TO MRS. FLEEMING JENKIN

[_Skerryvore_, _Bournemouth_, _April_ 1886.]

MY DEAR MRS. JENKIN,—The Book—It is all drafted: I hope soon to send you

for comments Chapters III., IV., and V. Chapter VII. is roughly but

satisfactorily drafted: a very little work should put that to rights.

But Chapter VI. is no joke; it is a _mare magnum_: I swim and drown and

come up again; and it is all broken ends and mystification: moreover, I

perceive I am in want of more matter. I must have, first of all, a

little letter from Mr. Ewing about the phonograph work: _If_ you think he

would understand it is quite a matter of chance whether I use a word or a

fact out of it. If you think he would not: I will go without. Also,

could I have a look at Ewing’s _précis_? And lastly, I perceive I must

interview you again about a few points; they are very few, and might come

to little; and I propose to go on getting things as well together as I

can in the meanwhile, and rather have a final time when all is ready and

only to be criticised. I do still think it will be good. I wonder if

Trélat would let me cut? But no, I think I wouldn’t after all; ’tis so

quaint and pretty and clever and simple and French, and gives such a good

sight of Fleeming: the plum of the book, I think.

You misunderstood me in one point: I always hoped to found such a

society; that was the outside of my dream, and would mean entire success.

_But_—I cannot play Peter the Hermit. In these days of the Fleet Street

journalist, I cannot send out better men than myself, with wives or

mothers just as good as mine, and sisters (I may at least say) better, to

a danger and a long-drawn dreariness that I do not share. My wife says

it’s cowardice; what brave men are the leader-writers! Call it

cowardice; it is mine. Mind you, I may end by trying to do it by the pen

only: I shall not love myself if I do; and is it ever a good thing to do

a thing for which you despise yourself?—even in the doing? And if the

thing you do is to call upon others to do the thing you neglect? I have

never dared to say what I feel about men’s lives, because my own was in

the wrong: shall I dare to send them to death? The physician must heal

himself; he must honestly _try_ the path he recommends: if he does not

even try, should he not be silent?

I thank you very heartily for your letter, and for the seriousness you

brought to it. You know, I think when a serious thing is your own, you

keep a saner man by laughing at it and yourself as you go. So I do not

write possibly with all the really somewhat sickened gravity I feel. And

indeed, what with the book, and this business to which I referred, and

Ireland, I am scarcely in an enviable state. Well, I ought to be glad,

after ten years of the worst training on earth—valetudinarianism—that I

can still be troubled by a duty. You shall hear more in time; so far, I

am at least decided: I will go and see Balfour when I get to London.

We have all had a great pleasure: a Mrs. Rawlinson came and brought with

her a nineteen-year-old daughter, simple, human, as beautiful as—herself;

I never admired a girl before, you know it was my weakness: we are all

three dead in love with her. How nice to be able to do so much good to

harassed people by—yourself! Ever yours,

The Letters of Robert Louis Stevenson — Volume 2 · 第 47 / 512 题