TO C. W. STODDARD

_Skerryvore_, _Bournemouth_, _Feb._ 13_th_, 1886.

MY DEAR STODDARD,—I am a dreadful character; but, you see, I have at last

taken pen in hand; how long I may hold it, God knows. This is already my

sixth letter to-day, and I have many more waiting; and my wrist gives me

a jog on the subject of scrivener’s cramp, which is not encouraging.

I gather you were a little down in the jaw when you wrote your last. I

am as usual pretty cheerful, but not very strong. I stay in the house

all winter, which is base; but, as you continue to see, the pen goes from

time to time, though neither fast enough nor constantly enough to please

me.

My wife is at Bath with my father and mother, and the interval of

widowery explains my writing. Another person writing for you when you

have done work is a great enemy to correspondence. To-day I feel out of

health, and shan’t work; and hence this so much overdue reply.

I was re-reading some of your South Sea Idyls the other day: some of the

chapters are very good indeed; some pages as good as they can be.

How does your class get along? If you like to touch on _Otto_, any day

in a by-hour, you may tell them—as the author’s last dying

confession—that it is a strange example of the difficulty of being ideal

in an age of realism; that the unpleasant giddy-mindedness, which spoils

the book and often gives it a wanton air of unreality and juggling with

air-bells, comes from unsteadiness of key; from the too great realism of

some chapters and passages—some of which I have now spotted, others I

dare say I shall never spot—which disprepares the imagination for the

cast of the remainder.

Any story can be made _true_ in its own key; any story can be made

_false_ by the choice of a wrong key of detail or style: Otto is made to

reel like a drunken—I was going to say man, but let us substitute

cipher—by the variations of the key. Have you observed that the famous

problem of realism and idealism is one purely of detail? Have you seen

my ‘Note on Realism’ in Cassell’s _Magazine of Art_; and ‘Elements of

Style’ in the _Contemporary_; and ‘Romance’ and ‘Humble Apology’ in

_Longman’s_? They are all in your line of business; let me know what you

have not seen and I’ll send ’em.

I am glad I brought the old house up to you. It was a pleasant old spot,

and I remember you there, though still more dearly in your own strange

den upon a hill in San Francisco; and one of the most San Francisco-y

parts of San Francisco.

Good-bye, my dear fellow, and believe me your friend,

The Letters of Robert Louis Stevenson — Volume 2 · 第 25 / 512 题