

now mainly medical.

The smart ladies often seen shopping in Bond Street from neat

broughams and landaus, drawn by high-stepping horses, are mainly

people whose names figure largely in the so-called "society" papers;

their goings and comings, be they aristocratic or theatrical, are all,

therefore, carefully noted by the ubiquitous "lady reporter;" terrible

fate of the well-known or well-born! But it is an age of

advertisement; and who shall say entirely on which side the fault

lies? Where these leaders of society shop now, other generations of

fair dead ladies, gone "with the snows of yesteryear," have in their

turn enjoyed the dear delights of lace, millinery, and jewels. Here

the "ladies of St. James's," in the eighteenth century, revelled in

their "lutestrings," "dimitys," "paduasoys"; and, to flaunt it over

their less fortunate sisters, bought the very newest new thing in

turbans. Piccadilly, doubtless, looked a trifle brighter and smarter

in those days of less smoke, as befitted the "court end of the town;"

and the young "swells" of the day presented a braver array in their

laces, ruffles, and knee-breeches. Then, as now, the Holbein-like Gate

of St. James's Palace, dignified in sober red-brick, stood sentinel at

the bottom of St. James's Street,--the street thus alluded to by

Sheridan:

"The Campus Martius of St. James's Street,

Where the beaux' cavalry pace to and fro,

Before they take the field in Rotten Row."

[Illustration: _In Regent Street._]

St. James's Street, with all its byways and purlieus, has always been

greatly in request for exclusive and smart clubs, as well as for

bachelors' lodgings of the luxurious kind. It has also literary

associations. St. James's Place, where Addison lived, was also noted

for the residence of the old banker-poet Samuel Rogers; this was his

home for fifty-five years, and here, at No. 22, he gave his famous

"literary breakfasts." Of old the most exclusive gathering in this

region was "Almack's," ruled by the famous Lady Jersey, "the seventh

heaven of the fashionable world." It is situated in King Street, and

is now "Willis's Rooms." St. James's, as a rule, is "exclusive" enough

still; but the neighbourhood has in other ways gone through many

changes. The great house built by Nash for the Regent,--Carlton House,

beyond Pall Mall,--has vanished like Aladdin's Palace, and has left in

its place only one big column, a flight of noble steps, and a stately

terrace of palatial mansions,--Carlton-House-Terrace, overlooking the

Mall. This Phoenix-like spirit of London, ever rising anew on its own

ashes, was always dear to Thackeray. Here is one of his inimitable

passages on the subject, thrown off at random:

"... I remember peeping through the colonnade at Carlton

House, and seeing the abode of the great Prince Regent. I

can see yet the Guards pacing before the gates of the place.

The place? What place? The palace exists no more than the

palace of Nebuchadnezzar. It is but a name now. Where be the

sentries who used to salute as the Royal chariots drove in

and out? "The chariots, with the kings inside, have driven

to the realms of Pluto; the tall Guards have marched into

darkness, and the echoes of their drums are rolling in

Hades." Where the palace once stood, a hundred little

children are paddling up and down the steps to St. James's

Park. A score of grave gentlemen are taking their tea at the

Athenaeum Club; as many grisly warriors are garrisoning the

United Service Club opposite. Pall Mall is the great social

Exchange of London now--the mart of news, of politics, of

scandal, of rumour--the English forum, so to speak, where

men discuss the last despatch from the Crimea, the last

speech of Lord Derby, the next move of Lord John. And, now

and then, to a few antiquarians, whose thoughts are with the

past rather than with the present, it is a memorial of old

times and old people, and Pall Mall is our Palmyra. Look!

About this spot, Tom of Ten Thousand was killed by

Koenigsmarck's gang. In that red house Gainsborough lived,

and Culloden Cumberland, George III.'s uncle. Yonder is

Sarah Marlborough's palace, just as it stood when that

termagant occupied it. At 25, Walter Scott used to live; at

the house, now No. 79, and occupied by the Society for the

Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts, resided Mrs.

Eleanor Gwynn, comedian. How often has Queen Caroline's

chair issued from under yonder arch! All the men of the

Georges have passed up and down the street. It has seen

Walpole's chariot and Chatham's sedan; and Fox, Gibbon,

Sheridan, on their way to Brookes's; and stately William

Pitt stalking on the arm of Dundas; and Hanger and Tom

Sheridan reeling out of Raggett's; and Byron limping into

Wattier's; and Swift striding out of Bury Street; and Mr.

Addison and Dick Steele, both perhaps a little the better

for liquor; and the Prince of Wales and the Duke of York

clattering over the pavement; and Johnson counting the posts

along the streets, after dawdling before Dodsley's window;

and Horry Walpole hobbling into his carriage, with a

gimcrack just bought out at Christie's; and George Selwyn

sauntering into White's."--Thackeray: _The Four Georges_, p.

72.

[Illustration: _Piccadilly._]

Pall Mall, the street of palaces and palatial clubs _par excellence_,

is one of London's handsomest highways. It has for three centuries

been the Fleet Street of the well-to-do poets, of the leisured

literary world; for what, indeed, could poverty ever have in common

with Pall Mall? Defoe, in his day, wrote thus of it:

"I am lodged in the street called Pall Mall, the ordinary

residence of all strangers, because of its vicinity to the

Queen's Palace, the Park, the Parliament House, the

theatres, and the chocolate and coffee houses, where the

best company frequent. If you would know our manner of

living, 'tis thus:--We rise by nine, and those that frequent

great men's levees find entertainment at them till eleven,

or, as at Holland, go to tea tables. About twelve, the

_beau-monde_ assembles in several coffee or chocolate

houses; the best of which are the Cocoa Tree and White's

chocolate houses, St. James's, the Smyrna, Mr. Rochford's,

and the British coffee houses; and all these so near one

another that in less than one hour you see the company of

them all."

This sounds, truly, a pleasant enough life;--and its counterpart of

the present day is,--allowing for altered customs,--no doubt equally

pleasant. The taverns mentioned have given place to spacious

club-houses, all more or less modern; and the day has, in the last two

centuries, come to begin earlier and end later. Coffee-houses, in

Defoe's time, were the necessary ladders to rising fame talent; thus,

the boy Chatterton, starving and unknown in cruel London, sought to

allay his mother's anxiety by writing to her: "I am quite familiar at

the Chapter coffee-house (St. Paul's), and know all the geniuses

there."

In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Pall Mall was a pretty

suburban promenade, and its "sweet shady side," sung by the poets, was

really no misnomer, as a row of elms fringed it, both north and

south. And it is still an aristocratic region, despite the "business"

air that has of late invaded it. Of the people you meet here,--elderly

gentlemen with nothing, perhaps, very remarkable about them, to

outward view;--or smart young men, with well-polished boots and hats,

and faultless dress-coats,--it is safe to say that a fair number will

have distinguished themselves in one way or another; either in the

working of their country's government, or in the fighting of their

country's battles. But, here as elsewhere, England is uncommunicative,

and you may pass angels unawares.

Just behind Pall Mall is the aristocratic St. James's Square--already,

alas! invaded by the modern builder:

"She shall have all that's fine and fair,

And ride in a coach to take the air,

And have a house in St. James's Square,"--

--runs the old ballad. Though St. James's Square now contains a fair

sprinkling of Government and other offices,--yet its clientele is

still somewhat ducal. Nevertheless, this Square, too, recalls

something of the seamy side of life. "What," says Lord Rosebery,

referring to London's many associations, "can be less imposing, or

less interesting in themselves,--than the railings of St. James's

Square? Yet, you cannot touch those railings--hideous as they are and

dull as are the houses that surround them--without thinking that

Johnson and Savage, hungry boys, starved by their kind mother, London,

who attracted men of letters to her, walked round that square one

summer night and swore they would die for their country."

Yes,--this, in some way, seems "the best of all possible worlds,"--and

London, in such surroundings, the best of all possible cities to live

in. Yet, here, too, the East is still present in the West. Round the

corner, as I gaze, comes a pitiful group,--a tawdry woman, her voice

raucous and suggestive of gin, holding by the hand two children, a

boy and a girl,--all singing, or making believe to sing, in chorus:

"'Ark! ar ark, my sowl! Angelic songs are swellin',

From Hearth's green fields--and Hoceant's way-be shore--

'Ark, ar-ark,--"

Alas! the notes are hardly suggestive of angelic visitants. The chubby

little boy is crying, the tears making streaky marks down his dirty

little face. "I'm so cowld, so cowld, mammy," "'Owld yer

row!"--admonishes his sister, in the intervals of her husky

accompaniment.... The sodden voice of the mother is so terrible that I

am moved to give her a shilling to go away and remove her poor

suffering babies.... But,--at the angle of Waterloo Place,--another

phantom is stationed; a wretchedly-clothed creature, evidently on the

look-out for a job. He might himself be an incarnation of Famine. His

cheeks are hollow and cadaverous; his eyes are dulled and hopeless; he

shivers in the bleak raw December air;--in the "best of all possible

worlds,--the richest of all possible cities".... The mere "cab-horse's

charter" is not for such as he! Ungrateful country, that deals so ill

with her children, giving them too often "stones for bread!"

"If suddenly," says Mr. Ruskin, "in the midst of the

enjoyments of the palate and lightnesses of heart of a

London dinner-party, the walls of the chamber were parted,

and through their gap the nearest human beings who were

famishing and in misery were borne into the midst of the

company--feasting and fancy-free--if, pale with sickness,

horrible in destitution, broken by despair, body by body,

they were laid upon the soft carpet, one beside the chair of

every guest, would only the crumbs of the dainties be cast

to them--would only a passing glance, a passing thought be

vouchsafed to them? Yet the actual facts, the real relations

of each Dives and Lazarus, are not altered by the

intervention of the house wall between the table and the

sick-bed--by the few feet of ground (how few!) which are

indeed all that separate the merriment from the misery."

It is an effective contrast. But, perhaps the most vivid and pathetic

sketch of the Submerged of the Great City is that of John Davidson's

weird and haunting ballad: "The Loafer":

"I hang about the streets all day,

At night I hang about;

I sleep a little when I may,

But rise betimes the morning's scout;

For through the year I always hear

Afar, aloft, a ghostly shout.

"My clothes are worn to threads and loops;

My skin shows here and there;

About my face like seaweed droops

My tangled beard, my tangled hair;

From cavernous and shaggy brows

My stony eyes untroubled stare.

"I move from eastern wretchedness

Through Fleet Street and the Strand;

And as the pleasant people press

I touch them softly with my hand,

Perhaps to know that still I go

Alive about a living land.

"I know no handicraft, no art,

But I have conquered fate;

For I have chosen the better part,

And neither hope, nor fear, nor hate.

With placid breath on pain and death,

My certain alms, alone I wait."

[Illustration: _Speshul!_]

Highways and Byways in London · 第 8 / 18 章